Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Early goal-directed therapy based on endotracheal bioimpedance cardiography: a prospective, randomized controlled study in coronary surgery

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective was to compare the impact of an early goal-directed hemodynamic therapy based on cardiac output monitoring (Endotracheal Cardiac Output Monitor, ECOM) with a standard of care on postoperative outcome following coronary surgery. This prospective, controlled, parallel-arm trial randomized 100 elective primary coronary artery bypass grafting patients to a study group (ECOM; n = 50) or a control group (control; n = 50). In the ECOM group, hemodynamic therapy was guided by respiratory stroke volume variation and cardiac index given by the ECOM system. A standard of care was used in the control. Goal-directed therapy was started immediately after induction of anesthesia and continued until arrival in the intensive care unit (ICU). The primary endpoint was the time when patients fulfilled discharge criteria from hospital (possible hospital discharge). Secondary endpoints were the hospital discharge, the time to reach extubation, the length of stay in ICU, the number of major adverse cardiac events, and in-hospital mortality. Patients in the ECOM group received more often fluid loading and dobutamine. The time to reach extubation was reduced in the ECOM group: 510 min [360–1,110] versus 570 min [320–1,520], P = 0.005. No significant differences were found between both groups for possible hospital discharge [Hazard Ratio = 0.96 (95 % CI 0.64–1.45)] and hospital discharge [Hazard Ratio = 1.20 (95 % CI 0.79–1.81)]. A mini-invasive early goal-directed hemodynamic therapy based on ECOM can reduce the time to reach extubation but fails to significantly reduce the length of stay in hospital and the rate of major cardiac morbidity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ferguson TB Jr, Hammill BG, Peterson ED, DeLong ER, Grover FL. STS National Database Committee: a decade of change-risk profiles and outcomes for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting procedures, 1990–1999: a report from the STS National Database Committee and the Duke Clinical Research Institute. Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:480–9 discussion 9–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Scott BH, Seifert FC, Grimson R, Glass PS. Octogenarians undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: resource utilization, postoperative mortality, and morbidity. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2005;19:583–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Phan TD, Ismail H, Herior AG, Ho KM. Improving perioperative outcomes: fluid optimization with the esophageal Doppler monitor, a meta-analysis and review. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:935–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hamilton M, Cecconi M, Rhodes A. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients. Anesth Analg. 2011;112:1392–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Aya HD, Cecconi M, Hamilton M, Rhodes A. Goal-directed therapy in cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2013;110:510–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cannesson M, Pestel G, Ricks C, Hoeft A, Perel A. Hemodynamic monitoring and management in patients undergoing high risk surgery: a survey among North American and European anesthesiologists. Crit Care. 2011;15:R197.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Marik PE. Noninvasive cardiac output monitors: a state-of the-art review. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013;27:121–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wallace AW, Salahieh A, Lawrence A, Spector K, Owens C, Alonso D. Endotracheal cardiac output monitor. Anesthesiology. 2000;92:178–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ball TR, Culp BC, Patel V, Gloyna DF, Ciceri DP, Culp WC Jr. Comparison of the endotracheal cardiac output monitor to thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010;24:762–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Maus TM, Reber B, Banks DA, Berry A, Guerrero E, Manecke GR. Cardiac output determination from endotracheally measured impedance cardiography: clinical evaluation of endotracheal cardiac output monitor. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011;25:770–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fellahi JL, Fischer MO, Rebet O, Massetti M, Gerard JL, Hanouz JL. A comparison of endotracheal bioimpedance cardiography and transpulmonary thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012;26:217–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Moller-Sorenson H, Hansen KL, Ostergaard M, Andersen LW, Moller K. Lack of agreement and trending ability of the endotracheal cardiac output monitor compared with thermodilution. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;56:433–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fellahi JL, Fischer MO, Dalbera A, Massetti M, Gerard JL, Hanouz JL. Can endotracheal bioimpedance cardiography assess hemodynamic response to passive leg raising following cardiac surgery? Ann Intensive Care. 2012;2:26.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Van der Kleij SCJ, Koolen BB, Newhall DA, et al. Clinical evaluation of a new tracheal impedance cardiography method. Anaesthesia. 2012;67:729–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet. 2001;357:1191–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Goepfert MS, Richter HP, Eulenburg CZ, et al. Individually optimized hemodynamic therapy reduces complications and length of stay in the intensive care unit: a prospective, randomized controlled study. Anesthesiology. 2013;119:824–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simoons ML, Chaitman BR, White HD, Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction, Katus HA, Lindahl B, Morrow DA, Clemmensen PM, Johanson P, Hod H, Underwood R, Bax JJ, Bonow RO, Pinto F, Gibbons RJ, Fox KA, Atar D, Newby LK, Galvani M, Hamm CW, Uretsky BF, Steg PG, Wijns W, Bassand JP, Menasché P, Ravkilde J, Ohman EM, Antman EM, Wallentin LC, Armstrong PW, Simoons ML, Januzzi JL, Nieminen MS, Gheorghiade M, Filippatos G, Luepker RV, Fortmann SP, Rosamond WD, Levy D, Wood D, Smith SC, Hu D, Lopez-Sendon JL, Robertson RM, Weaver D, Tendera M, Bove AA, Parkhomenko AN, Vasilieva EJ, Mendis S. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2012;126:2020–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fellahi JL, Hédoire F, Le Manach Y, Monier E, Guillou L, Riou B. Determination of the threshold of cardiac troponin I associated with an adverse postoperative outcome after cardiac surgery: a comparative study between coronary artery bypass graft, valve surgery, and combined cardiac surgery. Crit Care. 2007;11:R106.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Polonen P, Ruokonen E, Hippelainen M, Poyhonen M, Takala J. A prospective, randomized study of goal-oriented hemodynamic therapy in cardiac surgical patients. Anesth Analg. 2000;90:1052–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Smetkin AA, Kirov MY, Kuzkov VV, et al. Single transpulmonary thermodilution and continuous monitoring of central venous oxygen saturation during off-pump coronary surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009;53:505–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kapoor PM, Kakani M, Chowdhury U, Choudhury M, Lakshmy KU. Early goal-directed therapy in moderate to high-risk cardiac surgery patients. Ann Card Anaesth. 2008;11:27–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mythen MG, Webb AR. Perioperative plasma volume expansion reduces the incidence of gut mucosal hypoperfusion during cardiac surgery. Arch Surg. 1995;130:423–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. McKendry M, McGloin H, Saberi D, Caudwell L, Brady AR, Singer M. Randomized controlled trial assessing the impact of a nurse delivered, flow monitored protocol for optimization of circulatory status after cardiac surgery. BMJ. 2004;329:258.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mohr R, Lavee J, Goor DA. Inaccuracy of radial artery pressure measurement after cardiac operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1987;94:286–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Reuter DA, Goepfert MSG, Goresch T, Schmoeckel M, Kilger E, Goetz E. Assessing fluid responsiveness during open chest conditions. Br J Anaesth. 2005;94:318–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Sylvain Thuaudet, M.D., (I.S.T. Cardiology, Saint-Contest, France) for kindly providing all the facilities necessary for hemodynamic monitoring with the ECOM device. Support was provided from institutional and departmental sources and from ECOM Medical Corporation (San Juan Capistrano, CA).

Conflict of interest

ECOM Medical Corporation had input neither in the design or conduct of the study nor in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Luc Fellahi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fellahi, JL., Brossier, D., Dechanet, F. et al. Early goal-directed therapy based on endotracheal bioimpedance cardiography: a prospective, randomized controlled study in coronary surgery. J Clin Monit Comput 29, 351–358 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-014-9611-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-014-9611-5

Keywords

Navigation