Skip to main content
Log in

The Multidimensional Emotion Questionnaire (MEQ): Rationale and Initial Psychometric Properties

  • Published:
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Emotion research would benefit from a self-report measure that assesses both discrete emotions and broad dimensions, takes into account the time-course of emotional experience, and distinguishes emotional reactivity and regulation. The present study describes the development and psychometric properties of the Multidimensional Emotion Questionnaire (MEQ), which was designed to address these needs. The MEQ assesses: (a) two superordinate dimensions of emotional reactivity (positive and negative), (b) three components of positive and negative emotional reactivity (frequency, intensity, and persistence), and (c) 10 discrete emotions (5 positive: happy, excited, enthusiastic, proud, inspired; 5 negative: sad, afraid, angry, ashamed, anxious). In addition, the MEQ assesses the ability to regulate these emotions. To investigate its psychometric properties, the MEQ was administered to a diverse sample of 309 United States adults (Study 1) along with established measures of emotional experience and regulation. The MEQ was also administered to a sample of 168 undergraduates (Study 2) to examine 3-week test-retest reliability. Results generally support the reliability and validity of the MEQ. Specifically, internal consistencies for all scales range from acceptable to excellent, confirmatory factor analyses support the hypothesized structure, and, with few exceptions, items exhibit hypothesized loadings, and scales exhibit hypothesized associations with each other and with other measures of emotional experience and regulation. In addition, the MEQ demonstrates strong test-retest reliability. The MEQ is likely to be of use to researchers interested in a detailed, reliable, and valid assessment of emotional experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bjureberg, J., Ljótsson, B., Tull, M. T., Hedman, E., Sahlin, H., Lundh, L. G., et al. (2016). Development and validation of a brief version of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale: The DERS-16. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 38, 284–296.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, L. J., Denham, S. A., & Ganiban, J. M. (2004). Definitional issues in emotion regulation research. Child Development, 75, 340–345.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buhrmester, M. D., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campos, J. J., Campos, R. G., & Barrett, K. C. (1989). Emergent themes in the study of emotional development and emotion regulation. Developmental Psychology, 25, 394–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camras, L. A., & Shuster, M. M. (2013). Current emotion research in developmental psychology. Emotion Review, 5(3), 321–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, S. T., Reynolds, C. A., & Gatz, M. (2001). Age-related differences and changes in positive and negative affect over 23 years. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 136–151.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, C., Victor, S. E., & Klonsky, E. D. (2016). Characterizing positive and negative emotional experience in young adults with borderline personality disorder symptoms. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 72, 956–965.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, P. M., Martin, S. E., & Dennis, T. A. (2004). Emotion regulation as a scientific construct: Methodological challenges and directions for child development research. Child Development, 75, 317–333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R. J. (1998). Affective style and affective disorders: Perspectives from affective neuroscience. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 307–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R. J., Jackson, D. C., & Kalid, N. H. (2000). Emotion, plasticity, context, and regulation: Perspectives from affective neuroscience. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 890–909.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1999). Basic Emotions. In T. Dalgleish & M. Power (Eds.), Handbook of Cognition and Emotion. Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd..

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnfeski, N., Kraaij, V., & Spinhoven, P. (2001). Negative life events, cognitive emotion regulation, and emotional problems. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 1311–I1327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, C. R., & Klonsky, E. D. (2009). Emotion dysregulation as a core feature of borderline personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 23, 20–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26, 41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. J. (2002). Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 39, 281–291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348–362.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. J., & Munoz, R. F. (1995). Emotion regulation and mental health. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 2, 151–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajcak, G., Moser, J. S., & Simons, R. F. (2006). Attending to affect: Appraisal strategies modulate the electrocortical response to arousing pictures. Emotion, 6, 517–522.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, M. J., Clough, B. A., & Day, J. J. (2017). The cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire: Factorial, convergent, and criterion validity analyses of the full and short versions. Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 90–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izard, C. E. (1994). Innate and universal facial expressions: Evidence from developmental and cross-cultural research. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 288–299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Izard, C. E. (2007). Basic emotions, natural kinds, emotion schemas, and a new paradigm. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 260–280.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • John, O. P., & Gross, J. J. (2004). Healthy and unhealthy emotion regulation: Personality processes, individual differences, and life span development. Journal of Personality, 72, 1301–1334.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, E. A., Xia, M., Fosco, G., Yaptangco, M., Skidmore, C. R., & Crowell, S. E. (2016). The difficulties in emotion regulation scale short form (DERS-SF): Validation and replication in adolescent and adult samples. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 38, 443–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-015-9529-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klonsky, E. D. (2007). The functions of deliberate self-injury: A review of the evidence. Clinical Psychology Review, 27, 226–230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klonsky, E. D. (2009). The functions of self-injury in young adults who cut themselves: Clarifying the evidence for affect-regulation. Psychiatry Research, 166, 260–268.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validity. Social Indicators Research, 46, 137–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mennin, D. S., Heimberg, R. G., Turk, C. L., & Fresco, D. M. (2005). Preliminary evidence for an emotion dysregulation model of generalized anxiety disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 1281–1310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nock, M. K., Wedig, M. M., Holmberg, E. B., & Hooley, J. M. (2008). The emotion reactivity scale: Development, evaluation, and relation to self-injurious thoughts and behaviors. Behavior Therapy, 39, 107–116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Panksepp, J. (2007). Neurologizing the psychology of affects: How appraisal-based constructivism and basic emotion theory can coexist. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 281–195.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, B., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2015). Current emotion research in social psychology: Thinking about emotions and other people. Emotion Review, 7(4), 371–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripper, C. A., Boyes, M. E., Clarke, P. J. F., & Hasking, P. A. (2018). Emotional reactivity, intensity, and perseveration: Independent dimensions of trait affect and associations with depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms. Personality and Individual Differences, 121, 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.09.032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothbart, M. K., & Derryberry, D. (Eds.). (1981). Development of individual differences in temperament. Advances in developmental psychology. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuman, V., & Scherer, K. R. (2014). Concepts and structures of emotions. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), Educational psychology handbook series. International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 13–35). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snell, W. E., Gum, S., Shuck, R. L., Mosley, J. A., & Hite, T. L. (1995). The clinical anger scale: Preliminary reliability and validity. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 215–226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, J. L., Klonsky, E. D., & Proudfit, G. H. (2014). How affective science can inform clinical science: An introduction to the special issue. Clinical Psychological Science, 2, 371–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Victor, S. E., & Klonsky, E. D. (2014). Daily emotion in non-suicidal self-injury. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 70, 364–375.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Victor, S. E., & Klonsky, E. D. (2016). Validation of a brief version of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale (DERS-18) in five samples. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 38, 582–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrana, S. R., Spence, E. L., & Lang, P. J. (1988). The startle probe response: A new measure of emotion? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97, 487–491.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D. & Clark, L.A. (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule – Expanded form. University of Iowa.

  • Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219–235.

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measure of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, A., & Klonsky, E. D. (2009). Measurement of emotion dysregulation in adolescents. Psychological Assessment, 21, 616–621.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, A., Klonsky, E. D., & Hajcak, G. (2009). Autonomic impairment in borderline personality disorder: A laboratory investigation. Brain and Cognition, 71, 279–286.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zelkowitz, R. L., & Cole, D. A. (2016). Measures of emotion reactivity and emotion regulation: Convergent and discriminant validity. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 123–132.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zelkowitz, R. L., Cole, D. A., Han, G. T., & Tomarken, A. J. (2016). The incremental utility of emotion regulation but not emotion reactivity in nonsuicidal self-injury. Suicide and Life-threatening Behavior, 46, 545–562.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a standard research grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) of Canada. In addition, author SEV was supported by NIH grant T32-MH018269-33 (PI: Tina R. Goldstein)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. David Klonsky PhD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

E. David Klonsky, Sarah E. Victor, Anita S. Hibbert, and Greg Hajcak declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics Approval

Ethics approval was obtained from the appropriate university behavioural ethics research board. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Multidimensional Emotion Questionnaire

Instructions:

This questionnaire asks about your experience of different emotions such as sad, happy, and afraid. We are interested in assessing four different parts of each emotion. Specifically, for each emotion, you will be asked to rate:

  1. 1)

    how often you experience the emotion;

  2. 2)

    how intense the emotion typically is when it occurs

  3. 3)

    how long-lasting the emotion typically is when it occurs

  4. 4)

    how well you can regulate the emotion when it occurs (i.e., how well you can reduce or increase the emotion).

Below are two examples to help you better understand how to rate these four parts of emotion.

figure a
figure b

If you understood the examples you are now ready to complete the questionnaire. Below are 10 emotions. Please rate each one based on your typical experience of that emotion. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask the experimenter. You may begin when ready.

Happy

  1. How Often?

About once per month or less

About once per week

About once each day

2 or 3 times each day

More than 3 times each day

2. How Intense?

Very Low

Low

Moderate

High

Very High

3. How Long-Lasting?

Less than 1 min

1–10 min

11–60 min

1–4 h

Longer than 4 h

4. How Easy to Regulate?

Very Easy

Easy

Moderate

Difficult

Very Difficult

Sad

1. How Often?

About once per month or less

About once per week

About once each day

2 or 3 times each day

More than 3 times each day

2. How Intense?

Very Low

Low

Moderate

High

Very High

3. How Long-Lasting?

Less than 1 min

1–10 min

11–60 min

1–4 h

Longer than 4 h

4. How Easy to Regulate?

Very Easy

Easy

Moderate

Difficult

Very Difficult

Afraid

  1. How Often?

About once per month or less

About once per week

About once each day

2 or 3 times each day

More than 3 times each day

  2. How Intense?

Very Low

Low

Moderate

High

Very High

  3. How Long-Lasting?

Less than 1 min

1–10 min

11–60 min

1–4 h

Longer than 4 h

  4. How Easy to Regulate?

Very Easy

Easy

Moderate

Difficult

Very Difficult

Excited

  1. How Often?

About once per month or less

About once per week

About once each day

2 or 3 times each day

More than 3 times each day

  2. How Intense?

Very Low

Low

Moderate

High

Very High

  3. How Long-Lasting?

Less than 1 min

1–10 min

11–60 min

1–4 h

Longer than 4 h

  4. How Easy to Regulate?

Very Easy

Easy

Moderate

Difficult

Very Difficult

Angry

  1. How Often?

About once per month or less

About once per week

About once each day

2 or 3 times each day

More than 3 times each day

  2. How Intense?

Very Low

Low

Moderate

High

Very High

  3. How Long-Lasting?

Less than 1 min

1–10 min

11–60 min

1–4 h

Longer than 4 h

  4. How Easy to Regulate?

Very Easy

Easy

Moderate

Difficult

Very Difficult

Ashamed

  1. How Often?

About once per month or less

About once per week

About once each day

2 or 3 times each day

More than 3 times each day

  2. How Intense?

Very Low

Low

Moderate

High

Very High

  3. How Long-Lasting?

Less than 1 min

1–10 min

11–60 min

1–4 h

Longer than 4 h

  4. How Easy to Regulate?

Very Easy

Easy

Moderate

Difficult

Very Difficult

Enthusiastic

  1. How Often?

About once per month or less

About once per week

About once each day

2 or 3 times each day

More than 3 times each day

  2. How Intense?

Very Low

Low

Moderate

High

Very High

  3. How Long-Lasting?

Less than 1 min

1–10 min

11–60 min

1–4 h

Longer than 4 h

  4. How Easy to Regulate?

Very Easy

Easy

Moderate

Difficult

Very Difficult

Proud

  1. How Often?

About once per month or less

About once per week

About once each day

2 or 3 times each day

More than 3 times each day

  2. How Intense?

Very Low

Low

Moderate

High

Very High

  3. How Long-Lasting?

Less than 1 min

1–10 min

11–60 min

1–4 h

Longer than 4 h

  4. How Easy to Regulate?

Very Easy

Easy

Moderate

Difficult

Very Difficult

Anxious

  1. How Often?

About once per month or less

About once per week

About once each day

2 or 3 times each day

More than 3 times each day

  2. How Intense?

Very Low

Low

Moderate

High

Very High

  3. How Long-Lasting?

Less than 1 min

1–10 min

11–60 min

1–4 h

Longer than 4 h

  4. How Easy to Regulate?

Very Easy

Easy

Moderate

Difficult

Very Difficult

Inspired

  1. How Often?

About once per month or less

About once per week

About once each day

2 or 3 times each day

More than 3 times each day

  2. How Intense?

Very Low

Low

Moderate

High

Very High

  3. How Long-Lasting?

Less than 1 min

1–10 min

11–60 min

1–4 h

Longer than 4 h

  4. How Easy to Regulate?

Very Easy

Easy

Moderate

Difficult

Very Difficult

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klonsky, E.D., Victor, S.E., Hibbert, A.S. et al. The Multidimensional Emotion Questionnaire (MEQ): Rationale and Initial Psychometric Properties. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 41, 409–424 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-019-09741-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-019-09741-2

Keywords

Navigation