Skip to main content
Log in

Backbone resonance assignment and order tensor estimation using residual dipolar couplings

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Biomolecular NMR Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An NMR investigation of proteins with known X-ray structures is of interest in a number of endeavors. Performing these studies through nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) requires the costly step of resonance assignment. The prevalent assignment strategy does not make use of existing structural information and requires uniform isotope labeling. Here we present a rapid and cost-effective method of assigning NMR data to an existing structure—either an X-ray or computationally modeled structure. The presented method, Exhaustively Permuted Assignment of RDCs (EPAR), utilizes unassigned residual dipolar coupling (RDC) data that can easily be obtained by NMR spectroscopy. The algorithm uses only the backbone N–H RDCs from multiple alignment media along with the amino acid type of the RDCs. It is inspired by previous work from Zweckstetter and provides several extensions. We present results on 13 synthetic and experimental datasets from 8 different structures, including two homodimers. Using just two alignment media, EPAR achieves an average assignment accuracy greater than 80%. With three media, the average accuracy is higher than 94%. The algorithm also outputs a prediction of the assignment accuracy, which has a correlation of 0.77 to the true accuracy. This prediction score can be used to establish the needed confidence in assignment accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Hashimi HM, Bolon PJ, Prestegard JH (2000) Molecular symmetry as an aid to geometry determination in ligand protein complexes. J Magn Reson 142:153–158

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal S, Miao X, Adams MWW et al (2008) Rapid classification of protein structure models using unassigned backbone RDCs and probability density profile analysis (PDPA). J Magn Reson 192:60–68

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Bax A (2003) Weak alignment offers new NMR opportunities to study protein structure and dynamics. Protein Sci 12:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bax A, Grishaev A (2005) Weak alignment NMR: a hawk-eyed view of biomolecular structure. Curr Opin Struct Biol 15:563–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bax A, Kontaxis G, Tjandra N (2001) Dipolar couplings in macromolecular structure determination. Methods Enzymol 339:127–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z et al (2000) The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 28:235–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Cheng C, Chen Y et al (2006) Preparation of amino-acid-type selective isotope labeling of protein expressed in Pichia pastoris. Proteins 62:279–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clore GM, Gronenborn AM, Bax A (1998) A robust method for determining the magnitude of the fully asymmetric alignment tensor of oriented macromolecules in the absence of structural information. J Magn Reson 133:216–221

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Cornilescu G, Marquardt JL, Ottiger M et al (1998) Validation of protein structure from anisotropic carbonyl chemical shifts in a dilute liquid crystalline phase. Journal of American Chemical Society 120:6836–6837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greshenfeld NA (1998) The nature of mathematical modeling. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronenborn AM, Clore GM (1996) Rapid screening for structural integrity of expressed proteins by heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy. Protein Sci 5:174–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grzesiek S, Bax A (1993) Amino acid type determination in the sequential assignment procedure of uniformly 13C/15 N-enriched proteins. J Biomol NMR 3:185–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Hus J, Prompers J, Bruschweiler R (2002) Assignment strategy for proteins with known structure. J Magn Reson 157:119–123

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones EY, Davis SJ, Williams AF et al (1992) Crystal structure at 2.8Å resolution of a soluble form of the cell adhesion molecule CD2. Nature 360:232–239

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Jung Y, Zweckstetter M (2004) Backbone assignment of proteins with known structure using residual dipolar couplings. J Biomol NMR V30:25–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn HW (1955) The Hungarian method for the assignment problem. Naval Res Logist Q 2:83–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langmead CJ, Donald BR (2004) An expectation/maximization nuclear vector replacement algorithm for automated NMR resonance assignments. J Biomol NMR 29:111–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langmead CJ, Yan A, Lilien R et al (2004) A polynomial-time nuclear vector replacement algorithm for automated NMR resonance assignments. J Comput Biol 11:277–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold M, Urbauer J, Wand A (1994) Resonance assignment strategies for the analysis of NMR spectra of proteins. Mol Biotechnol 2:61–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losonczi JA, Andrec M, Fischer MWF, Prestegard JH (1999) Order matrix analysis of residual dipolar couplings using singular value decomposition. J Magn Reson 138:334–342

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Miao X, Mukhopadhyay R, Valafar H (2008) Estimation of relative order tensors, and reconstruction of vectors in space using unassigned RDC data and its application. J Magn Reson 194:202–211

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay R, Shealy P, Valafar H (2008) Protein fold family recognition from unassigned residual dipolar coupling data, 633–638

  • Murray AJ, Head JG, Barker JJ et al (1998) Engineering an intertwined form of CD2 for stability and assembly. Nat Struct Biol 5:778–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ou HD, Lai HC, Serber Z et al (2001) Efficient identification of amino acid types for fast protein backbone assignments. J Biomol NMR 21:269–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park SH, Son WS, Mukhopadhyay R et al (2009) Phage-induced alignment of membrane proteins enables the measurement and structural analysis of residual dipolar couplings with dipolar waves and lambda-maps. J Am Chem Soc 131:14140–14141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pons JL, Delsuc MA (1999) RESCUE: an artificial neural network tool for the NMR spectral assignment of proteins. J Biomol NMR 15:15–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Press W, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (2002) Numerical recipes in C: the art of scientific computing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Prestegard JH, al-Hashimi HM, Tolman JR (2000) NMR structures of biomolecules using field oriented media and residual dipolar couplings. Q Rev Biophys 33:371–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saupe A, Englert G (1963) High-resolution nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of orientated molecules. Phys Rev Lett 11:462–464

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwieters CD, Kuszewski JJ, Tjandra N et al (2003) The Xplor-NIH NMR molecular structure determination package. J Magn Reson 160:65–73

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Spera S, Bax A (1991) Empirical correlation between protein backbone conformation and C.alpha. and C.beta. 13C nuclear magnetic resonance chemical shifts. J Am Chem Soc 113:5490–5492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian F, Valafar H, Prestegard JH (2001) A dipolar coupling based strategy for simultaneous resonance assignment and structure determination of protein backbones. J Am Chem Soc 123:11791–11796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolman JR, Flanagan JM, Kennedy MA et al (1995) Nuclear magnetic dipole interactions in field-oriented proteins—information for structure determination in solution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:9279–9283

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Tong K, Yamamoto M, Tanaka T (2008) A simple method for amino acid selective isotope labeling of recombinant proteins in E. coli. J Biomol NMR 42:59–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulmer TS, Ramirez BE, Delaglio F et al (2003) Evaluation of backbone proton positions and dynamics in a small protein by liquid crystal NMR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 125:9179–9191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich EL, Akutsu H, Doreleijers JF et al (2008) BioMagResBank. Nucleic Acids Res 36:D402–D408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valafar H, Prestegard J (2004) REDCAT: a residual dipolar coupling analysis tool. J Magn Reson 167:228–241

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Varner S, Vold R, Hoatson G (1996) An efficient method for calculating powder patterns. J Magn Reson 123:72–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren JJ, Moore PB (2001) A maximum likelihood method for determining D(a)(PQ) and R for sets of dipolar coupling data. J Magn Reson 149:271–275

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker J (2007) Selective isotopic labeling of recombinant proteins using amino acid auxotroph strains. Methods Mol Biol 389:175–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zweckstetter M (2003) Determination of molecular alignment tensors without backbone resonance assignment: aid to rapid analysis of protein–protein interactions. J Biomol NMR 27:41–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zweckstetter M, Bax A (2000) Prediction of sterically induced alignment in a dilute liquid crystalline phase: aid to protein structure determination by NMR. J Am Chem Soc 122:3791–3792

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been funded by NSF Grant number MCB-0644195. The authors are grateful to the Rothberg fellowship at USC for support to PGS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Homayoun Valafar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shealy, P., Liu, Y., Simin, M. et al. Backbone resonance assignment and order tensor estimation using residual dipolar couplings. J Biomol NMR 50, 357–369 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10858-011-9521-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10858-011-9521-5

Keywords

Navigation