Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of crystallographic orientation on the friction of copper and graphenized copper

  • Metals & corrosion
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work, we compare the friction behavior of single asperity contacts of a PtSi tip with copper and monolayered graphene on copper. For both PtSi/copper—and PtSi/graphenized copper tribological couples, we measured 16 differently oriented grains with three different sliding velocities as a function of the load by atomic force microscopy to assess the role of crystallographic orientation on friction and its rate dependence. We find that friction on copper is governed by shearing and does not depend on the crystallographic orientation but is significantly affected by the sliding velocity. We discuss this dependence based on contact aging in ambient conditions and shear strain rate sensitivity. In contrast, we find that friction of a graphene monolayer on copper is governed by puckering and depends both on the crystallographic orientation of the underlying grain and on the sliding velocity. We discuss these dependencies based on the orientational commensurability of the graphene lattice with the underlying copper crystallographic plane and on thermolubricity. Beyond their validity at the nanometer scale, our results are relevant to extend the understanding of friction between engineered surfaces at the macro- and micro-scale, where contacts initiate at nanometer-scale asperities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bowden FP, Tabor D (1950) The friction and lubrication of solids. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ko HE, Kwan SG, Park HW, Caron A (2018) Chemical effects on the sliding friction of Ag and Au(111). Friction 6:84–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ko HE, Park HW, Jiang JZ, Caron A (2018) Nanoscopic wear behavior of face-centered cubic metals. Acta Mater 147:203–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kwon SK, Kim HD, Pei XQ, Ko HE, Park HW, Bennewitz R, Caron A (2019) Effect of cooling rate on the structure and nanotribology of Ag–Cu nano-eutectic alloys. J Mater Sci 54:9168–9184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-03533-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Petzold C, Koch M, Bennewitz R (2018) Friction force microscopy of tribochemistry and interfacial ageing for the SiOx/Si/Au system. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 9:1647–1658

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gosvami NN, Feldmann M, Peguiron J, Moseler M, Schirmeisen A, Bennewitz R (2011) Ageing of a microscopic sliding gold contact at low temperature. Phys Rev Lett 107:144303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brechet Y, Estrin Y (1994) The effect of strain rate sensitivity on dynamic friction of metals. Scripta Metall Mater 30:1449–1454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Estrin Y, Brechet Y (1996) On a model of frictional sliding. Pageoph 147:745–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Filleter T, Bennewitz R (2010) Structural and frictional properties of graphene in SiC(0001) studied by atomic force microscopy. Phys Rev B 85:155412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cho DH, Wang L, Kim JS, Lee GW, Kim ES, Lee SH, Lee SY, Hone J, Lee CG (2013) Effect of surface morphology on friction of graphene on various substrates. Nanoscale 5:3063–3069

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Klemenz A, Pastewka L, Balakrishna SG, Caron A, Bennewitz R, Moseler M (2014) Atomic scale mechanisms of friction reduction and wear protection by graphene. Nano Lett 14:7145–7152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chan N, Balakrishna SG, Klemenz A, Moseler M, Egberts P, Bennewitz R (2017) Contrast in nanoscale friction between rotational domains of graphene on Pt(111). Carbon 113:132–138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Egberts P, Han GH, Liu XZ, Jonhson TC, Carpick R (2014) Frictional behavior of atomically thin sheets: hexagonal-shaped graphene islands grown on copper by chemical vapor deposition. ACS Nano 8:5010–5021

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Batzill M (2012) The surface science of graphene: Metal interfaces, CVD synthesis, nanoribbons, chemical modifications, and defects. Surf Sci Rep 67:83–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Seah CM, Chai SP, Mohamed AR (2014) Mechanisms of graphene growth by chemical vapour deposition on transition metals. Carbon 70:1–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Marchon B, Carrazza J, Heinemann H, Somorja GA (1988) TPD and XPS studies of O2, CO2 and H2O Adsorption on clean polycrystalline graphite. Carbon 26:507–514

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Butt H-J, Jaschke M (1995) Calculation of thermal noise in atomic force microscopy. Nanotechnol 6:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sangwal K (1987) Etching of crystals: theory, experiment, and application. North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  19. Deng S, Berry V (2016) Wrinkled, rippled and crumpled graphene: an overview of formation mechanisms, electronic properties, and applications. Mater Today 19:197–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. KL Johnson, K Kendall, AD Roberts (1971) In:Proc R Soc London Ser A 324: 301–313

  21. Antczak G, Ehrlich G (2010) Surface diffusion: metals, metal atoms, and clusters. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Dao M, Lu L, Shen YF, Suresh S (2006) Strength, strain-rate sensitivity and ductility of copper with nanoscale twins. Acta Mater 54:5421–5432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Frank O, Vejpravova J, Holy V, Kavan L, Kalbac M (2014) Interaction between graphene and copper substrate: the role of lattice orientation. Carbon 68:440–451

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Boyko EV, Kostogrud IA, Bezrukov IA, Krivenko AS, Smovzh DV (2019) The influence of the crystallographic orientation of the copper catalytic substrate crystallites on the mechanical transfer of graphene. Mater Res Express 6:125628

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Dienwiebel M, Verhoeven GS, Pradeep N, Frenken JWM, Heimberg JA, Zandbergen HW (2004) Superlubricity of graphite. Phys Rev Lett 92:126101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Popov VL, Gray JA (2012) Prandtl-Tomlinson model: history and application in friction, plasticity, and nanotechnologies. Z Angew Math Mech 92:683–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was partially supported by the Graduate School Research Program of KOREATECH.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Caron.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Catalin Croitoru.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 2793 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oh, Y.C., Kwon, S.K., Minkow, A. et al. Effect of crystallographic orientation on the friction of copper and graphenized copper. J Mater Sci 55, 16432–16450 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-05178-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-05178-1

Navigation