Skip to main content
Log in

Employed Rural, Low-Income, Single Mothers’ Family and Work Over Time

Journal of Family and Economic Issues Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this qualitative research study was to examine how low-income, single mothers manage their family and work lives. Analysis was based on longitudinal data collected from 28 rural, low-income, single mothers across 11 states who were continuously employed over three waves. Four main themes were identified: demands from family and work, resources the mothers used to maintain employment, work-family conflict, and strategies to retain employment. This study concludes that despite all the difficulties, mothers try to utilize their limited resources and adopt strategies for combining family and work life even though their demands and resources vary over time. Mothers employed in the same jobs receive consistent support from families. Implications for child care and leave policies are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  • Allen, T. D., Herst, D. E. L., Bruck, C. S., & Sutton, M. (2000). Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 278–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, J. W. (2004). Basebook report: Low income rural families, Tracking their well-being and functioning in the context of welfare reform. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, J. (2004). The low-wage labor market: Trends and policy implications. In A. C. Crouter & A. Booth (Eds.), Work-family challenges for low-income parents and their children (pp. 3–34). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, A. A., Katras, M. J., Sano, Y., Lee, J., & Bauer, J. W. (2008). Job volatility of rural, low-income, mothers: A mixed method approach. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 29, 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22, 723–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciabattari, T. (2007). Single mothers, social capital, and work-family conflict. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 34–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, R. E., & Firebaugh, F. M. (1988). Family resource management: Principles and applications. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golden, L. (2008). Limited access: Disparities in flexible work schedules and work-at-home. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 29, 86–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harknett, K. (2006). The relationship between private safety nets and economic outcomes among single mothers. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 172–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henly, J. R., Shaefer, H. L., & Waxman, E. (2006). Nonstandard work schedules: Employer-and employee-driven flexibility in retail jobs. Social Service Review, 80, 609–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbst, C. M., & Barnow, B. S. (2008). Close to home: A simultaneous equations model of the relationship between child care accessibility and female labor force participation. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 29, 128–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heymann, J., Boynton-Jarrett, R., Carter, P., Bond, J., & Galinsky, E. (2002). Work-family issues and low-income families. Retrieved March 5, 2007, from http://www.economythatworks.org/PDFs/ford_analysisfinal.pdf.

  • Kahn, P. (2005). The work-family time binds of low-income mothers: Nursing aides struggle to care. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 27, 97–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katras, M. J., Zuiker, V. S., & Bauer, J. W. (2004). Private safety net: Childcare resources from the perspective of rural low-income families. Family Relations, 53, 201–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, S. J. (1999). Lower-wage workers and the new realities of work and family. Annals, The American Academic of Political and Social Science, 562, 174–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livermore, M. K., & Powers, R. S. (2006). Employment of unwed mothers: The role of government and social support. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 27, 479–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mammen, S., Lass, D., & Seiling, S. B. (2009). Labor force supply decisions of rural low-income mothers. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 30, 67–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R. (2003). Listening to lone mothers: Paid work, family life, and child care in Canada. Journal of Children & Poverty, 9, 41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, H. (2006). Child care assistance helps families work: A review of the effects of subsidies receipt on the employment. CLASP. Retrieved March 5, 2008, from http://www.clasp.org/publications/ccassistance_employment.pdf.

  • McCrate, E. (2002). Working mothers in a double bind. Economic Policy Institute. Retrieved November 18, 2007 from http://www.epinet.org/content.cfm/briefingpapers_124.

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, D. E., Minnotte, K. L., Kiger, G., & Mannon, S. E. (2009). Workplace policy and environment, family role quality, and positive family-to-work spillover. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 30, 80–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry-Jenkins, M., Repetti, R. L., & Crouter, A. C. (2000). Work and family in the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 981–998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presser, H. B. (2003). Working in a 24/7 economy: Challenges for American families. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radey, M. (2008). The influence of social supports on employment for Hispanic, Black, and White unmarried mothers. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 29, 445–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahibzada, K., Hammer, L. B., Neal, M. B., & Kuang, D. (2005). The moderating effects of work-family role combinations and work-family organizational culture on the relationship between family-friendly workplace supports and job satisfaction. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 820–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, L. A., Braun, B., Wright, D. V., & Miller, S. R. (2007). Human capital, social support, and economic well-being among rural, low-income mothers: A latent growth curve analysis. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28, 635–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. (2007). Employment rates higher among rural mothers than urban mothers. Carsey Institute. Retrieved November 18, 2007, from http://www.carseyinstitute.unh.edu/documents/FS_ruralmothers_07.pdf.

  • Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 237–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban, J. A., & Olson, P. N. (2005). A comprehensive employment model for low-income mothers. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 26, 101–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voydanoff, P. (2005). The effects of community demands, resources, and strategies on the nature and consequences of the work-family interface: An agenda for future research. Family Relations, 54, 583–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Drs. Kathryn Rettig, Catherine Solheim, and Sharon Danes, members of FSoS 8047, the JFEI editor and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions. This research was supported in part by USDA/CSREES/NRICGP Grants-2001-35401-10215, 2002-35401-11591, 2004-35401-14938. Data were collected in conjunction with the cooperative multi state research project NC-223/NC-1011 Rural Low-Income Families: Tracking Their Well-Being and Functioning in the Context of Welfare Reform. Cooperating states are California, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New York, Ohio, and Oregon. Research was also supported by MIN-52-055 Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Project and Special Hatch Competitive Funding for Minnesota Rural Families Speak project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seohee Son.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Son, S., Bauer, J.W. Employed Rural, Low-Income, Single Mothers’ Family and Work Over Time. J Fam Econ Iss 31, 107–120 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-009-9173-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-009-9173-8

Keywords

Navigation