Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of embryo quality between intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization in sibling oocytes

  • Assisted Reproduction
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim of the present study was to compare the quality of embryos derived from sibling oocytes by in vitro fertilization (IVF) or ICSI.

Methods

Consecutive patients with a less than 40% fertilization rate in a previous standard IVF cycle or with relative male factor infertility were recruited for the study. The oocytes retrieved from each patient were divided into two groups for either conventional insemination (group A) or ICSI (group B). Power analysis showed that to detect a 25% difference in the rate of high-quality embryos between the groups with a power of 0.8, at least 1,200 oocytes were needed in each group.

Results

One hundred seventy-seven patients were included in the study. Group A was comprised of 1,526 oocytes and group B of 1,480 sibling oocytes. As expected, the fertilization rate was significantly higher in group B than group A (67.1 vs. 43.6%, p < 0.001). No significant between-group differences were observed in cleavage rate (92.7 and 89.7%, respectively) and the rate of either grade A embryos (22.6 and 23.9%, respectively) or grade A1 embryos (37.3 and 33.5%, respectively).

However, in the subgroup of patients with relative male-factor infertility (n = 36), the rate of grade A1 embryos was significantly higher in the IVF than the ICSI group (46.4 vs. 29.0%, respectively, p = 0.02).

Conclusions

Embryo quality does not seem to be influenced by the mode of fertilization (IVF or ICSI). We assume that embryo quality depends on intrinsic factors of the gametes involved rather than on the fertilization process per se.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hall J, Fishel S, Green S. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus high insemination concentration in cases of very severe teratozoospermia. Hum Reprod 1995;10:493–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Oehninger S, Kruger TF, Simon T, Jones D, Mayer J, Lanzendorf S, et al. A comparative analysis of embryo implantation potential in patients with severe teratozoospermia undergoing in-vitro fertilization with a high insemination concentration or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1996;11:1086–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Palermo GD, Cohen J, Rosenwaks Z. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a powerful tool to overcome fertilization failure. Fertil Steril 1996;65:899–908.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schwartz LB, Chiu AS, Courtney M, Krey L, Schmidt-Sarosi C. The embryo versus endometrium controversy revisited as it relates to predicting pregnancy outcome in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles. Hum Reprod 1997;12:45–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bar-Hava I, Ashkenazi J, Shelef M, Schwartz A, Brengauz M, Feldberg D, et al. Morphology and clinical outcome of embryos after in vitro fertilization are superior to those after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril 1997;68:653–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hsu MI, Mayer J, Aronshon M, Lanzendorf S, Muasher S, Kolm P, et al. Embryo implantation in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: impact of cleavage status, morphology grade, and number of embryos transferred. Fertil Steril 1999;72:679–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Frattarelli JL, Leondires MP, Miller BT, Segars JH. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection increases embryo fragmentation without affecting clinical outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet 2000;17:207–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ruiz A, Remohi J, Minguez Y, Guanes PP, Simon C, Pellicer A. The role of in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in couples with unexplained infertility after failed intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 1997;68:171–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pisarska MD, Casson PR, Cisneros PL, Lamb DJ, Lipshultz LI, Buster JE, et al. Fertilization after standard in vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in subfertile males using sibling oocytes. Fertil Steril 1999;71:627–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Staessen C, Camus M, Clasen K, De Vos A, Van Steirteghem A. Conventional in vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in sibling oocytes from couples with tubal infertility and normozoospermic semen. Hum Reprod 1999;14:2474–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Verheyen G, Tournaye H, Staessen C, De Vos A, Vandervorst M, Van Steirteghem A. Controlled comparison of conventional in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in patients with asthenozoospermia. Hum Reprod 1999;14:2313–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bukulmez O, Yarali H, Yucel A, Sari T, Gurgan T. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus in vitro fertilization for patients with a tubal factor as their sole cause of infertility: a prospective, randomized trial. Fertil Steril 2000;73:38–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fishel S, Aslam I, Lisi F, Rinaldi L, Timson J, Jacobson M, et al. Should ICSI be the treatment of choice for all cases if in-vitro conception? Hum Reprod 2000;15:1278–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang D, Shahata MA, Al-Bader M, Al-Natsha SD, Al-Flamerzia M, Al-Shawaf T. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection improving embryo quality: comparison of the sibling oocyte of non-male-factor couples. J Assist Reprod Genet 1996;13:351–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Khamsi F, Yavas Y, Roberge S, Wong JC, Lacanna IC, Endman M. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection increases fertilization and good-quality embryo formation in patients with non-male factor indications for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril 2001;75:342–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hughes CM, Lewis SEE, McKelvey-Martin VJ, Thompson W. A comparison of baseline and induced DNA damage in human spermatozoa from fertile and infertile men, using a modified comet assay. Mol Hum Reprod 1996;2:613–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sakkas D, Mariethoz E, Manicardi G, Bizzaro D, Bianchi PG, Bianchi U. Origin of DNA damage in ejaculated human spermatozoa. Rev Reprod 1999;4:31–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bernardini L, Martini E, Geraedts JP, Hopman AH, Lanteri S, Conte N, et al. Comparison of chromosomal aneuploidy in spermatozoa of normal fertile men and those with severe male factor detected by in-situ hybridization. Mol Hum Reprod 1997;3:431–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Colombero LT, Hariprashad JJ, Tsai MC, Rosenwaks Z, Palermo GD. Incidence of sperm aneuploidy in relation to semen characteristics and assisted reproductive outcome. Fertil Steril 1999;72:90–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pfeffer J, Pang MG, Hoegerman SF, Osgood CJ, Stacey MW, Mayer J, et al. Aneuploidy frequencies in semen fraction from ten oligoasthenoteratozoospermic patients donating sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril 1999;72:472–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ola B, Afnan M, Sharif K, Papaioannou S, Hammadieh N, Barratt CLR. Should ICSI be the treatment of choice for all cases if in-vitro conception? Hum Reprod 2001;16:2485–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Aboulghar MA, Mansour RT, Serour GI, Sattar MA, Amin YM. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection and conventional in vitro fertilization for sibling oocytes in cases of unexplained infertility and borderline semen. J Assist Reprod Genet 1996;13:38–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Molley D, Harrison K, Breen T, Hennessey J. The predictive value of idiopathic failure to fertilize on the first in vitro fertilization attempt. Fertil Steril 1991;56:285–9.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ben-Shlomo I, Bider D, Dor J, Levran D, Mashiach S, Ben-Rafael Z. Failure to fertilize in vitro in couples with male factor infertility: what next? Fertil Steril 1992;58:187–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lipitz S, Rabinovici J, Ben-Shlomo I, Bider D, Ben-Rafael Z, Mashiach S, et al. Complete failure of fertilization in couples with unexplained infertility: implications for subsequent in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril 1993;59:348–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lipitz S, Rabinovici J, Goldenberg M, Bider D, Dor J, Mashiach S. Complete failure of fertilization in couples with mechanical infertility: implications for subsequent in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril 1994;61:863–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Calderon G, Belil I, Aran B, Veiga A, Gil Y, Boada M, et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional in-vitro fertilization: first results. Hum Reprod 1995;10:2835–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Roest J, Van Heusden AM, Zeilmaker GH, Verhoeff A. Treatment policy after poor fertilization in the first IVF cycle. J Assist Reprod Genet 1998;15:18–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tarlatzis BC. Report on the activities of the ESHRE Task Force on intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1996;11(Suppl 4):160–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wennerholm UB, Bergh C, Hamberger L, Nilsson L, Reismer E, Wennergren M, et al. Obstetric and perinatal outcome of pregnancies following intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1996;11:1113–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Bonduelle M, Wilikens A, Buysse A, Van Assche E, Wisanto A, Devroey P, et al. A follow-up study of children born after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with epididymal and testicular spermatozoa and after replacement of cryopreserved embryos obtained after ICSI. Hum Reprod 1998;13(suppl 1):196–207.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bonduelle M, Camus M, De Vos A, Staessen C, Tournaye H, Van Assche E, et al. Seven years of intracytoplasmic sperm injection and follow up of 1987 subsequent children. Hum Reprod 1999;14(Suppl 1):243–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bonduelle M, Liebaers I, Deketelaere V, Derde MP, Camus M, Devroey P, et al. Neonatal data on a cohort of 2889 infants born after ICSI (1991–1999) and 2995 infants born after IVF (1983–1999). Hum Reprod 2002;17:671–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Loft A, Petersen K, Erb K, Mikkelsen AL, Grinsted J, Hald F, et al. A Danish national cohort of 730 infants born after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) 1994–1997. Hum Reprod 1999;14:2143–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Tarlatzis BC, Grimbizis G. Pregnancy and child outcome after assisted reproduction techniques. Hum Reprod 1999;14(Suppl 1):231–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Palermo GD, Neri QV, Hariprashad JJ, Davis OK, Veeck LL, Rosenwaks Z. ICSI and its outcome. Semin Reprod Med 2000;18:161–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kurinczuk JJ, Bower C. Birth defects in infants conceived by intracytoplasmic sperm injection: an alternative interpretation. Br Med J 1997;315:1260–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Wennerholm UB, Bergh C, Hamberger L, Lundin K, Nilsson L, Wikland M, et al. Incidence of congenital malformations in children born after ICSI. Hum Reprod 2000;15:944–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Ericson A, Kallen B. Congenital malformations in infants born after IVF: a population-based study. Hum Reprod 2001;16:504–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Bar-Hava.

Additional information

Capsule Embryo quality does not seem to be influenced by the mode of fertilization but depends on intrinsic factors of the gametes involved.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yoeli, R., Orvieto, R., Ashkenazi, J. et al. Comparison of embryo quality between intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization in sibling oocytes. J Assist Reprod Genet 25, 23–28 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-007-9188-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-007-9188-8

Keywords

Navigation