Skip to main content
Log in

Brief Report: Risk-Aversion and Rationality in Autism Spectrum Disorders

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Risk-aversion and rationality have both been highlighted as core features of decision making in individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD). This study tested whether risk-aversion is related to rational decision-making in ASD individuals. ASD and matched control adults completed a decision-making task that discriminated between the use of risk-averse and rational strategies. Results showed that overall, ASD participants were more risk-averse than control participants. Specifically, both groups made similar choices when risk-aversion was the less rational strategy but ASD participants chose more rational options than control participants when risk-aversion was the most rational strategy. This study confirmed that risk-aversion is a core feature of ASD and revealed that ASD individuals can switch their decision-making strategy adaptively to avoid negative consequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  • American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th edn., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th edn.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Andari, E., Duhamel, J. R., Zalla, T., Herbecht, E., Leboyer, M., & Sirigu, A. (2010). Promoting social behavior with oxytocin in high-functioning autism spectrum disorders. PNAS, 107, 4389–4394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (2009). Autism: The empathizing-systemizing (E-S) theory. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1156, 68–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J., & Clubley, E. (2001). The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): evidence from Asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Damasio, A. R., & Lee, G. P. (1999). Different contributions of the human amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex to decision making. The Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 5473–5481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan, M., Lewton, M., & Ashwin, C. (2014). Reasoning on the autism spectrum: A dual process theory account. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46, 2115–2125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, M., Grimshaw, J., & Steen, N. (2000). Sample size calculations for cluster randomised trials. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 5(1), 12–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, E., & Mikels, J. A. (2011). I’m feeling lucky: The relationship between affect and risk-seeking in the framing effect. Emotion, 11, 852–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Martino, B., Harrison, N. A., Knafo, S., Bird, G., & Dolan, R. J. (2008). Explaining enhanced logical consistency during decision making in autism. The Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 10746–10750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Martino, B., Kumaran, D., Seymour, B., & Dolan, R. J. (2006). Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain. Science, 313, 684–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, G. D., Baron-Cohen, S., & Skylark, W. J. (2017). People with autism spectrum conditions make more consistent decisions. Psychological Science, 28, 1067–1076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaeth, G. J., Levin, I. P., Jain, G., & Burke, E. V. (2016). Toward understanding everyday decision making by adults across the autism spectrum. Judgment and Decision Making, 11, 537–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgetta, C., Grecucci, A., Zuanon, S., Perini, L., Balestrieri, M., Bonini, N. … Brambilla, P. (2012). Reduced risk-taking behavior as a trait feature of anxiety. Emotion, 12, 1373–1383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandin, T. (2000). My mind is a web browser: How people with autism think. Cerebrum, 2, 14–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, J., Gilchrist, A., Burton, D., & Cox, A. (2000). Social and psychiatric functioning in adolescents with Asperger syndrome compared with conduct disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorder, 30, 279–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregoire, J., & Wierzbicki, C. (2009). Comparaison de 4 formes abrégées de l’échelle d’intelligence de Weschler pour adultes—troisième édition (WAIS-III). Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée, 59, 17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, R., Wu, R., Broster, L. S., Jiang, Y., Xu, R., Yang, Q., … Luo, Y. J. (2017). Trait anxiety and economic risk avoidance are not necessarily associated: Evidence from the framing effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habib, M., Cassotti, M., Moutier, S., Houdé, O., & Borst, G. (2015). Fear and anger have opposite effects on risk seeking in the gain frame. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heck, R. H., Thomas, S. L., & Tabata, L. N. (2012). Multilevel modeling of categorical outcomes using IBM SPSS. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, R. M., Crisan, L. G., Houser, D., Miclea, M., & Miu, A. C. (2010). Emotion regulation and decision making under risk and uncertainty. Emotion, 10(2), 257–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. A., Filliter, J. H., Pleskac, T. J., Gillespsie, J., Queller, S., & Corkum, P. (2011). Specificity of risk averse decision-making to the autism spectrum. San Diego: International Society for Autism Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. A., Yechiam, E., Murphy, R. R., Queller, S., & Stout, J. C. (2006). Motivational processes and autonomic responsivity in Asperger’s disorder: Evidence from the Iowa gambling task. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 12, 668–676.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, I. P., Gaeth, G. J., Foley-Nicpon, M., Yegorova, V., Cederberg, C., & Yan, H. (2015). Extending decision-making competence to special populations: A pilot study of persons on the autism spectrum. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, K. Y., & Zeger, S. L. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika, 73, 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, C., Rutter, M., & Le Couteur, A. (1994). Autism diagnostic interview—revised. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, 659–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luke, L., Clare, I. C., Ring, H., Redley, M., & Watson, P. (2012). Decision-making difficulties experienced by adults with autism spectrum conditions. Autism, 16, 612–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marriage, S., Wolverton, A., & Marriage, K. (2009). Autism spectrum disorder grown up: A chart review of adult functioning. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 18, 322–328.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mazefsky, C. A., & White, S. W. (2014). Emotion regulation: Concepts & practice in autism spectrum disorder. Child and adolescent psychiatric clinics of North America, 23, 15–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, D., Reyna, V. F., & Satterthwaite, T. D. (2017). Beyond stereotypes of adolescent risk taking: Placing the adolescent brain in developmental context. Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 27, 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, P., Catmur, C., & Bird, G. (2016). Emotional decision-making in autism spectrum disorder: The roles of interoception and alexithymia. Molecular Autism, 7, 43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sip, K. E., Smith, D. V., Porcelli, A. J., Kar, K., & Delgado, M. R. (2015). Social closeness and feedback modulate susceptibility to the framing effect. Social Neuroscience, 10(1), 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. R., Ebert, E. E., & Broman-Fulks, J. J. (2016). The relationship between anxiety and risk taking is moderated by ambiguity. Personality and Individual Differences, 95, 40–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • South, M., Chamberlain, P. D., Wigham, S., Newton, T., Le Couteur, A., McConachie, H., Gray, L., Freeston, M. P., Kirwan, C. B., & Rodgers, J. (2014). Enhanced decision-making and risk avoidance in high-functioning autism spectrum disorder. Neuropsychology, 28, 222–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vella, L., Ring, H. A., Aitken, M. R., Watson, P. C., Presland, A., & Clare, I. C. (2017). Understanding self-reported difficulties in decision-making by people with autism spectrum disorders. Autism. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316687988

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, S. W., Oswald, D., Ollendick, T., & Scahill, L. (2009). Anxiety in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 216–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, P., Gu, R., Broster, L. S., Wu, R., Van Dam, N. T., Jiang, Y., … Luo, Y. J. (2013). Neural basis of emotional decision making in trait anxiety. Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 18641–18653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to express special thanks to Professor Tony Attwood for his helpful comments on a previous version of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CJG and SM made substantial contributions to the conception, design, acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of the data.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sylvain Moutier.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no financial disclosures or competing interests.

Ethical Approval

The ethics committee of Paris Descartes University (CERES) approved this research involving human subjects (CERES No. 2016/14). In line with the declaration of Helskinski, all participants included in this research gave their written consent prior to their inclusion.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

10803_2018_3616_MOESM1_ESM.tif

Online Appendix—Example of a gain trial in the unequal expected value (EV) condition. First, participants received an initial sum of money to play the trial. Second, they were informed that they would not be able to keep the entire initial amount of money and would have to choose between a sure option (framed in terms of gain) and a risky option. In the gain frame of the unequal EV condition, the EV of the sure option (here, EVSure = 18€) was always inferior to the EV of the risky option (here, EVRisky = 20€) (TIF 2480 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gosling, C.J., Moutier, S. Brief Report: Risk-Aversion and Rationality in Autism Spectrum Disorders. J Autism Dev Disord 48, 3623–3628 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3616-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3616-8

Keywords

Navigation