Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of Comprehensive Treatment Models for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 16 September 2009

Abstract

Multiple dimensions of comprehensive treatment models (CTMs) for learners with autism were evaluated in this study. The purpose of the study was to provide evaluative information upon which service providers, family members, and researchers could make decisions about model adoption, selection for a family member, or future research. Thirty CTMs were identified, with the majority based on an applied behavior analysis framework, although a substantial minority followed a developmental or relationship-based model. As a group, CTMs were strongest in the operationalization of their models, although relatively weaker in measurement of implementation, and with notable exceptions, weak in evidence of efficacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The National Standards Project is located at the National Autism Center in MA. Its purpose is to identify research that documents efficacy of procedures and programs for learners with ASD. Investigators with this project conducted a comprehensive review of the literature and assembled a national review team to evaluate all articles identified. NSP staff is now aggregating the analyses by focused intervention practices and also CTMs. The four authors were reviewers with the NSP. The website for the NSP is: http://www.nationalautismcenter.org/about/national.php.

References

  • American Evaluation Association. (2008). Guiding principles for evaluators. American Journal of Evaluation, 29, 233–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. R., Thomeer, M. L., & King, D. C. (2006). Summit Academy: Implementing a system-wide intervention. In S. Handleman & S. Harris (Eds.), School-age programs for children with autism (pp. 195–220). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arick, J., Young, H., Falco, R., Loos, L., Krug, D., Gense, M., et al. (2003). Designing and outcome study to monitor the progress of students with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 18, 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bondy, A., & Battaglini, K. (2006). Application of the Pyramid approach to education model in a public school setting. In S. Handleman & S. Harris (Eds.), School-age programs for children with autism (pp. 163–194). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondy, A., & Frost, L. (2002). A picture’s worth: PECS and other visual communication strategies in autism. Bethesda, MD: Woodbine House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruey, C. T., & Vorhis, N. (2006). The Lancaster-Lebanon IU 13 autism support program. In S. Handleman & S. Harris (Eds.), School-age programs for children with autism (pp. 115–142). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, S., Cannon, B., Ellis, J. T., Lifter, K., Luiselli, J. K., Navalta, C. P., et al. (1998). The May Center for early childhood education: Description of a continuum of services model for children with autism. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 45, 173–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, H., Amerine-Dickens, M., & Smith, T. (2006). Early intensive behavioral treatment: Replication of the UCLA Model in a community setting. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 27(2), 145–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1982). Designing evaluations of educational and social programs. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domitrovich, C. E., Bradshaw, C. P., Poduska, J. M., Hoogwood, K., Buckley, J. A., Olin, S., et al. (2008). Maximizing the implementation quality of evidence-based preventive interventions in schools: A conceptual framework. Advance in School Mental Health Promotion, 1, 6–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durlak, J., & DuPre, E. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 327–350.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fenske, E. C., Zalenski, S., Krantz, P. J., & McClannahan, L. E. (1985). Age at intervention and treatment outcome for autistic children in a comprehensive intervention program. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 5, 49–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network (FMHI Publication #231).

  • Greenberg, M. T., Domitrovich, C. E., Graczyk, P. A., & Zins, J. E. (2005). The study of implementation in school-based preventive interventions: Theory, research, and practice. Promotion of mental health and prevention of mental and behavior disorders (Vol. 3). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutstein, S. E., Burgess, A. F., & Montfort, K. (2007). Evaluation of the Relationship Development Intervention. Autism, 11, 397–411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, L. (2009). Autism spectrum disorders: From theory to practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handleman, J. S., & Harris, S. L. (Eds.). (2006). School-age education programs for children with autism. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handleman, J. S., & Harris, S. L. (Eds.). (2008). Preschool education programs for children with autism. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S., Handleman, J., Gordon, R., Kristoff, B., & Fuentes, F. (1991). Changes in cognitive and language functioning of preschool children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 21, 281–290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hassen, C. E., Lawrenz, F., & Dunet, D. O. (2008). Concurrent meta-evaluation: A critique. American Journal of Evaluation, 29, 572–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, D. (1998). Autism through the lifespan: The Eden model. Bethesda, MD: Woodbine House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J. S., Sparkman, C. R., Cohen, H. G., Green, G., & Stanislaw, H. (2005). A comparison of intensive behavior analytic and eclectic treatments for young children with autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 26, 359–383.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howlin, P., Magiati, I., & Charman, T. (2009). Systematic review of early intensive behavioral interventions for children with autism. American Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 114, 23–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyson, M., Jamieson, B., & Strain, P. S. (1984). Individualized group instruction of normally developing and autistic-like children: The LEAP curriculum model. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 8, 157–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, K., & Odom, S. L. (2007). Effects of a work system on the work and play of children and individuals with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 1166–1180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, B. (1981). A miracle to believe in. New York: Fawcett Crest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, M., Henderson, M., Kerr, K. P., & Dillenburger, K. (2006). Applied behaviour analysis and autism: Building a future together. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koegel, R., & Koegel, L. (2006). Pivotal response treatments for autism. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koegel, L. K., Koegel, R. L., Harrower, J. K., & Carter, C. M. (1999). Pivotal response intervention I.: Overview of the approach. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 24(24), 174–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, A., & Gurry, S. (1998). Brief report: Progress reported in three children with autism using daily life therapy. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 4, 339–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leaf, R., & McEachin, J. (1999). A work in progress: Behavior management strategies and a curriculum for intensive behavioral treatment of autism. New York: DRL Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, C., Wagner, A., Rogers, S., Szatmari, P., Aman, M., Charman, T., et al. (2005). Challenges in evaluating psychosocial interventions for autistic spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35, 695–708.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, G., & Perales, F. (2005). Relationship-focused early intervention with children with pervasive developmental disorders and other disabilities: A comparative study. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 26(2), 77–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McConachie, H., Randle, V., Hammal, D., & LeCouteur, A. (2005). A controlled trial of a training course for parents of children with suspected autism spectrum disorder. The Journal of Pediatrics, 33, 5–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, G. G., Morrier, M. J., & Daly, T. (1999). An incidental teaching approach to early intervention for toddlers with autism. The Journal of the Association of Persons with Severe Handicaps, 24, 133–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKeon, J., Vuoncino, K., Brenkert, R., Dinnell-LoPresti, E. D., Lampert, M., Madden-Perez, M., et al. (2006). The valley program. In S. Handleman & S. Harris (Eds.), School-age programs for children with autism (pp. 247–268). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, L. S., Taylor, B. A., Cerino, K. E., Fisher, J. R., Moran, L., & Richard, E. (2006). Alpine learning group. In J. S. Handleman & S. L. Harris (Eds.), School-age education programs for children with autism (pp. 19–47). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A., & Miller, E. E. (1973). Cognitive-developmental training with elevated boards and sign language. Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia, 3, 65–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2001). Educating children with autism. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odom, S. L., Brown, W. H., Frey, T., Karasu, N., Smith-Carter, L., & Strain, P. (2003). Evidence-based practices for young children with autism: Evidence from single-subject research design. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 18, 176–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odom, S., Collet-Klinenberg, L., Rogers, S., & Hatton, D. (in press). Evidence-based practices in interventions for children and youth with autism spectrum disorders. Preventing School Failure.

  • Panerai, S., Ferrante, L., & Zingale, M. (2002). Benefits of the treatment and education of autistic and communication handicapped children (TEACCH) programme [sic] as compared with a non-specific approach. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 46, 318–327.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prizant, B., Wetherby, A., Rubin, E., Laurent, A., & Rydell, P. (2006). The SCERTS model: A comprehensive educational approach for children with autism spectrum disorders. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichow, B., & Wolery, M. (2009). Comprehensive synthesis of early intensive behavioral interventions for young children with autism based on the UCLA young autism project model. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 23–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reichow, B., Volkmar, F., & Cicchetti, D. (2008). Development of the evaluative method for evaluating and determining evidence-based practices in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 1311–1319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, S., & Vismara, L. (2008). Evidence-based comprehensive treatments for early autism. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 37, 8–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, S. J., Hayden, D., Hepburn, S., Charlifue-Smith, R., Hall, T., & Hayes, A. (2006). Teaching young nonverbal children with autism useful speech: A pilot study of the Denver model and PROMPT interventions. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 1007–1024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Romanczyk, R. G., Lockshin, S. B., Matey, L., & Gillis, J. M. (2006). The children’s unit for treatment and evaluation. In S. Handleman & S. Harris (Eds.), School-age programs for children with autism (pp. 49–89). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, I., Sandall, S., McBride, B., & Boulware, G. (2004). Project DATA (Developmentally Appropriate Treatment for Autism): An inclusive school-based approach to educating young children with autism. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 24, 156–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T., Scahill, L., Dawson, G., Guthrie, D., Lord, C., Odom, S., et al. (2007). Designing research studies on psychosocial interventions in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 354–366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R., Necheles, J., Ferch, C., & Bruckman, D. (2007). Pilot study of a parent training program for young children with autism. Autism, 11, 205–224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stahmer, A. C., & Ingersoll, B. (2004). Inclusive programming for toddlers with autism spectrum disorders: Outcomes form the Children’s Toddler School. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6, 67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, M., Washington, A., Rice, C., Jenner, W., Ottolino, J., Clancy, K., et al. (2007). Prevalence of the autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) in multiple areas of the United States, 2000 and 2002. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkmar, F., Paul, R., Klin, A., & Cohen, D. (2005). Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yell, M. L., Drasgow, E., & Lowrey, A. K. (2005). No child left behind and students with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20(3), 130–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper was based on a larger report funded by the California Department of Developmental Services and its Autism Spectrum Disorders: Guidelines for Effective Intervention project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel L. Odom.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0873-6

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 3.

Table 3 Summative evaluation of evidence for comprehensive treatment models

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Odom, S.L., Boyd, B.A., Hall, L.J. et al. Evaluation of Comprehensive Treatment Models for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders. J Autism Dev Disord 40, 425–436 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0825-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0825-1

Keywords

Navigation