Abstract
This study explores the perceptions of culturally relevant science teaching of 35 teachers of American Indian students. These teachers participated in professional development designed to help them better understand climate change science content and teaching climate change using both Western science and traditional and cultural knowledge. Teacher perceptions of practices using culturally relevant instruction were evaluated. The data were analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively. The results from the survey analysis show that the teachers’ existing practices of culturally relevant science teaching were limited in choosing topics relevant to American Indian culture. We found three common themes from the teachers’ perceptions of culturally relevant science teaching, meaning of culturally relevant science teaching, teaching strategies, and purpose of culturally relevant science teaching from the qualitative data. We also found that teachers with higher survey scores perceive culturally relevant science teaching differently than teachers with lower survey scores, specifically for the purposes and teaching strategies of culturally relevant science teaching. The results show that teachers with higher survey scores tended to perceive culturally relevant science teaching as a two-way learning process between teachers and students where the teachers can learn traditional science knowledge from the students. They also tend to perceive using concrete traditional science examples as effective teaching strategy for culturally relevant science teaching and building strong relationships with American Indian students as the most important purpose of culturally relevant science teaching. We also discuss common challenges faced by science teachers when trying to implement culturally relevant science teaching with American Indian students.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agbo, S. (2001). Enhancing success in American Indian students: Participatory research at Akwesasne as part of the development of a culturally relevant curriculum. Journal of American Indian Education, 40(1), 31–56.
Barnhardt, R. & Kawagley, A. O. (2005). Indigenous knowledge systems and Alaska native ways of knowing. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 36(1), 8–23.
Berg, B. L. (1998). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon.
Berkes, F. (1999). Sacred ecology: Traditional ecological knowledge and resource management. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.
Brayboy, B. M. B. & Castagno, A. E. (2008). How might native science inform “informal science learning?”. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3(3), 731–750.
Burke, C. (2007). Neighborhood science stories: Bridging science standards and urban students’ lives. Teaching Education, 18(4), 357–367.
Cajete, G. A. (1999). Igniting the sparkle: An indigenous science education model. Skyland: Kivaki.
Cleary, L. M. & Peacock, T. D. (1998). Collected wisdom: American Indian education. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Davidson-Hunt, I. J. & O’Flaherty, R. M. (2007). Researchers, indigenous peoples, and place-based learning communities. Society and Natural Resources, 20(4), 291–301.
Deloria, V., Jr. (1992). Relativity, relatedness and reality. Winds of Change, 7(4), 35–40.
Deloria, V., Jr. & Wildcat, D. R. (2001). Power and place: Indian education in America. Golden: Fulcrum.
Demmert, W.G., Jr, & Towner, J.C. (2003). A review of the research literature on the influences of culturally based education on the academic performance of Native American students. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. Retrieved from http://www.nwrel.org/Americaned/cbe.pdf.
Figueira, A. (2004). A new native teacher corps: Integrating culture and language in schooling. NABE News, September/October, 22–25.
Gilbert, W. S. (2011). Developing culturally based science curriculum for Native American classrooms. In J. Reyhner, W. S. Gilbert & L. Lockard (Eds.), Honoring our heritage: Culturally appropriate approaches to indigenous education (pp. 43–55). Flagstaff: Northern Arizona University.
Grande, S. (2004). Red pedagogy: Native American social and political thought. Blue Ridge Summit: Rowman & Littlefield.
Gruenewald, D. A. (2003a). A multidisciplinary framework for place-conscious education. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 619–654.
Gruenewald, D. A. (2003b). The best of both worlds: A critical pedagogy of place. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 3–12.
Kawageley, O. (2001). Tradition and education: The world made seamless again. In K. James (Ed.), Science and Native American communities: Legacies of pain, visions of promise (pp. 51–56). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Kawagley, A. O., Norris-Tull, D. & Norris-Tull, R. A. (1998). The indigenous worldview of Yupiaq culture: Its scientific nature and relevance to the practice and teaching of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(2), 133–144.
Kern, A. L., Roehrig, G. H., Reynolds, B., Bhattacharya, D., Varma, K., Hougham, R. J., Finley, F., Miller, B. G., Liu, S., Nam, Y. & Karahan, E. (2012). Teacher professional development for climate change education in native communities. Clearwater: Association of Science Teacher Education.
Lynch, S. J. (2000). Equity and science education reform. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mahan, J. M. (1981). Native Americans as teacher trainers: Anatomy and outcomes of a cultural immersion project. Los Angeles: The American Educational Research Association.
McKinley, E. (2005). Locating the global: Culture, language and science education for indigenous students. International Journal of Science Education, 27(2), 227–241.
Monhardt, R. M. (2003). The image of the scientist through the eyes of Navajo children. Journal of American Indian Education, 42(3), 25–39.
Morgan, H. (2010). Teaching Native American students: What every teacher should know. Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 75(6), 44–47.
National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington: National Academies Press.
National Academies & Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century (2006). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Ninnes, P. (2001). Writing multicultural science textbooks: Perspectives, problems, possibilities, and power. Australian Science Teachers, 47(4), 18–24.
Ovando, C. J. (1992). Science. In J. A. Reyhner (Ed.), Teaching American Indian students (pp. 223–240). Norman: The University of Oklahoma Press.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Preston, V. (1991). Mathematics and science curricula in elementary and secondary. Washington, DC: Department of Education, Indian Nations at Risk Task Force. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED343767.pdf.
Riggs, E. M. (2004). Field-based education and indigenous knowledge: Essential components of geoscience education for Native American communities. Science Education, 89(2), 296–313.
Roehrig, G. H., Campbell, K. M., Dalbotten, D. & Varma, K. (2012). CYCLES: A culturally-relevant approach to climate change education in native communities. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 6, 73–89.
Semken, S. & Freeman, C. B. (2008). Sense of place in the practice and assessment of place-based science teaching. Science Education, 92(6), 1042–1057.
Sievert, R. & LaFrance, J. (2011). Development, validation, and preliminary use of culturally congruent instruction survey. Orlando: National Association of Research in Science Teaching.
Snively, G. & Corsiglia, J. (2001). Discovering indigenous science: Implications for science education. Science Education, 85(1), 6–34.
Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (1998). Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nam, Y., Roehrig, G., Kern, A. et al. PERCEPTIONS AND PRACTICES OF CULTURALLY RELEVANT SCIENCE TEACHING IN AMERICAN INDIAN CLASSROOMS. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 11, 143–167 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9372-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9372-x