Skip to main content
Log in

Quantifying interspecific spatial overlap in aquatic macrophyte communities

  • PLANTS IN HYDROSYSTEMS
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Levins’s asymmetrical α index quantifies between species overlap over resources more realistically than similar-purpose single-value indices. The associated community-wide \(\bar \alpha\) index expresses the degree of “species packing”. Both indices were formulated upon competing animal (i.e., mobile) organisms and are independent of population densities. However, overlap over resources for nonmobile organisms such as plants may have an impact even below carrying capacity. The proposed \(\hat \alpha\) index, based on Levins’s α index, quantifies spatial overlap for plants integrating information on species spatial distribution and crowding conditions. The \(\hat \alpha\) index is specifically designed for plant distribution data collected in discrete plots with density expressed as percent coverage (%cover) of substratum. We also propose a community-wide \({\hat \alpha_{\text{c}}}\) index, conceptually analogous to \(\bar \alpha\), but furnished with a measure of dispersion (se \({\hat \alpha_{\text{c}}}\)). Species importance within the community is inferred from comparisons of pairwise \(\hat \alpha\)’s with \({\hat \alpha_{\text{c}}}\). The \(\hat \alpha\) and \({\hat \alpha_{\text{c}}}\) indices correlate closely and exponentially with plant density, and correct apparent over- and underestimations of interaction intensity at low and very high crowding by Levins’s α and \(\bar \alpha\), respectively. Index application to aquatic plant communities gave results consistent with within-community and general ecological patterns, suggesting a high potential of the proposed \(\hat \alpha\) and \({\hat \alpha_{\text{c}}}\) indices in basic and applied macrophyte ecological studies and management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A comparison between the association strength (r 2) of the two regressions in Fig. 4, and not the very small P values (a feature of sample-size-dependent regression analysis), is the real object of this analysis.

References

  • Abernethy, V. J., M. R. Sabbatini & K. J. Murphy, 1996. Response of Elodea canadensis Michx. and Myriophyllum spicatum L. to shade, cutting and competition in experimental culture. Hydrobiologia 340: 219–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, H. P., R. D. Snee & M. H. Sarner, 1980. Graphical display of means. American Statistician 34(4): 195–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowmer, K. H., D. S. Mitchell & D. L. Short, 1984. Biology of Elodea canadensis Michx. and its management in Australian irrigation systems. Aquatic Botany 18: 231–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruno, J. F. & C. W. Kennedy, 2000. Patch-size dependent habitat modification and facilitation on New England cobble beaches by Spartina alterniflora. Oecologia 122: 98–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, P. A. & E. E. Prepas, 1990. Competition and coexistence in submerged aquatic plant communities: the effects of species interactions versus abiotic factors. Freshwater Biology 23: 541–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, C. D., R. B. Sheldon & C. W. Boylen, 1987. Littoral zone macrophyte community structure: distribution and association of species along physical gradients in Lake George, New York, USA. Aquatic Botany 29: 177–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J. H., 1980. Diversity and the coevolution of competitors, or the ghost of competition past. Oikos 35: 131–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J. H., 1983. On the prevalence and relative importance of interspecific competition: evidence from field experiments. The American Naturalist 122: 661–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craine, J. M., J. Fargione & S. Sugita, 2005. Supply pre-emption, not concentration reduction, is the mechanism of competition for nutrients. New Phytologist 166: 933–940.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D., 1996. Comment: the first data analysis should be journalistic. Ecological Applications 6: 1090–1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egerston, C. J., J. A. Kopaska & J. A. Downing, 2004. A century of change in macrophyte abundance and composition in response to agricultural eutrophication. Hydrobiologia 524: 145–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ENSR, 2000. Survey of the Submerged Aquatic Vegetation and Vegetation Management Recommendations for Fort Meadow Reservoir, Marlborough, MA. Final Report to the Conservation Commission of the City of Marlborough, MA.

  • French, T. D. & P. A. Chambers, 1996. Habitat partitioning in riverine macrophyte communities. Freshwater Biology 36: 509–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gause, G. F., 1934. The Struggle for Existence. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, D. E. & S. M. Scheiner, 2001. ANOVA and ANCOVA: field competition experiments. In Scheiner, S. M. & J. Gurevitch (eds.), Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, New York, NY: 77–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert, S. J., 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecological Monographs 54: 187–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, G. E., 1961. The paradox of the plankton. The American Naturalist 95: 137–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEP, 1987. Diagnostic Feasibility Study, Fort Meadow Reservoir, Marlborough/Hudson, Massachusetts. Final Report to the City of Marlborough and the Town of Hudson, MA.

  • Kłosowski, S., E. Jabłońska & M. Szańkowski, 2011. Aquatic vegetation as an indicator of littoral habitats and various stages of lake aging in north-eastern Poland. Annales de Limnologie – International Journal of Limnology 47: 281–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knapton, R. W. & S. A. Petrie, 1999. Changes in distribution and abundance of submerged macrophytes in the Inner Bay at Long Point, Lake Erie: implications for foraging waterfowl. Journal of Great Lakes Research 25: 783–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolada, A., S. Hellsten, A. Kanninen, Ma. Søndergaard, B. Dudley, P. Nõges, I. Ott, F. Ecke, M. Mjelde, V. Bertrin, T. Davidson & H. Duel, 2011. Overview and comparison of macrophyte survey methods used in European countries and a proposal of harmonized common sampling protocol to be used for WISER uncertainty exercise including a relevant common species list. Deliverable D3.2-1, part of the final WISER report to the European Commission, 7th WFD Programme, Brussels, B.

  • Levins, R., 1968. Evolution in Changing Environments – Some Theoretical Explorations. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo, P. & G. D. Cooke, 2004. Resource use and partitioning by two co-occurring gastropod species. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 159: 229–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MA DEP, 2003. Massachusetts Year 2002 Integrated List of Waters Part 2 – Final Listing of Individual Categories of Waters CN 125.2. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Watershed Management, Worcester, MA.

  • May, R. M., 1972. Will a large complex system be stable? Nature 238: 413–414.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • May, R. M., 1975. Some notes on estimating the competition matrix, α. Ecology 56: 737–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikulyuk, A., J. Hauxwell, P. Rasmussen, S. Knight, K. I. Wagner, M. E. Nault & D. Ridgely, 2010. Testing a methodology for assessing plant communities in temperate inland lakes. Lake and Reservoir Management 26: 54–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mjelde, M., P. Lombardo, D. Berge & S. W. Johansen, 2012. Mass invasion of non-native Elodea canadensis Michx. in a large, clear-water, species-rich Norwegian lake – impact on macrophyte biodiversity. Annales de Limnologie – International Journal of Limnology 48: 225–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, L. D. & L. Altenberg, 1985. Statistical inference on measures of niche overlap. Ecology 66: 1204–1210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, S. R., 1988. Estimation of and testing significance for a common correlation coefficient. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods 17: 39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petren, K. & T. J. Case, 1996. An experimental demonstration of exploitation competition in an ongoing invasion. Ecology 77: 118–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pianka, E. R., 1973. The structure of lizard communities. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4: 53–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prairie, Y. T., 1996. Evaluating the predictive power of regression models. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53: 490–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reader, R. J., 1992. Herbivory as a confounding factor in an experiment measuring competition among plants. Ecology 73: 373–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rørslett, B., 1983. Tyrifjord og Steinsfjord – Undersøkelse av Vannvegetasjon 1977–1982. NIVA Report lnr. 1510. NIVA, Oslo, N.

  • Rørslett, B., N. W. Green & K. Kvalvågnes, 1978. Stereophotography as a tool in aquatic biology. Aquatic Botany 4: 61–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer, M., S. Rinaldi, J. Huisman & F. J. Weissing, 2003. Why plankton communities have no equilibrium: solutions to the paradox. Hydrobiologia 491: 9–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, R. J., 1996. Exploitation competition in mobile grazers: trade-offs in use of a limited resource. Ecology 77: 408–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoener, T. W., 1970. Non-synchronous spatial overlap of lizards in patchy habitats. Ecology 51: 408–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silander, J. A. & J. Antonovics, 1982. Analysis of interspecific interactions in a coastal plant community – a perturbation approach. Nature 298: 557–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slobodchikoff, C. N. & W. C. Schulz, 1980. Measures of niche overlap. Ecology 61: 1051–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smart, M.M., S.A. Nichols, J.H. Peck & R.G. Wetzel, 2005. Macrophytes. In: Eaton, A.D., L.S. Clesceri, E.W. Rice & A.E. Greenberg (eds), Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 21st ed. APHA, Washington, DC. Section 10400.

  • Thomson, J. D., 1980. Implications of different sorts of evidence for competition. The American Naturalist 116: 719–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, A. J., 1997. Experiments in Ecology – Their Logical Design and Interpretation Using Analysis of Variance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volterra, V., 1926. Variations and fluctuations of the number of individuals in animal species living together. In Chapman, R. N. (ed.), Animal Ecology. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY: 409–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar, J. H., 2009. Biostatistical Analysis, 5th ed. Prentice Hall/Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Constructive criticism by Dr. G. Dennis Cooke and Prof. David W. Waller (Kent State University); Dr. Tom Andersen (University of Oslo); Prof. Bruno Cicolani, Dr. Francesco Paolo Miccoli and Dr. Antonio Di Sabatino (University of L’Aquila); Dr. Gaetano De Luca (Italian Institute of Vulcanology and Seismology/INFN); Dr. John Silander (University of Connecticut), and two anonymous reviewers greatly improved the paper. We also thank Ms. Priscilla Ryder, Conservation Officer of the City of Marlborough, for permission to use the Fort Meadow Reservoir data. Our thanks go to the NIVA and ENSR employees who contributed to collect field data in Steinsfjord and Fort Meadow Reservoir, respectively. The index was developed as a spinoff activity of project # 154270/S30 (monitoring of E. canadensis in Steinsfjord), awarded by the Norwegian Research Council to NIVA. Our thanks also go to Mr. Dag Berge, the Steinsfjord project manager, for his continued support on pursuing the idea that led to this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paola Lombardo.

Additional information

Guest editors: M. T. Ferreira, M. O’Hare, K. Szoszkiewicz & S. Hellsten / Plants in Hydrosystems: From Functional Ecology to Weed Research

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lombardo, P., Mjelde, M. Quantifying interspecific spatial overlap in aquatic macrophyte communities. Hydrobiologia 737, 25–43 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-013-1716-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-013-1716-1

Keywords

Navigation