Skip to main content
Log in

Critical influence of seasonal sampling on the ecological quality assessment of small headwater streams

  • Primary research paper
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Variability in the ecological quality assessment of reference sites was tested on small headwater streams in Ireland. Although headwater streams constitute a large portion of the river channel network, they are not routinely monitored for water quality. Various metrics were used including the Irish Q-value and the newly developed Small Streams Risk Score (SSRS), and metrics applied elsewhere in the Atlantic biogeographic region in Europe, including the Biological Monitoring Working Party score (BMWP), the Average Score per Taxon (ASPT), the Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera taxa (EPT), the Belgium Biotic Index (BBI) and the Danish Stream Fauna Index (DSFI). The AQEM (version 2.5a) assessment software was used to apply some of these metrics. The spring and summer datasets are used to test the performance of biotic metrics with respect to season, and the applicability of their use to assess the ecological quality of wadeable streams. The quality status of most sites assigned by the various metrics was high using the spring invertebrate data, and an apparent considerable deviation in quality status occurred when the summer data was applied. Seasonal differences were noted using all the biotic indices and are attributed to the absence of pollution-sensitive groups in summer. Seasonal variability in the water quality status was particularly evident in acidic streams draining non-calcareous geologies with peaty soils that had relatively lower numbers of taxa. Some indices applied reflect a greater seasonal difference in the quality category assigned. The least amount of variability between seasons was obtained using the ASPT and the SSRS risk assessment system. Results suggest that reference status is reliably reflected in spring when more pollution-sensitive taxa were present, and that a new ecological quality assessment tool is required for application in summer when impacts may be most severe. This highly heterogeneous freshwater habitat seems to have too few taxa present in the summer to reliably determine the ecological quality of the stream using the available indices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alba-Tercedor, J. & A. M. Pujante, 2000. Running-water biomonitoring in Spain: opportunities for a predictive approach. In Wright, J. F., D. W. Sutcliffe & M. T. Furse (eds), Assessing the Biological Quality of Fresh Waters—RIVPACS and Other Techniques. FBA, Ambleside: 207–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous, 2005. Western river basin district project: small streams risk score. Environmental Protection Agency, Ireland.

  • Anonymous, 2006. Environment in focus 2006: environmental indicators For Ireland. Environmental Protection Agency, Ireland.

  • Armitage, P. D., D. Moss, J. F. Wright & M. T. Furse, 1983. The performance of a new biological water quality score system based on macroinvertebrates over a wide range of unpolluted running-water sites. Water Resources 17: 333–347.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baars, J.-R., C. Bradley & M. Kelly-Quinn, 2004. Macroinvertebrate assemblages of Irish “headwaters” and the preliminary evaluation of their biological integrity. The Heritage Council of Ireland.

  • Becker, G., 2005. Life cycle of Agapetus fuscipes (Trichoptera, Glossosomatidae) in a first-order upland stream in central Germany. Limnologica 35: 52–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birk, S. & D. Hering, 2006. Direct comparison of assessment methods using benthic macroinvertebrates: a contribution to the EU Water Framework Directive intercallibration exercise. Hydrobiologia 566: 401–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, J. H. & M. B. Forest, 1995. New records of Hydropsyche saxonica McLachlan (Trichopt., Hydropsychidae) from small streams in Great Britain. Entomologist’s Monthly Magazine 13: 71–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, J. H., R. J. M. Gunn & M. J. Hammett, 1998. Electrogena affinis (Eaton, 1985) (Ephemeroptera, Heptageniidae), a mayfly new to Britain. Entomologist’s Monthly Magazine 134: 257–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonada, N., N. Prat, V. H. Resh & B. Statzner, 2006. Developments in aquatic insect biomonitoring: a comparative analysis of recent approaches. Annual Review of Entomology 51: 495–523.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boulton, A. J. & P. S. Lake, 1992. The ecology of two intermittent streams in Victoria, Australia III. Temporal changes in faunal composition. Freshwater Biology 27: 123–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bournard, M., H. Tachet, A. L. Roux & Y. Auda, 1987. The effects of seasonal and hydrological influences on the macroinvertebrates of the Rhone River, France 1. Methodological aspects. Archives of Hydrobiology 109: 287–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buffagni, A., J. L. Kemp, S. Erba, C. Belfiore, D. Hering & O. Moog, 2001. A Europe-wide system for assessing the quality of rivers using macroinvertebrates: the AQEM Project and its importance for southern Europe (with special emphasis on Italy). Journal of Limnology 60: 39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunn, S. E., D. H. Edward & N. R. Loneragan, 1986. Spatial and temporal variation in the macroinvertebrate fauna of streams of the northern jarrah forest, Western Australia: community structure. Freshwater Biology 16: 67–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEC, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council: establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities L327.

  • Clenaghan, C., P. S. Giller, J. O’Halloran & R. Hernan, 1998. Stream macroinvertebrate communities in a conifer-afforested catchment in Ireland: relationships to physico-chemical and biotic factors. Freshwater Biology 40: 175–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, K. J., O. J. Ball, A. K. Graesser, M. R. Main & M. J. Winterbourn, 1990. Do organic and anthropogenic acidity have similar effects on aquatic fauna? Oikos 59: 33–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crunkilton, R. L. & R. M. Duchrow, 1991. Use of stream order and biological indices to assess water quality in the Osage and Black river basins of Missouri. Hydrobiologia 224: 155–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, K. W., 1992. Catchment characteristics and river ecosystems. In Boon, P. J., P. Calow & G. E. Petts (eds), River Conservation and Management. Wiley, Chichester, United Kingdom: 125–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, J., R. K. Johnson & L. Sandin, 2004. Detection of organic pollution of streams in southern Sweden using benthic macroinvertebrates. Hydrobiologia 516: 161–172.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dallas, H. F., 2002. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in lotic systems: implications for defining reference conditions for macroinvertebrates. Proceedings of the 3rd WaterNet/Warfsa symposium ‘Water demand management for sustainable development’.

  • Dallas, H. F., 2004. Seasonal variability of macroinvertebrate assemblages in two regions of South Africa: implications for aquatic bioassessment. African Journal of Aquatic Science 29: 173–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallas, H. F. & J. A. Day, 2007. Natural variation in macroinvertebrate assemblages and the development of a biological banding system for interpreting bioassessment data—a preliminary evaluation using data from upland sites in the south-western Cape, South Africa. Hydrobiologia 575: 231–244.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dangles, O., B. Malmqvist & H. Laudon, 2004. Naturally acid freshwater ecosystems are diverse and functional: evidence from boreal streams. OIKOS 104: 149–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Pauw, N. & G. Vanhooren, 1983. Method for biological quality assessment of watercourses in Belgium. Hydrobiologia 100: 153–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donohue, I., M. L. McGarrigle & P. Mills, 2006. Linking catchment characteristics and water chemistry with the ecological status of Irish rivers. Water Research 40: 91–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, C., J. P. O’Connor & M. F. O’Grady, 1981. A baseline survey of the Caragh, an unpolluted river in southwest Ireland: observations on the macroinvertebrates. Journal of Life Sciences 2: 147–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J. M., U. H. Humpesch & T. T. Macan, 1988. Larvae of the British Ephemeroptera—a key with ecological notes. Freshwater Biological Association.

  • Flanagan, P. J. & P. F. Toner, 1972. The national survey of Irish rivers. A Report on water quality. An Foras Forbartha, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friberg, N., L. Sandin, M. T. Furse, S. E. Larsen, R. T. Clarke & P. Haase, 2006. Comparison of macroinvertebrate sampling methods in Europe. Hydrobiologia 566: 365–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furse, M. T., D. Moss, J. F. Wright & P. D. Armitage, 1984. The influence of seasonal and taxonomic factors on the ordination and classification of running-water sites in Great Britain and on the prediction of their macro-invertebrate communities. Freshwater Biology 14: 257–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furse, M. T., 1998. The faunal richness of headwater streams. PhD Thesis, The University of Reading.

  • Furse, M. T., 2000. The application of RIVPACS procedures in headwater streams—an extensive and important national resource. In Wright, J. F., D. W. Sutcliffe & M. T. Furse (eds), Assessing the Biological Quality of Freshwaters. RIVPACS and Other Techniques. Freshwater Biological Association, Cumbria: 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, G. R., M. T. Barbour, J. B. Stribling, J. Gerritsen & J. R. Karr, 1996. Biological criteria: technical guidance for streams and small rivers (revised edition). EPA 822-B-96-001. USEPA Office of Water, Washington DC.

  • Hering, D., A. Buffagni, O. Moog, L. Sandin, M. Sommerhäuser, I. Stubauer, C. Feld, R. K. Johnson, P. Pinto, N. Skoulikidis, P. F. M. Verdonschot & S. Zahrádková, 2003. The development of a system to assess the ecological quality of streams based on macroinvertebrates-design of the sampling programme within the AQEM project. International Review of Hydrobiology 88: 345–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hering, D., O. Moog, L. Sandin & P. F. M. Verdonschot, 2004. Overview and application of the AQEM assessment system. Hydrobiologia 516: 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R. M., 1995. Defining acceptable biological status by comparing with reference conditions. In Davis, W. S. & T. P. Simon (eds), Biological Assessment and Criteria: Tools for Water Resource Planning and Decision Making. Lewis Publishers, Ann Arbor, Michigan: 31–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavanagh, P., R.Walsh & A. Walsh, 2006. Further characterisation of small streams and development of a new small stream risk score (SSRS) project output report. ESB International Limited: 46.

  • Kelly-Quinn, M., C. Bradley, I. Dodkins, T.J. Harrington, B. Ní Chathain, M. O’Connor, B. Rippey & D. Trigg, 2005. Water framework directive—characterisation of reference conditions and testing of typology of rivers (2002-W-LS-7). Final Report for the Environmental Protection Agency, Ireland: 1–49.

  • Kelly-Quinn, M., D. Murray, C. Bradley & D. Tierney, 2002. The biological integrity of aquatic systems—a perspective on invertebrates. In Convery, F. & J. Feehan (eds), Achievement and Challenge: Rio+ 10 and Ireland. The Environmental Institute, University College Dublin.

  • Lenat, D. R. & D. L. Penrose, 1996. History of the EPT taxa richness metric. Bulletin of the North American Benthological Society 13: 305–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linke, S., R. C. Bailey & J. Schwindt, 1999. Temporal variability of stream bioassessments using benthic macroinvertebrtares. Freshwater Biology 42: 575–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, A., D. Hering, C. K. Feld & P. Rolauffs, 2004. A new method for assessing the impact of hydromorphological degradation on the macroinvertebrate fauna of five German stream types. Hydrobiologia 516: 107–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucey, J., J. J. Bowman, K. J. Clabby, P. Cunningham, M. Lehane, M. MacCárthaigh, M. L. McGarrigle & P. F. Toner, 1999. Water Quality in Ireland. Environmental Protection Agency, Wexford.

  • McGarrigle, M. L. & J. Lucey, 1983. Biological monitoring in freshwaters. Irish Journal of Environmental Science 2: 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarrigle, M. L., J. J. Bowman, K. J. Clabby, J. Lucey, M. Cunningham, M. MacCarthaigh, M. Keegan, B. Cantrell, M. Lehane, C. Clenaghan & P. F. Toner, 2002. Water quality in Ireland 1998_/2000. Environmental Protection Agency, Wexford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. L., D. L. Strayer, J. B. Wallace, S. L. Eggert, G. S. Helfman & N. E. Leonard, 2007. The contribution of headwater streams to biodiversity in river networks. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 43: 86–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minshall, G. W. & J. N. Minshall, 1977. Microdistribution of benthic invertebrates in a rocky mountain stream. Hydrobiologia 55: 231–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minshall, G. W., R. C. Petersen & C. F. Nimz, 1985. Species richness in streams of different size from the same drainage basin. American Naturalist 125: 16–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstadt, P., H. H. Otter & H. W. Bohle, 1991. Zur Faunistik kliener Waldbache im Gladenbach-Biendenkopfer Bergland westlich von Marburg. Die Trichopteran des Grubenbachs. Hessiche Faunistische Briefe 11: 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P. M., 1978. The temporal variability in biotic indices. Environmetal Pollution 17: 227–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Water Council, 1981. River Quality: the 1980 Survey and Future Outlook, London, National Water Council.

  • Newbury, R. W., 1984. Hydrologic determinants of aquatic insect habitats. In Resh, V. H. & D. M. Rosenberg (eds), The Ecology of Aquatic Insects. Praeger, New York, NY: 323–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijboer, R., 2004. The ecological requirements of Agapetus fuscipes Curtis (Glossosomatidae), a characteristic species in unimpacted streams. Limnologica 34: 213–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijboer, R. C., R. K. Johnson, P. F. M. Verdonschot, M. Sommerhauser & A. Buffagni, 2004. Establishing reference conditions for European streams. Hydrobiologia 516: 91–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod, S. J., S. D. Rundle, E. Clare Lloyd & A. A. Douglas, 1993. The influence of riparian management on the habitat structure and macroinvertbrate communities of upland streams draining plantation forests. Journal of Applied Ecology 30: 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrin, Z., H. Laudon & B. Malmqvist, 2007. Does freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity along pH-gradient reflect adaptation to low pH? Freshwater Biology 52: 2172–2183.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Plafkin, J. L., M. T. Barbour, K. D. Porter, S. K. Gross, & R. M. Hughes. 1989. Rapid bioassessment protocols for streams and rivers: benthic macroinvertebrates and fish. United States Environemtal Protection Agency EPA/444/4-89-001.

  • Rapp, L., 2001. Critical loads of acid deposition for surface water, exploring existing models and a potential alternative for Sweden. Ph.D. thesis. Swedish University of Agriculture Science, Uppsala, Sweden.

  • Reece, P. F. & J. S. Richardson, 1999. Biomonitoring with the reference condition approach for the detection of aquatic ecosystems at risk. Proceedings of a Conference on the Biology and Management of Species and Habitats at Risk 2: 549–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renberg, I., T. Korsman & N. J. Anderson, 1993. A temporal perspective of lake acidification in Sweden. Ambio 22: 264–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resh, V. H. & J. K. Jackson, 1993. Rapid assesment approaches to biomonitoring. In Rosenberg, D. M. & V. H. Resh (eds), Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Chapman and Hall, New York: 195–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynoldson, T. B. & J. F. Wright, 2000. The reference condition: problems and solutions. In Wright, J. F., D. W. Sutcliffe & M. T. Furse (eds), Assessing the Biological Quality of Fresh Waters: RIVPACS and Other Techniques. Freshwater Biological Association: 293–303.

  • Rosenberg, D. M. & V. H. Resh, 1993. Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Chapman & Hall, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandin, L. & D. Hering, 2004. Comparing macroinvertebrate indices to detect organic pollution across Europe: a contribution to the EC Water Framework Directive intercalibration. Hydrobiologia 516: 55–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Skriver, J., N. Friberg & J. Kirkegaard, 2000. Biological assessment of running waters in Denmark: introduction of the Danish Stream Fauna Index. International Association of Theoretical and Applied Limnology 27: 1822–1830.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C., M. Good, J. F. Murphy, P. S. Giller & J. O’Halloran, 2000. Life-history patterns and spatial and temporal overlap in an assemblage of lotic Plecoptera in the Araglin catchment study area, Ireland. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 150: 117–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, D., M. Kelly-Quinn & J. J. Bracken, 1998. The faunal communities of upland streams in the eastern region of Ireland with reference to afforestation impacts. Hydrobiologia 389: 115–130.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vannote, R. L., G. W. Minshall, K. W. Cummins, J. R. Sedell & C. E. Cushing, 1980. The river continuum concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37: 130–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ventura, M. & D. Harper, 1996. The impacts of acid precipitation mediated by geology and forestry upon upland stream invertebrate communities. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 138: 161–173.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, G., J. I. Jones & A. G. Hildrew, 2002. Community persistence in broadstone stream (U.K.) over three decades. Freshwater Biology 47: 1419–1435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J., 1995. Development and use of a system predicting the macroinvertebrate fauna in flowing waters. Australian Journal of Ecology 20: 181–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamora-Muňoz, C., C. E. Sáinz-Cantero, A. Sánchez-Ortega & J. Alba-Tercedor, 1995. Are biological indices BMWP’ and ASPT’ and their significance regarding water quality seasonally dependent? Factors explaining their variations. Water Research 29: 285–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank The Heritage Council for the funding support under the wildlife grant scheme 2004. Thanks are also due to several colleagues for their support during field sampling and particularly Róisin Lyons for her assistance in the sorting process, and to the landowners for facilitating access to the sampling sites. Comments on drafts of this manuscript from Martin McGarrigle and Catherine Bradley are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Callanan.

Additional information

Handling editor: R. Bailey

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Callanan, M., Baars, JR. & Kelly-Quinn, M. Critical influence of seasonal sampling on the ecological quality assessment of small headwater streams. Hydrobiologia 610, 245–255 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-008-9439-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-008-9439-4

Keywords

Navigation