Skip to main content
Log in

A Novel Trapezoidal Bipolar Fuzzy TOPSIS Method for Group Decision-Making

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this research article, the notions of bipolar fuzzy numbers, trapezoidal bipolar fuzzy numbers, triangular bipolar fuzzy numbers and bipolar fuzzy linguistic variables are introduced. Ranking function on the set of all bipolar fuzzy numbers, and the expressions for the ranking of trapezoidal and triangular bipolar fuzzy numbers are derived. A group decision making method based on trapezoidal bipolar fuzzy TOPSIS method is proposed, and the implementation of the proposed method in the selection of best project proposal is presented. Finally, a theoretical comparison of the proposed trapezoidal bipolar fuzzy TOPSIS method with other multi-criteria decision making methods such as TOPSIS, bipolar fuzzy TOPSIS and bipolar fuzzy ELECTRE I is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akram M (2011) Bipolar fuzzy graphs. Inf Sci 181:5548–5564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M (2013) Bipolar fuzzy graphs with applications. Knowl Based Syst 39:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Alshehri NO, Davvaz B, Ashraf A (2016) Bipolar fuzzy digraphs in decision support systems. J Mult Valued Log Soft Comput 27(5–6):531–551

    Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Adeel A (2016) m-Polar fuzzy labeling graphs with application. Math Comput Sci 10(3):387–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Adeel A, Alcantud JCR (2019) Group decision-making methods based on hesitant \(N\)-soft sets. Expert Syst Appl 115:95–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Feng F, Borumand Saeid A, Fotea V (2017) A new multiple criteria decision-making method based on bipolar fuzzy soft graphs. Iran J Fuzzy Syst 15(4):73–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Waseem N (2018) Novel applications of bipolar fuzzy graphs to decision making problems. J Appl Math Comput 56(1–2):73–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alghamdi MA, Alshehri NO, Akram M (2018) Multi-criteria decision-making methods in bipolar fuzzy environment. Int J Fuzzy Syst 20(6):2057–2064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellman RE, Zadeh LA (1970) Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Manag Sci 4(17):141–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benayoun R, Roy B, Sussman N (1966) Manual de Reference du Programme Electre. Note de Synthese et Formation, No. 25 Direction Scientific SEMA Paris, France

  • Boran FE, Gen S, Kurt M, Akay D (2009) A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method. Expert Syst Appl 36(8):11363–11368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burillo P, Bustince H, Mohedano V (1994) Some definition of intuitionistic fuzzy number. Fuzzy based expert systems, fuzzy Bulgarian enthusiasts, Sofia, Bulgaria, 28–30

  • Chang SS, Zadeh LA (1972) On fuzzy mapping and control. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 2(1):30–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CT (2000) Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1(114):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen TY, Tsao CY (2008) The interval-valued fuzzy TOPSIS method and experimental analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst 159(11):1410–1428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu TC (2002) Selecting plant location via a fuzzy TOPSIS approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 20(11):859–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu TC (2002) Facility location selection using fuzzy TOPSIS under group decisions. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl Based Syst 10(6):687–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dey PP, Pramanik S, Giri BC (2016) TOPSIS for solving multi-attribute decision making problems under bipolar neutrosophic environment. In: Smarandache F, Pramanik S (eds) New trends in neutrosophic theory and applications. Pons Editions, Brussels, pp 65–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Methods for multiple attribute decision-making. In: Fandel G, Trockel W (eds) Multiple attribute decision making. Springer, Berlin, pp 58–191

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi D, Kumar S (2014) Intuitionistic fuzzy entropy and distance measure based TOPSIS method for multi-criteria decision making. Egypt Inf J 15:97–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KM (2000) Bipolar-valued fuzzy sets and their operations. In: Proceheeding the international conference on intelligent technologies, Bangkok, Thailand, pp 307–312

  • Li DF, Nan JX (2011) Extension of the TOPSIS for muti-attribute group decision making under atanassov IFS environments. Int J Fuzzy Syst Appl 1(4):47–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roszkowska E, Wachowicz T (2015) Application of fuzzy TOPSIS to scoring the negotiation offers in ill-structured negotiation problems. Eur J Oper Res 242(3):920–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roszkowska E (2011) Multi-criteria decision making models by applying the TOPSIS method to crisp and interval data. Mult Crit Decis Mak Univ Econ Katow 6:200–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarwar M, Akram M (2017a) Novel concepts of bipolar fuzzy competition graphs. J Appl Math Comput 54:511–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarwar M, Akram M (2017b) Certain algorithms for computing strength of competition in bipolar fuzzy graphs. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl Based Syst 25(6):877–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selvachandran G, Salleh AR (2014) Intuitionistic fuzzy linguistic variables and intuitionistic fuzzy hedges. Far East J Math Sci 95(2):221–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Xia M, Xu Z, Chen N (2013) Some hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators with their application in group decision making. Group Decis Negot 22:259–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1975a) Fuzzy logic and approximate reasoning. Synthese 30(3–4):407–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1975b) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I. Inf Sci 8(3):199–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang WR (1994) Bipolar fuzzy sets and relations. A computational framework for cognitive modeling and multiagent decision analysis. In: Proceedings of IEEE conference fuzzy information processing society biannual conference, pp 305–309

  • Zhang WR (1996) NPN fuzzy sets and NPN qualitative algebra: A computational framework for bipolar cognitive modeling and multiagerit decision analysis. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet Part B Cybern 26(4):561–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang WR (1998) Bipolar fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Syste Proc IEEE World Congr Comput Intell 1:835–840

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Li KW, Wang ZJ (2017) Prioritization and aggregation of intuitionistic preference relations: a multiplicative-transitivity-based transformation from intuitionistic judgment data to priority weights. Group Decis Negot 26:409–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are highly thankful to the Associate Editor, and the anonymous referees for their valuable comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Akram.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest regarding the publication of the research article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akram, M., Arshad, M. A Novel Trapezoidal Bipolar Fuzzy TOPSIS Method for Group Decision-Making. Group Decis Negot 28, 565–584 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-018-9606-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-018-9606-6

Keywords

Navigation