Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Experimental test on public information use in the colonial Lesser Kestrel

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The formation of colonies and the evolution of coloniality have been suggested to be a by-product of the use of public information to select breeding habitats. In this study we performed an experimental test to investigate whether the Lesser Kestrel (Falco naumanni) uses breeding success of conspecifics as a source of public information to select a breeding colony. We considered four potential cues based on reproductive performance of conspecifics in each colony: mean and variance of breeding success measured in both all pairs (TRS, total reproductive success), and only successful pairs (PRS, partial reproductive success). Both mean PRS and mean TRS could be predictive cues of the future reproductive output at a given site, because they varied among colonies and were autocorrelated from one year to the next. To dissociate any relationship between habitat quality and reproductive success we manipulated the mean brood sizes by transferring chicks among ten colonies. In five colonies, all the broods with at least two nestlings were reduced in one chick and in other five colonies all broods were enlarged by one chick. In the following year, we found that the number of adult immigrant kestrels settled at a colony was only explained by mean PRS in the previous year. We also examined the settlement of yearlings, which lack of information on breeding success in previous years. Unlike adult immigrant kestrels, yearlings tended to settle more frequently in those colonies with low mean PRS in the previous year, probably because of the lower pressure for occupation in those colonies. A multiple regression analysis showed that the growth of colonies was positively dependent on the mean PRS in the experimental year, and negatively on the number of predated nests. This study provides a solid support to the hypothesis that colonial species can use mean breeding success of successful pairs as a source of public information to make settlement decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aparicio JM (1997) Costs and benefits of surplus offspring in the Lesser Kestrel (Falco naumanni). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 41:129–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aparicio JM, Bonal R (2002) Effects of food supplementation and habitat selection on timing of Lesser Kestrel breeding. Ecology 83:873–877

    Google Scholar 

  • Aparicio JM, Cordero PJ (2001) The effects of the minimum threshold condition for breeding on offspring sex ratio adjustment in the Lesser Kestrel. Evolution 55:1188–1197

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boulinier T, Danchin E (1997) The use of conspecific reproductive success for breeding patch selection in territorial migratory species. Evol Ecol 11:505–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulinier T, Danchin E, Monnat J-Y, Doutrelant C, Cadiou B (1996) Timing of prospecting and the value of information in a colonial breeding bird. J Avian Biol 27:252–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyce MS, Perrins CM (1987) Optimizing great tit clutch size in a fluctuating environment. Ecology 68:142–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks R (1998) The importance of mate copying and cultural inheritance of mating preferences. Trends Ecol Evol 13:45–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown CR, Brown MB (1996) Coloniality in the cliff swallow. The effect of group size on social behavior. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown CR, Brown MB, Danchin E (2000) Breeding habitat selection in cliff swallows: the effect of conspecific reproductive success on colony choice. J Anim Ecol 69:133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown CR, Stutchbury BJ, Walsh PD (1990) Choice of colony size in birds. Trends Ecol Evol 12:398–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coolen I, van Bergen Y, Day RL, Laland KN (2003) Species difference in adaptive use of public information in sticklebacks. Proc R Soc Lond B, 270:2413–2419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danchin E., Boulinier T, Massot M (1998) Conspecific reproductive success and breeding habitat selection: implications for the study of coloniality. Ecology 79:2415–2428

    Google Scholar 

  • Danchin E, Giraldeau L-A, Valone TJ, Wagner RH (2004) Public information: from nosy neighbors to cultural evolution. Science 305:487–491

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Danchin E, Wagner RH (1997) The evolution of coloniality: the emergence of new perspectives. Trends Ecol Evol 12:342–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeWitt TJ (1997) Optimizing clutch size in birds. Trends Ecol Evol 12:342–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doligez B, Danchin E, Clobert J (2002) Public information and breeding habitat selection in a wild bird population population. Science 297:1168–1170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doligez B, Pärt T, Danchin E (2004) Prospecting in the Collared Flycatcher: gathering public information for future breeding habitat selection? Anim Behav 67:457–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donázar JA, Negro JJ, Hiraldo F (1991) A note on the adoption of alien young by Lesser Kestrel Falco naumanni. Ardea 79:443–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugatkin LA (1992) Sexual selection and imitation: females copy the mate choice of others. Am Nat 139:1384–1389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durell SEAL, Goss-Custard JD, Stillman RA, West AD (2001) The effect of weather and density-dependence on Oystercatcher Haematopus ostralegus winter mortality. Ibis 143:498–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Erwin RM, Nichols JD, Eyler TB, Scotts DB, Truitt BR (1998) Modelling colony-site dynamics: a case study of gull-billed terns (Sterna nilotica) in coastal Virginia. Auk 115:970–978

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes LS (1991) Insurance offspring and brood reduction in variable environment: the cost and benefits of pessimism. Oikos 62:325–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franco A, Andrada J (1974) Alimentación y selección de presa en Falco naumanni. Ardeola 23:137–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson RM, Höglund J (1992) Copying and sexual selection. Trends Ecol Evol 7:229–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giraldeau L-A, Valone TJ, Templeton JJ (2002) Potential disadvantages of using socially acquired information. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 357:1559–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko H, Harris MP, Wanless S (2004) Competition for breeding sites and site-dependent population regulation in a highly colonial seabird, the Common Guillemot Uria aalge. J Anim Ecol 73:367–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosciuch KL, Langerhans RB (2004) Evolution of coloniality via commodity selection: what about variance? Auk 121:257–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP (1987) Advantages and disadvantages of coloniality in the Swallow, Hirundo rustica. Anim Behav 35:819–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohaghan P, Nager RG (1997) Why don´t birds lay more eggs? Trends Ecol Evol 12:270–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy MT (2000) Evolution of clutch size in the Eastern Kingbird: test of alternative hypotheses. Ecol Monogr 70:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negro JJ, Hiraldo F, Donázar JA (1997) Causes of natal dispersal in the Lesser Kestrel: inbreeding avoidance or resource competition? J Anim Ecol 66:640–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordell SE, Valone TJ (1998) Mate choice copying as public information. Ecol Lett 1:74–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pärt T, Doligez B (2003) Gathering public information for habitat selection: prospecting birds cue on parental activity. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:1809–1813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam HR, Caraco T (1984) Living in groups: is there an optimal group size? In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach, 2nd edn. Blackwell Scientific Oxford, UK, pp 122–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Schjørring S, Gregersen J, Bregnballe T (1999) Prospecting enhances breeding success of first time breeders in the Great Cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo sinensis. Anim Behav 57:647–654

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sergio F, Penteriani V (2005) Public information and territory establishment in a loosely colonial raptor. Ecology 86:340–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serrano D, Forero M, Donázar JA, Tella JL (2004) Dispersal and social attraction affect colony selection and dynamics of lesser kestrels. Ecology 85:3438–3447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serrano D., Tella JL, Forero MG, Donazar JA (2001) Factors affecting breeding dispersal in the facultatively colonial lesser kestrel: individual experience vs. conspecific cues. J Anim Ecol 70:568–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serrano D, Tella JL, Donázar JA, Pomarol M (2003) Social and individual features affecting natal dispersal in the colonial Lesser Kestrel. Ecology 84:3044–3054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamps JA (1988) Conspecific attraction and aggregation in territorial species. Am Nat 131:329–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamps JA (2001) Habitat selection by dispersers: integrating proximate and ultimate approaches. In: Clobert J, Danchin E, Dhondt AA, Nichols JD (eds) Dispersal. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 230–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Suryan RM, Irons DB (2001) Colony and population dynamics of black-legged kittiwakes in a heterogeneous environment. Auk 118:636–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tella JL, Forero MG, Donázar JA, Negro JJ, Hiraldo F (1997) Non-adaptive adoptions of nestlings in the colonial Lesser Kestrel: proximote causes and fitness consequences. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 265:253–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Templeton JJ, Giraldeau L-A (1996) Vicarious sampling: the use of personal and public information by starling foraging in a simple patchy environment. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 38:105–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thirgood SJ, Redpath SM, Rothery P, Aebischer NJ (2000) Raptor predation and population limitation in red grouse. J Anim Ecol 69:504–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valone TJ (1989) Group foraging, public information, and patch estimation. Oikos 56:357–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valone TJ, Templeton JJ (2002) Public information for the assessment of quality: a widespread social phenomenon. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 357:1549–1557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner RH, Danchin E (2003) Conspecific copying: a general mechanism of social aggregation. Anim Behav 65:405–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner RH, Danchin E, Boulinier T, Helfenstein H (2000) Colonies as by products of commodity selection. Behav Ecol 11:572–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield DP (2003a) Density-dependent mortality of wintering Dunlins Calidris alpina through predation by Eurasian Sparrowhawks Accipiter nisus. Ibis 145:432–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield DP (2003b) Predation by Eurasian sparrowhawks produces density-dependent mortality of wintering redshanks. J Anim Ecol 72:27–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittenberger JF, Hunt GL (1985) The adaptive significance of coloniality in birds. In: Farner DS, King JR (eds) Avian biology, vol.8. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 1–78

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are in debt with Grupo Ornitológico de Alcazar, and especially with José Luis Hernández and Carlos Torralvo for their help in several aspects of field work. Lorenzo Marchante and other owners allowed us the access to their field houses. La Dirección General de Medio Natural de la Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha authorized to trap lesser kestrels and carry out this study. We acknowledge to two anonymous referees for their useful comments and improvement of an earlier version of the manuscript. This study was supported by Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología (project REN 2002–03295). RB and AM were supported by fellowships from the La Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Grupo de Investigación de la Biodiversidad Genética y Cultural, Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos, IREC, (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM), Grupo de Investigación en Ecología de la Biodiversidad y Conservación, Ronda de Toledo s/n, E-13005, Ciudad Real, Spain

    José Miguel Aparicio

  2. Departamento de Ciencias Ambientales, Facultad de Ciencias del Medio Ambiente, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, E-45071, Toledo, Spain

    Raúl Bonal & Alberto Muñoz

Authors
  1. José Miguel Aparicio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Raúl Bonal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alberto Muñoz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Miguel Aparicio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aparicio, J.M., Bonal, R. & Muñoz, A. Experimental test on public information use in the colonial Lesser Kestrel. Evol Ecol 21, 783–800 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-006-9151-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-006-9151-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation