Abstract
A number of swimming microorganisms, such as ciliates (Opalina) and multicellular colonies of flagellates (Volvox), are approximately spherical in shape and swim using beating arrays of cilia or short flagella covering their surfaces. Their physical actuation on the fluid may be mathematically modeled as the generation of surface velocities on a continuous spherical surface—a model known in the literature as squirming, which has been used to address various aspects of the biological physics of locomotion. Previous analyses of squirming assumed axisymmetric fluid motion and hence required all swimming kinematics to take place along a line. In this paper we generalize squirming to three spatial dimensions. We derive analytically the flow field surrounding a spherical squirmer with arbitrary surface motion and use it to derive its three-dimensional translational and rotational swimming kinematics. We then use our results to physically interpret the flow field induced by the swimmer in terms of fundamental flow singularities up to terms decaying spatially as \({\sim } 1/r^3\). Our results will make it possible to develop new models in biological physics, in particular in the area of hydrodynamic interactions and collective locomotion.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brennen C, Winet H (1977) Fluid mechanics of propulsion by cilia and flagella. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 9:339–398
Vogel S (1996) Life in moving fluids: the physical biology of flow, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Bray D (2000) Cell movements. Garland Publishing, New York
Guasto JS, Rusconi R, Stocker R (2012) Hydrodynamic phenomena in suspensions of swimming microorganisms. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 44:373–400
Lauga E, Powers T (2009) The hydrodynamics of swimming microorganisms. Rep Prog Phys 72:096601
Purcell EM (1977) Life at low Reynolds number. Am J Phys 45:3–11
Ishimoto K, Yamada M (2012) A coordinate-based proof of the scallop theorem. SIAM J Appl Math 72(5):1686–1694
Tamm SL (1972) Ciliary motion in Paramecium: a scanning electron microscope study. J Cell Biol 55:250–255
Solari CA, Ganguly S, Kessler JO, Michod RE, Goldstein RE (2006) Multicellularity and the functional interdependence of motility and molecular transport. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(5):1353–1358
Fauci LJ, Dillon R (2006) Biofluidmechanics of reproduction. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 38:371–394
Galajda P, Keymer J, Chaikin P, Austin R (2007) A wall of funnels concentrates swimming bacteria. J Bacteriol 189(23):8704–8707
Di Leonardo R, Angelani L, DellArciprete D, Ruocco G, Iebba V, Schippa S, Conte MP, Mecarini F, De Angelis F, Di Fabrizio E (2010) Bacterial ratchet motors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(21):9541–9545
Denissenko P, Kantsler V, Smith DJ, Kirkman-Brown J (2012) Human spermatozoa migration in microchannels reveals boundary-following navigation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(21):8007–8010
Lauga E (2007) Propulsion in a viscoelastic fluid. Phys Fluids 19(8):083104
Fu HC, Powers TR, Wolgemuth HC (2007) Theory of swimming filaments in viscoelastic media. Phys Rev Lett 99:258101
Shen XN, Arratia PE (May 2011) Undulatory swimming in viscoelastic fluids. Phys Rev Lett 106:208101
Liu B, Powers TR, Breuer KS (2011) Force-free swimming of a model helical flagellum in viscoelastic fluids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(49):19516–19520
Pratt LA, Kolter R (1998) Genetic analysis of escherichia coli biofilm formation: roles of flagella, motility, chemotaxis and type I pili. Mol Microbiol 2:285–293
Lemon KP, Higgins DE, Kolter R (2007) Flagellar motility is critical for listeria monocytogenes biofilm formation. J Bacteriol 189(12):4418–4424
Houry A, Briandet R, Aymerich S, Gohar M (2010) Involvement of motility and flagella in bacillus cereus biofilm formation. Microbiology 156(4):1009–1018
Berke AP, Turner L, Berg HC, Lauga E (2008) Hydrodynamic attraction of swimming microorganisms by surfaces. Phys Rev Lett 101:038102
Ramaswamy S (2010) The mechanics and statistics of active matter. Annu Rev Condens Matter Phys 1:323–345
Koch DL, Subramanian G (2011) Collective hydrodynamics of swimming microorganisms: living fluids. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 43:637–659
Berg HC (1993) Random walks in biology. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Howse JR, Jones RAL, Ryan AJ, Gough T, Vafabakhsh R, Golestanian R (2007) Self-motile colloidal particles: from directed propulsion to random walk. Phys Rev Lett 99:048102
Romanczuk P, Bär M, Ebeling W, Lindner B, Schimansky-Geier L (2012) Active brownian particles: from individual to collective stochastic dynamics. Eur Phys J Spec Top 202:1–162
Ebbens SJ, Howse JR (2010) In pursuit of propulsion at the nanoscale. Soft Matter 6:726–738
Nelson BJ, Kaliakatsos IK, Abbott JJ (2010) Microrobots for minimally invasive medicine. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 12:55–85
Taylor GI (1951) Analysis of the swimming of microscopic organisms. Proc R Soc Lond A 209(1099):447–461
Reynolds AJ (1965) The swimming of minute organisms. J Fluid Mech 23:241–260
Katz DF (1974) On the propulsion of micro-organisms near solid boundaries. J Fluid Mech 64:33–49
Balmforth NJ, Coombs D, Pachmann S (2010) Microelastohydrodynamics of swimming organisms near solid boundaries in complex fluids. Q J Mech Appl Math 63(3):267–294
Gray J, Hancock GJ (1955) The propulsion of sea-urchin spermatozoa. J Exp Biol 32(4):802–814
Cox RG (1970) The motion of long slender bodies in a viscous fluids: I. general theory. J Fluid Mech 44:791–810
Batchelor GK (1970) Slender body theory for particles of arbitrary cross section in stokes flow. J Fluid Mech 44:419–440
Chwang AT, Wu TY (1971) A note on the helical movement of micro-organisms. Proc R Soc Lond B 178:327–346
Keller JB, Rubinow SI (1976) Swimming of flagellated microorganisms. Biophys J 16:151–170
Johnson RE (1980) An improved slender-body theory for stokes flow. J Fluid Mech 99:411–431
Pedley TJ, Kessler JO (1992) Hydrodynamic phenomena in suspensions of swimming microorganisms. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 24:313–358
Lighthill MJ (1952) On the squirming motion of nearly spherical deformable bodies through liquids at very small Reynolds numbers. Commun Pure Appl Math 109:109–118
Blake JR (1971) A spherical envelop approach to ciliary propulsion. J Fluid Mech 46:199–208
Ishikawa T, Simmonds MP, Pedley TJ (2006) Hydrodynamic interaction of two swimming model micro-organisms. J Fluid Mech 568:119–160
Drescher K, Leptos KC, Tuval I, Ishikawa T, Pedley TJ, Goldstein RE (Apr 2009) Dancing Volvox: hydrodynamic bound states of swimming algae. Phys Rev Lett 102:168101
Ishikawa T, Simmonds MP, Pedley TJ (2007) The rheology of a semi-dilute suspension of swimming model micro-organisms. J Fluid Mech 588:399–435
Ishikawa T, Pedley TJ (2007) Diffusion of swimming model micro-organisms in a semi-dilute suspension. J Fluid Mech 588:437–462
Magar V, Goto T, Pedley TJ (2003) Nutrient uptake by a self-propelled steady squirmer. Q J Mech. Appl Math 56:65–91
Magar V, Pedley TJ (2005) Average nutrient uptake by a self-propelled unsteady squirmer. J Fluid Mech 539:93–112
Michelin S, Lauga E (2011) Optimal feeding is optimal swimming for all Péclet numbers. Phys Fluids 23(10):101901
Michelin S, Lauga E (2010) Efficiency optimization and symmetry-breaking in a model of ciliary locomotion. Phys Fluids 22(11):111901
Zhu L, Do-Quang M, Lauga E, Brandt L (2011) Locomotion by tangential deformation in a polymeric fluid. Phys Rev E 83:011901
Zhu L, Lauga E, Brandt L (2012) Self-propulsion in viscoelastic fluids: Pushers vs. pullers. Phys Fluids 24(5):051902
Wang S, Ardekani A (2012) Inertial squirmer. Phys Fluids 24(10):101902
Stone HA, Samuel ADT (1996) Propulsion of microorganisms by surface distortions. Phys Rev Lett 77:4102–4104
Drescher K, Goldstein RE, Tuval I (2010) Fidelity of adaptive phototaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(25):11171–11176
Lamb H (1932) Hydrodynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Brenner H (1964) The Stokes resistance of a slightly deformed sphere. Chem Eng Sci 19:519–539
Happel J, Brenner H (1973) Low Reynolds number hydrodynamics: with special applications to particulate media. Noordhoff International Publishing, Leyden
Kim S, Karilla JS (1991) Microhydrodynamics: principles and selected applications. Dover, New York
Abramowitz M, Stegun IA (1965) Handbook of mathematical functions: with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables. Dover, New York
Jeffrey A, Zwillinger D (2007) Table of integrals, series, and products. Academic Press, California
Drescher K, Goldstein RE, Michel N, Nicolas M, Tuval I (2010) Fidelity of adaptive phototaxis. Phys Rev Lett 105:168101
Batchelor GK (1970) The stress system in a suspension of force-free particles. J Fluid Mech 41:545–570
Lighthill J (1975) Mathematical biofluiddynamics. SIAM, Philadelphia
Childress S (1981) Mechanics of swimming and flying. Cambridge University Press, New York
Kim MJ, Breuer KS (2004) Enhanced diffusion due to motile bacteria. Phys Fluids 16(9):L78–L81
Turner L, Ryu WS, Berg HC (2000) Real-time imaging of fluorescent flagellar filaments. J Bacteriol 182:2793–2801
Spagnolie SE, Lauga E (2012) Hydrodynamics of self-propulsion near a boundary: predictions and accuracy of far-field approximations. J Fluid Mech 700:105–147
Acknowledgments
Funding from the US National Science Foundation (Grant CBET-0746285 to E.L.) and the Croucher Foundation (through a fellowship to O.S.P.) is gratefully acknowledged. The authors also wish to thank the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of California, San Diego where this work was initiated.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix A: Fundamental flow singularities in spherical coordinates
1.1 Stokeslets
The solution to Stokes equations due to a point force \(f \varvec{\alpha } \delta ({\mathbf {r}})\) of magnitude \(f\), and the direction \(\varvec{\alpha }\) at the origin is given by \({\mathbf {u}}= f {\mathbf {G}}(\varvec{\alpha })/ (8\pi \eta )\), where the vectorial representation of a Stokeslet is given by Eq. (36) in the main text.
Note that \(\varvec{\alpha }\) denotes the direction of the Stokeslet. Stokeslets in different Cartesian directions are expressed in spherical coordinates as
1.2 A general Stokes dipole
A general force dipole is obtained by taking the derivative of a Stokeslet along the direction of interest. The vectorial representation of a force dipole is given by Eq. (44) in the main text, where \(\varvec{\alpha }\) and \(\varvec{\beta }\) denote respectively the direction of the Stokeslet and the direction along which the derivative is taken. The expressions of Stokes dipoles of different configurations in spherical coordinates are given by
1.3 Stresslets
The vectorial representation of a stresslet is given by Eq. (45) in the main text, where \(\varvec{\alpha }\) and \(\varvec{\beta }\) denote respectively the direction of the Stokeslet and the direction along which the derivative is taken. The expressions of stresslets of different configurations in spherical coordinates are given by
1.4 Rotlets
The vectorial representation of a rotlet is given by Eq. (46) in the main text, where \(\varvec{\zeta } = \varvec{\beta } \times \varvec{\alpha }\) denotes the direction of the rotlet. The expressions of rotlets in different directions in spherical coordinates are given by
1.5 A general Stokes quadrupole
A higher-order singularity, the force quadrupole, is obtained by taking the derivative of a force dipole along different directions and is given by Eq. (50) in the main text, where \(\varvec{\beta }, \varvec{\gamma }\) are the directions along which each derivative is taken. The expressions of Stokes quadrupoles of different configurations in spherical coordinates are given by
1.6 Potential dipoles
The vectorial representation of a potential (source) dipole is given by Eq. (52) in the main text, where \(\varvec{\alpha }\) denotes the direction of the dipole. The expressions of potential dipoles in different directions in spherical coordinates are given by
1.7 Rotlet dipoles
One can take a derivative of a rotlet to obtain a rotlet dipole, which is given by Eq. (56) in the main text, where \(\varvec{\zeta }\) and \(\varvec{\gamma }\) denote respectively the direction of the rotlet and the direction along which the derivative is taken. The expressions of rotlet dipoles of different configurations in spherical coordinates are given by
Appendix B: Swimming of a squirmer with radial deformation
In the main text, we considered squirmers with a purely tangential deformation. In this appendix, we complement these results by addressing the case of squirmers also undergoing radial deformation. The results here might also be useful for modeling jet-driven microscopic swimmers, for instance, the locomotion of bacteria expelling slime.
For the axisymmetric case without the restriction to purely tangential deformations, Eq. (19), the solution to the pumping problem reads
with the surface velocities
Without the azimuthal modes \(C_{0n}\), the preceding surface velocities reduce to the form in Lighthill [40] and Blake [41]. However, notice that the coefficients \(A_{0n}\) and \(B_{0n}\) do not correspond directly to the coefficients \(A_n\) and \(B_n\) used in Lighthill [40] and Blake [41], which represent directly the radial and polar modes, respectively. With Lamb’s general solution, the radial and polar modes are represented by a combination of the \(A_{0n}\) and \(B_{0n}\) modes. The relation between the two sets of coefficients is given by
The translational and rotational velocities are computed similarly to Sect. 3.1. Without the restriction to tangential deformation, Eq. (19), the propulsion velocity becomes
while the computation of the rotational velocity is unaffected (Eq. 32).
The flow field around an axisymmetric swimming squirmer is thus given by
The computation of the propulsion speed of a nonaxisymmetric squirmer with radial deformation follows the same procedures as in Sect. 4.1, but without the restriction to tangential deformation, Eq. (19). The propulsion speed is given by
while the expression for the rotational speed remains the same, Eq. (61).
To obtain the overall swimming flow field, we follow the same procedures as in the axisymmetric case. Superimposing Lamb’s general solution in the pumping problem, Eqs. (16)–(17), with the flow fields due to the induced translation and rotation at the velocities determined earlier, we arrive at the flow field surrounding a general swimming squirmer without the assumption of purely tangential deformation:
Appendix C: Rate of work with radial deformation
We now compute the rate of work of a swimmer with a radial deformation. Lengthy calculations allow us to compute the integral from Eq. (76) as
We have again employed Eq. (78) to obtain the preceding result. Despite the presence of cross-terms, it can be shown by algebraic manipulations that the rate of work is positive definite. Removing all the nonaxisymmetric modes and transforming the coefficients with Eqs. (151) and (152), the preceding expression agrees with the results in Blake [41]. For the case of purely tangential deformation, with Eq. (19), the preceding expression reduces to Eq. (77) in the main text.
Appendix D: Squirming with arbitrary surface velocities and radial deformation
Here we allow in the general squirming profile additional radial velocity components of the form \(D_{m} (\theta ), \tilde{D}_m (\theta )\),
and follow the same matching conditions, Eqs. (83) and (84), in order to determine the coefficients \(A_{mn}\), \(\tilde{A}_{mn}\), \(B_{mn}\), \(\tilde{B}_{mn}\), \(C_{mn}\), and \(\tilde{C}_{mn}\) in Lamb’s general solution. The only difference is that we no longer have the purely tangential deformation condition (Eq. 19) and therefore are required to determine \(A_{mn}, \tilde{A}_{mn},B_{mn}, \tilde{B}_{mn}\) such that the radial (Eq. 83) and polar (Eq. 84) matching conditions are satisfied simultaneously. Using the orthogonality of the associated Legendre polynomials and simultaneously solving the equations, we obtain
for \(0\le m \le \infty \) and \(m \le n \ne 0\). When there is no radial deformation, i.e., \(D_m = \tilde{D}_m= 0\), we recover the results without radial deformation (Eqs. 90–93 and 19).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pak, O.S., Lauga, E. Generalized squirming motion of a sphere. J Eng Math 88, 1–28 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-014-9690-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-014-9690-9