Skip to main content
Log in

Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) Tests on Wastewater Treatment Plants with Daphnia magna and Selenastrum capricornutum

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Whole effluent toxicity (WET) tests, with Daphnia magna and Selenastrum capricornutum, were introduced to evaluate the biological toxicities of effluents from the wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in Korea. In WET tests of WWTPs effluents, 33.3% (33/99) for D. magna and 92.6% (75/81) for S. capricornutum revealed greater than 1 toxic unit (TU), even though all the treatment plants investigated were operating in compliance with the regulations, as assessed using conventional monitoring methods (i.e., BOD and total concentration of N or P, etc). There were only minor differences in toxicities according to the types of influents (municipal and agro-industrial) in all treatment plants. However, the effluents treated by an activated sludge treatment process were found to exhibit significantly lower toxicity than those treated by rotating biological contactor (RBC) and extended aeration processes. The seasonal variations in the toxicity were lower in the summer compared to winter, which may have been due to the rainfall received to the sewage intake system during the former period. The impact of WET on river water was also investigated based on the discharge volume. At sites A and B, the total impact of toxicity to stream and river waters was observed to be 70.9% and 90.4% for D. magna and S. capricornutum, respectively. The other four small treatment plants (sites F, G, H and I), with relative discharging volumes between 0.001 and 0.002, contribute less than 1% to the total toxicity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chapman, P. M. (2000). Whole effluent toxicity testing-usefulness, level of protection, and risk assessment. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 19, 3–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cœurdassier, M., de Vaufleury, A., Crini, N., Scheifler, R., & Badot, P. M. (2004). Assessment of whole effluent toxicity on aquatic snails: Bioaccumulation of Cr, Zn, and Fe, and individual effects in bioassay. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24, 198–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oris, J., & Klaine, S. (Eds.) (2000). Annual review: Whole effluent toxicity testing. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 19, 1–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarakinos, H. C., Bermingham, N., Paul, A., White, J. B., & Rasmussen, J. B. (2000). Correspondence between whole effluent toxicity and the presence of priority substances in complex industrial effluents. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 19, 63–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tonkes, M., Graaf, P. J. F., & Graansma, J. (1999). Assessment of complex industrial effluents using a whole effluent toxicity (or WET) approach. Water Science and Technology, 39, 51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1993). Method for Measuring the Acute Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater and Marine Organisms, Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH, EPA/600/4-90/027F.

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2004). National Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) Implementation Guidance under the NPDES Program, EPA 832-B-04-003.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sang Don Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ra, J.S., Kim, H.K., Chang, N.I. et al. Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) Tests on Wastewater Treatment Plants with Daphnia magna and Selenastrum capricornutum . Environ Monit Assess 129, 107–113 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9431-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9431-2

Keywords

Navigation