Skip to main content
Log in

Ecotoxicity test methods and environmental hazard assessment for engineered nanoparticles

  • Published:
Ecotoxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper considers whether current standard ecotoxicity methods are fit for purpose for assessing the hazards of engineered nanoparticles. We conclude that the types of test species and biological endpoints used within standard environmental hazard assessment frameworks are generally appropriate. However, there are areas of considerable uncertainty associated with characterisation of nanoparticle exposure in test systems that apply to all ecotoxicity testing guidelines, except those in which dosing of nanoparticles is oral. These include the way in which the substance is dosed into, and maintained within, the test medium; measurement and characterisation of nanoparticles in the test system; better understanding and reporting of abiotic factors that influence behaviour of nanoparticles in the test medium; and agreement on how dosimetric data should be reported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitken RJ, Tran CL, Donaldson K, Stone V, Cumpson P, Johnstone J, Chaudhry Q, Cash S (2007) Reference materials for engineered nanoparticle toxicology and metrology. Draft Report May 2007 for UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

  • Asuri P, Karajanagi SS, Sellitto E (2006) Water-soluble carbon nanotubes-enzyme conjugates as functional biocatalytic formulations. Biotech Bioeng 95:804–811

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow PG, Donaldson K, MacCallum J, Clouter A, Stone V (2005) Serum exposed to nanoparticle carbon black displays increased potential to induce macrophage migration. Toxicol Lett 155:397–401

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • BAuA (German Federal Institute for Occupational Health and Safety) (2007) Nanotechnology: health and environmental risks of nanoparticles—research strategy. http://www.baua.de/nn_47716/sid_B0AA05CB8FF8141A55EAC94DDDFCC809/nsc_true/de/Themen-von-A-Z/Gefahrstoffe/Nanotechnologie/pdf/draft-research-strategy.pdf

  • BCC report. Nanotechnology: a realistic market assessment (2006) Report highlights. http://www.bccresearch.com/nan/. Accessed 31 Jan 2007

  • Bergeron S, Archambault E (2005) Canadian stewardship practices for environmental nanotechnology. Environment Canada, Science-Metrix Nanotechnology Stewardship. http://science-metrix.com/eng/projects_2005_Nanotechnology_Environment.htm

  • Blanchard J, Grosell M (2006) Copper toxicity across salinities from freshwater to seawater in the euryhaline fish Fundulus heteroclitus: Is copper an ionoregulatory toxicant in high salinities? Aquat Toxicol 80:131–139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boxall ABA, Chaudhry Q, Sinclair C, Jones A, Aitken R, Jefferson B, Watts C (2007) Current and Future Predicted Environmental Exposure to Engineered Nanoparticles. Report to the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Central Science Laboratory, York, UK

  • Chen KA, Elimelech M (2007) Influence of humic acid on the aggregation kinetics of fullerenes (C60) nanoparticles in monovalent and divalent electrolyte solutions. J Colloid Interface Sci 309:126–134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Colvin VL (2003) The potential environmental impact of engineered nanoparticles. Nat Biotechnol 21:1166–1170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crane M, Watts CW, Boucard T (2006) Chronic aquatic environmental risks from exposure to human pharmaceuticals. Sci Total Environ 367:23–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dreher KL (2004) Health and environmental impact of nanotechnology. Toxicol Sci 77:3–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EC (2003) Technical Guidance Document in support of Commission Directive 93/67/EEC on Risk Assessment for new notified substances, Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 on Risk Assessment for existing substances and Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market. European Chemicals Bureau, European Commission, Ispra, Italy

  • EC (2007a) RIP 3.3.2 EWG08 Aquatic (Pelagic) Toxicity. Revised draft 26 October 2006

  • EC (2007b) RIP 3.3.2 EWG ToR Appendix 2. Draft EWG11 Terrestrial_version3.doc. Created 19 February 2007

  • EMEA (2006) Guideline on the environmental risk assessment of medicinal products for human use. European Medicines Evaluation Agency, London, UK. http://www.emea.eu.int/pdfs/human/swp/444700en.pdf

  • Environmental Defense–DuPont Nano Partnership (2007) Nano Risk Framework. Draft 26 February 2007. http://nanoriskframework.com/page.cfm?tagID=1081

  • Federici G, Shaw BJ, Handy RD (2007) Toxicity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles to rainbow trout, (Oncorhynchus mykiss): gill injury, oxidative stress, and other physiological effects. Aquat Toxicol 84:415–430

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fortner JL, Lyon D, Sayer CM, Boyd A, Frehner JG, Hotze EM, Alemann LB, Hughes J (2005) C60 in water: nanocrystal formation and microbial response. Environ Sci Technol 39:4307–4316

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freitas RA (2005) What is nanomedicine? Nanomedicine 1:2–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Galloway TS, Handy RD (2003) Immunotoxicity of organophosphorus pesticides. Ecotoxicology 12:345–363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ham HT, Choi YS, Chung IJ (2005) An explanation of dispersion states of single-walled carbon nanotubes in solvents and aqueous surfactant solutions using solubility parameters. J Colloid Interface Sci 286:216–223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Handy RD, Shaw BJ (2007a) Toxic effects of nanoparticles and nanomaterials: implications for public health, risk assessment and the public perception of nanotechnology. Health Risk Soc 9:125–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handy RD, Shaw BJ (2007b) Ecotoxicity of nanomaterials to fish: Challenges for ecotoxicity testing. Integr Environ Assess Manag 3:458–460

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Handy RD, Van Der Kammer F, Lead JR, Hassellöv M, Owen R, Crane M (2008) The ecotoxicity and chemistry of manufactured nanoparticles. Ecotoxicology 17:287–314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herbert DW, Alabaster JS, Dart MC, Lloyd D (1961) The effect of china-clay wastes on trout streams. Int J Air Water Pollut 5:56–74

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • HMG (2005) Her Majesty’s Government response to the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering Report: nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties, February 2005. http://www.dti.gov.uk/science/science-tech-and-dti/page27229.html

  • Hyung H, Fortner JD, Hughes JB, Kim J-H (2007) Natural organic matter stabilizes carbon nanotubes in the aqueous phase. Environm Sci Technol 41:179–184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DW, Haley MV, Hart GS, Muse WT, Landis WG (1986) Acute toxicity of brass particles to Daphnia magna. J Applied Toxicol 6:225–228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karajanagi SS, Yang HC, Asuri P (2006) Protein-assisted solubilisation of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Langmuir 22:1392–1395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kashiwada S (2006) Distribution of nanoparticles in the see-through medaka (Oryzias latipes). Environ Health Perspect 114:1697–1702

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lead JR, Wilkinson KJ (2006) Aquatic colloids and nanoparticles: current knowledge and future trends. Environ Chem 3:159–171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin Y, Allard LF, Sun YP (2004) Protein-affinity of single-walled carbon nanotubes in water. J Phys Chem B 108:3760–3764

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lovern SB, Klaper RD (2006) Daphnia magna mortality when exposed to titanium nanoparticles and fullerene (C60) nanoparticles. Environ Toxicol Chem 25:1132–1137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Masciangioli T, Zhang W-X (2003) Environmental technologies at the nanoscale. Environ Sci Technol 37:102–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro-Riviere NA, Nemanich RJ, Inman AO, Wang YYY, Riviere JE (2005) Multi-walled carbon nanotube interactions with human epidermal keratinocytes. Toxicol Lett 155:377–384

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore MN (2006) Do nanoparticles present ecotoxicological risks for the health of the aquatic environment? Environ Int 32:967–976

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newman MC (2001) Population ecotoxicology. Wiley, Chichester, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • NRCG (2005) Characterising the potential risks posed by engineered nanopartiles. A first UK Government research report. Defra, London, UK. http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/nanotech/research/index.htm

  • NRCG (2006) Characterising the potential risks posed by engineered nanopartiles. UK Government research—a progress report. Defra, London, UK. http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/nanotech/research/index.htm

  • Oberdörster E (2004) Manufactured nanomaterials (Fullerenes, C60) induce oxidative stress in the brain of juvenile Largemouth Bass. Environ Health Perspect 112:1058–1062

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberdörster G, Ferin J, Gelein R, Soderholm SC, Finkelstein J (1992) Role of the alveolar macrophage in lung injury—studies with ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect 97:193–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberdörster E, Zhu S, Blickley TM, McClellan-Green P, Haasch ML (2006) Ecotoxicology of carbon-based engineered nanoparticles: effects of fullerene (C60) on aquatic organisms. Carbon 44:1112–1120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2007) Guidance on grouping of chemicals. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Series on Testing and Assessment Number 80, ENV/JM/MONO(2007)28, 26th September 2007, Paris, France

  • Owen R, Depledge M (2005) Nanotechnology and the environment: risks and rewards. Mar Pollut Bull 50:609–612

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pantarotto D, Partidos CD, Graff R (2003) Synthesis, structural characterisation, and immunological properties of carbon nanotubes functionalised with peptides. J Am Chem Soc 125:6160–6164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prevodnik A, Gardeström J, Lilja K, Elfwing T, McDonagh B, Petrovíc N, Tedengren M, Sheehan D, Bollner T (2007) Oxidative stress in response to xenobiotics in the blue mussel Mytilus edulis L: evidence for variation along a natural salinity gradient of the Baltic Sea. Aquat Toxicol 82:63–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rickerby DG, Morrison M (2007) Nanotechnology and the environment: a European perspective. Sci Technol Adv Mater 8:19–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roco MC (2003) Nanotechnology: convergence with modern biology and medicine. Curr Opin Biotechnol 14:337–346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Royal Society (2004) Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties. Report by The Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering, London. http://www.nanotec.org.uk/finalReport.htm

  • SCENIHR (2005) Opinion on the appropriateness of existing methodologies to assess the potential risks associated with engineered and adventitious products of nanotechnologies. Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks, European Commission SCENIHR/002/05

  • SCENIHR (2007) Opinion on the appropriateness of the risk assessment methodology in accordance with the Technical Guidance Documents for new and existing substances for assessing the risks of nanomaterials. Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks, European Commission, 29th March 2007

  • Smith CJ, Shaw BJ, Handy RD (2007) Toxicity of single walled carbon nanotubes on rainbow trout, (Oncorhynchus mykiss): respiratory toxicity, organ pathologies, and other physiological effects. Aquat Toxicol 82:94–109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stolpe B, Hassellöv M (2007) Changes in size distribution of fresh water nanoscale colloidal matter and associated elements on mixing with seawater. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 71:3292–3301

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tran CL, Donaldson K, Stone V, Fernandes TF, Ford A, Christofi N, Ayres JG, Steiner M, Hurley JF, Aitken RJ, Seaton A (2005) A scoping study to identify hazard data needs for addressing the risks presented by nanoparticles and nanotubes. IOM Research Report, Defra, UK

  • USEPA (2007) Nanotechnology White Paper. Science Policy Council, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC, EPA 100/B-07/001. http://www.epa.gov/OSA/nanotech.htm. Accessed Feb 2007

  • Warheit DB (2008) How meaningful are the results of nanotoxicity studies in the absence of adequate material characterization? Toxicol Sci 101:183–185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weltens R, Goossens R, Van Puymbroeck S (2000) Ecotoxicity of contaminated suspended solids for filter feeders (Daphnia magna). Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 39:315–323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu J, Grossior N, Koning CE, Loos J (2007) Controlling the dispersion of multi-wall carbon nanotubes in aqueous surfactant solution. Carbon 45:618–623

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu S, Oberdörster E, Haasch ML (2006) Toxicity of an engineered nanoparticle (fullerene, C60) in two aquatic species, Daphnia and fathead minnow. Mar Environ Res 62:S5–S9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was funded by the UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. We also thank three anonymous reviewers for useful comments on an earlier draft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Crane.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crane, M., Handy, R.D., Garrod, J. et al. Ecotoxicity test methods and environmental hazard assessment for engineered nanoparticles. Ecotoxicology 17, 421–437 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-008-0215-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-008-0215-z

Keywords

Navigation