Skip to main content
Log in

Early development and larval behaviour of two clingfishes, Lepadogaster purpurea and Lepadogaster lepadogaster (Pisces: Gobiesocidae)

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The recent revision on the taxonomic status of Lepadogaster lepadogaster resulted in the division of this species into L. lepadogaster and L. purpurea, the clarification of each species’ distribution ranges and the elimination of L. zebrina (now in synonymy with L. lepadogaster). This new taxonomic status led to the need of clarifying the early development of the two species. Embryonic development lasted 21 days in L. purpurea at a mean temperature of 14.2°C, and 16 days in L. lepadogaster at a mean temperature of 16.5°C. Newly hatched larvae of both species measured 5.2 mm, had the mouth and anus opened, pigmented eyes and almost no yolk. At hatching and throughout development the two species can be distinguished by the ventral pigmentation which is absent in L. purpurea. The change to a benthic mode of life was gradual in both species, with larvae increasingly spending more time close to the bottom until definitely settling. Larval development lasted 33 days in L. purpurea at a mean temperature of 14.6°C and 18 days in L. lepadogaster at a mean temperature of 16.5°C. Locomotion and foraging behaviours are described for both species. L. lepadogaster showed a higher frequency of swimming and foraging behaviour when compared with L. purpurea.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen LG (1984) Gobiesociformes: development and relationships. In: Moser HG, Richards WJ, Cohen DM, Fahay MP, Kendall AW Jr, Richardson SL (eds) Ontogeny and systematics of fishes. The American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists, pp 629–636

  • Barlow GW (1968) Ethological units of behavior. In: Ingle DJ (ed) The central nervous system and fish behavior. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 217–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Beldade R, Pedro T, Gonçalves EJ (2007) Pelagic larval duration of 10 temperate cryptobenthic fishes. J Fish Biol 71:376–382. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01491.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaxter JHS (1969) Development: eggs and larvae. In: Hoar WS, Randall DJ (eds) Fish physiology, vol. III. Academic, New York, pp 178–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Borges R, Faria C, Gil F, Gonçalves EJ, Almada VC (2003) Embryonic and larval development of Gobius paganellus (Pisces: Gobiidae). J Mar Biol Assoc UK 83:1151–1156. doi:10.1017/S0025315403008415h

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breining T, Britz R (2000) Egg surface of three clingfish species, using scanning electron microscopy. J Fish Biol 56:1129–1137. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2000.tb02128.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs JC (1955) A monograph of the clingfishes (order Xenopterygii). Stanf Ichthyol Bull 6:1–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs JC (1986) Gobiesocidae. In: Whitehead PJP, Bauchot M-L, Hureau J-C, Nielsen J, Tortonese E (eds) Fishes of the North-Eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean. UNESCO, Paris, pp 1351–1359

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs JC (1990) Gobiesocidae. In: Quéro JC, Hureau JC, Karrer C, Post A, Saldanha L (eds) Check-list of the fishes of the eastern tropical Atlantic. UNESCO, Societas Europaea Ichthyologorum & JNICT, Lisboa, pp 474–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Browman HI, O’Brien WJ (1992a) The ontogeny of search behaviour in the white crappie Pomoxis annularis. Env Biol Fish 34:181–195. doi:10.1007/BF00002393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browman HI, O’Brien WJ (1992b) Foraging and prey-search behaviour of golden shiner (Notemigonus crysoleucas) larvae. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 49:813–819. doi:10.1139/f92-092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuhara O (1987) Larval development and behavior in early life stages of black sea bream reared in the laboratory. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 53:371–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonçalves EJ, Almada VC, Almeida SP, Gonçalves DM, Repas M, Simões N (1996) Observations on the agonistic behaviour of Lepadogaster lepadogaster purpurea (Pisces: Gobiesocidae). J Fish Biol 49:367–369. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1996.tb00032.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonçalves D, Gonçalves EJ, Almada VC, Almeida SP (1998) Comparative behaviour of two species of Lepadogaster (Pisces: Gobiesocidae) living at different depths. J Fish Biol 53:447–450. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1998.tb00992.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Guitel F (1888) Recherches sur les Lepadogasters. Arch Zoologie Exp Gen, 2ème série, 6:423–647

    Google Scholar 

  • Hefford AE (1910) Notes on teleostean ova and larvae observed at Plymouth in spring and summer, 1909. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 9:47–48. doi:10.1017/S0025315400073227

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriques M, Lourenço R, Almada F, Calado G, Gonçalves DM, Guillemaud T, Cancela ML, Almada VC (2002) A revision of the status of Lepadogaster lepadogaster (Teleostei: Gobiesocidae): sympatric subspecies or a long misunderstood blend of species? Biol J Linn Soc 76:327–338. doi:10.1046/j.1095-8312.2002.00067.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickford MJ, Schiel DR (2003) Comparative dispersal of larvae from demersal versus pelagic spawning fishes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 252:255–271. doi:10.3354/meps252255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiørboe T, Munk P (1986) Feeding and growth of larval herring, Clupea harengus, in relation to density of copepod nauplii. Environ Biol Fish 17:133–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leis JM, McCormick MI (2002) The biology, behavior, and ecology of the pelagic, larval stage of coral reef fishes. In: Sale PF (ed) Coral reef fishes: dynamics and diversity in a complex ecosystem. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 171–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin P, Bateson P (1993) Measuring behavior: an introductory guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller TJ, Crowder LB, Rice JA (1993) Ontogenetic changes in behavioural and histological measures of visual acuity in three species of fish. Environ Biol Fish 37:1–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Munk P, Kiørboe T (1985) Feeding behaviour and swimming activity of larval herring (Clupea harengus) in relation to density of copepod nauplii. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 24:15–21. doi:10.3354/meps024015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padoa E (1956) Uova, larva e stadi giovanili de Teleostei. Fauna e Flora del Golfo di Napoli Monogr 38:783–877

    Google Scholar 

  • Pankhurst PM, Montgomery JC, Pankhurst NW (1991) Growth, development and behaviour of artificially reared larval Pagrus auratus (Bloch & Schneider, 1801) (Sparidae). Aust J Mar Freshw Res 42:391–398. doi:10.1071/MF9910391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powles H, Markle D (1984) Identification of fish larvae. In: Moser HG, Richards WJ, Cohen DM, Fahay MP, Kendall AW Jr, Richardson SL (eds) Ontogeny and systematics of fishes. The American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists, pp 31–33

  • Rabe J, Brown JA (2001) The behavior, growth, and survival of witch flounder (Glyptocephalus cynoglossus) larvae in relation to prey availability: adaptations to an extended larval period. Fish Bull 99:465–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Raventós N, Macpherson E (2001) Planktonic larval duration and settlement marks on the otoliths of Mediterranean littoral fishes. Mar Biol 138:1115–1120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russel FS (1976) The eggs and planktonic stages of British marine fishes. Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sponaugle S, Cowen R, Shanks A, Morgan S, Leis J, Pineda J, Boehlert G, Kingsford M, Lindeman K, Grimes C, Munro J (2002) Predicting self-recruitment in marine populations: biophysical correlates and mechanisms. Bull Mar Sci 70:341–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Thresher RE (1984) Reproduction in Reef Fishes. T.F.H. Publications, Neptune City

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank R. Lourenço for the illustrations and F. Gil for help during larval rearing. This work was supported by a PhD grant to AMF (SFRH/BD/21742/2005) and through the Pluriannual Program (R & D Unit 331/94), financed by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. J. Gonçalves.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tojeira, I., Faria, A.M., Henriques, S. et al. Early development and larval behaviour of two clingfishes, Lepadogaster purpurea and Lepadogaster lepadogaster (Pisces: Gobiesocidae). Environ Biol Fish 93, 449–459 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-011-9935-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-011-9935-7

Keywords

Navigation