Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Cognitive support embedded in self-regulated e-learning systems for students with special learning needs

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents an anthropocentric approach in human – machine interaction in the area of self-regulated e-learning. In an attempt to enhance communication mediated through computers for pedagogical use we propose the incorporation of an intelligent emotional agent that is represented by a synthetic character with multimedia capabilities, modelled to imitate human behaviour. The agent is aiming to provide cognitive support to users with learning difficulties and attention disorders and is designed to accommodate self regulated learning elements. We review the basic principles of self regulated learning which, in turn, act as a basis for designing and implementing our system. Kolb’s learning cycle is used to provide a framework upon which agents’ pedagogical behaviour is constructed. A study between 24 students from higher education with learning difficulties and attention disorders is presented. The learning particularities of this special group that contradict with the principles of self regulated learning are reported. The study refers to students in higher education, in the domain of information technology. The analysis of results indicates that emotional agents improve communication between users of the particular learning group and learning environments by providing cognitive support through behavioural communication, compared to agents with neutral behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aist, G., Kort, B., Reilly, R., Mostow, J., & Picard, R. W. (2002). Experimentally augmenting an intelligent tutoring system with human-supplied capabilities: Adding human-provided emotional scaffolding to an automated reading tutor that listens. Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (Pittsburgh, PA, USA, October 14–16, 2002), pp. 483–490.

  • Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, M. A., Fletcher, J., & Fuchs, L. (2007). Learning disabilities: from identification to intervention. New York: The Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolomé, A., Bergamin, P., Persico, D., Steffens, K., & Underwood, J. (Eds.). (2011). Self-regulated learning in technology enhanced learning environments: problems and promises. Proceedings of the STELLAR-TACONET conference, Universitat de Barcelona, Oct.1, 2010. Aachen: Shaker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baylor, A. L., & Kim, Y. (2003). Three pedagogical agent roles: designing, developing, and validating agent as expert, motivator, and mentors. Annual Conference of EDMedia: Honolulu, Hawaii. June 23–28.

  • Beale, R., & Creed, C. (2009). Affective interaction: how emotional agents affect users. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67(9), 755–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, P. D., & Akroyd, D. (2006). Can factors related to self-regulated learning predict learning achievement in undergraduate asynchronous Web-based courses? International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 3(10), 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burleson, W., & Picard, R. W. (2007). Evidence for gender specific approaches to the development of emotionally intelligent learning companions. IEEE Intelligent Systems, Special issue on Intelligent Educational Systems, 22(4), 62–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caprara, G. V., Fida, R., Vecchione, M., Del Bove, G., Vecchio, G. M., Barbaranelli, C., et al. (2008). Longitudinal Analysis of the role of perceived self-efficacy for self-regulated learning in academic continuance and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 525–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carretie, L., Hinojosa, J. A., Martin-Loeches, M., Mercado, F., & Tapia, M. (2004). Automatic attention to emotional stimuli: neural correlates. Human Brain Mapping, 22, 290–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conati, C., & Maclaren, H. (2009). Empirically building and evaluating a probabilistic model of user affect. User Modelling and User-Adapted Interaction, 19(3), 267–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehn, D., & Van Mulken, S. (2000). The impact of animated interface agents: a review of empirical research. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 52(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gans, A., Kenny, M., & Ghany, D. (2003). Comparing the self-concept of students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(3), 287–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In A. R. Kaye (Ed.), Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: the Najaden papers (pp. 117–136). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, K. (2009). Anthropomorphic Systems: An Approach for Categorization, IDGD '09 Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Internationalization, Design and Global Development: Held as Part of HCI International 2009, (San Diego, CA, USA, July 19-24, 2009), pp 173–179. Springer-Verlag Berlin: Heidelberg.

  • Katz, L., Brown, F., Roth, R., & Beers, S. (2011). Processing speed and working memory performance in those with Both ADHD and a reading disorder compared with those with ADHD alone. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 26(5), 425–433. Oxford University Press.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D. (2001). Beliefs about knowledge and the process of teaching and learning as a factor in adjusting to study in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 26(2), 205–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kienle, A., & Wessner, M. (2006). The CSCL community in its first decade: development, continuity, connectivity. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (ijCSCL), 1(1), 9–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinnebrew, J., & Biswas, G. (2011). Self-regulated learning in teachable agent environments. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society - EN, 7(2), 19–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, R. (2010). Confidence to manage learning: the self-efficacy for self-regulated learning of early adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33(1), 1–12. Publisher: Council for Learning Disabilities.

  • Klassen, R., Tze, V., & Hannok, W. (2013). Internalizing problems of adults with learning disabilities: a meta-analysis. Learning Disabilities, 46(4), 317–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kort, B., Reilly, R., & Picard R. (2001). An Affective Model of Interplay between Emotions and Learning: Reengineering Educational Pedagogy-Building a Learning Companion, pp.0043, Second IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT’01).

  • Lee, T. Y., Chang, C. W., & Chen, G. D. (2007). Building an interactive caring agent for students in computer-based learning environments. In Proceeding of International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (Niigata, Japan, July 18–20, 2007), pp. 300–304.

  • Maldonado, H., Lee, J. R., Brave, S., Nass, C., Nakajima, H., Yamada, R., et al. (2005). We Learn Better Together: Enhancing e-Learning with Emotional Characters. In Proceedings, Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, Taipei, Taiwan.

  • Mangione Walcott, C., & Landau, S. (2004). The relation between disinhibition and emotion regulation in boys with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 33(4), 772–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGillivray, J. A., & Baker, K. L. (2009). Effects of comorbid ADHD with learning disabilities on anxiety. Depression, and aggression in adults. Journal of Attention Disorders, 12(6), 525–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, R. S. (2002). What do I need to do to succeed… when I don’t understand what I’m doing!?: developmental influences on students’ adaptive help seeking. In A. Wigfield & J. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 285–306). San Diego: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Palincsar, A., Magnussen, S. J., Marano, N., Ford, D., & Brown, N. (2001). Designing a community of practice: principles and practices of the GIsML community. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(1), 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panteliadou, S. (1995). Students’ knowledge about the training people with learning difficulties, The. Educationals, 37–38, 148–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picard, R. W. (2011). Emotion research by the people, for the people. International Society for Research on Emotion, SAGE Publications. Emotion Review, 2(3), 250–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, R. A. (2004). Conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407. Publisher: Springer.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steptoe, W., Steed, A., & Slater, M. (2013). Human tails: ownership and control of extended humanoid avatars. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19(4), 583–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2008). Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning: a validation study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 443–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, B. Y. L. (1985). Metacognition and learning disabilities. In D. L. Forrest-Pressley, G. E. MacKinnon, & G. T. Waller (Eds.), Metacognition, cognition, and human performance, Vol. 2. Instructional practices (pp. 137–180). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Special Education, University of Thessaly & NOUS Institute of Digital Learning & Communication, Argonafton & Filellinon, 38221 Volos & Filikis etaireias 7, 54621, Thessaloniki, Greece

    K. Chatzara

  2. Department of Special Education, University of Thessaly, Argonafton & Filellinon, 38221, Volos, Greece

    C. Karagiannidis

  3. Department of Informatics, Alexander T.E.I. of Thessaloniki, Greece, P.O BOX 141, GR T.K 57 400, Thessaloniki, Greece

    D. Stamatis

Authors
  1. K. Chatzara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. Karagiannidis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. Stamatis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Chatzara.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chatzara, K., Karagiannidis, C. & Stamatis, D. Cognitive support embedded in self-regulated e-learning systems for students with special learning needs. Educ Inf Technol 21, 283–299 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9320-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9320-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation