Skip to main content
Log in

Prealbumin and D-dimer as Prognostic Indicators for Rebleeding in Patients with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Determining the risk stratification of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) plays a vital role in treating upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). Traditional scores like Glasgow–Blatchford score (GBS), Rockall score (RS), and AIMS65 score have been widely utilized in UGIB practice, however exhibiting limited practical use due to relative lack of user-friendly characters. Prealbumin as a nutritional indicator and d-dimer as a fibrinolytic activity monitor, are generally used to evaluate the overall nutritional and fibrinolytic condition in UGIB patients.

Aims

Here, we explored the predictive value of these two markers in NVUGIB for evaluating severity and prognosis including rebleeding and surgery intervention.

Methods

One hundred and eighty-five patients suffering NVUGIB were enrolled. Their GBS, RS, and AIMS65 score, routine laboratory test results including prealbumin and d-dimer were determined after admission. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to define the independent predictors of rebleeding. ROC curves were generated to compare the suitability of prealbumin, d-dimer, and scores for rebleeding prediction.

Results

The NVUGIB patients with rebleeding exhibited higher scores, white blood cell counts, d-dimer, CRP, proportion of surgery intervention, and longer hospital stay, but lower hematocrit, hemoglobin, calcium, prealbumin, and fibrinogen than those without rebleeding. The multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that prealbumin and d-dimer were independent predictors for rebleeding. Values of prealbumin and d-dimer were correlated with hospital stay, ulcer degrees, and surgery demand. The ROC curve analyses showed that prealbumin and d-dimer exhibited superior prediction value over the scoring systems.

Conclusions

Prealbumin and d-dimer are promising predictors for severity and prognosis in NVUGIB practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cesaro P, Kohn A, Petruziello L, et al. A survey on mortality from non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: is the emergency referral system adequate. Dig Liver Dis. 2013;45:953–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rockall TA, Logan RF, Devlin HB, Northfield TC. Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Gut. 1996;38:316–321.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gralnek IM, Dumonceau JM, Kuipers EJ, et al. Diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy. 2015;47:a1–a46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Horibe M, Kaneko T, Yokogawa N, et al. A simple scoring system to assess the need for an endoscopic intervention in suspected upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a prospective cohort study. Dig Liver Dis. 2016;48:1180–1186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chaikitamnuaychok R, Patumanond J. Clinical risk characteristics of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage severity: a multivariable risk analysis. Gastroenterol Res. 2012;5:149–155.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Iino C, Mikami T, Igarashi T, et al. Evaluation of scoring models for identifying the need for therapeutic intervention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a new prediction score model for Japanese patients. Dig Endosc. 2016;28:714–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaya E, Karaca MA, Aldemir D, Ozmen MM. Predictors of poor outcome in gastrointestinal bleeding in emergency department. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:4219–4225.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hwang S, Jeon SW, Kwon JG, et al. The novel scoring system for 30-day mortality in patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Dig Dis Sci. 2016;61:2002–2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-016-4087-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kumar NL, Claggett BL, Cohen AJ, Nayor J, Saltzman JR. Association between an increase in blood urea nitrogen at 24 hours and worse outcomes in acute nonvariceal upper GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86:1022–1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Al-Naamani K, Alzadjali N, Barkun AN, Fallone CA. Does blood urea nitrogen level predict severity and high-risk endoscopic lesions in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding? Can J Gastroenterol. 2008;22:399–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tomizawa M, Shinozaki F, Hasegawa R, et al. Patient characteristics with high or low blood urea nitrogen in upper gastrointestinal bleeding. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:7500–7505.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ebrahimi BH, Morteza BHR, Rahmani F, Shahsavari NK, Ettehadi A. Clinical scoring systems in predicting the outcome of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding; a narrative review. Emergency. 2017;5:e36.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fattah SA, El-Hamshary NK, Kilany YF, et al. Prognostic and predictive values of MELD score, platelet count and pre-albumin in patients with compensated and decompensated liver cirrhosis with acute variceal bleeding. J Egypt Soc Parasitol. 2012;42:443–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vreeburg EM, Levi M, Rauws EA, et al. Enhanced mucosal fibrinolytic activity in gastroduodenal ulcer haemorrhage and the beneficial effect of acid suppression. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001;15:639–646.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Violl F, Basili S, Ferro D, Quintarelli C, Alessandril C, Cordova C. Association between high values of D-dimer and tissue-plasminogen activator activity and first gastrointestinal bleeding in cirrhotic patients. CALC Group. Thromb Haemost. 1996;76:177–183.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gutiérrez A, Sánchez-Payá J, Marco P, Pérez-Mateo M. Prognostic value of fibrinolytic tests for hospital outcome in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2001;32:315–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Anchu AC, Mohsina S, Sureshkumar S, Mahalakshmy T, Kate V. External validation of scoring systems in risk stratification of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2017;36:105–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mokhtare M, Bozorgi V, Agah S, et al. Comparison of Glasgow–Blatchford score and full Rockall score systems to predict clinical outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2016;9:337–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stanley AJ, Laine L, Dalton HR, et al. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study. BMJ. 2017;356:i6432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhong M, Chen WJ, Lu XY, Qian J, Zhu CQ. Comparison of three scoring systems in predicting clinical outcomes in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a prospective observational study. J Dig Dis. 2016;17:820–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Stanley AJ. Update on risk scoring systems for patients with upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:2739–2744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yaka E, Yılmaz S, Doğan NÖ, Pekdemir M. Comparison of the Glasgow–Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2015;22:22–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Laine L, Jensen DM. Management of patients with ulcer bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:345–360.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Han YJ, Cha JM, Park JH, et al. Successful endoscopic hemostasis is a protective factor for rebleeding and mortality in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Dig Dis Sci. 2016;61:2011–2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-016-4082-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cieniawski D, Kuzniar E, Winiarski M, Matlok M, Kostarczyk W, Pedziwiatr M. Prognostic value of the Rockall score in patients with acute nonvariceal bleeding from the upper gastrointestinal tract. Przegladlekarski. 2012;70:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yang HM, Jeon SW, Jung JT, et al. Comparison of scoring systems for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a multicenter prospective cohort study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;31:119–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81630016, to Jie Liu).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yue, W., Liu, Y., Jiang, W. et al. Prealbumin and D-dimer as Prognostic Indicators for Rebleeding in Patients with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding. Dig Dis Sci 66, 1949–1956 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06420-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06420-1

Keywords

Navigation