Abstract
Background
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an effective treatment for early-colorectal cancer. Although delayed bleeding is a serious potential complication, there is no consensus on the optimal protocol to determine which cases require emergency colonoscopy.
Aims
This study aimed to assess the risk factors for delayed bleeding after ESD and evaluate the “watch and wait” strategy for delayed bleeding. The “watch and wait” strategy was used for delayed bleeding, unless the shock index was ≥ 1 and/or a moderate amount of hematochezia occurred more than five occurrences.
Methods
This study included 404 patients who had undergone endoscopic resection for 439 lesions between April 2012 and February 2018. Patients were classified into the bleeding group or the no-bleeding group to investigate the risk factors for delayed bleeding, and to assess the necessity of emergency colonoscopy.
Results
Twenty-seven patients into the bleeding group and 412 into the no-bleeding group were classified. However, no case required emergency colonoscopy for hemostasis under “watch and wait strategy.” Multivariate analysis revealed the risk factors for bleeding were rectal lesion (OR 5.547, 95% CI 1.456–21.130; P = 0.012) and lesion size ≥ 40 mm (OR 3.967, 95% CI 1.003–15.696; P = 0.05).
Conclusions
Risk factors for delayed bleeding are rectal lesions and lesion size ≥ 40 mm. This watch and wait strategy resulted in no requirements for emergency colonoscopy or blood transfusion, and no serious conditions caused by delayed bleeding.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:87–108.
Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ, et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:687–696.
Gorgun E, Benlice C, Abbas MA, Steele S. Experience in colon sparing surgery in North America: advanced endoscopic approaches for complex colorectal lesions. Surg Endosc. 2018;32:3114–3121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6026-2.
Sauer M, Hildenbrand R, Oyama T, Sido B, Yahagi N, Dumoulin FL. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for flat or sessile colorectal neoplasia > 20 mm: a European single-center series of 182 cases. Endosc Int Open. 2016;4:E895–E900.
Chiba H, Ohata K, Ohno A, et al. Perforation with retroperitoneal emphysema after endoscopic submucosal dissection for a rectal carcinoid tumor. Endoscopy. 2010;42:E85–E86.
Arimoto J, Higurashi T, Chiba H, et al. Continued use of a single antiplatelet agent does not increase the risk of delayed bleeding after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Dig Dis Sci. 2018;63:218–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-017-4843-0.
Arimoto J, Higurashi T, Kato S, et al. Risk factors for post-colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) coagulation syndrome: a multicenter, prospective, observational study. Endosc Int Open. 2018;6:E342–E349.
Tanaka S, Terasaki M, Hayashi N, Oka S, Chayama K. Warning for unprincipled colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: accurate diagnosis and reasonable treatment strategy. Dig Endosc. 2013;25:107–116.
Uraoka T, Higashi R, Kato J, et al. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for elderly patients at least 80 years of age. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:3000–3007.
Hurlstone DP, Atkinson R, Sanders DS, Thomson M, Cross SS, Brown S. Achieving R0 resection in the colorectum using endoscopic submucosal dissection. Br J Surg. 2007;94:1536–1542.
Probst A, Golger D, Anthuber M, Märkl B, Messmann H. Endoscopic submucosal dissection in large sessile lesions of the rectosigmoid: learning curve in a European center. Endoscopy. 2012;44:660–667.
Tanaka S, Tamegai Y, Tsuda S, Saito Y, Yahagi N, Yamano HO. Multicenter questionnaire survey on the current situation of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in Japan. Dig Endosc. 2010;22:S2–S8.
Ogasawara N, Yoshimine T, Noda H, et al. Clinical risk factors for delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors in Japanese patients. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;28:1407–1414.
Tanaka S, Kashida H, Saito Y, et al. JGES guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection. Dig Endosc. 2015;27:417–434.
Uraoka T, Saito Y, Matsuda T, et al. Endoscopic indications for endoscopic mucosal resection of laterally spreading tumours in the colorectum. Gut. 2006;55:1592–1597.
Hotta K, Yamaguchi Y, Saito Y, Takao T, Ono H. Current opinions for endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors from our experiences: indications, technical aspects and complications. Dig Endosc. 2012;24:110–116.
Watanabe T, Itabashi M, Shimada Y, et al. Japanese society for cancer of the colon and rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2014 for treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2015;20:207–239.
Tajiri H, Kitano S. Complication associated with endoscopic mucosal resection: definition of bleeding that can be viewed as accidental. Dig Endosc. 2004;16:S134–S136.
Allgöwer M, Buri C. Schockindex. Dtsch Med Wodenschr. 1967;46:1–10.
Rady M, Nightingale P, Little R, Edwards JD. Shock index: a re-evaluation in acute circulatory failure. Resuscitation. 1992;23:227–234.
Fujimoto K, Fujishiro M, Kato M, et al. Japan gastroenterological endoscopy society. Guidelines for gastroenterological endoscopy in patients undergoing antithrombotic treatment. Dig Endosc. 2014;26:1–14.
Hirasawa K, Sato C, Makazu M, et al. Coagulation syndrome: delayed perforation after colorectal endoscopic treatments. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;10:1055–1061.
Saito Y, Yamada M, So E, et al. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: technical advantages compared to endoscopic mucosal resection and minimally invasive surgery. Dig Endosc. 2014;26:52–61.
Nakajima T, Saito Y, Tanaka S, et al. Current status of endoscopic resection strategy for large, early colorectal neoplasia in Japan. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:3262–3270.
Conio M, Repici A, Demarquay JF, Blanchi S, Dumas R, Filiberti R. EMR of large sessile colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:234–241.
Macrae FA, Tan KG, Williams CB. Towards safer colonoscopy: a report on the complications of 5000 diagnostic or therapeutic colonoscopies. Gut. 1983;24:376–383.
Taku K, Sano Y, Fu KI, et al. Iatrogenic perforation associated with therapeutic colonoscopy: a multicenter study in Japan. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;22:1409–1414.
Panteris V, Haringsma J, Kuipers EJ. Colonoscopy perforation rate, mechanisms and outcome: from diagnostic to therapeutic colonoscopy. Endoscopy. 2009;41:941–951.
Takeuchi Y, Uedo N, Ishihara R, et al. Efficacy of an endo-knife with a water-jet function (Flushknife) for endoscopic submucosal dissection of superficial colorectal neoplasms. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:314–322.
Higashiyama M, Oka S, Tanaka S, et al. Risk factors for bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric epithelial neoplasm. Dig Endosc. 2011;23:290–295.
Suzuki S, Chino A, Kishihara T, et al. Risk factors for bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal neoplasms. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:1839–1845.
Chiba H, Tachikawa J, Kurihara D, et al. Safety and efficacy of simultaneous colorectal ESD for large synchronous colorectal lesions. Endosc Int Open. 2017;5:E595–E602.
Yamamoto K, Shimoda R, Ogata S, et al. Perforation and postoperative bleeding associated with endoscopic submucosal dissection in colorectal tumors: an analysis of 398 lesions treated in Saga, Japan. Intern Med. 2018;57:2115–2122. https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.9186-17.
Ohya T, Marsk R, Pekkari K. Colorectal ESD in day surgery. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:3690–3695.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chiba, H., Ohata, K., Tachikawa, J. et al. Delayed Bleeding After Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: When Is Emergency Colonoscopy Needed?. Dig Dis Sci 64, 880–887 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-5310-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-5310-2