Skip to main content
Log in

Dating is Hard Work: A Narrative Approach to Understanding Sexual and Romantic Relationships in Young Adulthood

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Contemporary Family Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study utilized a qualitative approach informed by a narrative perspective to examine 57 young adults’ stories about sexual and romantic relationships. Participants (25 men and 32 women) were asked to define relationships in terms of how they know they are in a romantic or a sexual partnership. Young adults identified the language they use for different types of relationships, their perceptions of the hierarchy of romantic and sexual relationships, and their confusion or uncertainty about their relationship experiences. We discuss implications for clinicians working with young adults and provide suggestions for re-storying the confusing territory of intimate (and sometimes impersonal) interaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469–480.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (1998). Qualitative research in education (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogle, K. A. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, N., Acker, M., & Cook-Flanagan, C. (1992). Conflict and preoccupation in the intimacy life task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 644–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, L. M. (2002). Gender and the meaning and experience of virginity loss in the contemporary United States. Gender & Society, 16, 345–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, H. (2004). The long sexual revolution: English women, sex, and contraception, 1800–1975. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell, D., & Boston, P. (2002). Practitioner review: The effectiveness of systemic family therapy for children and adolescents. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43, 573–586.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, J., & Dittmar, H. (1995). The functions of clothes and clothing (dis)satisfaction: A gender analysis among British students. Journal of Consumer Policy, 18, 237–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eshbaugh, E. M., & Gute, G. (2008). Hookups and sexual regret among college women. The Journal of Social Psychology, 148, 77–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, J., & Combs, G. (1996). Narrative therapy: The social construction of preferred realities. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furman, W., & Hand, L. S. (2006). The slippery nature of romantic relationships: Issues in definition and differentiation. In A. C. Crouter & A. Booth (Eds.), Romance and sex in adolescence and emerging adulthood: Risks and opportunities (pp. 171–178). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gute, G., & Eshbaugh, E. M. (2008). Personality as a predictor of hooking up among college students. Journal of Community Health Nursing, http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t775648098~db=all~tab=issueslist~branches=25-v2525,26-43.

  • Hampel, A. D., & Vangelisti, A. L. (2008). Commitment expectation in romantic relationships: Application of a prototype interaction-pattern model. Personal Relationships, 15, 81–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havighurst, R. J. (1972). Developmental tasks and education (3rd ed.). New York: McKay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, L. (1990). Constructing realities: An art of lenses. Family Process, 29, 1–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J., Ramazanoglu, C., Sharpe, S., & Thomson, R. (1998). The male in the head: Young people, heterosexuality and power. London: Tufnell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. M., & Cram, F. (2003). Disrupting the sexual double standard: Young women’s talk about heterosexuality. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 113–127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karremans, J. C., & Verwijmeren, T. (2008). Mimicking attractive opposite-sex others: The role of romantic relationship status. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 939–950.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, T. A., Kahn, A. S., & Apple, K. J. (2003). Pluralistic ignorance and booking up. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 129–133.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, R. R., Quadrel, M. J., & Hartman, K. A. (1990). Development and change of young adults’ preventive health beliefs and behavior: Influence from parents and peers. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 31, 240–259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leach, E. (1964). Anthropological aspects of language: Animal categories and verbal abuse. In E. H. Lenneberg (Ed.), New directions in the study of language (pp. 23–63). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lees, S. (1993). Sugar and spice: Sexuality and adolescent girls. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mongeau, P. A., Jacobsen, J., & Donnerstein, C. (2007). Defining dates and first date goals: Generalizing from undergraduates to single adults. Communication Research, 34, 526–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monk, G., Winslade, J., Crocket, K., & Epston, D. (Eds.). (1997). Narrative therapy in practice: The archaeology of hope. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, M. J., & Sorell, G. T. (1998). Love and dating experiences in early and middle adolescence: Grade and gender comparisons. Journal of Adolescence, 21, 677–689.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muntigl, P. (2004). Ontogenesis in narrative therapy: A linguistic-semiotic examination of client change. Family Process, 43, 109–131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, M. E., Maggs, J. L., & Abar, C. C. (2007). Reasons to have sex, personal goals, and sexual behavior during the transition to college. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 240–249.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, E. L., McManus, B., & Hayes, A. (2000). “Hookups”: Characteristics and correlates of college students’ spontaneous and anonymous sexual experiences. The Journal of Sex Research, 37, 76–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peplau, L. A. (2003). Human sexuality: How do men and women differ. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(2), 37–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinisch, J. M., & Beasley, R. (1990). The Kinsey Institute new report on sex: What you must know to be sexually literate. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risman, B., & Schwartz, P. (2002). After the sexual revolution: Gender politics in teen dating. Contexts, 1, 16–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, S., & Kipnis, O. (2001). Adolescent romantic relationships: A look from the future. Journal of Adolescence, 24, 337–351.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, S., & Scharf, M. (2000). Adolescent romantic behaviors and perceptions: Age- and gender related differences, and links with family and peer relationships. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 10, 99–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, M. (1998). Journaling with clients. The Journal of Individual Psychology, 45, 435–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surra, C. A., Boettcher-Burke, T. M. J., Cottle, N. R., West, A. R., & Gray, C. R. (2007). The treatment of relationship status in research on dating and mate selection. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 207–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. R. (1989). Linguistic categorization: Prototypes in linguistic theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, D. L. (2002). Dilemmas of desire: Teenage girls talk about sexuality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, W. M., & Keenan, R. (1997). Narrative family therapy. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 5, 332–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J. (2002). The development of romantic relationships and adaptations in the system of peer relationships. Journal of Adolescent Health, 31, 216–225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jamie E. Banker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Banker, J.E., Kaestle, C.E. & Allen, K.R. Dating is Hard Work: A Narrative Approach to Understanding Sexual and Romantic Relationships in Young Adulthood. Contemp Fam Ther 32, 173–191 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-009-9111-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-009-9111-9

Keywords

Navigation