Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Modeling climate change and biophysical impacts of crop production in the Austrian Marchfeld Region

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Climate change affects major biophysical processes in agricultural crop production (e.g. evaporation of plants and soils, nutrient cycles, and growth of plants). This analysis aims to assess some of these effects by simulating regional climate projections that are integrated in the biophysical process model EPIC (Environmental Policy Integrated Climate). Statistical climate models have been developed for six weather parameters based on daily weather records of a weather station in the Austrian Marchfeld region from 1975 to 2006. These models have been used to estimate daily weather parameters for the period 2007–2038. The resulting projections have been compared to climate scenarios provided from the TYNDALL Centre for Climate Change Research, which are based on General Circulation Models (GCMs). The comparison indicates some differences, namely a smaller temperature increase and a higher precipitation amount in the TYNDALL data. Both climate datasets have been used to simulate impacts of climate change on crop yields, topsoil organic carbon content, and nitrate leaching with EPIC and thus to perform a sensitivity analysis of EPIC. Yield impacts have been assessed for four simulated crops, i.e. 6.2 t/ha for winter wheat for statistical climate projections compared to 5.7 t/ha for TYNDALL scenarios, 10.6 t/ha for corn compared to 10.5 t/ha, 3.9 t/ha for sunflower compared to 3.7 t/ha, and 4.5 t/ha for spring barley compared to 4.3 t/ha—all values as an average over the period 2007–2038. Smaller differences have been simulated for topsoil organic carbon content i.e. 55.1 t/ha for the statistical climate projections compared to 55.3 t/ha for the TYNDALL scenarios and nitrate leaching i.e. 7.1 kg/ha compared to 11.1 kg/ha. All crop yields as well as topsoil organic carbon content and nitrate leaching show highest sensitivity to temperature and solar radiation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike H (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. Second International Symposium on Information Theory 1:267–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexandrow V, Hoogenboom G (2000) Vulnerability and adaptation assessments of agricultural crops under climate change in the Southeastern USA. Theor Appl Climatol 67:45–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baier W, Robertson GW (1965) Estimation of latent evaporation from simple weather observations. Can J Plant Sci 45:276–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balkovič J, Schmid E, Skalský R, Nováková M (2011) Modelling soil organic carbon changes on arable land under climate change—a case study analysis of the Kočín Farm in Slovakia. Soil Water Res 6:30–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliss CI (1958) Periodic regression in biology and climatology. Bull Conn Agr Exp Stat, New Haven 615:1–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Cayan DR, Maurer EP, Dettinger MD, Tyree M, Hayhoe K (2008) Climate change scenarios for the California region. Clim Change 87(Suppl 1):S21–S42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen JH, Hewitson B, Busuioc A, Chen A, Gao X, Held I, Jones R, Kolli RK, Kwon WT, Laprise R, Magaña Rueda V, Mearns L, Menéndez CG, Räisänen J, Rinke A, Sarr A, Whetton P (2007) Regional climate projections. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Eitzinger J, Thaler S, Kubu G, Rischbeck P, Formayer H (2008) Potentielle Auswirkungen und Anpassungsmaßnahmen der Landwirtschaft an den Klimawandel im Nordosten Österreichs (Weinviertel-Marchfeld Region). Auswirkungen des Klimawandels in Niederösterreich (NÖ-Klimastudie 2007), Amt der Niederösterreichischen Landesregierung, 1–356.

  • Göttfert D (2000) Methoden zur Abschätzung von Klimaänderungen im Marchfeld hinsichtlich des Niederschlages. Diploma Thesis, University of Natural Resouces and Applied Life Sciences Vienna.

  • Hargreaves GH, Samani ZA (1985) Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature. Appl Eng Agr 1:96–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Izaurralde RC, Williams JR, McGill WB, Rosenberg NJ, Quiroga MC (2006) Simulating soil C dynamics with EPIC: model description and testing against long-term data. Ecol Model 192(3–4):362–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Williams JR, Wang X, Yang H (2008) Using MODAWEC to generate daily weather data for the EPIC model. Environ Model Software 24:655–664

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobell DB, Field CB (2007) Global scale climate-crop yield relationships and the impacts of recent warming. Environ Res Lett. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/2/1/014002

  • Lobell DB, Field CB, Cahill KN, Bonfils C (2006) Impacts of future climate change on California perennial crop yields: model projections with climate and crop uncertainties. Agr Forest Meteorol 141:208–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marek P, Gustar M, Teply B, Novak D, Kersner Z (1998) Sensitivity analysis in simulation-based reliability assessment of structures. In: Struct Saf and Reliab, Shiraishi, Shinozuka, Wen (eds), Balkema, Rotterdam, ISBN 9054109785, pp. 715–722.

  • Mauser W, Marke T, Stoeber S (2008) Climate change and water resources: scenarios of low-flow conditions in the Upper Danube River Basin. Earth Environ Sci. doi:10.1088/1755-1307/4/1/012027

  • Mitchell TD, Carter TR, Jones PD, Hulme M, New M (2004) A comprehensive set of high-resolution grids of monthly climate for Europe and the globe: the observed record (1901–2000) and 16 scenarios (2001–2100). Tyndall Centre, Working Paper 55, Norwich, UK.

  • Monteith JL (1977) Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain. Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond B 281:277–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New M, Hulme M, Jones PD (2000) Representing twentieth century space-time climate variability. Part 2: development of 1901–96 monthly grids of terrestrial surface climate. J Clim 13:2217–2238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penman HL (1948) Natural evaporation from open, bare soil and grass. Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond A 193:120–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Priestly CHB, Taylor RJ (1972) On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large scale parameters. Mon Weather Rev 100:81–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall DA, Wood RA, Bony S, Colman R, Fichefet T, Fyfe J, Kattsov V, Pitman A, Shukla J, Srinivasan J, Stouffer RJ, Sumi A, Taylor KE (2007) Cilmate models and their evaluation. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratto M, Tarantola S, Saltelli A (2001) Sensitivity analysis in model calibration: GSA-GLUE approach. Comput Phys Comm 136:212–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rischbeck P (2007) Der Einfluss von Klimaänderung, Bodenbearbeitung und Saattermin auf den Wasserhaushalt und das Ertragspotential von Getreide im Marchfeld. Dissertation, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences Vienna.

  • Ritchie JT (1972) A model for predicting evaporation from a row crop with incomplete cover. Water Resour Res 8:1204–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivington M, Matthews KB, Buchan K (2002) A comparison of methods for providing solar radiation data to crop models and decision support systems. In: Proceedings of the International Environmental Modelling and Software Society, Lugano, Switzerland, 3:193–198.

  • Schmid E, Sinabell F, Liebhard P (2004) Effects of reduced tillage systems and cover crops on sugar beet yield and quality, ground water recharge and nitrogen leaching in the Pannonic Region Marchfeld, Austria. Pflanzenbauwiss 8(1):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider UA, Havlik P, Schmid E, Valin H, Mosnier A, Obersteiner M, Bottcher H, Skalsky R, Balkovic J, Sauer T, Fritz S (2011) Impacts of population growth, economic development, and technical change on global food production and consumption. Agr Syst 104(2):204–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schönhart M, Schauppenlehner T, Schmid E, Muhar A (2011) Integration of bio-physical and economic models to analyze management intensity and landscape structure effects at farm and landscape level. Agr Syst 104(2):122–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpley AN, Williams JR (1990) EPIC, Erosion/productivity impact calculator, I. Model documentation. Tech Bull No 1768, Washington, DC (USA).

  • Statistics Austria (various years) Landwirtschaftliche Gesamtrechnung (Economic Accounts of Agriculture), electronic dataset, mime.

  • Tebaldi C, Lobell DB (2008) Towards probabilistic projections of climate change impacts on global crop yields. Geophys Res Lett. doi:10.1029/2008GL033423

  • Tebaldi C, Sansó B (2008) Joint projections of temperature and precipitation change from multiple climate models: a hierarchical Bayesian approach. J Roy Stat Soc A 172(1)

  • Tebaldi C, Nychka D, Mearns LO (2004) From global mean responses to regional signals of climate change: simple pattern scaling, its limitations (or lack of) and the uncertainty in its results. In: Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Probability and Statistics in the Atmospheric Sciences, AMS Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA.

  • Wang X, Youssef M, Skaggs RW, Atwood JD, Frankenberger JR (2005) Sensitivity analyses of the nitrogen simulation model DRAINMOD-N II. Trans Am Soc Agr Eng 48(6):2205–2212

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Potter SR, Williams JR, Atwood JD, Pitts T (2006) Sensitivity analysis of APEX for national assessment. Trans Am Soc Agr Eng 49(3):679–688

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams JR (1995) The EPIC Model. In: Singh VP (ed) Computer models of watershed hydrology. Water Resources Publications, Highlands Ranch, pp 909–1000

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study has been part of the project “A toolbox of models of a sustainable economy” which has been funded by the collaborative research programme proVISION of the Austrian Federal Ministry for Science and Research and Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management under the research contract 100394 (more information: www.dafne.at, www.landnutzung.at). It was further supported by the European Commission within the cc-TAME research project (climate change—Terrestrial Adaptation and Mitigation in Europe, http://www.cctame.eu/). We also thank the Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics as well as the TYNDALL Centre for Climate Change Research for providing the climate data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Sustainable Economic Development, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Feistmantelstraße 4, 1180, Vienna, Austria

    Franziska Strauss & Erwin Schmid

  2. Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand

    Elena Moltchanova

  3. Institute of Meteorology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Peter-Jordan-Straße 82, 1190, Vienna, Austria

    Herbert Formayer

  4. Blackland Research and Extension Center, 720 E. Blackland Rd., Temple, TX, 76502, USA

    Xiuying Wang

Authors
  1. Franziska Strauss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Erwin Schmid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Elena Moltchanova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Herbert Formayer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiuying Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Franziska Strauss.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Strauss, F., Schmid, E., Moltchanova, E. et al. Modeling climate change and biophysical impacts of crop production in the Austrian Marchfeld Region. Climatic Change 111, 641–664 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0171-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0171-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation