Skip to main content
Log in

An optimal cardiothoracic ratio cut-off to predict clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The traditional cut-off for the cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) by chest X-ray was not originally proposed as a prognostic variable. We investigated an optimal CTR cut-off that could predict clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). A total of 3,083 AMI patients (65.2 ± 12.0 years, 2,091 males) who underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention were divided into two groups by use of a CTR of 0.42 as determined by receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis (group I: CTR ≤ 0.42, group II: CTR > 0.42). We compared the incidences of in-hospital death and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), including cardiac death, reinfarction, coronary artery bypass grafting, and target lesion revascularization, during 12 months between the groups. The patients in group II were older than those in group I and included more women. The patients in group II were more likely to have hypertension and multivessel disease and had a higher Killip class, higher troponin, higher N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, and lower ejection fraction than did those in group I. The in-hospital death rate was higher in group II (1.9 vs. 4.8 %, p < 0.001). The incidences of cardiac death and composite of MACEs during 12 months of follow-up were significantly higher in group II than in group I (2.4 vs. 5.7 %, p < 0.001, and 16.0 vs. 19.8 %, p = 0.007, respectively). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that CTR greater than 0.42 was an independent predictor of MACEs (relative risk: 1.361, 95 % CI 1.014–1.827, p = 0.040). A CTR greater than 0.42, although within the traditional normal range, was associated with worse in-hospital and long-term clinical outcome in AMI patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pocock SJ, Wang D, Pfeffer MA et al (2006) Predictors of mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J 27:65–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fukuta H, Ohte N, Brucks S et al (2007) Contribution of right-sided heart enlargement to cardiomegaly on chest roentgenogram in diastolic and systolic heart failure. Am J Cardiol 99:62–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Battler A, Karliner JS, Higgins CB et al (1980) The initial chest X-ray in acute myocardial infarction. Prediction of early and late mortality and survival. Circulation 61(5):1004–1009

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kelly DJ, Gershlick T, Witzenbichler B et al (2011) Incidence and predictors of heart failure following percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the HORIZON-AMI trial. Am Heart J 162:663–670

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ernst ER, Shub C, Bailey KR et al (2001) Radiographic measurements of cardiac size as predictors of outcome in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. J Card Fail 7:13–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Danzer CS (1919) The cardio-thoracic ratio. An index of cardiothoracic enlargement. Am J Med Sci 157:513–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nickol K, Wade AJ (1982) Radiographic heart size and cardiothoracic ratio in three ethnic groups: a basis for a simple screening test for cardiac enlargement in men. Br J Radiol 55:399–403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hemingway H, Shipley M, Christie D et al (1998) Cardiothoracic ratio and relative heart volume as predictors of coronary heart disease mortality. The Whitehall study 25 year follow-up. Eur Heart J 19:859–869

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zaman MJ, Sanders J, Crook AM et al (2007) Cardiothoracic ratio within the “normal” range independently predicts mortality in patients undergoing coronary angiography. Heart 93:491–494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Birtcher KK, Ballantyne CM (2004) Cardiology patient page. measurement of cholesterol: a patient perspective. Circulation 110:296–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferguson EC, Krishnamurthy R, Oldham SA (2007) Classic imaging signs of cardiovascular abnormalities. Radiographics 27:1323–1324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Young JB (2006) Imaging patients with heart failure: expectations of the clinician. Heart Fail Clin 2:107–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sanchez O, Revel MP, Couchon S et al (2007) Imaging of pulmonary hypertension. Rev Mal Resp 24:155–169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hunt SA, Abraham WT, Chin MH et al (2005) ACC/AHA 2005 guideline update for the diagnosis and management of chronic heart failure in the adult: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure): developed in collaboration with the American College of Chest Physicians and the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation 112:e154–e235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rayner BL, Goodman H, Opie LH (2004) The chest radiograph. A useful investigation in the evaluation of hypertensive patients. Am J Hypertens 17:507–510

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wexler RK, Elton T, Pleister A et al (2009) Cardiomyopathy: an overview. Am Fam Physician 79:778–784

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bluemke DA, Kronmal RA, Lima JA et al (2008) The relationship of left ventricular mass and geometry to incident cardiovascular events: the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 52(25):2148–2155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Levy D, Garrison RJ, Savage DD et al (1990) Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham Heart Study. N Engl J Med 322:1561–1566

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Harrison DG, Marcus ML, Dellsperger KC et al (1991) Pathophysiology of myocardial perfusion in hypertension. Circulation 83:III14–III18

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Giamouzis G, Sui X, Love TE et al (2008) A propensity-matched study of the association of cardiothoracic ratio with morbidity and mortality in chronic heart failure. Am J Cardiol 101:303–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Inoue K, Yoshii K, Ito H (1999) Effect of aging on cardiothoracic ratio in women: a longitudinal study. Gerontology 45:53–58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Potter JF, Elahi D, Tobin JD et al (1982) Effect of aging on the cardiothoracic ratio of men. J Am Geriatr Soc 30:404–409

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Frishman WH, Nadelmann J, Ooi WL et al (1992) Cardiomegaly on chest X-ray: prognostic implications from a ten-year cohort study of elderly subjects: a report from the Bronx Longitudinal Aging Study. Am Heart J 124:1026–1030

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gan SC, Beaver SK, Houck PM et al (2000) Treatment of acute myocardial infarction and 30-day mortality among women and men. N Engl J Med 343:8–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Vaccarino V, Rathore SS, Wenger NK et al (2002) Sex and racial differences in the management of acute myocardial infarction 1994 through 2002. N Engl J Med 353:671–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kang SH, Suh JW, Yoon CH et al (2012) Sex differences in management and mortality of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (from the Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction National Registry). Am J Cardiol 109:787–793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Devereux RB, Wachtell K, Gerdts E et al (2004) Prognostic significance of left ventricular mass change during treatment of hypertension. JAMA 292:2350–2356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Mitu M, Mitu F, Pandele GI (2000) Clinical characteristics of patients with ischemic heart failure. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Lasi 104:55–62

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Januzzi JL Jr, Maisel AS, Silver M (2012) Natriuretic peptide testing for predicting adverse events following heart failure hospitalization. Congest Heart Fail 12(Suppl 1):S9–S13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sigurdsson E, Thorgeirsson G, Sigvaldason H et al (1996) Prognostic role of cardiovascular risk factor for men with cardiomegaly: the Reykjavik Study. Am J Cardiol 78:1355–1361

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Jaber WA, Lennon RJ, Mathew V et al (2005) Application of evidence-based medical therapy is associated with improved outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention and is a valid quality indicator. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:1473–1478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sigurdsson E, Sigfusson N, Agnarsson U et al (1995) Long-term prognosis of different forms of coronary heart disease: the Reykjavik Study. Int J Epidemiol 24:58–68

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant of the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (MEST), Republic of Korea (2010-0020261), and the Korean Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (A120247, A120326).

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Youngkeun Ahn.

Additional information

Seung Jin Jun and Hae Chang Jeong contributed equally to the publication.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jun, S.J., Jeong, H.C., Ku, Y.H. et al. An optimal cardiothoracic ratio cut-off to predict clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29, 1889–1897 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-013-0260-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-013-0260-4

Keywords

Navigation