Abstract
This paper explores the underlying factors behind the collapse of commercial archaeology in Spain, with implications for other international contexts. It contributes to the current global debate about heritage ethics, adding nuance and conceptual depth to critical management studies and cultural heritage management in their approach to business ethics. Similar to other European contexts, Spanish archaeological management thrived during the 1990s and 2000s as a business model based on policies directed at safeguarding cultural heritage. The model had controversial ethical implications at academic, policy and business levels. However, the global financial crisis of 2008 had a huge impact on this sector, and more than 70% of the Spanish archaeological companies closed by 2017. Drawing on the concepts of abstract narratives, functional stupidity and corporatist neoliberalism, this paper illustrates the need to examine ethical issues from a pragmatic standpoint, beyond epistemological and moralistic critiques of profit-oriented businesses in the cultural realm. In doing so, it connects the fields of cultural heritage and management studies, opening up hitherto unexplored strands of research and debate.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler, P. (2009). A social science which forgets its founders is lost. In P. Adler (Ed.), Oxford handbook of sociology and organizational studies (pp. 3–19). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aitchison, K. (2009). After the ‘gold rush’: Global archaeology in 2009. World Archaeology, 41(4), 659–671.
Alonso González, P. (2016). Between certainty and trust: Boundary-work and the construction of archaeological epistemic authority. Cultural Sociology, 10(4), 483–501.
Alonso González, P. (2019). The heritage machine: fetishism and domination in Maragateria, Spain. London: Pluto.
Alonso González, P., & Macías Vázquez, A. (2014). Neoliberalismo corporativo y clientelismo en España: etnografía de la financiación europea del desarrollo rural a través de un proyecto fallido. AIBR, 9(3), 223–250.
Alvesson, M., & Spicer, A. (2012). A stupidity-based theory of organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 49(7), 1194–1220.
Argandoña, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in the tourism industry: Some lessons from the Spanish experience. IESE Business School Working Paper, 844.
Beugelsdijk, S., Van Schaik, T., & Arts, W. A. (2006). Toward a unified Europe? Explaining regional differences in value patterns by economic development, cultural heritage and historical shocks. Regional Studies, 40, 317–328.
Bonini Baraldi, S. (2014). Evaluating results of public sector reforms in Rechtsstaat countries: The role of context and processes in the reform of the Italian and French cultural heritage system. International Public Management Journal, 17(3), 411–432.
Bonini Baraldi, S., Shoup, D. D., & Zan, L. (2017). When megaprojects meet archaeology: A research framework and case study from Yenikapi, Istanbul. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 25(4), 423–444.
Bucherer, E., Eisert, U., & Gassmann, O. (2012). Towards systematic business model innovation: Lessons from product innovation management. Creativity Innovation Management, 21(2), 183–198.
Butler, N. (2016). Functional stupidity: A critique. Ephemera, 16(2), 115–123.
Cleary, K., Frolík, J., Krekovič, E., Parga-Dans, E., & Prokopiou, E. S. (2014). Responding to the financial crisis in five European Countries: People, roles, reactions and initiatives in archaeology. Archaeologies, 10(3), 211–231.
Demoule, J.-P. (2002). Rescue archaeology: The French way. Public Archaeology, 2(3), 170–177.
Dimitrova, A., & Steunenberg, B. (2013). Living in parallel universes? Implementing European movable cultural heritage policy in Bulgaria. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(2), 246–263.
European Commission. (2017). Special Eurobarometer 466: Cultural Heritage. Brussels: Directorate-General for Communication.
European Parliament. (2017). (EU) 2017/864. European Year of Cultural Heritage (2018). Strasbourg: Official Journal of the European Union.
Farías, A., Ibarra-Colado, E., & Guedes, A. (2010). Internationalization of management, neoliberalism and the Latin American challenge. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 6(2–3), 97–113.
Ferreira, L. M. (2010). Aqueología comunitaria, arqueología de contrato y educación patrimonial en Brasil. Jangwa Pana, 9(1), 95–102.
Gambardella, A., & McGahan, A. (2010). Business-model innovation: General purpose technologies and their implications for industry structure. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 262–271.
Gibson, C. (2017). Elaboration, generalization, triangulation, and interpretation: On enhancing the value of mixed method research. Organizational Research Methods, 20(2), 193–223.
Gnecco, C. (2015). An entanglement of sorts: Archaeology, ethics, praxis, multiculturalism. In C. Gnecco (Ed.), Ethics and archaeological praxis (pp. 1–17). New York: Springer.
Gnecco, C., & Dias, A. S. (2015). On contract archaeology. International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 19(4), 687–698.
González-Ruibal, A. (2018). Ethics of archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 47, 345–360.
González-Ruibal, A., Alonso González, P., & Criado-Boado, F. (2018a). Against reactionary populism: Towards a new public archaeology. Antiquity, 92(362), 507–515.
González-Ruibal, A., Alonso González, P., & Criado-Boado, F. (2018b). Authority vs power: Capitalism, archaeology and the populist challenge. Antiquity, 92(362), 525–527.
González Álvarez, D. (2013). Del precariado a la nada. La situación laboral de la Arqueología Comercial en el Estado Español a comienzos del s. XXI. Arqueología Pública en España (pp. 151–168). Madrid: JAS.
Greffe, X. (2004). Is heritage an asset or a liability? Journal of Cultural Heritage, 5(3), 301–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2004.05.001.
Haastrup, T. (2013). EU as mentor? Promoting regionalism as external relations practice in EU–Africa relations. Journal of European Integration, 35(7), 785–800.
Haber, A., & Shepherd, N. (2015). After Ethics: Ancestral Voices and Post-disciplinary Worlds in Archaeology: An Introduction (pp. 1–10). New York: Springer.
Hamilakis, Y., & Duke, P. (2009). Archaeology and capitalism: From ethics to politics. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
Hancké, B. (2010). Beyond varieties of capitalism conflict, contradictions, and complementarities in the European economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hernando Álvarez, C., & Tejerizo García, C. (2011). La arqueología y la academia: del siglo XIX al “Plan Bolonia”. Revista Arkeogazte, 1, 53–69.
Hutchings, R., & La Salle, M. (2015). Archaeology as disaster capitalism. International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 19(4), 699–720.
Iatridis, K., & Kesidou, E. (2018). What drives substantive versus symbolic implementation of ISO 14001 in a time of economic crisis? Insights from Greek manufacturing companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(4), 859–877.
Ibarra-Colado, E. (2006). Organization studies and epistemic coloniality in Latin America: Thinking otherness from the margins. Organization, 13(4), 463–488.
Icomos Australia. (1999 [1979]). The Burra Charter and guidelines to the Burra Charter. Canberra: Icomos.
Jerez Darias, L. M., Martín Martín, V. O., & Pérez González, R. (2012). Aproximación a una geografía de la corrupción urbanística en España. Ería, 87, 5–18.
Kristiansen, K. (2009). Contract archaeology in Europe: An experiment in diversity. World Archaeology, 41(4), 641–648.
Marín Suárez, C., & Parga Dans, E. (2017). Arqueologia de Gestão em Madrid: presos pelo modelo de especulação capitalista do território. Revista de Arqueologia, 28(2), 118–138.
Martin-Rios, C., & Parga-Dans, E. (2016). Service response to economic decline: Innovation actions for achieving strategic renewal. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2890–2900.
Meskell, L., & Pels, P. (2005). Introduction: Embedding ethics. In L. Meskell & P. Pels (Eds.), Embedding ethics (pp. 1–26). Oxford: Berg.
Parga-Dans, E. (2019). Heritage in danger. The collapse of commercial archaeology in Spain. Archaeological Dialogues, 26(2), 111–122.
Parga Dans, E., & Alonso González, P. (2017). The Altamira controversy: Assessing the economic impact of a world heritage site for planning and tourism management. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 30, 180–189.
Parga Dans, E., & Alonso González, P. (2019). Sustainable tourism and social value at World Heritage Sites: Towards a conservation plan for Altamira, Spain. Annals of Tourism Research, 74, 68–80.
Parga-Dans, E., Barreiro, D., & Varela-Pousa, R. (2016). Isomorphism and legitimacy in Spanish contract archaeology: The free-fall of an institutional model and the caveat of change. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 22(4), 291–301.
Parrado, S., Dahlström, C., & Lapuente, V. (2018). Mayors and corruption in Spain: Same rules, different outcomes. South European Society Politics, 23(3), 303–322.
Paulsen, R. (2017). Slipping into functional stupidity: The bifocality of organizational compliance. Human Relations, 70(2), 185–210.
Rubio Arostegui, J. A., & Rius-Ulldemolins, J. (2018). Cultural policies in the South of Europe after the global economic crisis: Is there a Southern model within the framework of European convergence? International Journal of Cultural Policy, 26, 1–15.
Schlanger, N. (2010). Archaeology and the global economic crisis: Multiple impacts, possible solutions. Brussels: Culture Lab Editions.
Schlanger, N., & Aitchison, K. (2010). Introduction. Archaeology and the global economic crisis. In N. Schlanger & K. Aitchison (Eds.), Archaeology and the global economic crisis. Multiple impacts, possible solutions (pp. 9–12). Tervuren: Culture Lab Editions.
Suarez-Villa, L. (2009). Technocapitalism a critical perspective on technological innovation and corporatism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Trotzig, G. (1993). The new European Convention on the protection of the archaeological heritage. Antiquity, 67(255), 414–415.
van Hoorn, A. (2015). The global financial crisis and the values of professionals in finance: An empirical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(2), 253–269.
Vidal, M., Adler, P., & Delbridge, R. (2015). When organization studies turns to societal problems: The contribution of Marxist Grand Theory. Organization Studies, 36(4), 405–422.
Zorzin, N. (2015). Archaeology and capitalism: Successful relationship or economic and ethical alienation? In C. Gnecco & D. Lippert (Eds.), Ethics and archaeological praxis (pp. 115–139). New York: Springer.
Funding
This work was supported by Project ID 2013-1126/001-001: “New ways of Engaging audiences, Activating societal relations and Renewing practices in Cultural Heritage (NEARCH)” European Commission—Culture Programme (2013–2018). This research was supported by funds from The Institute of Hertitage Sciences and the Spanish national research project CSO2017-85188-R: La construcción social de la calidad alimentaria: Mediaciones entre la producción y el consume de una economía basada en el conocimiento. The authors thank the individuals that took part in this study and the collaborating institutions. This manuscript has been edited by Guido Jones, currently funded by the Cabildo de Tenerife, under the TFinnova Programme supported by MEDI and FDCAN funds.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Parga Dans, E., Alonso González, P. The Unethical Enterprise of the Past: Lessons from the Collapse of Archaeological Heritage Management in Spain. J Bus Ethics 172, 447–461 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04504-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04504-6