Skip to main content
Log in

Appraising Intangible Assets from the Viewpoint of Value Drivers

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article does not intend to actually valuate intangible assets but focuses to investigate the relative value distribution of corporate intangible assets, and this links closely to the concept and application of value drivers. This is because we believe that drivers or attributes of the value significantly determine how the virtual value of these intangibles can be created for companies. We apply the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to the appraising process of intangible assets. The AHP method can mainly sort the non-financial value drivers in order according to their weighted contributions. Therefore, the key purpose of this article is to develop a tentative model for the evaluation of intangible assets, which helps business to correctly appraise corporate value ratios and avoid bias due to mainly relying on financial statements when measuring an entity’s value. In addition, in view of the significant proportion of intangible assets over total assets in high-technology industries, this research, then, uses six industries in Hsinchu Science Park, Taiwan, as its research objects in order to test the applicability of its model, as well as exploring the value weights of intangible assets and its evaluation among different technology industries. Besides, the empirical result of this article is mainly to support business appraisal and thus improves the effectiveness of value-based management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chan, L. K. C., Lakonishok, J., Sougiannis, T. (2001), The stock market valuation of research and development expenditures. Journal of Finance 56(6):2431–2456. doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, Y. J., Chen, Y. W. (2004) Using AHP in patent valuation. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 46:1054–1062 doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubin, J. A. (2007) Valuing intangible assets with a nested logit market share model. Journal of Econometrics 139(2):285–302. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2006.10.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feltham, G. A., Ohlson, J.A. (1995) Valuation and clean surplus accounting for operating and financial activities. Contemporary Accounting Research 11:689–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G.: 1991, `Competition for Competence and Inter-Partner Learning within International Strategic Alliances', Strategic Management Journal 12, 83–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W. H. A. (1999) An integrative taxonomy of intellectual capital: measuring the stock and flow of intellectual capital components in the firm. International Journal of Technology Management, 18(5):562–575. doi:10.1504/IJTM.1999.002788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L. D., Neave, E. H., Pazderka, B. (2002) Knowledge, innovation and share value. International Journal of Management Reviews 4(2):101–134. doi:10.1111/1468-2370.00080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalafut, P. C., Low, J. (2001) The value creation index: quantifying intangible value. Strategy & Leadership, 29(5):9–15. doi:10.1108/10878570110696632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton: 2004, ‹Measuring the Strategic Readiness of Intangible Assets’, Harvard Business Review February, 52–63

  • Kayo, E. K.: 2002, Capital Structure and Risk of Tangible and Intangible-intensive Companies: A Contribution of Studying of Firm Valuation. PhD Dissertation, University of Sao Paulo

  • Kelso, Louis O., Adler, Mortimer J. (1958), The Capitalist Manifesto. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P.(2003), Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and Control. 11th ed., New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev, B. (2001), Intangibles: Management, Measurement and Reporting. Washington: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Grace T.R., Lin, Jerry (2006). Ethical customer value creation: drivers and barriers. Journal of Business Ethics 67:93–105. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9009-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luthy, D. H.: 1998, Intellectual Capital and Its Measurement. Proceedings of the Asian Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting Conference (APIRA), Osaka, Japan

  • Mathis, Robert L. and Jackson, John H. (2003). Human Resource Management. MN: South-Western College Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, R., Schweihs, R. (1999), Valuing Intangible Assets. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T.L. (1996) Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, T.A. (1999), The Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organization. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sveiby, K.E. (1997), The New Organization Wealth: Managing and Measuring. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sveiby, K. E.: 2002, ‹Methods for Measuring Intangible Assets’, Working paper, Hanken Business School, Helsinki, Finland

  • William, S.: 2001, ‹On-line Professional Development for Ohio’s K-12 Educators: A Key to Student Success on the Ohio Graduation Test’, Presented to The National Association of Science Teachers Regional Meeting (SECO), 16 Feb 2001, Cincinnati, Ohio, Science Education Council of Ohio Program, Vol. 24, p. 33

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grace T. R. Lin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lin, G.T.R., Tang, J.Y.H. Appraising Intangible Assets from the Viewpoint of Value Drivers. J Bus Ethics 88, 679–689 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9974-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9974-y

Keywords

Navigation