Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Comparison of Models Describing the Impact of Moral Decision Making on Investment Decisions

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As moral decision making in financial markets incorporates moral considerations into investment decisions, some rational decision theorists argue that moral considerations would introduce inefficiency to investment decisions. However, market demand for socially responsible investment is increasing, suggesting that investment decisions are influenced by both financial and moral considerations. Several models can be applied to explain moral behavior. We test the suitability of (a) multiple attribute utility theory (MAUT), (b) theory of planned behavior, and (c) issue-contingent model of ethical decision making in organizations. In an experimental setting, 141 participants traded company shares in a computerized asset market. Over 12 periods, companies varied in morality (i.e., treatment of employees) and in profitability (i.e., expected dividends per share). Participants’ bids and asks for shares were recorded. Results indicate that moral considerations influence investment decisions, controlling for profit. Differences between the three models are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen I. (1985). From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior. In: Kuhl J., Beckmann J. (eds.), Action-Control: From Cognition to Behavior. Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 11–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50, 179–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand P., Cowton C. J. (1993). The Ethical Investor: Exploring Dimensions of Investment Behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology 14, 377–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberg S., Rolle D., Weber C. (2003). Does Habitual Car Use not Lead to More Resistance to Whom It May Concern: Change of Travel Mode? Transportation 30, 97–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron J. (2000). Thinking and Deciding (3rd edition). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg J. E., Daley L. A., Dickhaut J. W., O’Brien J. R. (1986). Controlling Preferences for Lotteries on Units of Experimental Exchange. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 101, 281–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobek D., Hatfield R. (2003). An Investigation of the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Role of Moral Obligation in Tax Compliance. Behavioral Research in Accounting 15, 13–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borrello, M. G., M. Morricone, A. Pedon and P. Benevene: 2004, Ethical Finance between Saving and Investment. Paper presented at the 29th Annual Colloquium of the International Association for Economic Psychology/SABE-IAREP Conference, Philadelphia, USA.

  • Bortz J. (1999). Statistik für Sozialwissenschaftler (5th ed). Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer C. F., Hogarth R. M. (1999). The Effects of Financial Incentives in Experiments: A Review and Capital–Labor–Production Framework. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19, 7–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson D. S., Kacmar K. M., Wadsworth L. L. (2002). The Impact of Moral Intensity Dimensions on Ethical Decision Making: Assessing the Relevance of Orientation. Journal of Managerial Issues 14, 15–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Carswell A. (2002). Crisis of Conscience. Australian CPA 72, 26–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman G. B., Elstein A. S., Kuzel T. M., Nadler R. B., Sharifi R., Bennett C. L. (1999). A Multi-Attribute Model of Prostate Cancer Patients’ Preferences for Health States. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation 8, 171–180

    Google Scholar 

  • East R. (1993). Investment Decisions and the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology 14, 337–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flannery B. L., May D. R. (2000). Environmental Ethical Decision Making in the US Metal-Finishing Industry. Academy of Management Journal 43, 642–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein M., Ajzen I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior. Addison Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallup: 2000, One in Nine Investor Households Have “Socially Responsible” Investments (Gallup, Princeton).

  • Hofmann, E., E. Penz and E. Kirchler: 2004, Ethical Investment: An Explorative Study for the Explanation of Ethical Behaviour on Asset Markets. Paper presented at the 29th Annual Colloquium of the International Association for Economic Psychology/SABE-IAREP Conference, Philadelphia, USA.

  • Jones T. M. (1991). Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model. Academy of Management Review 16, 366–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasubek, W. and K. M. Aschenbrenner: 1978, Optimierung subjektiver Urteile. Anwendung der multiattributen Nutzentheorie bei medizinischen Therapieentscheidungen. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 25, 594–616. [Optimization of subjective judgments. Application of the MAUT for decisions of medical therapy.]

  • Kant, I.: 1959, Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals (translated by L. W. Beck) (Liberal Arts Press, New York), (Original published 1781).

  • Kim T-Y., Kwak S.-J., Yoo S. H. (1998). Applying Multi-Attribute Utility Theory to Decision Making in Environmental Planning: A Case Study of the Electric Utility in Korea. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 41, 597–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwak S-J., Yoo S. H., Kim T-Y. (2001). A Constructive Approach to Air-Quality Valuation in Korea. Ecological Economics 38, 327–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis A. (2001). A Focus Group Study of the Motivation to Invest: ‹Ethical/Green’ and ‹Ordinary’ Investors Compared. Journal of Socio-Economics 30, 331–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis A., Mackenzie C. (2000). Morals, Money, Ethical Investing and Economic Psychology. Human Relations 53, 179–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis A., Webley P. (1994). Social and Ethical Investing. Beliefs, Preferences and the Willingness to Sacrifice Financial Return. In: Lewis A., Wärneryd K.-E. (eds), Ethics and Economic Affairs. Routhledge, London, pp.171–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis A., Webley P., Winnett A., Mackenzie C. (1998). Morals and Markets: Some Theoretical and Policy Implications of Ethical Investing. In: Taylor-Goodby P. (ed.), Choice and Public Policy: The Limits of Welfare Markets. Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp.164–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Loe T. W., Ferrell L., Mansfield P. (2000). A Review of Empirical Studies Assessing Ethical Decision Making in Business. Journal of Business Ethics 25, 185–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz H. M. (1952a). The Utility of Wealth. Journal of Political Economy 60, 151–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz H. M. (1952b). Portfolio Selection. Journal of Finance 7, 77–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May D. R., Pauli K. P. (2002). The Role of Moral Intensity in Ethical Decision Making. Business and Society 41, 84–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michelson G., Wailes N., van der Laan S., Frost G. (2004). Ethical Investment Processes and Outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics 52, 1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montalvo-Corral C. (2002). Environmental Policy and Technological Innovation: Why Do Firms Adopt or Reject New Technologies? Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Raftery A. E. (1996). Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research. In: Marsden P. V. (ed.), Sociological Methodology Vol. 25. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 111–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest J. (1986). Moral Development. Advances in Research and Theory. Praeger, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth A. E., Malouf M. W. K. (1979). Game-Theoretic Models and the Role of Information in Bargaining. Psychological Review 86, 574–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schifter D. B., Ajzen I. (1985). Intention, Perceived Control and Weight Loss: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49, 843–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith V. (1962). An Experimental Study of Competitive Market Behavior. The Journal of Political Economy LXX, 111–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith V. (1994). Economics in the Laboratory. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8, 113–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparkes R., Cowton C. J. (2004). The Maturing of Socially Responsible Investment: A Review of the Developing Link with Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 52, 45–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stata Corporation: 2005, Stata Base Reference Manual, Release 9 Vol. 1 (Stata Press, College Station, TX).

  • Stewart, M.: 1983, On Least Squares Estimation When the Dependent Variable Is Grouped. Review of Economic Studies 50, 737–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor R. (2000). How New Is Socially Responsible Investment? Business Ethics: A European Review 9, 174–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber J. (1996). Influences upon Managerial Moral Decision Making: Nature of the Harm and Magnitude of Consequences. Human Relations 49, 1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webley P., Lewis A., Mackenzie C. (2001). Commitment among Ethical Investors: An Experimental Approach. Journal of Economic Psychology 22, 27–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Nicole Fabbro and Silvia Hansbauer for helping with data collection and the ‹Verein zur Foerderung der Wirtschaftspsychologie’ for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Vienna, Universitaetsstrasse 7, 1010, Vienna, Austria

    Eva Hofmann, Erik Hoelzl & Erich Kirchler

Authors
  1. Eva Hofmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Erik Hoelzl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Erich Kirchler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eva Hofmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hofmann, E., Hoelzl, E. & Kirchler, E. A Comparison of Models Describing the Impact of Moral Decision Making on Investment Decisions. J Bus Ethics 82, 171–187 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9570-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9570-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation