Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Screening mammography after breast cancer treatment: patterns in community practice

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Background

Guidelines for screening women post-breast cancer treatment are generally lacking. This study was conducted to review the literature on guidelines for this population and to evaluate whether there is a common practice in the community for following these women.

Methods

The literature was reviewed for presence of published or inferred guidelines. Data were then used from the Carolina Mammography Registry (CMR) to see if patterns exist in community practice. For the years 1995–1999, 3081 women with a new diagnosis of unilateral breast cancer and a post-treatment screening mammogram in CMR were included. Recommendations for initial mammographic examination and intervals of subsequent mammograms post-treatment were described and tested for patterns of follow-up time.

Results

The only evidence-based guidelines found for post-treatment mammographic examinations were from the American Society of Clinical Oncology. They recommend 6 month follow-up initially followed by 12 month follow-up if findings remain stable. Among the 3081 women included in the study, 17.4% were recommended to return at 6 months post-treatment following their initial mammogram. Of the women who had at least three post-cancer mammograms (1592/3081), 82.6% were recommended for 12 month intervals at all three visits; only 2.1% of women were recommended for 6 month intervals at all three visits.

Conclusions

This study found that most community-based radiologists included in our study recommend following women at 12 month intervals post-treatment. Whether this 12 month screening interval is optimal for detecting recurrent cancers is not known and should be the focus of future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Cancer Society, Cancer Facts and Figures. 2005

  2. Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, Woolf SH, Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Ann Intern Med 2002; 137:347–360

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. U.S Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to Clinical Perventive Services, Third Edition. 2002 [cited 2003 Oct 15]; Available from: URL: http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/aspstf/uspsbrca.htm

  4. Yankaskas BC, Jones MB, Aldrich TE, The Carolina Mammography Registry: a population-based mammography and cancer surveillance project J Registry Manage 1996; 23:173–178

    Google Scholar 

  5. National Comprehensive Cancer Network, http://www.ncn.org/patient_gls/_english/_breast/index.htm, [cited 2003 Sept 25]

  6. Smith T, Davidson N, Schapira D, et al. Recommended breast cancer survellance guidelinesJ Clin Oncol 1997; 15:2149–2156

    Google Scholar 

  7. Smith TJ, Davidson NE, Schapira DV, Grunfeld E, Muss HB, Vogel VG 3rd, Somerfield MR. American Society of Clinical Oncology 1998 update of recommended breast cancer surveillance guidelines J Clin Oncol 1999; 17:1080–1082

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Recht A, Silen W, Schnitt SJ, Connouy JL, Gelman RS, Rose MA, Silver B, Harris JR. Time-course of local recurrence following conservative surgery and radiotherapy for early stage breast cancer Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1988; 15:255–261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Murphy K, Coppin C, Kader E, Norris B, Weir L, Follow-up after treatment for breast cancer, The Sterrling Committee on Clinical Practice and Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Breast Cancer Can Med Assoc J 1998; 158:S65–S70

    Google Scholar 

  10. Geller BM, Kerlikowske K, Carney PA, Abraham LA, Yankaskas BC, Taplin SH, Balllard-Barbash R, Dignan MB, Rosenberg R, Urban N, Barlow WE. Mammography surveillance following breast cancer Breast Cancer Res Treat 2003; 81:107–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jacobson JA, Danforth DN, Cowan KH, D′Angelo T, Steinberg SM, Pierce L, Lippman ME, Lichter AS, Glatstein E, Okunieff P. Ten-year results of a comparison of conservation with mastectomy in the treatment of stage I and II breast cancer New Engl J of Med 1995; 332:907–911

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kurtz JM, Amalric R, Brandone H, Ayme Y, Jacquemier J, Pietra JC, Hans D, Pollet JF, Bressac C, Spitalier JM. Local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy. Frequency, time course, and prognosis Cancer 1989; 63:1912–1917

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Grosse A, Schreer I, Frischbier HJ, Maass H, Loening T, Bahnsen J, Results of breast conserving therapy for early breast cancer and the role of mammographic follow-up Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997; 38:761–767

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Orel SG, Troupin RH, Patterson EA, Fowble BL, Breast cancer recurrence after lumpectomy and irradiation: role of mammography in detection Radiology 1992; 183:201–206

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hassell PR, Olivotto IA, Mueller HA, Kingston GW, Basco VE, Early breast cancer: detection of recurrence after conservative surgery and radiation therapy Radiology 1990; 176:731–735

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stomper PC, Recht A, Berenberg AL, Jochelson MS, Harris JR, Mammographic detection of recurrent cancer in the irradiated breast AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987; 148:39–43

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Funding: Funded by National Cancer Institute, U01-CA-70040.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arun Krishnaraj.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krishnaraj, A., Yankaskas, B.C. & Stearns, S.C. Screening mammography after breast cancer treatment: patterns in community practice. Breast Cancer Res Treat 97, 73–80 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-005-9093-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-005-9093-8

Keywords

Navigation