Skip to main content
Log in

Introduction: A Primer on Adaptationism

  • Published:
Biology & Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Amundson R (1988) Logical adaptationism. Behav Brain Sci 11:505–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amundson R (1994) Two concepts of constraint: adaptationism and the challenge from developmental biology. Philos Sci 61:556–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amundson R (1996) Historical development of the concept of adaptation. In Rose MR, Lauder GV (eds) Adaptation. San Diego, Academic Press, pp 11–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Amundson R (2007) The changing role of the embryo in evolutionary thought: roots of Evo Devo. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty J, Desjardins EC (2009) Natural selection and history. Biol Philos

  • Brandon R, Rausher MD (1996) Testing adapationism: a comment on Orzack and Sober. Am Nat 148:189–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (1986) The blind watchmaker. New York, WW Norton

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett DC (1995) Darwin’s dangerous idea. New York, Simon and Schuster

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupré J (1987) The latest on the best: essays on evolution and optimality. Cambridge, MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Forber P (2009) Spandrels and a pervasive problem of evidence. Biol Philos

  • Godfrey-Smith P (2001) Three kinds of adaptationism. In Orzack SH, Sober E (eds) Adaptationism and optimality. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp 335–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith P, Wilkins JF (2008) Adaptationism. In Sarkar S, Plutynski A (eds) A companion to the philosophy of biology. Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell

  • Gould SJ (2002) The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge, Belknap, Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould SJ, Lewontin RC (1979) The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 205:581–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey PH, Pagel MD (1991) The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston AI (2009) San Marco and evolutionary biology. Biol Philos

  • Lewens T (2009) Seven types of adaptationism. Biol Philos

  • Love A (2006) Evolutionary morphology and evo-devo: Hierarchy and novelty. Theor Biosci 124:317–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J, Burian RM, Kauffman S, Alberch P, Campbell J, Goodwin B, Lande R, Raup D, Wolpert L (1985) Developmental constraints and evolution: a perspective from the mountain lake conference on development and evolution. Q Rev Biol 60(3):265–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E (1983) How to carry out the adaptationist program? Am Nat 121(3):324–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller GB, Wagner GP (2003) Innovation. In Hall BK, Olson WM (eds) Keywords and concepts in evolutionary developmental biology. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, pp 218–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr HA (2005) The genetic theory of adaptation: a brief history. Nat Rev Genet 6:119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orzack SH, Sober E (1994) Optimality models and the test of adaptationism. Am Nat 143:361–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orzack SH, Sober E (1996) How to formulate and test adaptationism. Am Nat 148(1):202–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orzack SH, Sober E (2001) Adaptationism and optimality. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci M, Kaplan J (2000) The fall and rise of Dr Pangloss: adaptationism and the Spandrels paper 20 years later. Trends Ecol Evol 15(2):66–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potochnik A (2009). Optimality modeling in a suboptimal world. Biol Philos

  • Raff RA (1996) The shape of life: genes, development, and the evolution of animal form. Chicago, University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose MR, Lauder GV (1996) Adaptation. San Diego, Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden J (1998) Primer of ecological theory. Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober E (1987) What is adaptationism? In Dupré J (eds) The latest on the best. Cambridge, MIT Press, pp 105–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober E (1996) Evolution and optimality: feathers, bowling balls, and the thesis of adaptationism. Philos Exch 26:41–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Valen L (2009) How ubiquitous is adaptation? A critique of the epiphenomenist program. Biol Philos

  • Wagner G (2001) The character concept in evolutionary biology. San Diego, Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner GP, Altenberg L (1996) Complex adaptations and the evolution of evolvability. Evolution 50:967–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins JF, Godfrey-Smith P (2009) Adaptationism and the adaptive landscape. Biol Philos

Download references

Acknowledgements

I owe a significant debt to Kim Sterelny for the opportunity to prepare this special issue, and for invaluable help with both the content and the editorial process. I would also like to thank everyone who expressed positive interest in the production of an issue commemorating the Spandrels article, especially (but certainly not limited to) the contributors herein.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Forber.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Forber, P. Introduction: A Primer on Adaptationism. Biol Philos 24, 155–159 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-008-9150-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-008-9150-x

Keywords

Navigation