Skip to main content
Log in

Response to the Commentaries on Dreger (2008)

  • Reply to Peer Commentaries
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. As this article was going to press, Mathy sent a letter to my dean complaining that I am unethical because, among other things, I decided to publish my article in Archives. Apparently she has also filed an ethics complaint about me with the American Psychological Association, in spite of the fact that I'm an historian (see Gsovski, 2008).

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

For assistance in formulating this response, my thanks (and none of the blame) go to Aron Sousa, Paul Vasey, a few colleagues who understandably wish to remain anonymous, and my colleagues in the Medical Humanities and Bioethics Program of the Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University and in the Donnelley Family Disability Ethics Program of the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alice D. Dreger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dreger, A.D. Response to the Commentaries on Dreger (2008). Arch Sex Behav 37, 503–510 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9348-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9348-7

Navigation