Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The viability of interprofessional entrustable professional activities

  • Reflections
  • Published:
Advances in Health Sciences Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interprofessional education (IPE) and entrustable professional activities (EPAs) represent two topics in health professions education that have attracted significant attention in recent years. IPE (when different health professionals learn with, from and about each other with the aim of optimal care) has an inherent focus on the collective. EPAs (units of professional practice that can be fully entrusted to a trainee, once he or she has demonstrated the necessary competence to execute this activity unsupervised) have a focus on the individual. Attempts to relate the two may cause friction and the question is: can they be reconciled? Are interprofessional EPAs or team-EPAs useful concepts and if so what should they look like? The authors argue that most work in modern healthcare involves interprofessional collaboration. Some EPAs have an inherent strong interprofessional nature, such as emergency teamwork, running multidisciplinary team meetings, and surgery. Other EPAs are less inherently dependent on interprofessional collaboration. The authors conclude that neither interprofessional team-EPAs (for which a team can or should be certified), nor IP-EPAs for individuals, as opposed to other EPAs, are viable concepts. However, the authors do not question that certifying health care professionals and entrusting trainees with most clinical tasks will require to ascertain their competence in interprofessional collaboration. This must be included when assessing learners for most EPAs and making entrustment decisions. This can help to strengthen interprofessional competence in the clinical workplace.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brandt, B. F., Kitto, S., & Cervero, R. M. (2018). Untying the interprofessional gordian knot: The national collaborative for improving the clinical learning. Environment, 93(10), 1437–1440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, B., Lutfiyya, M. N., King, J. A., & Chioreso, C. (2014). A scoping review of interprofessional collaborative practice and education using the lens of the triple aim. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 28(5), 393–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. R., Gillespie, C. C., & Warren, J. B. (2016). EPA 9—Collaborate as a member of an interprofessional team: A short communication from the AAMC core EPAs for entering residency pilot schools. Medical Science Educator, 26(3), 457–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H. C., & ten Cate, O. (2018). Assessment through entrustable professional activities. In C. Delany & E. Molloy (Eds.), Learning & teaching in clinical contexts: A practical guide (pp. 286–304). Chatswood: Elsevier Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (2018). Expertise in transition—Expansive learning in medical work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Englander, R., Flynn, T., Call, S., Carraccio, C., Cleary, L., et al. (2014). Core entrustable professional activities for entering residency—Curriculum developers guide. Washington DC: Association of American Medical Colleges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammick, M., Freeth, D., Koppel, I., Reeves, S., & Barr, H. (2007). A best evidence systematic review of interprofessional education: BEME Guide no. 9. Medical Teacher, 29(8), 735–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Interprofessional Education Collaborative. (2016). Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: 2016 update. Interprofessional Education Collaborative. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182308e39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koff, N., DeFriese, A., & Witzke, D. (1994). Loosely coupled systems as a conceptual framework for interdisciplinary training. Educational Gerontology, 20(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, L. A. (2012). Rethinking competence in the context of teamwork. In B. D. Hodges & L. A. Lingard (Eds.), The question of competence (pp. 42–69). New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, L. (2016). Paradoxical truths and persistent myths: Reframing the team competence conversation. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 36, S19–S21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutfiyya, M. N., Brandt, B. F., & Cerra, F. (2016). Reflections from the intersection of health professions education and clinical practice: The state of the science of interprofessional education and collaborative practice. Academic Medicine, 91(6), 766–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meade, L. B., Suddarth, K. H., Jones, R. R., Zaas, A. K., Albanese, T., Yamazaki, K., et al. (2016). Patients, nurses, and physicians working together to develop a discharge entrustable professional activity assessment tool. Academic Medicine, 91(10), 1388–1391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mihaljevic, A. L., Schmidt, J., Mitzkat, A., Probst, P., Kenngott, T., Mink, J., et al. (2018). Heidelberger Interprofessionelle Ausbildungsstation (HIPSTA): A practice- and theory-guided approach to development and implementation of Germany’s first interprofessional training ward. GMS Journal for Medical Education, 35(3), Doc33. https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, G., Lincoln, M., Dunn, S., Nisbet, G., Lincoln, M., & Informal, S. D. (2013). Informal interprofessional learning: An untapped opportunity for learning and change within the workplace learning and change within the workplace. Journal of Interprofssional Care, 27(6), 469–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paradis, E., & Whitehead, C. R. (2015). Louder than words: Power and conflict in interprofessional education articles, 1954–2013. Medical Education, 49(4), 399–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, E. S., Roth, E. M., Woods, D. D., Chow, R., & Gomes, J. O. (2004). Handoff strategies in settings with high consequences for failure: Lessons for health care operations. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 16(2), 125–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Post, J. A., Wittich, C. M., Thomas, K. G., Dupras, D. M., Halvorsen, A. J., Mandrekar, J. N., et al. (2016). Rating the quality of entrustable professional activities: Content validation and associations with the clinical context. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 31(5), 518–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, S., Goldman, J., Freeth, D., & Zwarenstein, M. (2013). Interprofessional education: Effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002213.pub3.www.cochranelibrary.com.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmelter, V., März, E., Adolf, C., Wölfel, T. L., Lottspeich, C., Fischer, M. R., et al. (2018). Ward rounds in internal medicine: Validation of an entrustable professional activity (EPA) observation checklist. GMS Journal for Medical Education, 35(2), Doc17. https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shorey, S., Lau, T. C., Lau, L. S. T., & Ang, E. (2019). Entrustable professional activities in health care education: A scoping review. Medical Education, 53(7), 766–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szasz, G. (1969). Interprofessional education in the health sciences: A project conducted at the University of British Columbia. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 47(4), 449–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D. R., Park, Y. S., Egan, R., Chan, M. K., Karpinski, J., Touchie, C., et al. (2017). EQual, a novel rubric to evaluate entrustable professional activities for quality and structure. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 92(11), S110–S117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ten Cate, O. (2005). Entrustability of professional activities and competency-based training. Medical Education, 39(12), 1176–1177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ten Cate, O. (2013). Nuts and bolts of entrustable professional activities. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 5(1), 157–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ten Cate, O. (2014). Trusting graduates to enter residency: What does it take? Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 6(1), 7–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ten Cate, O., Chen, H. C., Hoff, R. G., Peters, H., Bok, H., & van der Schaaf, M. (2015). Curriculum development for the workplace using entrustable professional activities (EPAs): AMEE guide no. 99. Medical Teacher, 37(11), 983–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ten Cate, O., Hart, D., Ankel, F., Busari, J., Englander, R., Glasgow, N., et al. (2016). Entrustment decision making in clinical training. Academic Medicine, 91(2), 191–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ten Cate, O., & Hoff, R. G. (2017). From case-based to entrustment-based discussions. Clinical Teacher, 14(6), 385–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ten Cate, O., & Scheele, F. (2007). Viewpoint: Competency-based postgraduate training—Can we bridge the gap between theory and clinical practice? Academic Medicine, 82(6), 542–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Leijen-Zeelenberg, J. E., Van Raak, A. J. A., Duimel-Peeters, I. G. P., Kroese, M. E. A. L., Brink, P. R. G., & Vrijhoef, H. J. M. (2015). Interprofessional communication failures in acute care chains: How can we identify the causes? Journal of Interprofessional Care, 29(4), 320–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, S. J., & Reeves, S. (2015). Milestones and entrustable professional activities: The key to practically translating competencies for interprofessional education? Journal of Interprofessional Care, 29(5), 507–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wölfel, T., Beltermann, E., Lottspeich, C., Vietz, E., Fischer, M. R., & Schmidmaier, R. (2016). Medical ward round competence in internal medicine—An interview study towards an interprofessional development of an entrustable professional activity (EPA). BMC Medical Education, 16(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0697-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge comments on an early version of the manuscript from Dr. Bridget O’Brien and Dr. Marije Hennus.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Research and Development of Education, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box # 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Olle ten Cate & Inge A. Pool

Authors
  1. Olle ten Cate
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Inge A. Pool
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olle ten Cate.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

ten Cate, O., Pool, I.A. The viability of interprofessional entrustable professional activities. Adv in Health Sci Educ 25, 1255–1262 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-019-09950-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-019-09950-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation