Skip to main content
Log in

Internal medicine residents do not accurately assess their medical knowledge

  • --/Exemplar/Reflections/If I knew then...
  • Published:
Advances in Health Sciences Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Medical knowledge is essential for appropriate patient care; however, the accuracy of internal medicine (IM) residents’ assessment of their medical knowledge is unknown.

Methods

IM residents predicted their overall percentile performance 1 week (on average) before and after taking the in-training exam (ITE), an objective and well accepted method to assess medical knowledge to study resident assessment accuracy. Ordinary least squares regression was used to study the association between the absolute accuracy of their predictions of their percentile performance on the ITE examination and their actual percentile performance.

Results

Ninety-three percent of our 28 residents participated. Residents were highly inaccurate in predicting their percentile performance. Only 31% had ITE scores that were within 10 points of their predictions. On average, most residents were pessimistic about their overall percentile performance with 18 (69%) underestimating their performance. Having just taken the examination and previous experience with the examination did not improve predictions of percentile performance.

Conclusion

IM residents did not accurately predict their own level of medical knowledge. Taking the examination and experience with previous exams does not appear to improve the ability of these IM residents to predict their performance. Residents need to be taught to rely on the results of standardized examinations such as the ITE to best assess their overall medical knowledge. The factors important for accurate self-assessment of medical knowledge in individual clinical situations remain unexplored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACP In-Training Exam. (n.d.) Retrieved August, 2005, from: http://www.acponline.org/cme/itelg.htm?idxt/InTraining Exam.

  • Arnold, L., Willoughby, T. L., & Calkins, E.V. (1985). Self-evaluation in undergraduate medical education: A longitudinal perspective. Journal of Medical Education, 60(1), 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colliver, J., Verhulst, S., & Barrows, H. (2005). Self-assessment in medical practice: A further concern about the conventional research paradigm. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 17(3), 200–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coutts, L., & Rogers, J. (1999). Predictors of student self-assessment accuracy during a clinical performance exam: Comparisons between overestimators and under-estimators of standardized patient evaluated performance. Academic Medicine, 74(10 Suppl), S128–S130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crunden, E. J. (1991). An investigation into why qualified nurses inappropriately describe their own cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 16(5), 597–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eva, K., & Regehr, G. (2005). Self-assessment in the health professions: A reformulation and research agenda. Academic Medicine, 80(10 Suppl), S46–S54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farnill, D., Hayes, S. C., & Todisco, J. (1997). Interviewing skills: Self-evaluation by medical students. Medical Education, 31(2), 122–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M. J. (1991). A review of the validity and accuracy of self-assessments in health professions training. Academic Medicine, 66(12), 762–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruppen, L. D., Garcia, J., Grum, C. M., Fitzgerald, J. T., White, C. A., & Dicken, L. (1997). Medical students’ self-assessment accuracy in communication skills. Academic Medicine, 72(10 Suppl 1), S57–S59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruppen, L. D., White, C., Fitzgerald, J. T., Grum, C. M., & Woolliscroft, J. O. (2000). Medical students’ self-assessments and their allocations of learning time. Academic Medicine, 75(4), 374–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, B., Regehr, G., & Martin, D. (2001). Difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence: Novice physicians who are unskilled and unaware of it. Academic Medicine, 76(10 Suppl), S87–S89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, J. B., & Macbeth, W. A. (1977). Correlations between staff, peer and self-assessments of fourth-year students in surgery. Medical Education, 11(3), 167–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezler, A. G. (1989). Self assessment in problem-based groups. Medical Teacher, 11(2), 151–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, M. E., Hitchcock, M. A., & Dunnington, G. L. (1999). Peer and self-assessment during problem-based tutorials. American Journal of Surgery, 177(3), 266–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamblyn, R., Abrahamowicz, M., Dauphinee, W. D., Hanley, J. A., Norcini, J., & Girard, N. (2002). Association between licensure examination scores and practice in primary care. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288(23), 3019–3026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, M., Gruppen, L., & Regehr, G. (2002). Measuring self-assessment: Current state of the art. Advances in Health Science Education Theory and Practice, 7(1), 63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winfield, D., Cook, J., Thiss, L., Straessen, J. A., Fletcher, A. E., & Fagard, R. et al. (2002). Terminal digit preference in the Eur trial. Blood Pressure Monitor, 7, 169–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolliscroft, J. O., TenHaken, J., Smith, J., & Calhoun, J. G. (1993). Medical students’ clinical self-assessments: Comparisons with external measures of performance and the students’ self-assessments of overall performance and effort. Academic Medicine, 68(4), 285–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all of the internal medicine residents who participated in this study and Dr. Neema Doshi for her valuable insights.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roger Jones.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, R., Panda, M. & Desbiens, N. Internal medicine residents do not accurately assess their medical knowledge. Adv in Health Sci Educ 13, 463–468 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-007-9058-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-007-9058-2

Keywords

Navigation