Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Factors that influence the intensity of non-agricultural management of plant resources

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated the relationships of land tenure, biological, cultural and spatial variables and their effect on the intensity of management of 20 edible plants used by the Santa Maria Tecomavaca community in Oaxaca State, Mexico. We developed a non-linear generalized model showing that land ownership, cultural importance and biological characteristics of a plant are the most significant factors influencing farmers’ decisions to intensify management of plant resources. On common land, species with high cultural importance and long life cycles are managed intensively, while, regardless of cultural importance, species with short life cycles are simply gathered. On land where particular people have an acknowledged right of use, species with long life cycles are always managed at an intermediate level of intensity regardless of their cultural importance, while for species with short life cycles, management intensity tends to slightly decrease as cultural importance increases. Even though management is generally more intensive in lands where individuals have use rights, as expected from the “supervised collective action model”, culturally important resources are more intensively managed in communal areas, probably as a result of a long tradition of consumption and of their economic importance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcorn JB (1981) Huastec non crop resource management: implications for prehistoric rain forest management. Hum Ecol 9:395–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcorn JB (1989) Process as resource: the traditional agricultural ideology of Bora and Huastec resource management and its implications for research. Adv Econ Bot 7:63–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson AB, Posey DA (1989) Management of a tropical scrub savanna by the Gorotire Kayapo Brazil. Adv Econ Bot 7:159–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Arellano E, Casas A (2003) Morphological variation of Escontria chiotilla (Cactaceae) under silvicultural management in the Tehuacán valley, central Mexico. Genet Resour Crop Evol 50:439–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold JE, Ruíz-Perez M (1998) The role of non-timber forest products in conservation and development. In: Wollenberg E, Ingles A (eds) Incomes from forest methods for the development and conservation of forest products for local communities. Centre for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, pp 17–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Balée W (1989) The cultura of Amazonian forest. Adv Econ Bot 7:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Balée W, Gély A (1989) Managed forest succesion in Amazonia: the Ka’apor case. Adv Econ Bot 7:129–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum WM, Kraft JR (1998) Group choice: competition, travel, and the ideal free distribution. J Exp Anal Behav 69:227–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Begon M, Harper JL, Townsend CR (1996) Ecology: individuals, populations and communities, 3rd edn. Blackwell science, Oxford, London, 1068 pp

  • Berkes F (1998) Indigenous knowledge and resource management systems in the Canadian subartic. In: Berkes F, Folke C, Colding J (eds) Linking social and ecological systems. Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 98–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Holding J, Folke C (2000) Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecol Appl 10:1251–1262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlin B, Breedlove DE, Raven PH (1974) Principles of Tzeltal plant classification. An introduction to the botanical ethnography of a Mayan-speaking people of highland Chiapas. Academic press New York and London, New York, 660 pp

  • Bettinger RL (2001) Holocene hunter–gatherers. In: Feinman Price TD (ed) Archaeology at the millennium. Kluwer/Plenum, New York, pp 137–195

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bromley D (1992) The commons property, and common-property Regimes. In: Blomqist WA, Bromley DW (eds) Making the commons work: theory, practice, and policy. Institute for Contemporary Studies Press, San Francisco, pp 3–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Bye RA (1998) La intervención del hombre en la diversidad de las plantas en México. In: Ramamoorthy TP, Bye RA, Lot A, Fa J (eds) Diversidad Biológica de México, Orígenes y Distribución. Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de México, México DF, pp 689–713

  • Caballero J, Cortés L (2001) Percepción, uso y manejo tradicional de los recursos vegetales en México. In: Rendón B, Caballero J, Martínez-Alfaro MA (eds) Plantas, Cultura y Sociedad. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Secretaría del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales, México DF, pp 79–100

  • Caballero J, Mapes C (1985) Gathering and subsistence patterns among the purépecha of Pátzcuaro, Mexico. J Ethnobiol 5:31–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Callen EO (1967) Analysis of the Tehuacan coprolites. In: Byers DS (ed) The prehistory of the Tehuacan valley. Environments and subistence, vol 1. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX, pp 261–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Caraco T (1980) Time budgeting and group size: a test of theory. Ecology 60:618–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casas A, Caballero J (1996) Traditional management and morphological variation in Leucaena esculenta (Fabaceae: Mimosoideae) in the Mixtec region of Guerrero, Mexico. Econ Bot 50:167–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Casas A, Vasquez MC, Viveros JL, Caballero J (1996) Plant management among the nahua and the mixtec in the Balsas river basin, México: an ethnobotanical approach to the study of plant domestication. Hum Ecol 24:455–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casas A, Caballero J, Mapes C, Zarate S (1997a) Manejo de la vegetación, domesticación de plantas y origen de la agricultura en mesoamerica. Bol Soc Bot México 61:17–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Casas A, Pickersgill B, Caballero J, Valiente-Banuet A (1997b) Ethnobotany and domestication in xoconochtli, Stenocereus stellatus (Cactaceae) in the Tehuacan valley and la Mixteca Baja, Mexico. Econ Bot 51:279–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Casas A, Caballero J, Valiente-Banuet A (1999) Use, manegement and domestication of columnar cacti in south-central México: a historical perspective. J Ethnobiol 19:71–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Casas A, Valiente-Banuet A, Viveros JL, Caballero J, Cortés L, Dávila P, Lira R, Rodriguez I (2001) Plant resources of the Tehuacán-Cuicatlán valley, México. Econ Bot 55:129–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Cody ML (1974) Optimization in ecology. Science 183:1156–1164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colunga P, Hernández-X E, Castillo A (1986) Variación morfológica, manejo agrícola tradicional y grado de domesticación de Opuntia spp. en el bajío guanajuatense. Agrociencia 65:7–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (1993) GLIM for ecologist. Blackwell Science, London, 379 pp

  • Cruz M, Casas A (2002) Morphological variation and reproductive biology of Polaskia chende (Cactaceae) under domestication in central México. J Arid Environ 51:561–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies T, Bye RA (1981) Ethnobotany and progressive domestication of Jaltomata (Solanaceae) in México and central America. Econ Bot 36:225–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Frei B, Sticher O, Heinrich M (2000) Zapotec and Mixe use of tropical habitats for securing medicinal plants in México. Econ Bot 54:73–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadgil M, Berkes F (1991) Traditional resource management systems. Resour Manag Optim 18:127–141

    Google Scholar 

  • González L (1972) Las cactáceas subfósiles de Tehucán, Puebla. Cactáceas y Suculentas Mexicanas 17:3–15

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Insuasti MS, Caballero J (2007) Managing plant resources: how intensive can it be? Hum Ecol 35:303–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grupo Mesófilo (2001) Ordenamiento Territorial, Santa María Tecomavaca. Teotitlán Oaxaca. Etapa 1: Diagnóstico y Sistematización de la Información Comunitaria. Internal Document of work, Oaxaca, 169 pp

  • Harlan JR (1975) Crops and man. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, 295 pp

  • Harris DR (1996) Domesticatory relationships of people, plants and animals. In: Ellen R, Fukui K (eds) From redefining nature: ecology, culture and domestication. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 437–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart TB, Hart JA (1986) The ecological basis of hunter-gatherer subsistance in African rain forests: the Mbuti of eastern Zaire. Hum Ecol 14:29–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes JG (1983) The diversity of crop plants. Harvard University press, Cambridge, MA, 184 pp

  • Hunn E (1982) The utilitarian factor in folk biological classification. Am Anthropol 84:830–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingold T (2001) El forrajeo óptimo y el hombre económico. In: Descola P, Palsson G (eds) Naturaleza y Sociedad. Perspectivas Antropológicas. Siglo veintiuno Editores S.A. de C. V, México DF, pp 37–59

  • Kaplan H, Hill K (1992) The evolutionary ecology of food acquisition. In: Smith AE, Winterhalder B (eds) Evolutionary ecology and human behavior. New York Aldine of Gruyter Press, New York, pp 167–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam WF (1998) Governing irrigation systems in Nepal: institutions, infrastructure, and collective action. Institute for Contemporary Studies Press, Oakland, 275 pp

  • Lawrence A, Philips O, Reategui-Ismodes A, López M, Rose S, Wood D, Farfan AJ (2005) Local values for harvested forest plants in Madre de Dios, Peru: towards a more contextualized interpretation of quantitative ethnobotanical data. Biodivers Conserv 14:45–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levi M (1989) Of rule and revenue. University of California Press, Berkeley, 247 pp

  • Luna MDC, Aguirre JR, Peña CB (2001) Cultivares tradicionales mixtecos de Stenocereus stellatus (Cactaceae). Anales del Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Ser Bot 72:131–155

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNeish RS (1967) A summary of the subsistence. In: Byers DS (ed) The prehistory of the Tehuacán valley. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX, pp 290–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Mapes C (1997). Etnobotánica del “quintonil” conocimiento, uso y manejo de Amaranthus spp. en México. PhD dissertation. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México DF

  • Martínez-Ballesté A, Martorell C, Martínez-Ramos M, Caballero J (2005) Applying retrospective demographic models to assess sustainable use: the Maya management of xa’an palms. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art17/

  • McCay BJ, Acheson JM (1987) Human ecology and the commons. In: Mc Cay BJ, Acheson JM (eds) The question of the commons: the culture and ecology of communal resources. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp 1–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Netting RM (1981) Balancing on an Alp: ecological change and continuity in a Swiss mountain community. Cambridge University Press, New York, 350 pp

  • Netting RM (1993) Smallholders, householders: farm families and the ecology of intensive, sustainable agriculture. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 415 pp

  • Newman RP, Hirsch E (2000) Commercialization of non timber forest products: review and analysis of research. Center International Forestry Research CIFOR, Bogor, 250 pp

  • Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons. The evolution of Institutions for collective actions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, 395 pp

  • Ostrom E, Dietz T, Dolšak N, Stern PC, Stonich S, Weber EU (eds) (2002) The drama of the commons. Committee on the human dimensions of global change, division of behavioral and social sciences and education, national research council. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 361 pp

  • Padoch C (1987) The economic importante and marketing of forest and fallow products in the Iquitos region. Adv Econ Bot 5:74–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock SL, Turner NJ (2000) Just like a garden: traditional resource management and biodiversity conservation on the interior plateau of British Columbia. In: Minnis PE, Elisens WJ (eds) Biodiversity and Native America. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, pp 44–73

  • Pendelton LH (1992) Trouble in paradise: practical obstacles to non timber forestry in Latin America. In: Plotkin M, Famolare L (eds) Sustainable harvest and marketing of rain forest products. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 252–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Philips O, Gentry AH (1993a) The useful plants of Tambopata, Peru: I. Statistical hypothesis test with a new quantitative technique. Econ Bot 47:15–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Philips O, Gentry AH (1993b) The useful plants of Tambopata, Peru: II. Additional hypothesis testing in quantitative ethnobotany. Econ Bot 47:33–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieroni A (2001) Evaluation of the cultural significance of wild food botanicals traditionally consumed in northwestern Tuscany, Italy. J Ethnobiol 21:89–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimienta-Barrios E, Nobel PS (1994) Pitaya (Stenocereus spp., Cactaceae): an ancient and modern fruit crop of Mexico. Econ Bot 48:76–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Posey DA (1992) Interpreting and applying the “reality” of indigenous concepts: what is necessary to learn from the natives? In: Redford KH, Padoch C (eds) Conservation of neotropical forest. Working from traditional resource use. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 21–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam HR, Caraco T (1984) Living in groups: is there an optimal group size? In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioral ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 122–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1971) Theory of feeding strategies. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:396–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweik CM (1998) Social norms and human foraging: An Investigation into the spatial distribution of Shorea robusta in Nepal. In: Gibson C, McKean M, Ostrom E (eds) Forest, trees and people programme. FAO, Rome. Working paper No. 3, chap 5

  • Smith CE (1967) Plant remains. In: Byers DS (ed) The prehistory of the Tehuacán valley. Environment and subsistence I. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX, pp 220–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoffle RW, Halmo DV, Evans MJ, Olmsted JE (1990) Calculating the cultural significance of American indian plants: Paiute and Shoshone Ethnobotany at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. Am Anthropol 92:417–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang SY (1992) Institutions and collective action: self-governance in irrigation. Institute for Contemporary Studies Press, San Francisco, CA, 151 pp

  • Tinoco A, Casas A, Luna R, Oyama K (2005) Population genetics of Escontria chiotilla in wild and silvicutural managed populations in the Tehuacán Valley, central Mexico. Genet Resour Crop Evol 52:525–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner NJ (1988) “The importante of a rose”: evaluating the cultural significance of plants in Thompson and Lillooet Interior Salish. Am Anthropol 90:272–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasquez MDC (1991) Tendencias en el proceso de domesticación del papaloquelite (Porophyllum ruderale (Jacq.) Cass. Subsp. macrocephalum (DC.) R.R. Jonson Asteraceae). Magíster dissertation. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México DF

  • Verbeek NA (1973) The exploitation system of the Yellow-billed Magpie. Univ Calif Publ Zool 99:1–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Warman A (2001) El Campo Mexicano en el Siglo XX. Fondo de Cultura Económica, México DF, 325 pp

  • Williams DE (1985) Tres arvenses solanáceas comestibles y su proceso de domesticación en el estado de Tlaxcala, México. Magíster dissertation, Colegio de Posgraduados de Montecillo, Montecillo

  • Winterhalder B (1981) Optimal foraging strategies and hunter-gatherer research in Anthropololgy: theory and models. In: Winterhalder B, Smith EA (eds) Hunter–gatherer forraging strategies: ethnographic and archeological analyses. Chicago University Press, Chicago, pp 218–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohary D, Hopf M (1993) Domestication of plants in the world. The origin and spread of cultivated plants in west Asia, Europe and the Nile valley. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 286 pp

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by The National Council of Science and Technology of México CONACYT through Project G35450-V “Los Recursos Vegetales del Valle de Tehuacán-Cuicatlán desde una Perspectiva Etnobotánica”. Special gratitude is expressed to Rafael Lira for his advice and support, as well as Santa María Tecomavaca community for their hospitality and help.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Biología, Universidad de Nariño, Pasto, Colombia

    Martha S. González-Insuasti

  2. Departamento de Ecología y Recursos Naturales, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México UNAM, México DF, México

    Carlos Martorell

  3. Jardín Botánico, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México UNAM, México DF, México

    Javier Caballero

Authors
  1. Martha S. González-Insuasti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carlos Martorell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Javier Caballero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martha S. González-Insuasti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

González-Insuasti, M.S., Martorell, C. & Caballero, J. Factors that influence the intensity of non-agricultural management of plant resources. Agroforest Syst 74, 1–15 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-008-9148-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-008-9148-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation