Skip to main content
Log in

Quantification of Four Isoflavones in Forages with UPLC®-MS/MS, Using the Box–Behnken Experimental Design to Optimize Sample Preparation

  • Original
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A performant method for the simultaneous quantification of daidzein, genistein, formononetin, and biochanin A in forages using an UPLC®-MS/MS was developed and fully validated. The ultrasound-assisted extraction and enzymatic hydrolysis used in the sample preparation step were optimized using the Box–Behnken experimental design. The optimal extraction conditions used for a representative mix of forage plants were 80 °C, 10 min, and 55 % methanol, and for hydrolysis, they were 20 °C, 18 h, and pH = 6. The chromatographic separation was achieved using an Acquity UPLC® HSS T3 column, with a water/methanol linear gradient containing 0.01 % of formic acid at a 0.55 mL min−1 flow rate. The four isoflavones were detected by ESI mass spectrometry in positive ion MRM mode. The method allows high throughput analyses of samples and showed an adequate linear regression model for all isoflavones over a range from 5 to 125 ng mL−1. There were good intra- and inter-day precisions (≤8.2 and ≤7.6 %) and accuracy (≤11.4 and ≤7.1 %). The recovery rates were in an acceptable range of 70–120 %, except for biochanin A, where the rate was about 50 %. Good method repeatability was also observed, and there was no matrix effect or carryover problem. The sample extracts were stable for at least 6 days of storage at -21 and 6 °C. The method proved to be sensitive, precise, and accurate for discriminating a wide variety of forages likely to be grazed by ruminants according to their isoflavone contents and to observe the impact of storage process on isoflavone content in forages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mostrom M, Evans TJ (2012) In: Gupta Ramesh C (ed) Veterinary toxicology—basic and clinical principles, 2nd edn. Elsevier, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vitale DC, Piazza C, Melilli B, Drago F, Salomone S (2013) Isoflavones: estrogenic activity, biological effect and bioavailability. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 38:15–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ko KP (2014) Isoflavones: Chemistry, analysis, functions and effects on health and cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 15(17):7001–7010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sirotkin AV, Harrath AH (2014) Phytoestrogens and their effects. Eur J Pharmacol 741:230–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Patisaul HB, Jefferson W (2010) The pros and cons of phytoestrogens. Front Neuroendocrin 31:400–419

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rostagno MA, Villares A, Guillamón E, García-Lafuente A, Martínez JA (2009) Sample preparation for analysis of isoflavones from soybeans and soy foods. J Chromatogr A 1216(1):2–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wu Q, Wang M, Simon JE (2004) Analytical methods to determine phytoestrogenic compounds. J Chromatogr B 812:325–355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Saviranta NMM, Julkunen-Tiitto R, Oksanen E, Karjalainen RO (2010) Leaf phenolic compounds in red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) induced by exposure to moderately elevated ozone. Environ Pollut 158:440–446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tsao R, Papadopoulos Y, Yang R, Young JC, McRae K (2006) Isoflavone profiles of red clovers and their distribution in different parts harvested at different growing stages. J Agric Food Chem 54:5797–5805

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Vacek J, Klejdus B, Lojková L, Kubán V (2008) Current trends in isolation, separation, determination and identification of isoflavones: a review. J Sep Sci 31:2054–2067

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Grynkiewicz G, Ksycinska H, Ramza J, Zagrodzka J (2005) Chromatographic quantification of isoflavones (why and how). J Acta Chromatogr 15:31–65

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang CC, Prasain JK, Barnes S (2002) Review of the methods used in the determination of phytoestrogens. J Chromatogr B 777:3–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Stalikas CD (2007) Extraction, separation, and detection methods for phenolic acids and flavonoids. J Sep Sci 30:3268–3295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rostagno MA, Palma M, Barroso CG (2003) Ultrasound-assisted extraction of soy isoflavones. J Chromatogr A 1012(2):119–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Daems F, Jasselette C, Romnee JM, Planchon V, Lognay G, Froidmont É (2015) Validating the use of an ultra-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry method to quantify equol in cow’s milk. Dairy Sci Technol 95(3):303–319

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Daems F, Romnee JM, Heuskin S, Froidmont É, Lognay G (2016) Analytical methods used to quantify isoflavones in cow’s milk: a review. Dairy Sci Technol 1–23. doi:10.1007/s13594-015-0276-8

  17. Hoerger CC, Praplan AP, Becker L, Wettstein FE, Hungerbühler K, Bucheli TD (2011) Quantification of five isoflavones and coumestrol in various solid agroenvironmental matrices using 13C3-labeled internal standards. J Agric Food Chem 59:847–856

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ferrer C, Lozano A, Agüera A, Girón AJ, Fernández-Alba AE (2011) Overcoming matrix effects using the dilution approach in multiresidue methods for fruits and vegetables. J Chromatogr A 1218:7634–7639

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Reynaud A, Fraisse D, Cornu A, Farruggia A, Pujos-Guillot E, Besle JM, Martin B, Lamaison JL, Paquet D, Doreau M, Graulet B (2010) Variation in content and composition of phenolic compounds in permanent pastures according to botanical variation. J Agric Food Chem 58:5485–5494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Konar N, Poyrazoğlu ES, Demir K, Artik N (2012) Effect of different sample preparation methods on isoflavone, lignan, coumestan and flavonoid contents of various vegetables determined by triple quadrupole LC-M/MS. J Food Compos Anal 26:26–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kuhnle GGC, Dell’Aquila C, Low YL, Kussmaul M, Bingham SA (2007) Extraction and quantification of phytoestrogens in foods using automated solid-phase extraction and LC/MS/MS. Anal Chem 79:9234–9239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. EMA (2015) VICH GL49: Studies to evaluate the metabolism and residue kinetics of veterinary drugs in food-producing animals: Validation of analytical methods used in residue depletion studies. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2011/04/WC500105053.pdf. Accessed February 2015

  23. Valls J, Millán S, Martí MP, Borràs E, Arola L (2009) Advanced separation methods of food anthocyanins, isoflavones and flavanols. J Chromatogr A 1216:7143–7172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zou Y, Xie C, Fan G, Gu Z, Han Y (2010) Optimization of ultrasound-assisted extraction of melanin from Auricularia auricular fruit bodies. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 11:611–615

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Joglekar AM, May AT (1987) Product excellence through design of experiments. Cereal Foods World 32:857–868

    Google Scholar 

  26. Malcolmson LJ, Matsuo RR, Balshaw R (1993) Textural optimization of spaghetti using response surface methodology: Effects of drying temperature and durum protein level. Cereal Chem 70:417–423

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Zgórka G (2009) Ultrasound-assisted solid-phase extraction coupled with photodiode-array and fluorescence detection for chemotaxonomy of isoflavone phytoestrogens in Trifolium L. (clover) species. J Sep Sci 32:965–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kiss B, Popa DS, Hanganu D, Pop A, Loghin F (2010) Ultra-performance liquid chromatography method for the quantification of some phytoestrogens in plant material. Rev Roum Chim 55(8):459–465

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Niranjan A, Pandey A, Misra P, Trivedi PK, Lehri A, Amla DV (2011) Development and optimization of HPLC-PDA-MS-MS method for simultaneous quantification of three classes of flavonoids in legume seeds, vegetables, fruits, and medicinal plants. J Liq Chromatogr RT 34:1729–1742

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Biesaga M (2011) Influence of extraction methods on stability of flavonoids. J Chromatogr A 1218:2505–2512

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Schwartz H, Sontag G, Plumb J (2009) Inventory of phytoestrogen databases. Food Chem 113:736–747

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Alves RC, Almeida IMC, Casal S, Oliveira MBPP (2010) Method development and validation for isoflavones quantification in coffee. Food Chem 122:914–919

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Andersen C, Nielsen TS, Purup S, Kristensen T, Eriksen J, Søegaard K, Sørensen J, Fretté XC (2009) Phyto-oestrogens in herbage and milk from cows grazing white clover, red clover. Lucerne or chicory-rich pastures. Animal 3(8):1189–1195

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Steinshamn H, Purup S, Thuen E, Hansen-Møller J (2008) Effects of clover-grass silages and concentrate supplementation on the content of phytoestrogens in dairy cow milk. J Dairy Sci 91:2715–2725

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Moreno-González D, Huertas-Pérez JF, García-Campaña AM, Bosque-Sendra JM, Gámiz-Gracia L (2013) Ultrasound-assisted surfactant-enhanced emulsification microextraction for the determination of carbamates in wines by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1315:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Antignac JP, Cariou R, Le Bizec B, Cravedi JP, Andre F (2003) Identification of phytoestrogens in bovine milk using liquid chromatography/electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 17:1256–1264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Fiechter G, Opacak I, Raba B, Mayer HK (2013) A new ultra-high pressure liquid chromatography method for the determination of total isoflavone aglycones after enzymatic hydrolysis: Application to analyze isoflavone levels in soybean cultivars. Food Res Int 50:586–592

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. De Bock L, Boussery K, Colin P, De Smet J, T’Jollyn H, Van Bocxlaer J (2012) Development and validation of a fast and sensitive UPLC-MS/MS method for the quantification of six probe metabolites for the in vitro determination of cytochrome P450 activity. Talanta 89:209–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Salomone A, Gerace E, Brizio P, Gennaro MC, Vincenti M (2011) A fast liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for determining benzodiazepines and analogues in urine. Validation and application to real cases of forensic interest. J Pharmaceut Biomed 56:582–591

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Ellis RL (2008) Development of veterinary drug residue controls by the Codex Alimentarius Commission: a review. Food Addit Contam 25(12):1432–1438

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Delgado-Zamarreño MM, Pérez-Martín L, Bustamante-Rangel M, Carabias-Martínez R (2012) A modified QuEChERS method as sample treatment before the determination of isoflavones in foods by ultra-performance liquid chromatography–triple quadrupole mass spectrometry. Talanta 100:320–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the Public Service of Wallonia (PhytoHealth project, Moerman funds) for providing financial assistance during the course of this research. They wish to thank Christophe Jasselette for his involvement in the development and validation of this analytical method. They also wish to thank all the people at CRA-W who participated, directly or indirectly, in the development of this method and the members of GrassMilk project for the collection of the samples.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frédéric Daems.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 652 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Daems, F., Romnee, JM., Rasse, C. et al. Quantification of Four Isoflavones in Forages with UPLC®-MS/MS, Using the Box–Behnken Experimental Design to Optimize Sample Preparation. Chromatographia 79, 711–725 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-016-3074-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-016-3074-4

Keywords

Navigation