Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of cross-infection control methods on performance of pen-type laser fluorescence in detecting occlusal caries lesions in primary teeth

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this in vitro study was to determine the influence of cross-infection control methods, as probe tip autoclaving and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) wrapping, on the performance of laser fluorescence device (DIAGNOdent pen—LFpen) on occlusal surfaces of primary molars. One experienced examiner carried out all examinations (n = 78). For the probe tip autoclaving study, 62 sites (sample A, 40 teeth) were used. The sites were assessed with LFpen using tips in six different conditions: without autoclaving and after autoclaving for 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 cycles of 10 min. For the PVC wrapping study, we selected other 58 sites (sample B, 38 teeth). The sites were assessed with the LFpen device in two conditions: with and without PVC wrapping. The teeth were sectioned and histologically assessed for caries depth. LFpen values, sensitivity, and specificity were compared among the different conditions. The LF readings were slightly higher after successive examinations, independently of autoclaving. In both studies, no statistical differences in the sensitivity and specificity were observed for all conditions. In conclusion, probe tip autoclaving and PVC wrapping do not influence the performance of LFpen device on occlusal surfaces of primary molars.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bader JD, Shugars DA, Bonito AJ (2002) A systematic review of the performance of methods for identifying carious lesions. J Public Health Dent 62:201–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lussi A, Hack A, Hug I, Heckenberger H, Megert B, Stich H (2006) Detection of approximal caries with a new laser fluorescence device. Caries Res 40:97–103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lussi A, Megert B, Longbottom C, Reich E, Francescut P (2001) Clinical performance of a laser fluorescence device for detection of occlusal caries lesions. Eur J Oral Sci 109:14–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lussi A, Hellwig E (2006) Performance of a new laser fluorescence device for the detection of occlusal caries in vitro. J Dent 34:467–471

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hibst R, Paulus R, Lussi A (2001) Detection of occlusal caries by laser fluorescence: basic and clinical investigations. Med Laser Appl 16:205–213, Med Laser Appl 2001; 16: 205–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mendes FM, Hissadomi M, Imparato JCP (2004) Effects of drying time and the presence of plaque on the in vitro performance of laser fluorescence in occlusal caries of primary teeth. Caries Res 38:104–108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hosoya Y, Matsuzaka K, Inoue T, Marshall GW Jr (2004) Influence of tooth-polishing pastes and sealants on DIAGNOdent values. Quintessence Int 35:605–611

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lussi A, Reich E (2005) The influence of toothpastes and prophylaxis pastes on fluorescence measurements for caries detection in vitro. Eur J Oral Sci 113:141–144

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cabral RM, Mendes FM, Nicolau J, Zezell DM (2006) The influence of PVC seal wrap and probe tips autoclaving on the in vitro performance of laser fluorescence device in occlusal caries in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 30:306–309

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rodrigues Jde A, Hug I, Lussi A (2009) The influence of PVC wrapping on the performance of two laser fluorescence devices on occlusal surfaces in vitro. Photomed Laser Surg 27:435–439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rocha-Cabral RM, Mendes FM, Miura F, Ribeiro Ada C, Braga MM, Zezell DM (2008) Autoclaving and battery capacity influence on laser fluorescence measurements. Acta Odontol Scand 66:122–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shah R, Collins JM, Hodge TM, Laing ER (2009) A national study of cross infection control: 'are we clean enough?'. Br Dent J 207:267–274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mortimer KV (1970) The relationship of deciduous enamel structure to dental disease. Caries Res 4:206–223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Braga MM, Mendes FM, Imparato JC, Rodrigues CR (2007) Effect of cut-off points on performance of laser fluorescence for detecting occlusal caries. J Clin Pediatr Dent 32:33–36

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Francescut P, Zimmerli B, Lussi A (2006) Influence of different storage methods on laser fluorescence values: a two-year study. Caries Res 40:181–185

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Braga MM, Mendes FM, Martignon S, Ricketts DN, Ekstrand KR (2009) In vitro comparison of Nyvad's system and ICDAS-II with Lesion Activity Assessment for evaluation of severity and activity of occlusal caries lesions in primary teeth. Caries Res 43:405–412

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Novaes TF, Matos R, Gimenez T, Braga MM, MS DEB, Mendes FM (2012) Performance of fluorescence-based and conventional methods of occlusal caries detection in primary molars—an in vitro study. Int J Paediatr Dent. doi:10.1111/j.1365-263X.2011.01217.x

  18. Araujo MW, Andreana S (2002) Risk and prevention of transmission of infectious diseases in dentistry. Quintessence Int 33:376–382

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cowpe J, Plasschaert A, Harzer W, Vinkka-Puhakka H, Walmsley AD (2010) Profile and competences for the graduating European dentist—update 2009. Eur J Dent Educ 14:193–202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ghasemi H, Bayat F, Hooshmand B, Maleki Z (2011) Determinants of Iranian dentists' behaviour regarding infection control. Int Dent J 61:85–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wilson PR, Beynon AD (1989) Mineralization differences between human deciduous and permanent enamel measured by quantitative microradiography. Arch Oral Biol 34:85–88

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sonju Clasen AB, Ogaard B, Duschner H, Ruben J, Arends J, Sonju T (1997) Caries development in fluoridated and non-fluoridated deciduous and permanent enamel in situ examined by microradiography and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Adv Dent Res 11:442–447

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the participants of the Post-Graduation in Pediatric Dentistry Seminar of FOUSP for the critical comments put forth. The study was supported by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq—process nos. 476372/2006-2, 302368/2008-6, and 565061/2008-9), Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa e de Pós-Graduação da USP, and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo. The authors are also grateful to Dr. Ana O'Such for English corrections.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mariana Minatel Braga.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matos, R., Novaes, T.F., Reyes, A. et al. Influence of cross-infection control methods on performance of pen-type laser fluorescence in detecting occlusal caries lesions in primary teeth. Lasers Med Sci 28, 185–192 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-012-1092-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-012-1092-5

Keywords

Navigation