Abstract
The present work has been undertaken for energetic and exergetic analysis of coal-fired supercritical thermal power plant and natural gas-fired combined cycle power plant. Comparative analysis has been conducted for the two contestant technologies. The key drivers of energetic and exergetic efficiencies have been studied for each of the major sub-system of two contestant technologies. Overall energetic and exergetic efficiency of coal-fired supercritical thermal power plant are found to be 43.48 and 42.89 %, respectively. Overall energetic and exergetic efficiency of natural gas-fired combined cycle power plant are 54.47 and 53.93 %, respectively. The major energetic power loss has been found in the condenser for coal-fired supercritical thermal power plant. On the other hand, the major energetic power loss has been found in both the condenser and heat recovery steam generator for gas-fired combined cycle thermal power plant. The exergetic analysis shows that boiler field is the main source of exergetic power loss in coal-fired supercritical thermal power plant and combustion chamber in the gas-fired combined cycle thermal power plant. It is concluded that natural gas-fired combined cycle power plant is better from energetic and exergetic efficiency point of view. These results will be useful to all involved in the improvement of the design of the existing and future power plants.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- B:
-
Boiler
- BFP:
-
Boiler feed water pump
- C:
-
Air compressor
- Con:
-
Condenser
- Com:
-
Combustion
- CC:
-
Combustion chamber
- CEP:
-
Condensate extract pump
- D:
-
Deaerator
- EXP:
-
Expansion valve
- f:
-
Fuel
- FWH:
-
Feed water heater
- GT:
-
Gas turbine
- gen:
-
Generation
- heat:
-
High temperature heat exchanger
- HPH:
-
High pressure feed water heater
- HPT:
-
High pressure turbine
- HFP:
-
High pressure feed water pump
- HRSG:
-
Heat recovery steam generator
- IPT:
-
Intermediate pressure turbine
- LPT:
-
Low pressure turbine
- LPH:
-
Low pressure feed water heater
- LFP:
-
Low pressure feed water pump
- p:
-
Combustion products
References
Ahmet C, Oktay H, Kamil K (2006) Energy–exergy analysis and modernization suggestions for a combined cycle power plant. Int J Energy Res 30:115–126
Alobaid F, Strohle J, Bernd E, Hyun GK (2009) Dynamic simulation of a supercritical once-through heat recovery steam generator during load changes and start-up procedures. Appl Energy 86:1274–1282
Ameri M, Pouria A, Armita H (2009) Energy, exergy and exergoeconomic analysis of a steam power plant: a case study. Int J Energy Res 33:499–512
Hasan HE, Ali Akkaya AV, Burhanettin C, Ahmet D, Sevilgen SH, Bahri S, Ismail T, Cengiz G, Selcuk A (2009) Comparative energetic and exergetic performance analyses for coal-fired thermal power plants in Turkey. Int J Therm Sci 48:2179–2186
Kaushik SC, Siva Reddy V, Tyagi SK (2011) Energy and exergy analysis of thermal power plants: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15:1857–1872
Khaliq A, Kaushik SC (2004) Second-law based thermodynamic analysis of Brayton/Rankine combined power cycle with reheat. Appl Energy 78:179–197
Klein SA, Alvarado F (2011) Engineering Equation Solver, version 8.629. F Chart Software, Middleton
Kotas TJ (1984) The exergy method of thermal plant analysis. Wiley, New York
Marousek J (2013) Removal of hardly fermentable ballast from the maize silage to accelerate biogas production. Ind Crops Prod 44:253–257
Marousek J, Kawamitsu Y, Ueno M, Kondo Y, Kolar L (2012) Methods for improving methane yield from rye straw. Appl Eng Agric 28:747–755
Naterer GF, Regulagadda P, Dincer I (2010) Exergy analysis of a thermal power plant with measured boiler and turbine losses. Appl Therm Eng 30:970–976
Reddy BV, Mohamed K (2007) Exergy analysis of natural gas fired combined cycle power generation unit. Int J Exergy 4:180–196
Romeo LM, Sergio E, Bolea I (2008) Designing a supercritical steam cycle to integrate the energy requirements of CO2 amine scrubbing. Int J Greenh Gas Control 2:563–570
Sengupta S, Datta A, Duttagupta S (2007) Exergy analysis of a coal-based 210 MW thermal power plant. Int J Energy Res 31:14–28
Siamak F, Majid SA, Maryam YS (2008) Efficient design of feedwater heaters network in steam power plants using pinch technology and exergy analysis. Int J Energy Res 32:1–11
Singh OK, Kaushik SC (2012) Variables influencing the exergy based performance of a steam power plant. Int J Green Energy. doi:10.1080/15435075.2011.653847
Siva Reddy V, Kaushik SC, Tyagi SK (2012) Exergetic analysis of solar concentrator aided natural gas fired combined cycle power plant. Renew Energy 39:114–125
Siva Reddy V, Kaushik SC, Tyagi SK (2013) Exergetic analysis of solar concentrator aided coal fired supercritical thermal power plant. Clean Technol Environ Policy 15:133–145
Srinivas T (2009) Study of a deaerator location in triple-pressure reheat combined power cycle. Energy 34:1364–1371
Srinivas T, Gupta AVSSKS, Reddy BV (2007) Performance simulation of 210 MW natural gas fired combined cycle power plant. J Energy Heat Mass Transf 29:61–82
Woudstra N, Woudstra T, Pirone A, Stelt TV (2010) Thermodynamic evaluation of combined cycle plants. Energy Convers Manag 51:1099–1110
Xiaojun S, Defu C (2007) Thermodynamic analysis of an LNG fuelled combined cycle power plant with waste heat recovery and utilization system. Int J Energy Res 31:975–998
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Siva Reddy, V., Kaushik, S.C. & Tyagi, S.K. Exergetic analysis and evaluation of coal-fired supercritical thermal power plant and natural gas-fired combined cycle power plant . Clean Techn Environ Policy 16, 489–499 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-013-0647-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-013-0647-x