Skip to main content
Log in

Exergetic analysis and evaluation of coal-fired supercritical thermal power plant and natural gas-fired combined cycle power plant

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present work has been undertaken for energetic and exergetic analysis of coal-fired supercritical thermal power plant and natural gas-fired combined cycle power plant. Comparative analysis has been conducted for the two contestant technologies. The key drivers of energetic and exergetic efficiencies have been studied for each of the major sub-system of two contestant technologies. Overall energetic and exergetic efficiency of coal-fired supercritical thermal power plant are found to be 43.48 and 42.89 %, respectively. Overall energetic and exergetic efficiency of natural gas-fired combined cycle power plant are 54.47 and 53.93 %, respectively. The major energetic power loss has been found in the condenser for coal-fired supercritical thermal power plant. On the other hand, the major energetic power loss has been found in both the condenser and heat recovery steam generator for gas-fired combined cycle thermal power plant. The exergetic analysis shows that boiler field is the main source of exergetic power loss in coal-fired supercritical thermal power plant and combustion chamber in the gas-fired combined cycle thermal power plant. It is concluded that natural gas-fired combined cycle power plant is better from energetic and exergetic efficiency point of view. These results will be useful to all involved in the improvement of the design of the existing and future power plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

B:

Boiler

BFP:

Boiler feed water pump

C:

Air compressor

Con:

Condenser

Com:

Combustion

CC:

Combustion chamber

CEP:

Condensate extract pump

D:

Deaerator

EXP:

Expansion valve

f:

Fuel

FWH:

Feed water heater

GT:

Gas turbine

gen:

Generation

heat:

High temperature heat exchanger

HPH:

High pressure feed water heater

HPT:

High pressure turbine

HFP:

High pressure feed water pump

HRSG:

Heat recovery steam generator

IPT:

Intermediate pressure turbine

LPT:

Low pressure turbine

LPH:

Low pressure feed water heater

LFP:

Low pressure feed water pump

p:

Combustion products

References

  • Ahmet C, Oktay H, Kamil K (2006) Energy–exergy analysis and modernization suggestions for a combined cycle power plant. Int J Energy Res 30:115–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alobaid F, Strohle J, Bernd E, Hyun GK (2009) Dynamic simulation of a supercritical once-through heat recovery steam generator during load changes and start-up procedures. Appl Energy 86:1274–1282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ameri M, Pouria A, Armita H (2009) Energy, exergy and exergoeconomic analysis of a steam power plant: a case study. Int J Energy Res 33:499–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasan HE, Ali Akkaya AV, Burhanettin C, Ahmet D, Sevilgen SH, Bahri S, Ismail T, Cengiz G, Selcuk A (2009) Comparative energetic and exergetic performance analyses for coal-fired thermal power plants in Turkey. Int J Therm Sci 48:2179–2186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaushik SC, Siva Reddy V, Tyagi SK (2011) Energy and exergy analysis of thermal power plants: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15:1857–1872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khaliq A, Kaushik SC (2004) Second-law based thermodynamic analysis of Brayton/Rankine combined power cycle with reheat. Appl Energy 78:179–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein SA, Alvarado F (2011) Engineering Equation Solver, version 8.629. F Chart Software, Middleton

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotas TJ (1984) The exergy method of thermal plant analysis. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Marousek J (2013) Removal of hardly fermentable ballast from the maize silage to accelerate biogas production. Ind Crops Prod 44:253–257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marousek J, Kawamitsu Y, Ueno M, Kondo Y, Kolar L (2012) Methods for improving methane yield from rye straw. Appl Eng Agric 28:747–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naterer GF, Regulagadda P, Dincer I (2010) Exergy analysis of a thermal power plant with measured boiler and turbine losses. Appl Therm Eng 30:970–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy BV, Mohamed K (2007) Exergy analysis of natural gas fired combined cycle power generation unit. Int J Exergy 4:180–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Romeo LM, Sergio E, Bolea I (2008) Designing a supercritical steam cycle to integrate the energy requirements of CO2 amine scrubbing. Int J Greenh Gas Control 2:563–570

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta S, Datta A, Duttagupta S (2007) Exergy analysis of a coal-based 210 MW thermal power plant. Int J Energy Res 31:14–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siamak F, Majid SA, Maryam YS (2008) Efficient design of feedwater heaters network in steam power plants using pinch technology and exergy analysis. Int J Energy Res 32:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh OK, Kaushik SC (2012) Variables influencing the exergy based performance of a steam power plant. Int J Green Energy. doi:10.1080/15435075.2011.653847

    Google Scholar 

  • Siva Reddy V, Kaushik SC, Tyagi SK (2012) Exergetic analysis of solar concentrator aided natural gas fired combined cycle power plant. Renew Energy 39:114–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siva Reddy V, Kaushik SC, Tyagi SK (2013) Exergetic analysis of solar concentrator aided coal fired supercritical thermal power plant. Clean Technol Environ Policy 15:133–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivas T (2009) Study of a deaerator location in triple-pressure reheat combined power cycle. Energy 34:1364–1371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivas T, Gupta AVSSKS, Reddy BV (2007) Performance simulation of 210 MW natural gas fired combined cycle power plant. J Energy Heat Mass Transf 29:61–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Woudstra N, Woudstra T, Pirone A, Stelt TV (2010) Thermodynamic evaluation of combined cycle plants. Energy Convers Manag 51:1099–1110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xiaojun S, Defu C (2007) Thermodynamic analysis of an LNG fuelled combined cycle power plant with waste heat recovery and utilization system. Int J Energy Res 31:975–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Siva Reddy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Siva Reddy, V., Kaushik, S.C. & Tyagi, S.K. Exergetic analysis and evaluation of coal-fired supercritical thermal power plant and natural gas-fired combined cycle power plant . Clean Techn Environ Policy 16, 489–499 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-013-0647-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-013-0647-x

Keywords

Navigation