Skip to main content
Log in

In vivo development of daptomycin resistance in vancomycin-susceptible methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus severe infections previously treated with glycopeptides

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our aim was to describe the clinical and microbiological features of four cases of severe vancomycin-susceptible methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections in which the vancomycin non-susceptibility development and daptomycin resistance occurred under therapy with teicoplanin (three cases) and daptomycin switched to vancomycin (one case). Clinical data were retrospectively reviewed. On nine clinical epidemiologically unrelated daptomycin-susceptible (DAP-S) and daptomycin-resistant (DAP-R) MRSA, we performed: (i) DAP-VAN-TEC-CFX-RIF minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs); (ii) glycopeptide resistance detection (GRD) by δ-hemolysis; (iii) glycopeptide population analysis; (iv) molecular characterization by PFGE-MLST-SCCmec-agr-typing; (v) rpoB and mprF single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs); (vi) dltA-mprF-atl-sceD expression by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Three out of the four patients did not survive despite salvage treatment; two died with active MRSA infection and one died because of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia sepsis. The fourth patient, in which a reversion to a DAP-S phenotype occurred, survived with daptomycin plus trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and oxacillin treatment, and endovascular device removal. Daptomycin resistance development was preceded by a stable heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (hVISA) or VISA phenotype acquisition, while in one case, daptomycin resistance was preceded by an unstable daptomycin heteroresistance (hDAP) behavior reverting to DAP-S during vancomycin plus rifampin therapy followed by high doses of daptomycin. All DAP-R strains showed hVISA or DAP-R traits, including mutations and/or up-regulation of genes involved in cell wall turnover and cell membrane perturbation. In our study, daptomycin resistance arose during glycopeptide therapy. The emergence of DAP-R isolates was preceded by a stable VISA or hVISA phenotype or by instability reverting to a DAP-S heteroresistant phenotype. Daptomycin, as first-line therapy for the treatment of severe MRSA infections, should be used at optimal dosage combined with other agents such as beta-lactams, to prevent daptomycin resistance occurrence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. van Hal SJ, Lodise TP, Paterson DL (2012) The clinical significance of vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration in Staphylococcus aureus infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 54:755–771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yoon YK, Kim JY, Park DW et al (2010) Predictors of persistent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in patients treated with vancomycin. J Antimicrob Chemother 65:1015–1018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lodise TP, Drusano GL, Lazariu V et al (2014) Quantifying the matrix of relationships between reduced vancomycin susceptibility phenotypes and outcomes among patients with MRSA bloodstream infections treated with vancomycin. J Antimicrob Chemother 69:2547–2545

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mishra NN, Bayer AS, Weidenmaier C et al (2014) Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of daptomycin-resistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains: relative roles of mprF and dlt operons. PLoS One 16, e107426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schweizer ML, Furuno JP, Sakoulas G et al (2011) Increased mortality with accessory gene regulator (agr) dysfunction in Staphylococcus aureus among bacteremic patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:1082–1087

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Harigaya Y, Ngo D, Lesse AJ et al (2011) Characterization of heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate resistance, MIC and accessory gene regulator (agr) dysfunction among clinical bloodstream isolates of Staphyloccocus aureus. BMC Infect Dis 11:287

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Cafiso V, Bertuccio T, Spina D et al (2012) A novel δ-hemolysis screening method for detecting heteroresistant vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus. J Clin Microbiol 50:1742–1744

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Chang SC, Liu TP, Chen CJ et al (2015) Detection of heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus isolates using a combination of δ-hemolysis assay and Etest. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 81:246–250

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stefani S, Campanile F, Santagati M et al (2015) Insights and clinical perspectives of daptomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: a review of the available evidence. Int J Antimicrob Agents 46:278–289. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2015.05.008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bayer AS, Schneider T, Sahl HG et al (2013) Mechanisms of daptomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: role of the cell membrane and cell wall. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1277:139–158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Cafiso V, Bertuccio T, Purrello S et al (2014) dltA overexpression: a strain-independent keystone of daptomycin resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Antimicrob Agents 43:26–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mishra NN, Bayer AS, Weidenmaier C et al (2014) Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of daptomycin-resistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains: relative roles of mprF and dlt operons. PLoS One 9, e107426

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kelley PG, Gao W, Ward PB et al (2011) Daptomycin non-susceptibility in vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) and heterogeneous-VISA (hVISA): implications for therapy after vancomycin treatment failure. J Antimicrob Chemother 66:1057–1060

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cafiso V, Bertuccio T, Spina D et al (2012) Modulating activity of vancomycin and daptomycin on the expression of autolysis cell-wall turnover and membrane charge genes in hVISA and VISA strains. PLoS One 7, e29573

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Campanile F, Bongiorno D, Borbone S et al (2009) Hospital-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (HA-MRSA) in Italy. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 8:22

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Stefani S, Bongiorno D, Cafiso V et al (2009) Pathotype and susceptibility profile of a community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain responsible for a case of severe pneumonia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 63:100–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cafiso V, Bertuccio T, Santagati M et al (2007) agr-Genotyping and transcriptional analysis of biofilm-producing Staphylococcus aureus. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 51:220–227

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pfaffl MW, Horgan GW, Dempfle L (2002) Relative expression software tool (REST) for group-wise comparison and statistical analysis of relative expression results in real-time PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 30, e36

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Matsuo M, Hishinuma T, Katayama Y et al (2011) Mutation of RNA polymerase beta subunit (rpoB) promotes hVISA-to-VISA phenotypic conversion of strain Mu3. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:4188–4195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Cui L, Isii T, Fukuda M et al (2010) An RpoB mutation confers dual heteroresistance to daptomycin and vancomycin in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:5222–5233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Moise PA, North D, Steenbergen JN et al (2009) Susceptibility relationship between vancomycin and daptomycin in Staphylococcus aureus: facts and assumptions. Lancet Infect Dis 9:617–624

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bassetti M, Villa G, Ansaldi F et al (2015) Risk factors associated with the onset of daptomycin non-susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus infections in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 41:366–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wichelhaus T, Schäfer V, Brade V et al (2001) Differential effect of rpoB mutations on antibacterial activities of rifampicin and KRM-1648 against Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother 47:153–156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Smirnova MV, Vostrov SN, Strukova EV et al (2009) The impact of duration of antibiotic exposure on bacterial resistance predictions using in vitro dynamic models. J Antimicrob Chemother 64:815–820

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by the grant DIAMOND HV PO-FESR 2007–2013 from MIUR Italy. We wish to thank the Scientific Bureau of the University of Catania for the language support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Cafiso.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Additional information

A. Capone and V. Cafiso contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Capone, A., Cafiso, V., Campanile, F. et al. In vivo development of daptomycin resistance in vancomycin-susceptible methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus severe infections previously treated with glycopeptides. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 35, 625–631 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-016-2581-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-016-2581-4

Keywords

Navigation