Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of brainstem reflex recordings and evoked potentials with clinical and MRI data to assess brainstem dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: a short-term follow-up

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Brainstem dysfunctions are associated to high risk of developing severe disability in patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), often undetected by conventional routine assessments. In this view, the purpose of this study was to monitor brainstem function over a short-term period in PwMS, comparing clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations with evoked potentials (EPs) and brainstem reflexes (BSRs). Forty-five PwMS were evaluated at baseline and after 15.1 ± 4.2 months through Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, MRI, EPs, vestibulo-masseteric (VMR), acoustic-masseteric (AMR), vestibulo-collic (VCR) and trigemino-collic (TCR) reflexes. At baseline, brainstem alterations were detected by EDSS, MRI, EPs and BSRs in 40, 77.8, 84.4 and 82.2 % of patients, respectively. At follow-up, EDSS and MRI remained unchanged, while EP and BSR deteriorated in 86.7 and 91.1 % of patients, respectively. Changes from 1 to 3 altered EPs and from 1 to 4 altered BSRs were significant only for EPs (p = 0.028). The analysis of grading severity for each test disclosed significant worsening of the VMR, AMR, TCR and P14 wave of the median somatosensory EP. Combined EP/BSR recordings were significantly more sensitive than paired EDSS/MRI assessments at baseline (93.3 versus 80 %; p = 0.006) and follow-up (97.8 versus 82.2 %; p = 0.008). In the short-term VMR, AMR, TCR and P14 wave disclosed a significant functional brainstem deterioration by detecting lesions that remained clinically and MRI silent. Our findings provide evidence for a valuable role of neurophysiological methods, especially BSRs, in investigating and monitoring brainstem dysfunctions in MS, in comparison with the standard clinical and MRI procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Filippi M, Rocca MA, De Stefano N et al (2011) Magnetic resonance techniques in multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 68:1514–1520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barkhof F (2002) The clinico-radiological paradox in multiple sclerosis revisited. Curr Opin Neurol 15:239–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Comi G, Martinelli V, Locatelli T et al (1998) Neurophysiological and cognitive markers of disease evolution in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 4:260–265

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Minneboo A, Barkhof F, Polman CH et al (2004) Infratentorial lesions predict long-term disability in patients with initial findings suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 61:217–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Patkó T, Simó M, Arányi Z (2007) Vestibular click-evoked myogenic potentials: sensitivity and factors determining abnormality in patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 13:193–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gabelić T, Krbot Skorić M, Adamec I et al (2015) The vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP) score: a promising tool for evaluation of brainstem involvement in multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol 22:261–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rosengren SM, Welgampola MS, Colebatch JG (2010) Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: past, present and future. Clin Neurophysiol 121:636–651

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Magnano I, Pes GM, Pilurzi G et al (2014) Exploring brainstem function in multiple sclerosis by combining brainstem reflexes, evoked potentials, clinical and MRI investigations. Clin Neurophysiol 125:2286–2296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Leocani L, Rovaris M, Boneschi FM et al (2006) Multimodal evoked potentials to assess the evolution of multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 77:1030–1035

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Invernizzi P, Bertolasi L, Bianchi MR et al (2011) Prognostic value of multimodal evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis: the EP score. J Neurol 258:1933–1939

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fisniku LK, Brex PA, Altmann DR et al (2008) Disability and T2 MRI lesions: a 20-year follow-up of patients with relapse onset of multiple sclerosis. Brain 131:808–817

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B et al (2011) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol 69:292–302

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Deuschl G, Eisen A (1999) Recommendations for the practice of clinical neurophysiology: guidelines of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 52:192–211

    Google Scholar 

  14. Restuccia D (2000) Anatomic origin of P13 and P14 scalp far-field potentials. J Clin Neurophysiol 17:246–257

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Eleftheriadou A, Deftereos S, Zarikas V et al (2009) Test-retest reliability of p13n23 and n34p44 components of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in a large healthy population. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 38:462–467

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Alpini D, Pugnetti L, Caputo D et al (2004) Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in multiple sclerosis: clinical and imaging correlations. Mult Scler 10:316–321

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gazioglu S, Boz C (2012) Ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in multiple sclerosis patients. Clin Neurophysiol 123:1872–1879

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pittock SJ, McClelland RL, Mayr WT et al (2004) Clinical implications of benign multiple sclerosis: a 20-year population-based follow-up study. Ann Neurol 56:303–306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lublin FD, Reingold SC, Cohen JA et al (2014) Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: the 2013 revisions. Neurology 83:278–286

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Deriu F, Tolu E, Rothwell JC (2005) A sound-evoked vestibulo-masseteric reflex in healthy humans. J Neurophysiol 93:2739–2751

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Deriu F, Giaconi E, Rothwell JC et al (2010) Reflex responses of masseter muscles to sound. Clin Neurophysiol 121:1690–1699

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee EK, Seyal M (1998) Generators of short latency human somatosensory-evoked potentials recorded over the spine and scalp. J Clin Neurophysiol 15:227–234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yamada T (2000) Neuroanatomic substrates of lower extremity somatosensory evoked potentials. J Clin Neurophysiol 17:269–279

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. De Natale ER, Ginatempo F, Paulus KS et al (2015) Paired neurophysiological and clinical study of the brainstem at different stages of Parkinson’s Disease. Clin Neurophysiol. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2014.12.017

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. De Natale ER, Ginatempo F, Paulus KS et al (2015) Abnormalities of vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease are associated with clinical evidence of brainstem involvement. Neurol Sci 36:995–1001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chiappa KH (1980) Pattern shift visual, brainstem auditory and short latency somatosensory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 30:110–123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. M. Immacolata Pirastru and Dr. M. Cristina Varone for their helpful assistance in patients’ recruitment, Mrs. Pierina Mura for her skillful technical assistance, Mr. Paul Gottlieb for language revision.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Franca Deriu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding

The study was supported by Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla (Grants 2008/R/9 and 2011/R/17) and by Fondazione Banco di Sardegna, Sassari (Grants 2013/1205 and 2014/0190).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Magnano, I., Pes, G.M., Cabboi, M.P. et al. Comparison of brainstem reflex recordings and evoked potentials with clinical and MRI data to assess brainstem dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: a short-term follow-up. Neurol Sci 37, 1457–1465 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-016-2604-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-016-2604-z

Keywords

Navigation