Abstract
Brainstem dysfunctions are associated to high risk of developing severe disability in patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), often undetected by conventional routine assessments. In this view, the purpose of this study was to monitor brainstem function over a short-term period in PwMS, comparing clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations with evoked potentials (EPs) and brainstem reflexes (BSRs). Forty-five PwMS were evaluated at baseline and after 15.1 ± 4.2 months through Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, MRI, EPs, vestibulo-masseteric (VMR), acoustic-masseteric (AMR), vestibulo-collic (VCR) and trigemino-collic (TCR) reflexes. At baseline, brainstem alterations were detected by EDSS, MRI, EPs and BSRs in 40, 77.8, 84.4 and 82.2 % of patients, respectively. At follow-up, EDSS and MRI remained unchanged, while EP and BSR deteriorated in 86.7 and 91.1 % of patients, respectively. Changes from 1 to 3 altered EPs and from 1 to 4 altered BSRs were significant only for EPs (p = 0.028). The analysis of grading severity for each test disclosed significant worsening of the VMR, AMR, TCR and P14 wave of the median somatosensory EP. Combined EP/BSR recordings were significantly more sensitive than paired EDSS/MRI assessments at baseline (93.3 versus 80 %; p = 0.006) and follow-up (97.8 versus 82.2 %; p = 0.008). In the short-term VMR, AMR, TCR and P14 wave disclosed a significant functional brainstem deterioration by detecting lesions that remained clinically and MRI silent. Our findings provide evidence for a valuable role of neurophysiological methods, especially BSRs, in investigating and monitoring brainstem dysfunctions in MS, in comparison with the standard clinical and MRI procedures.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Filippi M, Rocca MA, De Stefano N et al (2011) Magnetic resonance techniques in multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 68:1514–1520
Barkhof F (2002) The clinico-radiological paradox in multiple sclerosis revisited. Curr Opin Neurol 15:239–245
Comi G, Martinelli V, Locatelli T et al (1998) Neurophysiological and cognitive markers of disease evolution in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 4:260–265
Minneboo A, Barkhof F, Polman CH et al (2004) Infratentorial lesions predict long-term disability in patients with initial findings suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 61:217–221
Patkó T, Simó M, Arányi Z (2007) Vestibular click-evoked myogenic potentials: sensitivity and factors determining abnormality in patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 13:193–198
Gabelić T, Krbot Skorić M, Adamec I et al (2015) The vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP) score: a promising tool for evaluation of brainstem involvement in multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol 22:261–269
Rosengren SM, Welgampola MS, Colebatch JG (2010) Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: past, present and future. Clin Neurophysiol 121:636–651
Magnano I, Pes GM, Pilurzi G et al (2014) Exploring brainstem function in multiple sclerosis by combining brainstem reflexes, evoked potentials, clinical and MRI investigations. Clin Neurophysiol 125:2286–2296
Leocani L, Rovaris M, Boneschi FM et al (2006) Multimodal evoked potentials to assess the evolution of multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 77:1030–1035
Invernizzi P, Bertolasi L, Bianchi MR et al (2011) Prognostic value of multimodal evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis: the EP score. J Neurol 258:1933–1939
Fisniku LK, Brex PA, Altmann DR et al (2008) Disability and T2 MRI lesions: a 20-year follow-up of patients with relapse onset of multiple sclerosis. Brain 131:808–817
Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B et al (2011) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol 69:292–302
Deuschl G, Eisen A (1999) Recommendations for the practice of clinical neurophysiology: guidelines of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 52:192–211
Restuccia D (2000) Anatomic origin of P13 and P14 scalp far-field potentials. J Clin Neurophysiol 17:246–257
Eleftheriadou A, Deftereos S, Zarikas V et al (2009) Test-retest reliability of p13n23 and n34p44 components of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in a large healthy population. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 38:462–467
Alpini D, Pugnetti L, Caputo D et al (2004) Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in multiple sclerosis: clinical and imaging correlations. Mult Scler 10:316–321
Gazioglu S, Boz C (2012) Ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in multiple sclerosis patients. Clin Neurophysiol 123:1872–1879
Pittock SJ, McClelland RL, Mayr WT et al (2004) Clinical implications of benign multiple sclerosis: a 20-year population-based follow-up study. Ann Neurol 56:303–306
Lublin FD, Reingold SC, Cohen JA et al (2014) Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: the 2013 revisions. Neurology 83:278–286
Deriu F, Tolu E, Rothwell JC (2005) A sound-evoked vestibulo-masseteric reflex in healthy humans. J Neurophysiol 93:2739–2751
Deriu F, Giaconi E, Rothwell JC et al (2010) Reflex responses of masseter muscles to sound. Clin Neurophysiol 121:1690–1699
Lee EK, Seyal M (1998) Generators of short latency human somatosensory-evoked potentials recorded over the spine and scalp. J Clin Neurophysiol 15:227–234
Yamada T (2000) Neuroanatomic substrates of lower extremity somatosensory evoked potentials. J Clin Neurophysiol 17:269–279
De Natale ER, Ginatempo F, Paulus KS et al (2015) Paired neurophysiological and clinical study of the brainstem at different stages of Parkinson’s Disease. Clin Neurophysiol. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2014.12.017
De Natale ER, Ginatempo F, Paulus KS et al (2015) Abnormalities of vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease are associated with clinical evidence of brainstem involvement. Neurol Sci 36:995–1001
Chiappa KH (1980) Pattern shift visual, brainstem auditory and short latency somatosensory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 30:110–123
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. M. Immacolata Pirastru and Dr. M. Cristina Varone for their helpful assistance in patients’ recruitment, Mrs. Pierina Mura for her skillful technical assistance, Mr. Paul Gottlieb for language revision.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding
The study was supported by Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla (Grants 2008/R/9 and 2011/R/17) and by Fondazione Banco di Sardegna, Sassari (Grants 2013/1205 and 2014/0190).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Magnano, I., Pes, G.M., Cabboi, M.P. et al. Comparison of brainstem reflex recordings and evoked potentials with clinical and MRI data to assess brainstem dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: a short-term follow-up. Neurol Sci 37, 1457–1465 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-016-2604-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-016-2604-z