Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the visual processing of global and local levels of hierarchical stimuli in domestic dogs. Fourteen dogs were trained to recognise a compound stimulus in a simultaneous conditioned discrimination procedure and were then tested for their local/global preference in a discrimination test. As a group, dogs showed a non-significant trend for global precedence, although large inter-individual variability was observed. Choices in the test were not affected by either dogs’ sex or the type of stimulus used for training. However, the less time a dog took to complete the discrimination training phase, the higher the probability that it chose the global level of test stimulus. Moreover, dogs that showed a clear preference for the global level in the test were significantly less likely to show positional responses during discrimination training. These differences in the speed of acquisition and response patterns may reflect individual differences in the cognitive requirements during discrimination training. The individual variability in global/local precedence suggests that experience in using visual information may be more important than predisposition in determining global/local processing in dogs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adachi I, Kuwahata H, Fujita K (2007) Dogs recall their owner’s face upon hearing the owner’s voice. Anim Cogn 10:17–21. doi:10.1007/s10071-006-0025-8
Adams B, Chan A, Callahan H, Milgram NW (2000) The canine as a model of human cognitive ageing: recent developments. Prog Neuro-Psychophamacol 24:675–692. doi:10.1016/S0278-5846(00)00101-9
Allison PD (2001) Logistic regression using SAS system: theory and application. Wiley-SAS, WA
Buttelmann D, Tomasello M (2013) Can domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) use referential emotional expressions to locate hidden food? Anim Cogn 16:137–145. doi:10.1007/s10071-012-0560-4
Cavoto KK, Cook RG (2001) Cognitive precedence for local information in hierarchical stimulus processing by pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 27:3–16. doi:10.1037//0097-7403.27.1.3
De Lillo C, Spinozzi G, Truppa V, Naylor DM (2005) A Comparative analysis of global and local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli in young children (Homo sapiens) and monkeys (Cebus apella). J Comp Psychol 119:155–165. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.119.2.155
De Lillo C, Spinozzi G, Palumbo M, Giustino G (2011) Attention allocation modulates the processing of hierarchical visual patterns: a comparative analysis of capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) and humans. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 37:341–352. doi:10.1037/a0022989
Deruelle C, Fagot J (1998) Visual search for global/local stimulus features in humans and baboons. Psychon Bull Rev 5:476–481
Fagot J, Deruelle C (1997) Processing of global and local visual information and hemispheric specialization in humans (Homo sapiens) and baboons (Papio papio). J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 23:429–442
Fagot J, Tomonaga M (1999) Global and local processing in humans (Homo sapiens) and chimpanzees (Pan troglocytes): use of a visual search task with compound stimuli. J Comp Psychol 113:3–12
Fremouw T, Herbranson WT, Shimp CP (1998) Priming of attention to local or global levels of visual analysis. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 24:278–290
Fremouw T, Herbranson WT, Shimp CP (2002) Dynamic shift of pigeon local/global attention. Anim Cogn 5:233–243
Goto K, Wills AJ, Lea SEG (2004) Global-feature classification can be acquired more rapidly than local-feature classification in both humans and pigeons. Anim Cogn 7:109–113. doi:10.1007/s10071-003-0193-8
Guo K, Meints K, Hall C, Hall S, Mills D (2009) Left gaze bias in humans, rhesus monkeys and domestic dogs. Anim Cogn 12:409–418. doi:10.1007/s10071-008-0199-3
Guthrie ER, Horton GP (1946) Cats in a puzzle box. Rinehart & Company, New York
Hare B, Brown M, Williamson C, Tomasello M (2002) The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science 298:1634–1636. doi:10.1126/science.1072702
Hejjas K, Vas J, Kubinyi E, Sasvari-Szekely M, Miklósi Á, Ronai Z (2007) Novel repeat polymorphisms of the dopaminergic neurotransmitter genes among dogs and wolves. Mamm Genome 18:871–879. doi:10.1007/s00335-007-9070-0
Hoar S, Linnell KJ (2013) Cognitive load eliminates the global perceptual bias for unlimited exposure durations. Atten Percept Psychophys 75:210–215. doi:10.3758/s13414-012-0421-x
Hopkins WD, Washburn DA (2002) Matching visual stimuli on the basis of global and local features by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Anim Cogn 5:27–31. doi:10.1007/s10071-001-0121-8
Horn L, Viranyi Z, Miklósi Á, Huber L, Range F (2012) Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) flexibly adjust their human-directed behavior to the actions of their human partners in a problem situation. Anim Cogn 15:57–71. doi:10.1007/s10071-011-0432-3
Huber L, Racca A, Scaf B, Virányi Z, Range F (2013) Discrimination of familiar human faces in dogs (Canis familiaris). Learn Motiv. doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2013.04.005
Kimchi R (1998) Uniform connectedness and grouping in the perceptual organization of hierarchical patterns. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:1105–1118
Kimchi R, Amishav R, Sulitzeanu-Kenan A (2009) Gender differences in global-local perception? Evidence from orientation and shape judgments. Acta Psychol 130:64–71. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.10.002
Kinchal RA, Wolf JM (1979) The order of visual processing: “top–down”, “bottom–up”, or “middle–out”. Percept Psychophys 25:225–231
Kmichi R (1992) Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: a critical review. Psychol Bull 112:24–38
Lamb MR, Robertson LC, Knight RT (1990) Component mechanisms underlying the processing of hierarchically organized patterns: interferences from patients with unilateral cortical lesions. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 16:471–483
Lux S, Marshall JC, Thimm M, Fink GR (2008) Differential processing of hierarchical visual stimuli in young and older healthy adults: implications for pathology. Cortex 44:21–28. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2005.08.001
Miklósi Á (2007) Social cognition. In: Miklósi Á (ed) Dog behaviour, evolution, and cognition. Oxford University Press Inc., New York, pp 165–200
Miklósi Á, Topál J (2013) What does it take to become ‘best friend’? Evolutionary changes in canine social competence. Trends Cogn Sci 17:287–294. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.04.005
Milgram NW, Head E, Weiner E, Thomas E (1994) Cognitive functions and aging in the dog: acquisition of nonspatial visual tasks. Behav Neurosci 108:57–68. doi:10.1037//0735-7044.108.1.57
Miller PE, Murphy CJ (1995) Vision in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 207:1623–1634
Mongillo P, Bono G, Regolin L, Marinelli L (2010) Selective attention to humans in companion dogs, Canis familiaris. Anim Behav 80:1057–1063. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.09.014
Müller-Oehring EM, Schulte T, Raassi C, Pfefferbaum A, Sullivan EV (2007) Local-global interference is modulated by age, sex and anterior corpus callosum size. Brain Res 1142:189–205. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2007.01.062
Murphy CJ, Mutti DO, Zadnik K, Ver Hoeve J (1997) Effect of optical defocus on visual acuity in dogs. Am J Vet Res 58:414–418
Nagasawa M, Murai K, Mogi K, Kikusui T (2011) Dogs can discriminate human smiling faces from blank expressions. Anim Cogn 14:525–533. doi:10.1007/s10071-011-0386-5
Navon D (1977) Forest before trees: the precedence of global features in visual perception. Cogn Psychol 9:353–383
Pongrácz P, Miklósi Á, Dóka A, Csányi V (2003) Successful application of video-projected human images for signalling to dogs. Ethology 109:809–821. doi:10.1046/j.0179-1613.2003.00923.x
Pretterer G, Bubna-Littitz H, Windischbauer G, Gabler C, Griebel U (2004) Brightness discrimination in the dog. J Vision 4:241–249. doi:10.1167/4.3.10
Racca A, Amadei E, Ligout S, Guo K, Meints K, Mills D (2010) Discrimination of human and dog faces and inversion responses in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris). Anim Cogn 13:525–533. doi:10.1007/s10071-009-0303-3
Racca A, Guo K, Meints K, Mills DS (2012) Reading faces: differential lateral gaze bias in processing canine and human facial expressions in dogs and 4-year-old children. Public Library of Science One 7:e36076. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036076
Range F, Aust U, Steurer M, Huber L (2008) Visual categorization of natural stimuli by domestic dogs. Anim Cogn 11:339–347. doi:10.1007/s10071-007-0123-2
Roalf D, Lowery N, Turetsky BI (2006) Behavioral and physiological findings of gender differences in global-local visual processing. Brain Cogn 60:32–42. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2005.09.008
Schmittmann VD, van der Maas HLJ, Raijmakers MEJ (2012) Distinct discrimination learning strategies and their relation with spatial memory and attentional control in 4-to 14-year-olds. J Exp Child Psychol 111:644–662. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.10.010
Sherf KS, Behrmann M, Kimchi R, Luna B (2009) Emergence of global shape processing continues through adolescence. Child Dev 80:162–177. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01252.x
Slavin MJ, Mattingley JB, Bradshaw JL, Storey E (2002) Local-global processing in Alzheimer’s disease: an examination of interference, inhibition and priming. Neuropsychologia 40:1173–1186. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00225-1
Somppi S, Törnqvist H, Hänninen H, Krause C, Vainio O (2012) Dogs do look at images: eye tracking in canine cognition research. Anim Cogn 15:163–174
Song Y, Hakoda Y (2012) The interference of local over global information processing in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder of the inattentive type. Brain Dev-JPN 34:308–317. doi:10.1016/j.braindev.2011.07.010
Spinozzi G, De Lillo C, Truppa V (2003) Global and local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). J Comp Psychol 117:15–23. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.117.1.15
Spinozzi G, De Lillo C, Salvi V (2006) Local advantage in the visual processing of hierarchical stimuli following manipulations of stimulus size and element numerosity in monkeys (Cebus apella). Behav Brain Res 166:45–54. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2005.06.043
Topál J, Gergely G, Erdöhegyi Á, Csibra G, Miklósi Á (2009) Differential sensitivity to human communication in dogs, wolves, and human infants. Science 325:1269–1272. doi:10.1126/science.1176960
Truppa V, Sovrano VA, Spinozzi G, Bisazza A (2010) Processing of visual hierarchical stimuli by fish (Xenotoca eiseni). Behav Brain Res 207:51–60. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2009.09.039
Wagemans J, Feldman J, Gepshtein S, Kimchi R, Pomerantz JR, van der Helm PA, van Leeuwen C (2012) A century of gestalt psychology in visual perception: II. Conceptual and theoretical foundations. Psychol Bull 138:1218–1252. doi:10.1037/a0029334
Acknowledgments
We are very grateful to Francesco Valentini for assistance with experiments. Dr. Elisa Pitteri received a Ph.D. Grant from the University of Padova, Italy.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Elisa Pitteri and Paolo Mongillo have contributed equally to this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pitteri, E., Mongillo, P., Carnier, P. et al. Hierarchical stimulus processing by dogs (Canis familiaris). Anim Cogn 17, 869–877 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-013-0720-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-013-0720-1