Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Efficacy of various side-to-side toothbrushes for noncontact biofilm removal

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of four different powered toothbrushes with side-to-side action for noncontact biofilm removal in vitro.

Materials and methods

A three-species biofilm was formed in vitro on protein-coated titanium disks using a flow chamber combined with a static biofilm growth model. Subsequently, the biofilm-coated substrates were exposed to four different side-to-side toothbrushes (A, B, C, and D) with various brushing times (2, 4, and 6 s) and brushing (bristle-to-disk) distances (0, 2, and 4 mm). The biofilm volumes were measured using volumetric analyses with confocal laser scanning microscope images and Imaris version 7.5.2 software.

Results

The median percentages of biofilm reduction by the analyzed toothbrushes ranged from 9 % to 80 %. The abilities of the tested toothbrushes to remove the in vitro biofilm differed significantly (p < 0.05). Two of the tested toothbrushes (C and D) were capable of significant biofilm reduction by noncontact brushing.

Conclusions

It was possible to reduce a three-species in vitro biofilm by noncontact brushing with two out of four side-to-side toothbrushes.

Clinical relevance

Toothbrushes C and D show in vitro a high efficacy in biofilm removal without bristle contact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Socransky SS, Haffajee AD (2000) Dental biofilms: difficult therapeutic targets. Periodontol 28:12–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Del Pozo JL, Patel R (2007) The challenge of treating biofilm-associated bacterial infections. Clin Pharmacol Ther 82:204–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sanz M, van Winkelhoff AJ (2011) Periodontal infections: understanding the complexity—consensus of the Seventh European Workshop on Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol 38(Suppl 11):3–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kolenbrander PE, Palmer RJ Jr, Periasamy S, Jakubovics NS (2010) Oral multispecies biofilm development and the key role of cell-cell distance. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:471–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Walter C, Weiger R (2006) Antibiotics as the only therapy of untreated chronic periodontitis: a critical commentary. J Clin Periodontol 33:938–939, author reply 940–931

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Herrera D, Alonso B, Leon R, Roldan S, Sanz M (2008) Antimicrobial therapy in periodontitis: the use of systemic antimicrobials against the subgingival biofilm. J Clin Periodontol 35:45–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Axelsson P, Nystrom B, Lindhe J (2004) The long-term effect of a plaque control program on tooth mortality, caries and periodontal disease in adults. Results after 30 years of maintenance. J Clin Periodontol 31:749–757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schmidt JC, Zaugg C, Weiger R, Walter C (2013) Brushing without brushing?—a review of the efficacy of powered toothbrushes in noncontact biofilm removal. Clin Oral Investig 17:687–709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sharma PK, Gibcus MJ, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ (2005) Influence of fluid shear and microbubbles on bacterial detachment from a surface. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:3668–3673

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Busscher HJ, Jager D, Finger G, Schaefer N, van der Mei HC (2010) Energy transfer, volumetric expansion, and removal of oral biofilms by non-contact brushing. Eur J Oral Sci 118:177–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hannig C, Hannig M (2009) The oral cavity—a key system to understand substratum-dependent bioadhesion on solid surfaces in man. Clin Oral Investig 13:123–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Teles FR, Teles RP, Sachdeo A, Uzel NG, Song XQ, Torresyap G, Singh M, Papas A, Haffajee AD, Socransky SS (2012) Comparison of microbial changes in early redeveloping biofilms on natural teeth and dentures. J Periodontol 83:1139–1148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Palmer RJ Jr, Gordon SM, Cisar JO, Kolenbrander PE (2003) Coaggregation-mediated interactions of streptococci and actinomyces detected in initial human dental plaque. J Bacteriol 185:3400–3409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Paramonova E, Kalmykowa OJ, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ, Sharma PK (2009) Impact of hydrodynamics on oral biofilm strength. J Dent Res 88:922–926

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lea SC, Khan A, Patanwala HS, Landini G, Walmsley AD (2007) The effects of load and toothpaste on powered toothbrush vibrations. J Dent 35:350–354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Saxer UP, Imfeld T, van Waes H (2010) Medienmitteilung “Hydrodynamik-Schallzahnbürsten”. SSO Taskforce, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  17. Astasov-Frauenhoffer M, Braissant O, Hauser-Gerspach I, Daniels AU, Weiger R, Waltimo T (2012) Isothermal microcalorimetry provides new insights into biofilm variability and dynamics. FEMS Microbiol Lett 337:31–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hauser-Gerspach I, Kulik EM, Weiger R, Decker EM, Von Ohle C, Meyer J (2007) Adhesion of Streptococcus sanguinis to dental implant and restorative materials in vitro. Dent Mater J 26:361–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Weiger R, Decker EM, Krastl G, Brecx M (1999) Deposition and retention of vital and dead Streptococcus sanguinis cells on glass surfaces in a flow-chamber system. Arch Oral Biol 44:621–628

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Decker EM, Weiger R, Wiech I, Heide PE, Brecx M (2003) Comparison of antiadhesive and antibacterial effects of antiseptics on Streptococcus sanguinis. Eur J Oral Sci 111:144–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Decker EM, Weiger R, von Ohle C, Wiech I, Brecx M (2003) Susceptibility of planktonic versus attached Streptococcus sanguinis cells to chlorhexidine. Clin Oral Investig 7:98–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Decker EM, Maier G, Axmann D, Brecx M, von Ohle C (2008) Effect of xylitol/chlorhexidine versus xylitol or chlorhexidine as single rinses on initial biofilm formation of cariogenic streptococci. Quintessence Int 39:17–22

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cho SB, Nakanishi K, Soga N, Ohtsuki C, Nakamura T, Kitsugi T, Yamamuro T (1995) Defence of apatite formation on silica gel on its structure: effect of heat treatment. J Am Ceram Soc 78:1769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kazor CE, Mitchell PM, Lee AM, Stokes LN, Loesche WJ, Dewhirst FE, Paster BJ (2003) Diversity of bacterial populations on the tongue dorsa of patients with halitosis and healthy patients. J Clin Microbiol 41:558–563

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kinane DF, Hajishengallis G (2009) Polymicrobial infections, biofilms, and beyond. J Clin Periodontol 36:404–405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rimondini L, Fare S, Brambilla E, Felloni A, Consonni C, Brossa F, Carrassi A (1997) The effect of surface roughness on early in vivo plaque colonization on titanium. J Periodontol 68:556–562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dezelic T, Guggenheim B, Schmidlin PR (2009) Multi-species biofilm formation on dental materials and an adhesive patch. Oral Health Prev Dent 7:47–53

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bürgers R, Gerlach T, Hahnel S, Schwarz F, Handel G, Gosau M (2010) In vivo and in vitro biofilm formation on two different titanium implant surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res 21:156–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Stepanovic S, Vukovic D, Jezek P, Pavlovic M, Svabic-Vlahovic M (2001) Influence of dynamic conditions on biofilm formation by staphylococci. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 20:502–504

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Stoodley P, Cargo R, Rupp CJ, Wilson S, Klapper I (2002) Biofilm material properties as related to shear-induced deformation and detachment phenomena. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 29:361–367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Verkaik MJ, Busscher HJ, Rustema-Abbing M, Slomp AM, Abbas F, van der Mei HC (2010) Oral biofilm models for mechanical plaque removal. Clin Oral Investig 14:403–409

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Adams H, Winston MT, Heersink J, Buckingham-Meyer KA, Costerton JW, Stoodley P (2002) Development of a laboratory model to assess the removal of biofilm from interproximal spaces by powered tooth brushing. Am J Dent 15:12B–17B

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Leonhardt A, Adolfsson B, Lekholm U, Wikstrom M, Dahlen G (1993) A longitudinal microbiological study on osseointegrated titanium implants in partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 4:113–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Heitz-Mayfield LJ, Lang NP (2010) Comparative biology of chronic and aggressive periodontitis vs. peri-implantitis. Periodontol 2000 53:167–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Romeo E, Ghisolfi M, Murgolo N, Chiapasco M, Lops D, Vogel G (2005) Therapy of peri-implantitis with resective surgery. A 3-year clinical trial on rough screw-shaped oral implants. Part I: clinical outcome. Clin Oral Implants Res 16:9–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Genco RJ, Ho AW, Grossi SG, Dunford RG, Tedesco LA (1999) Relationship of stress, distress and inadequate coping behaviors to periodontal disease. J Periodontol 70:711–723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ak G, Sepet E, Pinar A, Aren G, Turan N (2005) Reasons for early loss of primary molars. Oral Health Prev Dent 3:113–117

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Borrell LN, Burt BA, Warren RC, Neighbors HW (2006) The role of individual and neighborhood social factors on periodontitis: the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Periodontol 77:444–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Meisel P, Reifenberger J, Haase R, Nauck M, Bandt C, Kocher T (2008) Women are periodontally healthier than men, but why don't they have more teeth than men? Menopause 15:270–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Quirynen M, De Soete M, van Steenberghe D (2002) Infectious risks for oral implants: a review of the literature. Clin Oral Implants Res 13:1–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. König J, Plagmann HC, Rühling A, Kocher T (2002) Tooth loss and pocket probing depths in compliant periodontally treated patients: a retrospective analysis. J Clin Periodontol 29:1092–1100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Eickholz P, Kaltschmitt J, Berbig J, Reitmeir P, Pretzl B (2008) Tooth loss after active periodontal therapy. 1: patient-related factors for risk, prognosis, and quality of outcome. J Clin Periodontol 35:165–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Heitz-Mayfield LJ (2008) Peri-implant diseases: diagnosis and risk indicators. J Clin Periodontol 35:292–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Emling RC, Yankell SL (1997) The application of sonic technology to oral hygiene: the third generation of powered toothbrushes. J Clin Dent 8:1–3

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Robinson PG, Damien Walmsley A, Heanue M, Deacon S, Deery C, Glenny AM, Worthington H, Shaw W (2006) Quality of trials in a systematic review of powered toothbrushes: suggestions for future clinical trials. J Periodontol 77:1944–1953

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Elisabeth Filipuzzi-Jenny (Clinic of Preventive Dentistry and Oral Microbiology, University of Basel) for laboratory assistance; Dr. Oliver Biehlmaier and Dr. Alexa Ferrand (Image Core Facility, Biozentrum, University of Basel) for assistance with microscopic analyses; and Ing. EurEta Sascha Martin (Department of Physics, University of Basel) for the construction of the toothbrush apparatus.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. This project was supported in part by an unrestricted grant by the Swiss Society of Dentistry (SSO), project number 264-12. The titanium disks were provided by Straumann AG (Basel, Switzerland).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clemens Walter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmidt, J.C., Astasov-Frauenhoffer, M., Hauser-Gerspach, I. et al. Efficacy of various side-to-side toothbrushes for noncontact biofilm removal. Clin Oral Invest 18, 793–800 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1047-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1047-7

Keywords

Navigation