Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of a laparoscopic resection on the quality of life in rectal cancer patients: Results of 135 patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the impact of a laparoscopic resection on the quality of life in rectal cancer patients.

Methods

This study included 135 patients (laparoscopic resection [LR] 65 cases and open resection [OR] 70 cases). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38 questionnaires were used to measure the quality of life before the operation, then 1 week, 3 months, and 1 year after the operation.

Results

Eleven (16.9%) patients underwent a conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery. The incision length and blood loss both decreased significantly in the LR group in comparison to the OR group (P < 0.05). Recovery of the gastrointestinal function, bladder function, and ambulation was more rapid in the LR group (P < 0.05). The patients in the LR group reported better global health status (33.3 vs 25.0, P < 0.001), body image (77.8 vs 66.7, P = 0.008), and less pain (33.3 vs 50. 0, P = 0.009) 1 week after operation. Better body image was reported in the LR group even 1 year after the operation (P < 0.05). Fewer financial difficulties were reported by patients in the LR group (P < 0.001). No significant differences were found between two groups on other scales.

Conclusions

This study showed that the quality of life benefits due to minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery were evident only in the immediate postoperative period. A laparoscopic rectal resection therefore provided only better cosmetic benefit over the longer term.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Colon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR). Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomized trial. Lancet Oncol 2005;6:477–484.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Piqué JM, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomized trial. Lancet 2002;359:2224–2229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Ng SS, et al. Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomized trial. Lancet 2004;363:1187–1192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Breukink SO, Pierie J, Wiggers T. Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;18:CD005200.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kim SH, Park IJ, Joh YG, Hahn KY. Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: a prospective analysis of thirty-month follow-up outcomes in 312 patients. Surg Endosc 2006;20:1197–1202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Marescaux J, Rubino F, Leroy J. Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer surgery. Dig Dis 2005;23:135–141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ng SS, Leung KL, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Li JC, Teoh AY, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2008;15:2418–2425.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. MRC CLASICC Trial Group. Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:3061–3068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ding KF, Chen R, Zhang JL, Li J, Xu YQ, Lv L, et al. Laparoscopic surgery for the curative treatment of rectal cancer: results of a Chinese three-center case-control study. Surg Endosc 2009;23:854–861.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, Civelli V, Di Carlo V. Laparoscopic vs open colectomy in cancer patients: long-term complications, quality of life, and survival. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:2217–2223.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, Capretti G, Di Carlo V. Laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer patients: outcome and cost-benefit analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:464–471.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang L, Yu YY, Zhou ZG, Li Y, Xu B, Song JM, et al. Quality of life outcomes following laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancers: a clinical control study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2007;33:575–579.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Staudacher C, Vignali A, Saverio DP, Elena O, Andrea T. Laparoscopic vs open total mesorectal excision in unselected patients with rectal cancer: impact on early outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:1324–1331.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jayne DG, Brown JM, Thorpe H, Walker J, Quirke P, Guillou PJ. Bladder and sexual function following resection for rectal cancer in a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open technique. Br J Surg 2005;92:1124–1132.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Quah HM, Jayne DG, Eu KW, Seow-Choen F. Bladder and sexual dysfunction following laparoscopically assisted and conventional open mesorectal resection for cancer. Br J Surg 2002;89:1551–1556.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Breukink SO, van der Zaag-Loonen HJ, Bouma EM, Pierie JP, Hoff C, Wiggers T, et al. Prospective evaluation of quality of life and sexual functioning after laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:147–155.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Larson DW, Davies MM, Dozois EJ, Cima RR, Piotrowicz K, Anderson K. Sexual function, body image, and quality of life after laparoscopic and open ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 2008;51:392–396.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Li M, Gu J. Changing patterns of colorectal cancer in China over a period of 20 years. World J Gastroenterol 2005;11:4685–4688.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez N J, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85:365–376.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sprangers MA, TE Velde A, Aaronson NK. The construction and testing of the EORTC colorectal cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire module (QLQ-CR38). European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study Group on Quality of Life. Eur J Cancer 1999;35:238–247.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wan CH, Chen MQ, Zhang CZ, Tang XL, Meng Q, Zhang XX, et al. The Chinese version of EORTC QLQ-C30 form in evaluation of quality of life for patients with cancer (in Chinese with English abstract). Shi Yong Zhong Liu Za Zhi (Journal of Practical Oncology) 2005;20:353–355.

    Google Scholar 

  22. EORTC Quality of Life Study Group. The EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual (3rd Edition) [M]. Brussels: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer; 2001. p. 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Osoba D, Rodrigues G, Myles J, Zee B, Pater J. Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:139–144.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Taflampas P, Christodoulakis M, Tsiftsis DD. Anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: facts, obscurity, and fiction. Surg Today 2009;39:183–188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Stocchi L, Nelson H. Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2005;12:960–970.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, J., Chen, R., Xu, YQ. et al. Impact of a laparoscopic resection on the quality of life in rectal cancer patients: Results of 135 patients. Surg Today 40, 917–922 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-009-4156-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-009-4156-9

Key words

Navigation