Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of adductor canal block and IPACK block (interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee) with adductor canal block alone after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective control trial on pain and knee function in immediate postoperative period

  • Original Article • KNEE - ARTHROPLASTY
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Editors’ Note to this article was published on 20 April 2020

Abstract

Background

Adductor canal block (ACB) is a peripheral nerve blockade technique that provides good pain control in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty which however does not relieve posterior knee pain. The recent technique of an ultrasound-guided local anesthetic infiltration of the interspace between popliteal artery and the capsule of posterior knee (IPACK) has shown promising results in providing significant posterior knee analgesia without affecting the motor nerves.

Materials and methods

A prospective study was conducted from September 2016 to March 2017 in a total of 120 patients undergoing unilateral total knee arthroplasty. The initial 60 consecutive patients received ACB + IPACK (Group 1, n = 60), and the subsequent 60 patients received ACB alone (Group 2, n = 60). All patients were evaluated with VAS score for pain recorded at 8 h, postoperative day (POD) 1 and POD 2 after the surgery. The secondary outcome measures assessed were the range of movement (ROM) and ambulation distance.

Results

VAS score showed significantly (p < 0.005) better values in ACB + IPACK group compared to the ACB group. The mean ROM of knee and ambulation distance also showed significantly better values in ACB + IPACK group compared to the ACB group.

Conclusion

ACB + IPACK is a promising technique that offers improved pain management in the immediate postoperative period without affecting the motor function around the knee joint resulting in better ROM and ambulation compared to ACB alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mahoney OM, Noble PC, Davidson J et al (1990) The effect of continuous epidural analgesia on postoperative pain, rehabilitation, and duration of hospitalization in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 260:30–37

    Google Scholar 

  2. Paul JE, Arya A, Hurlburt L et al (2010) Femoral nerve block improves analgesia outcomes after total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology 113(5):1144–1162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lamplot JD, Wagner ER, Manning DW (2014) Multimodal pain management in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 29(2):329–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Korean Knee Society (2012) Guidelines for the management of postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Relat Res 24(4):201–207

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Li D, Ma GG (2016) Analgesic efficacy and quadriceps strength of adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block following total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24(8):2614–2619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Soltesz S, Meiger D, Milles-Thieme S, Saxler G, Ziegeler S (2016) Intermittent versus continuous sciatic block combined with femoral block for patients undergoing knee arthroplasty. A randomized controlled trial. Int Orthop 40(9):1861–1867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hanson NA, Allen CJ, Hostetter LS, Nagy R et al (2014) Continuous ultrasound-guided adductor canal block for total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind trial. Anesth Analg 118(6):1370–1377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Li D, Yang Z, Xie X, Zhao J, Kang P (2016) Adductor canal block provides better performance after total knee arthroplasty compared with femoral nerve block: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Orthop 40(5):925–933

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Laoruengthana A, Rattanaprichavej P, Rasamimongkol S, Galassi M (2017) Anterior vs posterior periarticular multimodal drug injections: a randomized, controlled trial in simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 32(7):2100–2104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ilfeld BM, McCartney CJ (2017) Searching for the optimal pain management technique after knee arthroplasty: analgesia is just the tip of the iceberg. Anesthesiology 126(5):768–770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sinha SK, Abrams JH, Arumugam S et al (2012) Femoral nerve block with selective tibial nerve block provides effective analgesia without foot drop after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, observer-blinded study. Anesth Analg 115(1):202–206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Elliott CE, Myers TJ, Soberon JR, et al (2015) The adductor canal block combined with iPACK improves physical therapy performance and reduces hospital length of stay (Abstract 197). Presented at the 40th annual regional anesthesiology and acute pain medicine meeting (ASRA), 14–16 May in LasVegas, Nevada

  13. Terkawi AS, Mavridis D, Sessler DI, Nunemaker MS et al (2017) Pain management modalities after total knee arthroplasty: a network meta-analysis of 170 randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology 126(5):923–937

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vora MU, Nicholas TA, Kassel CA, Grant SA (2016) Adductor canal block for knee surgical procedures: review article. J Clin Anesth 35:295–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pham Dang C, Gautheron E, Guilley J et al (2005) The value of adding sciatic block to continuous femoral block for analgesia after total knee replacement. Reg Anesth Pain Med 30(2):128–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wegener JT, Dijk NV, Hollmann MW, Preckel B, Stevens MF (2011) Value of single-injection or continuous sciatic nerve block in addition to a continuous femoral nerve block in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med 36(5):481–488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nader A, Kendall MC, Manning DW et al (2016) Single-dose adductor canal block with local infiltrative analgesia compared with local infiltrate analgesia after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med 41(6):678–684

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cullom C, Weed JT (2017) Anesthetic and analgesic management for outpatient knee arthroplasty. Curr Pain Headache Rep 21(5):23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Safa B, Gollish J, Haslam L, McCartney CJ (2014) Comparing the effects of single shot sciatic nerve block versus posterior capsule local anesthetic infiltration on analgesia and functional outcome after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, double- blinded, controlled trial. J Arthroplasty 29(6):1149–1153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics, Sunshine Hospital, P.G.Road, Secunderabad, Telangana, India

    S. R. Sankineani, Ajit Jangale & A. V. Gurava Reddy

  2. Department of Anaesthesia, Mediciti Institute of Medical Sciences, Medchal, Hyderabad, India

    A. R. C. Reddy

  3. Department of Orthopaedics, Maxcure Hospital, Madhapur, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

    Krishna Kiran Eachempati

Authors
  1. S. R. Sankineani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. R. C. Reddy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Krishna Kiran Eachempati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ajit Jangale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. V. Gurava Reddy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. R. C. Reddy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sankineani, S.R., Reddy, A.R.C., Eachempati, K.K. et al. Comparison of adductor canal block and IPACK block (interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee) with adductor canal block alone after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective control trial on pain and knee function in immediate postoperative period. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 28, 1391–1395 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-018-2218-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-018-2218-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation