Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Diagnostic accuracy of various modalities relative to open bone biopsy for detection of long bone posttraumatic osteomyelitis

  • Original Article • GENERAL ORTHOPAEDICS - TRAUMA
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Long bone posttraumatic osteomyelitis (PTOM) is a relatively common complication following surgical fixation of open fractures. There is a lacking consensus on ideal strategies for diagnostic evaluation of long bone PTOM. While open bone biopsy and culture is considered the ‘gold diagnostic standard,’ its cost and invasiveness are often prohibitive and have prompted the search for alternate diagnostic methods.

Objective

To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of various diagnostic modalities relative to open bone biopsy and culture for the detection of long bone PTOM.

Design

Retrospective cohort study; Level of Evidence, III.

Setting

Urban Level I trauma center and safety-net institution.

Patients/participants

A consecutive cohort of 159 adult patients presenting with long bone PTOM at our Level I trauma center between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2013, were retrospectively identified. All included patients fulfilled diagnostic criteria for PTOM (as defined by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention) that involved a long bone (femur, fibula, tibia, humerus, radius, and ulna). Patients with diabetic foot infection, septic arthritis, osteomyelitis of the spine/pelvis/hand, or insufficient medical records were excluded.

Main outcome measurements

Sensitivity and specificity of deep wound culture, soft tissue histopathologic examination, and elevated levels of acute phase reactants [C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and leukocyte count (WBC)] were determined using findings of open bone biopsy and culture as a reference standard.

Results

The most common pathogen isolated on open bone culture was staphylococci, contributing to 89 (57%) of 159 cases of long bone PTOM (p < 0.001). Relative to open bone biopsy and culture as the gold diagnostic standard, soft tissue histopathology demonstrated a sensitivity of 69.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 53.7–82.3%] and specificity of 38.9% (95% CI 18.3–63.9%) for the detection of long bone PTOM. Deep wound culture exhibited a lower sensitivity of 66.0% (95% CI 56.1–74.8%) and specificity of 28.1% (95% CI 12.9–49.5%), a difference that was statistically significant (p = 0.021). Among inflammatory markers, elevated levels of CRP and ESR were equally sensitive for the detection of PTOM compared to open bone biopsy and culture, while WBC was significantly less sensitive (sensitivity 33.2%; 95% CI 25.3–43.7; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Soft tissue histopathologic examination and deep wound culture are relatively poor substitutes for the diagnosis of long bone PTOM compared to open bone biopsy and culture. The accurate identification of causative pathogens underlying long bone PTOM is critical for diagnosis and choice of antibiotic treatment. Future studies investigating the use of higher-resolution diagnostic methods are merited.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Patzakis MJ, Zalavras CG (2005) Chronic posttraumatic osteomyelitis and infected nonunion of the tibia: current management concepts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 13:417–427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zalavras CG, Christensen T, Rigopoulos N et al (2009) Infection following operative treatment of ankle fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:1715–1720

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Calhoun JH, Manring MM, Shirtliff M (2009) Osteomyelitis of the long bones. Semin Plast Surg 23:59–72

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ikpeme IA, Ngim NE, Ikpeme AA (2010) Diagnosis and treatment of pyogenic bone infections. Afr Health Sci 10:82–88

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Sanders J, Mauffrey C (2013) Long bone osteomyelitis in adults: fundamental concepts and current techniques. Orthopedics 36:368–375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sanders JO, Bozic KJ, Glassman SD et al (2014) Clinical practice guidelines: their use, misuse, and future directions. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 22:135–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Palmer MP, Altman DT, Altman GT et al (2014) Can we trust open culture results in nonunions? J Orthop Trauma 28:384–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hake ME, Oh JK, Kim JW et al (2015) Difficulties and challenges to diagnose and treat post-traumatic long bone osteomyelitis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 25:1–3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fritz JM, McDonald JR (2008) Osteomyelitis: approach to diagnosis and treatment. Phys Sportsmed 36:nihpa116823

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Wilson ML, Winn W (2008) Laboratory diagnosis of bone, joint, soft-tissue, and skin infections. Clin Infect Dis 46:453–457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Maharajan K, Patro DK, Menon J et al (2013) Serum Procalcitonin is a sensitive and specific marker in the diagnosis of septic arthritis and acute osteomyelitis. J Orthop Surg Res 8:19

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Michail M, Jude E, Liaskos C et al (2013) The performance of serum inflammatory markers for the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with osteomyelitis. Int J Lower extrem Wounds 12:94–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Unkila-Kallio L, Kallio MJ, Peltola H (1994) The usefulness of C-reactive protein levels in the identification of concurrent septic arthritis in children who have acute hematogenous osteomyelitis. A comparison with the usefulness of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and the white blood-cell count. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:848–853

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Harris JC, Caesar DH, Davison C et al (2011) How useful are laboratory investigations in the emergency department evaluation of possible osteomyelitis? Emerg Med Australas 23:317–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Khatri G, Wagner DK, Sohnle PG (2001) Effect of bone biopsy in guiding antimicrobial therapy for osteomyelitis complicating open wounds. Am J Med Sci 321:367–371

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lewis RP, Sutter VL, Finegold SM (1978) Bone infections involving anaerobic bacteria. Medicine 57:279–305

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cyril Mauffrey.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest in relation to the presented body of research.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chadayammuri, V., Herbert, B., Hao, J. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of various modalities relative to open bone biopsy for detection of long bone posttraumatic osteomyelitis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 27, 871–875 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-017-1976-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-017-1976-y

Keywords

Navigation