Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Indication for anterior spinal cord decompression via a posterolateral approach for the treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the thoracic spine: a prospective cohort study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

For ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) in the thoracic spine, anterior decompression is the most effective method for relieving spinal cord compression. The purpose of this study was to prospectively analyze the surgical outcomes based on our strategy in the treatment of thoracic OPLL.

Methods

This study included 23 patients who underwent surgery for thoracic OPLL based on the following strategy between 2011 and 2017. For patients with a beak-type OPLL in the kyphotic curve with a ≥ 50% canal occupying ratio, circumferential decompression via a posterolateral approach and fusion (CDF) was indicated. For other types of OPLL, posterior decompression and fusion (PDF) was commonly indicated. Posterior fusion without decompression (PF) was applied when the spinal cord was separated from the posterior spinal elements. Clinical and radiological outcomes were compared among the CDF, PDF, and PF groups with a minimum of 20-month follow-up.

Results

Ten, eleven, and two patients underwent CDF, PDF, and PF, respectively. The preoperative Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score in the CDF group was significantly lower than that in the PDF group. The average recovery rate, according to JOA score, was 63%, 56%, and 25% in the CDF, PDF, and PF groups, respectively. The result in the CDF group was better than that in the PF group.

Conclusions

Anterior decompression was appropriate for patients with localized spinal cord compression by a large OPLL in the kyphotic curve, and CDF via a posterolateral approach appears to be safe and effective.

Graphic abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Matsumoto M, Chiba K, Toyama Y et al (2008) Surgical results and related factor for ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament of the thoracic spine. A multi-institutional retrospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:1034–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Matsumoto M, Toyama Y, Chikuda H et al (2011) Outcomes of fusion surgery for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the thoracic spine: a multicenter retrospective survey: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 15:380–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Imagama S, Ando K, Takeuchi K et al (2018) Perioperative complications after surgery for thoracic ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament—nationwide multicenter prospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 43:E1389–E1397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fujimura Y, Nishi Y, Nakamura M, Watanabe M, Matsumoto M (1997) Myelopathy secondary to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the thoracic spine treated by anterior decompression and bony fusion. Spinal Cord 35:777–784

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Takahata M, Ito M, Abumi K, Kotani Y, Sudo H, Minami A (2008) Clinical results and complications of circumferential spinal cord decompression through a single posterior approach for thoracic myelopathy caused by ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:1199–1208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tomita K, Kawahara N, Baba H, Kikuchi Y, Nishimura H (1990) Circumspinal decompression for thoracic myelopathy due to combined ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and ligamentum flavum. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 15:1114–1120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Min JH, Jang JS, Lee SH (2008) Clinical results of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) of the thoracic spine treated by anterior decompression. J Spinal Disord Tech 21:116–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Matsuyama Y, Yoshihara H, Tsuji T et al (2005) Surgical outcome of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) of the thoracic spine: implication of the type of ossification and surgical options. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:492–497 (discussion 498)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yamazaki M, Okawa A, Fujiyoshi T, Furuya T, Koda M (2010) Posterior decompression with instrumented fusion for thoracic myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Eur Spine J 19:691–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Imagama S, Ando K, Ito Z et al (2017) Risk factors for ineffectiveness of posterior decompression and dekyphotic corrective fusion with instrumentation for beak-type thoracic ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a single institute study. Neurosurgery 80:800–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kato S, Murakami H, Demura S, Yoshioka K, Hayashi H, Tsuchiya H (2012) Novel surgical technique for ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament in the thoracic spine. J Neurosurg Spine 17:525–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tokuhashi Y, Matsuzaki H, Oda H, Uei H (2006) Effectiveness of posterior decompression for patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the thoracic spine: usefulness of the ossification-kyphosis angle on MRI. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:E26–E30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sakai K, Okawa A, Takahashi M et al (2012) Five-year follow-up evaluation of surgical treatment for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a prospective comparative study of anterior decompression and fusion with floating method versus laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:367–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yoshii T, Sakai K, Hirai T et al (2016) Anterior decompression with fusion versus posterior decompression with fusion for massive cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament with a ≥ 50% canal occupying ratio: a multicenter retrospective study. Spine J 16:1351–1357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Iwasaki M, Okuda S, Miyauchi A et al (2007) Surgical strategy for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: part 2: advantages of anterior decompression and fusion over laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:654–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kimura H, Fujibayashi S, Takemoto M, Otsuki B, Matsuda S (2014) Spontaneous reduction in ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the thoracic spine after posterior spinal fusion without decompression: a case report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39:E417–E419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tomita K, Kawahara N, Baba H, Tsuchiya H, Nagata S, Toribatake Y (1994) Total en bloc spondylectomy for solitary spinal metastases. Int Orthop 18:291–298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kawahara N, Tomita K, Murakami H, Demura S (2009) Total en bloc spondylectomy for spinal tumors: surgical techniques and related basic background. Orthop Clin North Am 40:47–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kato S, Murakami H, Demura S et al (2014) More than 10-year follow-up after total en bloc spondylectomy for spinal tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 21:1330–1336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kato S, Murakami H, Demura S et al (2015) Gradual spinal cord decompression through migration of floated plaques after anterior decompression via a posterolateral approach for OPLL in the thoracic spine. J Neurosurg Spine 23:479–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hirabayashi K, Miyakawa J, Satomi K, Maruyama T, Wakano K (1981) Operative results and postoperative progression of ossification among patients with ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 6:354–364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Abiola R, Rubery P, Mesfin A (2016) Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: etiology, diagnosis, and outcomes of nonoperative and operative management. Global Spine J 6:195–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Imagama S, Ando K, Ito Z et al (2016) Resection of beak-type thoracic ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament from a posterior approach under intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring for paralysis after posterior decompression and fusion surgery. Global Spine J 6:812–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Koda M, Mochizuki M, Konishi H et al (2016) Comparison of clinical outcomes between laminoplasty, posterior decompression with instrumented fusion, and anterior decompression with fusion for K-line (-) cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Eur Spine J 25:2294–2301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ohtsuka K, Terayama K, Tsuchiya T et al (1983) A surgical procedure of the anterior decompression of the thoracic spinal cord through the posterior approach. Seikei Saigai Geka (Orthoped Surg Traumatol) 26:1083–1090 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kawahara N, Tomita K, Murakami H et al (2008) Circumspinal decompression with dekyphosis stabilization for thoracic myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:39–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Murakami H, Kawahara N, Tomita K et al (2010) Does interruption of the artery of Adamkiewicz during total en bloc spondylectomy affect neurologic function? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:E1187–E1192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kato S, Kawahara N, Tomita K et al (2008) Effects on spinal cord blood flow and neurologic function secondary to interruption of bilateral segmental arteries which supply the artery of Adamkiewicz: an experimental study using a dog model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:1533–1541

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a Japanese Health Labour Sciences Research Grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, 13-1 Takara-machi, Kanazawa, 920-8641, Japan

    Satoshi Kato, Hideki Murakami, Satoru Demura, Katsuhito Yoshioka, Noriaki Yokogawa, Shimizu Takaki, Norihiro Oku & Hiroyuki Tsuchiya

Authors
  1. Satoshi Kato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hideki Murakami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Satoru Demura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Katsuhito Yoshioka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Noriaki Yokogawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shimizu Takaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Norihiro Oku
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satoshi Kato.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 16904 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kato, S., Murakami, H., Demura, S. et al. Indication for anterior spinal cord decompression via a posterolateral approach for the treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the thoracic spine: a prospective cohort study. Eur Spine J 29, 113–121 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06047-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06047-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation