Skip to main content
Log in

Instrumentation failure following pedicle subtraction osteotomy: the role of rod material, diameter, and multi-rod constructs

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) has a complication rate noticeably higher than other corrective surgical techniques used for the treatment of spinal sagittal imbalance. In particular, rod breakage and pseudoarthrosis remain burning issues of this technique. Goal of this study was to investigate the biomechanical performance of several hardware constructs.

Methods

The study was performed using two validated finite element models of the lumbosacral spine (L1–S1) incorporating a PSO on L3 and L4, respectively. Both models were instrumented two levels above and below the osteotomy site. Different combinations of materials (Ti6Al4V and Cr–Co) and device configurations (bilateral single vs. double rod, rod diameters of 5 and 6 mm) were investigated. The loading was represented considering a force of 500 N (imposed along the spinal curvature and connecting the vertebral bodies) and pure moments of 7.5 Nm in flexion-extension, lateral bending and axial rotation. The results were evaluated in terms of range of motion (ROM), load, and stresses acting on the instrumentation.

Results

A comparable ROM was found for all the models. The simulations showed a different behavior of the devices: increasing the stiffness an 8–19% increase of the load was calculated on the rod. However, the stress on the instrumentation resulted higher on Cr–Co devices and on smaller rods. The highest stress reduction (up to 50%) was ensured using double rod constructs.

Conclusions

The bilateral double parallel rods configuration resulted the best to reduce the stresses on the spinal fixators at the osteotomy site. However, the high loads acting on the rods with respect to the physiologic condition could slow down the bone healing at the osteotomy site.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bridwell KH, Lewis SJ, Lenke LG (2003) Pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the treatment of fixed sagittal imbalance. J Bone Jt Surg Am 85:454–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dickson DD, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Koester LA (2014) Risk Factors for and Assessment of Symptomatic Pseudarthrosis After Lumbar Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy in Adult Spinal Deformity. Spine 39(15):1190–1195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Cheh G, Baldus C (2007) Results of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance: a minimum 5-year follow-up study. Spine 32(20):2189–2197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Charles YP, Yu B, Steib JP (2016) Sacroiliac joint luxation after pedicle subtraction osteotomy: report of two cases and analysis of failure mechanism. Eur Spine J 25(Suppl 1):63–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith JS, Sansur CA, Donaldson WF, Perra JH, Mudiyam R, Choma TJ, Zeller RD, Knapp DR, Noordeen HH, Berven SH, Goytan MJ, Boachie-Adjei O, Shaffrey CI (2011) Short-term morbidity and mortality associated with correction of thoracolumbar fixed sagittal plane deformity. Spine 36(12):958–964

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith JS, Shaffrey E, Klineberg E, Shaffrey CI, Lafage V, Schwab FJ, Protopsaltis T, Scheer JK, Mundis GM, Fu K-MG, Gupta MC, Hostin R, Deviren V, Kebaish K, Hart R, Burton DC, Line B, Bess S, Ames CP (2014) Prospective multicenter assessment of risk factors for rod fracture following surgery for adult spinal deformity. J Neurosurg Spine 21(6):994–1003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Ames CP, Demakakos J, Fu K-MG, Keshavarzi S, Li CMY, Deviren V, Schwab FJ, Lafage V, Bess S (2012) Assessment of symptomatic rod fracture after posterior instrumented fusion for adult spinal deformity. Neurosurgery 71(4):862–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Charosky S, Guigui P, Blamoutier A, Roussouly P, Chopin D (2012) Complications and risk factors of primary adult scoliosis surgery: a multicenter study of 306 patients. Spine 37(8):693–700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Barton C, Noshchenko A, Patel V, Cain C, Kleck C, Burger E (2015) Risk factors for rod fracture after posterior correction of adult spinal deformity with osteotomy: a retrospective case-series. Scoliosis 10(1):30

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Berjano P, Bassani R, Casero G, Sinigaglia A, Cecchinato R, Lamartina C (2013) Failures and revisions in surgery for sagittal imbalance: analysis of factors influencing failure. Eur Spine J 22(Suppl 6):S853–S858

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hyun SJ, Lenke LG, Kim YC, Koester LA, Blanke KM (2014) Comparison of standard 2-rod constructs to multiple-rod constructs for fixation across 3-column spinal osteotomies. Spine 39(22):1899–1904

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Palumbo MA, Shah KN, Eberson CP, Hart RA, Daniels AH (2015) Outrigger rod technique for supplemental support of posterior spinal arthrodesis. Spine J 15(6):1409–1414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Charosky S, Moreno P, Maxy P (2014) Instability and instrumentation failures after a PSO: a finite element analysis. Eur Spine J 23(11):2340–2349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ottardi C, Galbusera F, Luca A, Prosdocimo L, Sasso M, Brayda-Bruno M, Villa T (2016) Finite element analysis of the lumbar destabilization following pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Med Eng Phys 38(5):506–509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nguyen T-Q, Buckley JM, Ames C, Deviren V (2011) The fatigue life of contoured cobalt chrome posterior spinal fusion rods. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 225(2):194–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tang JA, Leasure JM, Smith JS, Buckley JM, Kondrashov D, Ames CP (2013) Effect of severity of rod contour on posterior rod failure in the setting of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO): a biomechanical study. Neurosurgery 72(2):276–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hallager DW, Gehrchen M, Dahl B, Harris JA, Gudipally M, Jenkins S, Wu AM, Bucklen BS (2016) Use of Supplemental Short Pre-Contoured Accessory Rods and Cobalt Chrome Alloy Posterior Rods Reduces Primary Rod Strain and Range of Motion Across the Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy Level: An In Vitro Biomechanical Study. Spine 41(7):E388–E395

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Frost HM (2004) A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff’s Law for clinicians. Angle Orthod 74(1):3–15

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Luca A, Lovi A, Galbusera F, Brayda-Bruno M (2014) Revision surgery after PSO failure with rod breakage: a comparison of different techniques. Eur Spine J 23(Suppl 6):610–615

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Deviren V, Tang JA, Scheer JK, Buckley JM, Pekmezci M, McClellan RT, Ames CP (2012) Construct rigidity after fatigue loading in pedicle subtraction osteotomy with or without adjacent interbody structural cages. Global Spine J 2(4):213–220

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Akira Matsumura, MD, Ph.D., Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka City General Hospital, for his intellectual support in developing the original idea of the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Luca.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We have no potential conflict of interest.

Additional information

A. Luca and C. Ottardi equally contributed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luca, A., Ottardi, C., Sasso, M. et al. Instrumentation failure following pedicle subtraction osteotomy: the role of rod material, diameter, and multi-rod constructs. Eur Spine J 26, 764–770 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4859-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4859-8

Keywords

Navigation