Skip to main content
Log in

The characteristics of spinopelvic sagittal alignment in patients with lumbar disc degenerative diseases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

A comparative study of the spinopelvic sagittal alignment in patients with lumbar disc degeneration or herniation (LDD/LDH) in normal population was designed to analyse the role of sagittal anatomical parameter (pelvic incidence, PI) and positional parameters in the pathogenesis and development of the disease. Several comparative studies of these patients with asymptomatic controls have been done. However, in previous studies without lumbar MRI, a certain number of asymptomatic LDD patients should have been included in the control group and then impacted on the results.

Methods

Based on MRI findings, we divided 60 LDD or LDH patients and 110 asymptomatic volunteers into the normal group (NG) and the degeneration group (DG), which was further subdivided into the symptomatic (SDG) and asymptomatic (ADG) subgroups according to patients’ symptoms. Standing full spine radiographs were used to measure sagittal parameters, including PI, sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and sacrum-bicoxofemoral distance (SFD).

Results

The PI, SS and LL in DG were significantly lower than NG, while the SVA and SFD were significantly greater (P < 0.05). PI correlated well with the SS and LL in all subjects. However, the trend lines of SS or LL over PI were downward in DG. PI was similar in SDG and ADG (P = 0.716) but SS and LL were significantly lower and SVA was significantly greater (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

PI may play a predisposing role in the pathogenesis of lumbar disc degenerative diseases. The secondary structural and compensatory factors would lead to a straighter spine after disc degenerative change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vialle R, Levassor N, Rillardon L, Templier A, Skalli W, Guigui P (2005) Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(2):260–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Legaye J, Duval-Beaupère G, Hecquet J, Marty C (1998) Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 7(2):99–103

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jackson RP, Hales C (2000) Congruent spinopelvic alignment on standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(21):2808–2815

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J, Roussouly P, Labelle H (2005) Analysis of the sagittal balance of the spine and pelvis using shape and orientation parameters. J Spinal Disord Tech 18(1):40–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Korovessis PG, Stamatakis MV, Baikousis AG (1998) Reciprocal angulation of vertebral bodies in the sagittal plane in a asymptomatic greek population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23(6):700–704

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kobayashi T, Atsuta Y, Matsuno T, Takeda N (2004) A longitudinal study of congruent sagittal spinal alignment in an adult cohort. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29(6):671–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Duval-Beaupere G, Schimdt C, Cosson P (1992) A baricentremetric study of the sagittal shape of spine and pelvis: the conditions required for an economic standing position. Ann Biomed Eng 20(4):451–462

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. During J, Goudfrooij H, Keessen W, Beeker TW, Crowe A (1985) Toward standards for posture. Postural characteristics of the lower back system in normal and pathologic conditions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 10(1):83–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mangione P, Gomez D, Senegas J (1997) Study of the course of the incidence angle during growth. Eur Spine J 6(3):163–167

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Vaz G, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2002) Morphology and equilibrium of pelvis and spine. Eur Spine J 11(1):80–87

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Boulay C, Tardieu C, Hecquet J et al (2006) Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis regulated by pelvic incidence: standard values and prediction of lordosis. Eur Spine J 15(4):415–422

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Aono K, Kobayashi T, Jimbo S, Atsuta Y, Matsuno T (2010) Radiographic analysis of newly developed degenerative spondylolisthesis in a mean twelve-year prospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(8):887–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Barrey C, Jund J, Noseda O, Roussouly P (2007) Sagittal balance of the pelvis-spine complex and lumbar degenerative diseases. A comparative study about 85 cases. Eur Spine J 16(9):1459–1467

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rajnics P, Templier A, Skalli W, Lavaste F, Illes T (2002) The importance of spinopelvic parameters in patients with lumbar disc lesions. Int Orthop 26(2):104–108

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Endo K, Suzuki H, Tanaka H, Kang Y, Yamamoto K (2010) Sagittal spinal alignment in patients with lumbar disc herniation. Eur Spine J 19(3):435–438

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Barrey C, Jund J, Perrin G, Roussouly P (2007) Spinopelvic alignment of patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Neurosurgery 61(5):981–986

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lazennec JY, Ramare S, Arafati N et al (2000) Sagittal alignment in lumbosacral fusion relations between radiological parameters and pain. Eur Spine J 9(1):47–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Modic MT, Ross JS (2007) Lumbar degenerative disk disease. Radiology 245(1):43–61 Review

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wiesel SW, Tsourmas N, Feffer HL, Citrin CM, Patronas N (1984) A study of computer-assisted tomography. I. The incidence of positive CAT scans in an asymptomatic group of patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 9(6):549–551

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Boden SD, Davis DO, Dina TS, Patronas NJ, Wiesel SW (1990) Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects: a prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72(3):403–408

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jensen MC, Brant-Zawadzki MN, Obuchowski N, Modic MT, Malkasian D, Ross JS (1994) Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain. N Engl J Med 331(2):69–73

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wiltse LL, Winter RB (1983) Terminology and measurements of spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg 65(6):768–772

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lafage V, Schwab F, Patel A, Hawkinson N, Farcy JP (2009) Pelvic tilt and truncal inclination: two key radiographic parameters in the setting of adults with spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(17):E599–E606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2005) Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(3):346–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Barrey C, Roussouly P, Perrin G, Le Huec JC (2011) Sagittal balance disorders in severe degenerative spine. Can we identify the compensatory mechanisms? Eur Spine J Suppl 5:626–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N (2001) Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26(17):1873–1878

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Special Scientific Research Project of Health Industry (201002018): Early Intervention, Standard Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Spinal Degenerative Diseases and Deformities for the financial supporting. The authors also thank Prof. Wu Bin (Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University) for his kindly assistance in MRI evaluation. We are grateful to Prof. Tao Zhang (Department of Biostatistics, University of Iowa) for assistance in statistical analysis. Funds were received from Special Scientific Research Project of Health Industry (201002018): Early Intervention, Standard Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Spinal Degenerative Diseases and Deformities in support of this work.

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qingquan Kong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, X., Kong, Q., Song, Y. et al. The characteristics of spinopelvic sagittal alignment in patients with lumbar disc degenerative diseases. Eur Spine J 23, 569–575 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-3067-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-3067-z

Keywords

Navigation