Skip to main content
Log in

Standardized way for imaging of the sagittal spinal balance

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nowadays, conventional or digitalized teleradiography remains the most commonly used tool for the study of the sagittal balance, sometimes with secondary digitalization. The irradiation given by this technique is important and the photographic results are often poor. Some radiographic tables allow the realization of digitalized spinal radiographs by simultaneous translation of X-ray tube and receptor. EOS system is a new, very low dose system which gives good quality images, permits a simultaneous acquisition of upright frontal and sagittal views, is able to cover in the same time the spine and the lower limbs and study the axial plane on 3D envelope reconstructions. In the future, this low dose system should take a great place in the study of the pelvispinal balance. On the lateral view, several pelvic (incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope) and spinal (lumbar lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, Th9 sagittal offset, C7 plumb line) parameters are drawn to define the pelvispinal balance. All are interdependent. Pelvic incidence is an individual anatomic characteristic that corresponds to the “thickness” of the pelvis and governs the spinal balance. Pelvis and spine, in a harmonious whole, can be compared to an accordion, more or less compressed or stretched.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Legaye J, Saunier P, Dumas R, Vallee C (2009) Correction for patients sway in radiographic biplanar imaging for three-dimensional reconstruction of the spine: in vitro study of a new method. Acta Radiol 50(7):781–790

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Vialle R, Levassor N, Rillardon L, Templier A, Skalli W, Guigui P (2005) Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87-A:260–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2005) Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine 30:346–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rajnics P, Pomero V, Templier A, Lavaste F, Illes T (2001) Computer-assisted assessment of spinal sagittal plane radiographs. J Spinal Disord 14:135–142

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dubousset J, Charpak G, Dorion I et al (2005) A new 2D and 3D imaging approach to musculoskeletal physiology and pathology with low-dose radiation and the standing position: the EOS system. Bull Acad Natl Med 189(2):287–297

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dubousset J, Charpak G, Skalli W, Kalifa G, Lazennec JY (2007) EOS stereo-radiography system: whole-body simultaneous anteroposterior and lateral radiographs with very low radiation dose. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 93:141–143

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Deschênes S, Charron G, Beaudoin G, Labelle H, Dubois J, Miron MC, Parent S (2010) Diagnostic imaging of spinal deformities: reducing patients radiation dose with a new slot-scanning X-ray imager. Spine 35(9):989–994

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Duval-Beaupère G, Schmidt C, Cosson P (1992) A barycentremetric study of the sagittal shape of spine and pelvis: the conditions required for an economic standing position. Ann Biomed Eng 20(4):451–462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jackson RP, McManus AC (2004) Pelvic lordosis and pelvic incidence: the relationship of pelvic parameters to sagittal spinal profile. Curr Opin Orthop 15:150–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schwab F, Lafage V, Boyce R, Skalli W, Farcy JP (2006) Gravity line analysis in adult volunteers. Age-related correlation with spinal parameters, pelvic parameters and foot position. Spine 31:E959–E967

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Putto E, Tallroth K (1990) Extension-flexion radiographies for motion studies of the lumbar spine a comparison of two methods. Spine 115:107–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Farfan HJ (1973) Mechanical disorders of the low back. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  13. Morgan FP, Kingt T (1957) Primary instability of lumbar vertebra as common cause of low back pain. J Bone Joint Surg Br 39:6–22

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Froning EC, Frohman B (1968) Motion of the lumbosacral spine after laminectomy and spine fusion. Correlation of motion with the result. J Bone Joint Surg Am 50(5):897–917

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gérard Morvan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morvan, G., Mathieu, P., Vuillemin, V. et al. Standardized way for imaging of the sagittal spinal balance. Eur Spine J 20 (Suppl 5), 602 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1927-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1927-y

Keywords

Navigation