Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Predictors of surgical outcome and their assessment

  • Review
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relatively high rate of failed back surgery has prompted the search for “risk factors” to predict the result of spinal surgery in a given individual. However, the literature reveals few unequivocal predictors and they often explain a relatively low proportion of variance in outcome. This suggests that we have a long way to go before being able to rest easily, having refused someone surgery on the basis of unfavourable baseline characteristics. The best recommendation is to ensure, firstly, that the indication for surgery is absolutely clear-cut (i.e. that surgically remediable pathology exists) and then to consider the various factors that may influence the “typical” outcome. Consistent risk factors for a poor outcome regarding return-to-work include long-term sick leave/receipt of disability benefit. Hence, every effort should be made to keep the individual in the workforce, despite the ongoing symptoms and plans for surgery. In patients with a particularly heavy job, consultation with occupational physicians might later ease the patient’s way back into the workplace. Patients with degenerative disorders and/or comorbidity should be counselled that few of them will have complete/lasting pain relief or a complete return to pre-morbid function. Patients with a high level of distress may benefit from psychological treatment, before and/or accompanying the surgical treatment. The opportunity (time), encouragement (education and positive messages), and resources (referral to appropriate support services) to modify risk factors that are indeed modifiable should be offered, and realistic expectations should be discussed with the patient before the decision to operate is made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amundsen T, Weber H, Nordal HJ, Magnaes B, Abdelnoor M, Lilleas F (2000) Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management? A prospective 10-year study discussion 1435–1426. Spine 25:1424–1435

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Andersen T, Christensen FB, Laursen M, Hoy K, Hansen ES, Bunger C (2001) Smoking as a predictor of negative outcome in lumbar spinal fusion. Spine 26:2623–2628

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Asch HL, Lewis PJ, Moreland DB, Egnatchik JG, Yu YJ, Clabeaux DE, Hyland AH (2002) Prospective multiple outcomes study of outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy: should 75 to 80% success rates be the norm?. J Neurosurg Spine 96:34–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Atkinson JH, Slater MA, Patterson TL, Grant I, Garfin SR (1991) Prevalence, onset, and risk of psychiatric disorders in men with chronic low back pain: a controlled study. Pain 45:111–121

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J (1961) An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 4:561–571

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bernd L, Schiltenwolf M, Mau H, Schindele S (1997) No indications for percutaneous lumbar discectomy?. Int Orthop 21:164–168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Block AR, Vanharanta H, Ohnmeiss DD, Guyer RD (1996) Discographic pain report Influence of psychological factors. Spine 21:334–338

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Block AR, Ohnmeiss DD, Guyer RD, Rashbaum RF, Hochschuler SH (2001) The use of presurgical psychological screening to predict the outcome of spine surgery. Spine J 1:274–282

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Block AR, Gatchel RJ, Deardorff WW, Guyer RD (2003) The psychology of spine surgery. American Psychological Association, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bombardier C (2000) Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders. Spine 25:3100–3103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bombardier C, Hayden J, Beaton DE (2001) Minimal clinically important difference Low back pain: outcome measures. Pain 28:431–438

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Brox JI, Sorensen R, Friis A, Nygaard O, Indahl A, Keller A, Ingebrigtsen T, Eriksen HR, Holm I, Koller AK, Riise R, Reikeras O (2003) Randomized clinical trial of lumbar instrumented fusion and cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic low back pain and disc degeneration. Spine 28:1913–1921

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Buttermann GR, Garvey TA, Hunt AF, Transfeldt EE, Bradford DS, Boachie-Adjei O, Ogilvie JW (1998) Lumbar fusion results related to diagnosis. Spine 23:116–127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Carragee EJ (2001) Psychological screening in the surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation. Clin J Pain 17:215–219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Carragee EJ, Kim DH (1997) A prospective analysis of magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with sciatica and lumbar disc herniation Correlation of outcomes with disc fragment and canal morphology. Spine 22:1650–1660

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Carragee EJ, Han MY, Suen PW, Kim D (2003) Clinical outcomes after lumbar discectomy for sciatica: the effects of fragment type and anular competence. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:102–108

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chaory K, Fayad F, Rannou F, Lefevre-Colau MM, Fermanian J, Revel M, Poiraudeau S (2004) Validation of the French version of the fear avoidance belief questionnaire. Spine 29:908–913

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. COST B13 Action (2004) Guidelines for the management of chronic low back pain. www.backpaineurope.org

  19. Costa PTJ, McCrae RR (1985) The NEO Personality Inventory manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa

    Google Scholar 

  20. Coste J, Delecoeuillerie G, Cohen de Lara A, Le Parc JM, Paolaggi JB (1994) Clinical course and prognostic factors in acute low back pain: an inception cohort study in primary care practice. BMJ 308:577–580

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. DeBerard MS, Masters KS, Colledge AL, Schleusener RL, Schlegel JD (2001) Outcomes of posterolateral lumbar fusion in Utah patients receiving workers’ compensation: a retrospective cohort study discussion 747. Spine 26:738–746

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. DeBerard MS, Masters KS, Colledge AL, Holmes EB (2003) Presurgical biopsychosocial variables predict medical and compensation costs of lumbar fusion in Utah workers’ compensation patients. Spine J 3:420–429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Deyo R, Centor RM (1986) Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance. J Chronic Dis 39 (11):897–906

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Dupuy HJ (1984) The Psychological General Well-Being (PGWB) Index. In: Assessment of quality of life in clinical trials of cardiovascular therapies. Le Jacq, New York, pp 170–183

  25. Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Katz NP, Kerns RD, Stucki G, Allen RR, Bellamy N, Carr DB, Chandler J, Cowan P, Dionne R, Galer BS, Hertz S, Jadad AR, Kramer LD, Manning DC, Martin S, McCormick CG, McDermott MP, McGrath P, Quessy S, Rappaport BA, Robbins W, Robinson JP, Rothman M, Royal MA, Simon L, Stauffer JW, Stein W, Tollett J, Wernicke J, Witter J (2005) Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain 113:9–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Elfering A, Kälin W, Semmer NK (2000) Stability and change in job satisfaction at the transition from vocational training into “real work”. Swiss J Psychol 59:256–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Epker J, Block AR (2001) Presurgical psychological screening in back pain patients: a review. Clin J Pain 17:200–205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Fairbank JHF, Frost H, Wilson-MacDonald J, Yu LM, Barker K, Collins R (2005) Spine Stabilisation Trial Group: Randomised controlled trial to compare surgical stabilisation of the lumbar spine with an intensive rehabilitation programme for patients with chronic low back pain. The MRC Spine Stabilisation trial BMJ 330(7502):1233

    Google Scholar 

  29. Franklin GM, Haug J, Heyer NJ, McKeefrey SP, Picciano JF (1994) Outcome of lumbar fusion in Washington State workers’ compensation. Spine 19:1897–1903

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Glassman SD, Dimar JR, Johnson JR, Minkow R (1998) Preoperative SF-36 responses as a predictor of reoperation following lumbar fusion. Orthopedics 21:1201–1203

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Glassman SD, Anagnost SC, Parker A, Burke D, Johnson JR, Dimar JR (2000) The effect of cigarette smoking and smoking cessation on spinal fusion. Spine 25:2608–2615

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Graham JR (1990) The MMPI-2: assessing personality and psychopathology. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  33. Grebner M, Breme K, Rothoerl R, Woertgen C, Hartmann A, Thome C (1999) Coping and convalescence course after lumbar disk operations. Schmerz 13:19–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Greenough CG, Fraser RD (1991) Comparison of eight psychometric instruments in unselected patients with back pain. Spine 16:1068–1074

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Greenough CG, Taylor LJ, Fraser RD (1994a) Anterior lumbar fusion A comparison of noncompensation patients with compensation patients. Clin Orthop 30–37

  36. Greenough CG, Taylor LJ, Fraser RD (1994b) Anterior lumbar fusion: results, assessment techniques and prognostic factors. Eur Spine J 3:225–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Greenough CG, Peterson MD, Hadlow S, Fraser RD (1998) Instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion Results and comparison with anterior interbody fusion. Spine 23:479–486

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Grob D, Benini A, Junge A, Mannion AF (2005) Clinical experience with the Dynesys semirigid fixation system for the lumbar spine: surgical and patient-orientated outcome in 50 cases after an average of 2 years. Spine 30:324–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Gunzburg R, Keller TS, Szpalski M, Vandeputte K, Spratt KF (2003) Clinical and psychofunctional measures of conservative decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective cohort study. Eur Spine J 12:197–204

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Hagg O, Fritzell P, Ekselius L, Nordwall A (2003a) Predictors of outcome in fusion surgery for chronic low back pain A report from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study. Eur Spine J 12:22–33

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Hagg O, Fritzell P, Hedlund R, Moller H, Ekselius L, Nordwall A (2003b) Pain-drawing does not predict the outcome of fusion surgery for chronic low-back pain: a report from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study. Eur Spine J 12:2–11

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Hagg O, Fritzell P, Nordwall A, Group SLSS (2003c) The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 12:12–20

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Hathaway SR, McKinley JC (1951) The Minnesota Personality Inventory manual revised. The Psychological Corporation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hobby JL, Lutchman LN, Powell JM, Sharp DJ (2001) The distress and risk assessment method (DRAM). J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:19–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Iguchi T, Kurihara A, Nakayama J, Sato K, Kurosaka M, Yamasaki K (2000) Minimum 10-year outcome of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 25:1754–1759

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Jensen AR (1958) The Maudsley Personality Inventory. Acta Psychol 14:314–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Junge A, Mannion AF (2004) Questionnaires for patients with back pain Diagnosis and outcome assessment. Orthopade 33:545–552

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Junge A, Dvorak J, Ahrens S (1995) Predictors of bad and good outcomes of lumbar disc surgery A prospective clinical study with recommendations for screening to avoid bad outcomes. Spine 20:460–468

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Junge A, Frohlich M, Ahrens S, Hasenbring M, Sandler A, Grob D, Dvorak J (1996) Predictors of bad and good outcome of lumbar spine surgery A prospective clinical study with 2 years’ follow up discussion 1064–1055. Spine 21:1056–1064

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Kaptain GJ, Shaffrey CI, Alden TD, Young JN, Laws ER Jr, Whitehill R (1999) Secondary gain influences the outcome of lumbar but not cervical disc surgery discussion 223–215. Surg Neurol 52:217–223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Katz JN, Stucki G, Lipson SJ, Fossel AH, Grobler LJ, Weinstein JN (1999) Predictors of surgical outcome in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 24:2229–2233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Keller RB, Atlas SJ, Soule DN, Singer DE, Deyo RA (1999) Relationship between rates and outcomes of operative treatment for lumbar disc herniation and spinal stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:752–762

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Kohlboeck G, Greimel KV, Piotrowski WP, Leibetseder M, Krombholz-Reindl M, Neuhofer R, Schmid A, Klinger R (2004) Prognosis of multifactorial outcome in lumbar discectomy: a prospective longitudinal study investigating patients with disc prolapse. Clin J Pain 20:455–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Lacaille RA, Deberard MS, Masters KS, Colledge AL, Bacon W (2005) Presurgical biopsychosocial factors predict multidimensional patient: outcomes of interbody cage lumbar fusion. Spine J 5:71–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Little DG, MacDonald D (1994) The use of the percentage change in Oswestry Disability Index score as an outcome measure in lumbar spinal surgery. Spine 19:2139–2143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Loupasis GA, Stamos K, Katonis PG, Sapkas G, Korres DS, Hartofilakidis G (1999) Seven- to 20-year outcome of lumbar discectomy. Spine 24:2313–2317

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Lutz GK, Butzlaff ME, Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Singer DE, Deyo RA (1999) The relation between expectations and outcomes in surgery for sciatica. J Gen Intern Med 14:740–744

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Main CJ (1983) The Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire (MSPQ). J Psychosom Res 27:503–514

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Main CJ, Spanswick CC (1995) Personality assessment and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 50 years on: do we still need our security blanket?. Pain Forum 4:90–96

    Google Scholar 

  60. Main CJ, Wood PLR, Hollis S, Spanswick CC, Waddell G (1992) The distress and risk assessment method—a simple patient classification to identify distress and evaluate the risk of poor outcome. Spine 17:42–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Mannion AF, Elfering A, Staerkle R, Junge A, Grob D, Semmer NK, Jacobshagen N, Dvorak J, Boos N (2005) Outcome assessment in low back pain: how low can you go? Eur Spine J (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Mannion AF, Junge A, Grob D, Dvorak J, Fairbank JCT (2005) Development of a German version of the Oswestry Low Back Index. Part 2: Sensitivity to change after spinal surgery. Eur Spine J (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  63. McCrae RR, John OP (1992) An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. J Pers 60:175–215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. McGregor AH, Hughes SP (2002) The evaluation of the surgical management of nerve root compression in patients with low back pain Part 1: The assessment of outcome. Spine 27:1465–1470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. McGregor AH, Hughes SP (2002) The evaluation of the surgical management of nerve root compression in patients with low back pain Part 2: Patient expectations and satisfaction discussion 1476–1477. Spine 27:1471–1476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Muller U, Duetz MS, Roeder C, Greenough CG (2004) Condition-specific outcome measures for low back pain Part I: Validation. Eur Spine J 13:301–313

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Muller U, Roeder C, Dubs L, Duetz MS, Greenough CG (2004) Condition-specific outcome measures for low back pain Part II: Scale construction. Eur Spine J 13:314–324

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Nagel B, Gerbershagen HU, Lindena G, Pfingsten M (2002) Development and evaluation of the multidimensional German pain questionnaire. Schmerz 16:263–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Ng LC, Sell P (2004) Predictive value of the duration of sciatica for lumbar discectomy A prospective cohort study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:546–549

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. North RB, Campbell JN, James CS, Conover-Walker MK, Wang H, Piantadosi S, Rybock JD, Long DM (1991) Failed back surgery syndrome: 5-year follow-up in 102 patients undergoing repeated operation discussion 681–690. Neurosurgery 28:685–690

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Nygaard OP, Kloster R, Solberg T (2000) Duration of leg pain as a predictor of outcome after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a prospective cohort study with 1-year follow up. J Neurosurg Spine 92:131–134

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Ostendorf F (1990) Sprache und Persönlichkeitsstruktur: Zur Validität des Fünf-Faktoren-Modells der Persönlichkeit [Language and personality structure: the validity of the five-factor model of personality]. Roderer, Regensburg

    Google Scholar 

  73. Ostendorf F, Angleitner A (1992) On the generality and comprehensiveness of the five-factor model of personality. Evidence for five robust factors in questionnaire data. In: Modern personality psychology. Critical reviews and new directions. Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York, pp 73–109

  74. Penta M, Fraser RD (1997) Anterior lumbar interbody fusion A minimum 10-year follow-up. Spine 22:2429–2434

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Peolsson A, Hedlund R, Vavruch L, Oberg B (2003) Predictive factors for the outcome of anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Eur Spine J 12:274–280

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Peolsson A, Hedlund R, Vavruch L (2004) Prediction of fusion and importance of radiological variables for the outcome of anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Eur Spine J 13:229–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Pfingsten M, Kroner-Herwig B, Leibing E, Kronshage U (2000) Validation of the German version of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). Eur J Pain 4:259–266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Radloff LS (1977) The CES-D Scale: a self-report depression-scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1:385–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Rothoerl RD, Woertgen C, Brawanski A (2002) When should conservative treatment for lumbar disc herniation be ceased and surgery considered? Neurosurg Rev 25:162–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Schade V, Semmer N, Main CJ, Hora J, Boos N (1999) The impact of clinical, morphological, psychosocial and work-related factors on the outcome of lumbar discectomy. Pain 80:239–249

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Schallberger U, Venetz M (1999) Kurzversionen des MRS-Inventars von Ostendorf (1990) zur Erfassung der fünf “grossen” Persönlichkeitsfaktoren [Brief versions of Ostendorf’s MRS inventory for the assessment of the Big-Five personality factors]. Universität Zürich, Zürich: Berichte aus der Abteilung Angewandte Psychologie 30:1–51

  82. Solberg TK, Nygaard OP, Sjaavik K, Hofoss D, Ingebrigtsen T (2005) The risk of “getting worse” after lumbar microdiscectomy. Eur Spine J 14:49–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Spengler DM, Ouellette EA, Battie M, Zeh J (1990) Elective discectomy for herniation of a lumbar disc Additional experience with an objective method. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:230–237

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Spratt KF, Keller TS, Szpalski M, Vandeputte K, Gunzburg R (2004) A predictive model for outcome after conservative decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 13:14–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Staerkle R, Mannion AF, Elfering A, Junge A, Semmer NK, Jacobshagen N, Grob D, Dvorak J, Boos N (2004) Longitudinal validation of the fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FABQ) in a Swiss-German sample of low back pain patients. Eur Spine J 13:332–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Stärkle R, Mannion AF, Junge A, Elfering A, Grob D, Dvorak J, Boos N (2002) The influence of baseline psychological factors on outcome after spine surgery. SIROT, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  87. Sun EC, Wang JC, Endow K, Delamarter RB (2004) Adjacent two-level lumbar discectomy: outcome and SF-36 functional assessment. Spine 29:E22–E27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Tandon V, Campbell F, Ross ER (1999) Posterior lumbar interbody fusion Association between disability and psychological disturbance in noncompensation patients. Spine 24:1833–1838

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Trief PM, Grant W, Fredrickson B (2000) A prospective study of psychological predictors of lumbar surgery outcome. Spine 25:2616–2621

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Allen RR, Bellamy N, Brandenburg N, Carr DB, Cleeland C, Dionne R, Farrar JT, Galer BS, Hewitt DJ, Jadad AR, Katz NP, Kramer LD, Manning DC, McCormick CG, McDermott MP, McGrath P, Quessy S, Rappaport BA, Robinson JP, Royal MA, Simon L, Stauffer JW, Stein W, Tollett JJW (2003) Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain 106:337–345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Uomoto JM, Turner JA, Herron LD (1988) Use of the MMPI and MCMI in predicting outcome of lumbar laminectomy. J Clin Psychol 44:191–197

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Vaccaro AR, Ring D, Scuderi G, Cohen DS, Garfin SR (1997) Predictors of outcome in patients with chronic back pain and low-grade spondylolisthesis discussion 2035. Spine 22:2030–2034

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Van Susante J, Van de Schaaf D, Pavlov P (1998) Psychological distress deteriorates the subjective outcome of lumbosacral fusion A prospective study. Acta Orthop Belg 64:371–377

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Waddell G, Morris EW, Di Paola MP, Bircher M, Finlayson D (1986) A concept of illness tested as an improved basis for surgical decisions in low-back disorders. Spine 11:712–719

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Waddell G, Burton AK, Main CJ (2003) Screening to identify people at risk of long-term incapacity for work A conceptual and scientific review. Royal Society of Medicine Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  96. Waddell G, Newton M, Henderson I, Somerville D, Main CJ (1993) A Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability. Pain 52:157–168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Wetzel FT, McCracken L, Robbins RA, Lahey DM, Carnegie M, Phillips FM (2001) Temporal stability of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) in patients undergoing lumbar fusion: a poor predictor of surgical outcome. Am J Orthop 30:469–474

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Woertgen C, Rothoerl RD, Breme K, Altmeppen J, Holzschuh M, Brawanski A (1999) Variability of outcome after lumbar disc surgery. Spine 24:807–811

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Young JN, Shaffrey CI, Laws ER Jr, Lovell LR (1997) Lumbar disc surgery in a fixed compensation population: a model for influence of secondary gain on surgical outcome. Surg Neurol 48:552–558

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Zung WW (1965) A Self-Rating Depression Scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry 12:63–70

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Spine Unit, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zürich , Switzerland

    Anne F. Mannion

  2. Department of Rheumatology and Institute of Physical Medicine, University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland

    Anne F. Mannion

  3. Department of Psychology, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland

    Achim Elfering

Authors
  1. Anne F. Mannion
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Achim Elfering
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne F. Mannion.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mannion, A.F., Elfering, A. Predictors of surgical outcome and their assessment. Eur Spine J 15 (Suppl 1), S93–S108 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-1045-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-1045-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation