Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A longitudinal analysis of phenotypic and symptom characteristics associated with inter-individual variability in employment interference in patients with breast cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

A breast cancer diagnosis has a substantial economic impact. Study aims were to evaluate for inter-individual differences in cancer’s level of interference with employment and identify phenotypic and symptom characteristics associated with higher levels of interference.

Methods

Patients (n = 387) were enrolled prior to breast cancer surgery and followed for 12 months. Interference with employment was measured using a 0 (no problem) to 10 (severe problem) numeric rating scale. Hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) was used to evaluate for inter-individual differences in trajectories of employment interference and characteristics associated with employment interference at enrollment and over 12 months.

Results

Patients’ mean age was 55.0 (±11.7) years and the majority underwent breast conservation surgery (80.6%). Mean employment interference score was 3.2 (±3.7). Unconditional model for employment interference demonstrated a decreasing linear trend (−.076/month). Younger age, lower income, higher pain intensity, and having an axillary lymph node dissection were associated with higher pre-surgical interference scores. Having a sentinel lymph node biopsy was associated with ongoing employment interference scores. Higher sleep disturbance scores were associated with both initial and ongoing employment interference scores. Receipt of chemotherapy, use of complementary or alternative therapies, and re-excision or mastectomy following surgery were significant time varying covariates.

Conclusion

This study is the first to use HLM to describe inter-individual differences in the trajectories of cancer’s interference with employment and associated factors prior to and for 12 months following breast cancer surgery. Patients with the identified risk factors warrant ongoing assessments of employment interference and appropriate referrals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Cancer Institute (2019) SEER Cancer Stat Facts: Female Breast Cancer. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/breast.html. Accessed 19-04-2019

  2. Sun Y, Shigaki CL, Armer JM (2017) Return to work among breast cancer survivors: a literature review. Support Care Cancer 25(3):709–718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3446-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bradley CJ, Neumark D, Bednarek HL, Schenk M (2005) Short-term effects of breast cancer on labor market attachment: results from a longitudinal study. J Health Econ 24(1):137–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.07.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jagsi R, Abrahamse PH, Lee KL, Wallner LP, Janz NK, Hamilton AS, Ward KC, Morrow M, Kurian AW, Friese CR, Hawley ST, Katz SJ (2017) Treatment decisions and employment of breast cancer patients: results of a population-based survey. Cancer 123(24):4791–4799. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30959

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Pearce A, Tomalin B, Kaambwa B, Horevoorts N, Duijts S, Mols F, van de Poll-Franse L, Koczwara B (2019) Financial toxicity is more than costs of care: the relationship between employment and financial toxicity in long-term cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv 13(1):10–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-018-0723-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ekwueme DU, Trogdon JG, Khavjou OA, Guy GP Jr (2016) Productivity costs associated with breast cancer among survivors aged 18-44 years. Am J Prev Med 50(2):286–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.10.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lindbohm ML, Kuosma E, Taskila T, Hietanen P, Carlsen K, Gudbergsson S, Gunnarsdottir H (2014) Early retirement and non-employment after breast cancer. Psychooncology 23(6):634–641. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3459

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mehnert A, de Boer A, Feuerstein M (2013) Employment challenges for cancer survivors. Cancer 119(Suppl 11):2151–2159. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28067

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Quinlan E, Thomas-MacLean R, Hack T, Kwan W, Miedema B, Tatemichi S, Towers A, Tilley A (2009) The impact of breast cancer among Canadian women: disability and productivity. Work 34(3):285–296. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2009-0926

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ahn E, Cho J, Shin DW, Park BW, Ahn SH, Noh DY, Nam SJ, Lee ES, Yun YH (2009) Impact of breast cancer diagnosis and treatment on work-related life and factors affecting them. Breast Cancer Res Treat 116(3):609–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-008-0209-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Calvio L, Peugeot M, Bruns GL, Todd BL, Feuerstein M (2010) Measures of cognitive function and work in occupationally active breast cancer survivors. J Occup Environ Med 52(2):219–227. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181d0bef7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Carlsen K, Jensen AJ, Rugulies R, Christensen J, Bidstrup PE, Johansen C, Huitfeldt Madsen IE, Dalton SO (2013) Self-reported work ability in long-term breast cancer survivors. A population-based questionnaire study in Denmark. Acta Oncol 52(2):423–429. https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2012.744877

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hansen JA, Feuerstein M, Calvio LC, Olsen CH (2008) Breast cancer survivors at work. J Occup Environ Med 50(7):777–784. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e318165159e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Todd BL, Feuerstein EL, Feuerstein M (2011) When breast cancer survivors report cognitive problems at work. Int J Psychiatry Med 42(3):279–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Breckenridge LM, Bruns GL, Todd BL, Feuerstein M (2012) Cognitive limitations associated with tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors in employed breast cancer survivors. Psychooncology 21(1):43–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1860

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Miaskowski C, Cooper B, Paul SM, West C, Langford D, Levine JD, Abrams G, Hamolsky D, Dunn L, Dodd M, Neuhaus J, Baggott C, Dhruva A, Schmidt B, Cataldo J, Merriman J, Aouizerat BE (2012) Identification of patient subgroups and risk factors for persistent breast pain following breast cancer surgery. J Pain 13(12):1172–1187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2012.09.013

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Karnofsky D (1977) Performance scale. Factors that influence the therapeutic response in cancer: a comprehensive treatise. Plenum press, New York

  18. Sangha O, Stucki G, Liang MH, Fossel AH, Katz JN (2003) The self-administered comorbidity questionnaire: a new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services research. Arthritis Rheum 49(2):156–163. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.10993

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ferrell BR, Wisdom C, Wenzl C (1989) Quality of life as an outcome variable in the management of cancer pain. Cancer 63(11 Suppl):2321–2327

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Spielberger CG, Gorsuch RL, Suchene R, Vagg PR, Jacobs GA (1983) Manual for the state-anxiety (form Y): self evaluation questionnaire. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA

    Google Scholar 

  21. Radloff LS (1977) The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1(3):385–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee KA, Hicks G, Nino-Murcia G (1991) Validity and reliability of a scale to assess fatigue. Psychiatry Res 36(3):291–298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dhruva A, Dodd M, Paul SM, Cooper BA, Lee K, West C, Aouizerat BE, Swift PS, Wara W, Miaskowski C (2010) Trajectories of fatigue in patients with breast cancer before, during, and after radiation therapy. Cancer Nurs 33(3):201–212. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181c75f2a

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Cimprich B, Visovatti M, Ronis DL (2011) The Attentional function index--a self-report cognitive measure. Psychooncology 20(2):194–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fletcher BS, Paul SM, Dodd MJ, Schumacher K, West C, Cooper B, Lee K, Aouizerat B, Swift P, Wara W, Miaskowski CA (2008) Prevalence, severity, and impact of symptoms on female family caregivers of patients at the initiation of radiation therapy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 26(4):599–605. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.12.2838

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hox JJ, Moerbeek M, van de Shoot R (2017) Multilevel analysis: techniques and applications. 3rd edn. Routledge academic: Taylor & Francis Group, New York: New York

  27. Enders CK (2010) Applied missing data analysis. Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  28. Balak F, Roelen CA, Koopmans PC, Ten Berge EE, Groothoff JW (2008) Return to work after early-stage breast cancer: a cohort study into the effects of treatment and cancer-related symptoms. J Occup Rehabil 18(3):267–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-008-9146-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Johnsson A, Fornander T, Rutqvist LE, Vaez M, Alexanderson K, Olsson M (2009) Predictors of return to work ten months after primary breast cancer surgery. Acta Oncol 48(1):93–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/02841860802477899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Carlsen K, Dalton SO, Diderichsen F, Johansen C, Danish Cohort S (2008) Risk for unemployment of cancer survivors: a Danish cohort study. Eur J Cancer 44(13):1866–1874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.05.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Choi KS, Kim EJ, Lim JH, Kim SG, Lim MK, Park JG, Park EC (2007) Job loss and reemployment after a cancer diagnosis in Koreans - a prospective cohort study. Psychooncology 16(3):205–213. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Park JH, Park JH, Kim SG (2009) Effect of cancer diagnosis on patient employment status: a nationwide longitudinal study in Korea. Psychooncology 18(7):691–699. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Fantoni SQ, Peugniez C, Duhamel A, Skrzypczak J, Frimat P, Leroyer A (2010) Factors related to return to work by women with breast cancer in northern France. J Occup Rehabil 20(1):49–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-009-9215-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Petersson LM, Wennman-Larsen A, Nilsson M, Olsson M, Alexanderson K (2011) Work situation and sickness absence in the initial period after breast cancer surgery. Acta Oncol 50(2):282–288. https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2010.533191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Steiner JF, Nowels CT, Main DS (2010) Returning to work after cancer: quantitative studies and prototypical narratives. Psychooncology 19(2):115–124. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1591

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G, Luini A, Zurrida S, Galimberti V, Intra M, Veronesi P, Robertson C, Maisonneuve P, Renne G, De Cicco C, De Lucia F, Gennari R (2003) A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 349(6):546–553. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa012782

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Langford DJ, Paul SM, Cooper B, Kober KM, Mastick J, Melisko M, Levine JD, Wright F, Hammer MJ, Cartwright F, Lee KA, Aouizerat BE, Miaskowski C (2016) Comparison of subgroups of breast cancer patients on pain and co-occurring symptoms following chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 24(2):605–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2819-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Howell D, Oliver TK, Keller-Olaman S, Davidson JR, Garland S, Samuels C, Savard J, Harris C, Aubin M, Olson K, Sussman J, MacFarlane J, Taylor C (2014) Sleep disturbance in adults with cancer: a systematic review of evidence for best practices in assessment and management for clinical practice. Ann Oncol 25(4):791–800. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdt506

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Saboonchi F, Petersson LM, Wennman-Larsen A, Alexanderson K, Vaez M (2015) Trajectories of anxiety among women with breast cancer: a proxy for adjustment from acute to transitional survivorship. J Psychosoc Oncol 33(6):603–619. https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2015.1082165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kremser T, Evans A, Moore A, Luxford K, Begbie S, Bensoussan A, Marigliani R, Zorbas H (2008) Use of complementary therapies by Australian women with breast cancer. Breast 17(4):387–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2007.12.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wanchai A, Armer JM, Stewart BR (2010) Complementary and alternative medicine use among women with breast cancer: a systematic review. Clin J Oncol Nurs 14(4):E45–E55. https://doi.org/10.1188/10.CJON.E45-E55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. de Boer AG, Taskila TK, Tamminga SJ, Feuerstein M, Frings-Dresen MH, Verbeek JH (2015) Interventions to enhance return-to-work for cancer patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9:CD007569. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007569.pub3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Stone DS, Ganz PA, Pavlish C, Robbins WA (2017) Young adult cancer survivors and work: a systematic review. J Cancer Surviv 11(6):765–781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-017-0614-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The Oncology Nursing Foundation provided funding for this project. The original study was funded by grants from the National Cancer Institute (NCI, CA107091 and CA118658). Dr. Miaskowski is an American Cancer Society Clinical Research Professor and has a K05 award from the NCI (CA168960). This project was supported by NIH/NCRR UCSF-CTSI Grant Number UL1 RR024131. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or the Oncology Nursing Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine Miaskowski.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The authors had full control over the data and will allow the journal to review our data if requested to do so.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chan, R.J., Cooper, B., Koczwara, B. et al. A longitudinal analysis of phenotypic and symptom characteristics associated with inter-individual variability in employment interference in patients with breast cancer. Support Care Cancer 28, 4677–4686 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05312-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05312-4

Keywords

Navigation