Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Topical agent therapy for prevention and treatment of radiodermatitis: a meta-analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Radiodermatitis (RD) is a common side effect during radiotherapy. Various topical agents have been tried to be applied on RD. However, the efficiency of topical agents applied on radiotherapy is still uncertain.

Objective

This study aims to assess the efficiency of the topical agents in the prevention and treatment of RD.

Methods

The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Pubmed, and Medline were searched for relevant reports. Quantitative analysis was carried out to evaluate the efficiency of topical agents in the prevention and treatment of RD.

Results

Twenty reports involving 3,098 patients were included: 2,406 patients for prophylactic trials and 692 for treatment trials, respectively. For prophylactic trials, primary meta-analysis indicated that using topical agents could not reduce the incidence of grade 2 and higher RD (P = 0.128, RR = 0.90, 95 % CI = 0.78–1.03) with a high heterogeneity (P = 0.000, I 2 = 71.5 %). In subgroup analyses, heterogeneity disappeared by excluding reports with low Jadad score (≤3) (P = 0.292, I 2 = 15.2 %), and still no significant difference was found between the topical agent group and control group (P = 0.625, RR = 0.98, 95 % CI = 0.89–1.07). In addition, for treatment trials, topical agents failed to increase the incidence of wound healing (P = 0.784, RR = 1.01, 95 % CI = 0.92–1.12) with a high heterogeneity (P = 0.067, I 2 = 51.5 %).

Conclusions

Topical agents could not prevent or treat RD effectively. New type of agents should be developed to improve the efficiency based on the pathophysiology of RD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Delaney G, Jacob S, Featherstone C et al (2005) The role of radiotherapy in cancer treatment: estimating optimal utilization from a review of evidence-based clinical guidelines. Cancer 104:1129–1137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Benomar S, Boutayeb S, Laiya I et al (2010) Treatment and prevention of acute radiation dermatitis. Cancer Radiother 14:213–216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Becker-Schiebe M, Mengs U, Schaefer M et al (2011) Topical use of a silymarin-based preparation to prevent radiodermatitis. Strahlenther Onkol 187:485–491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Richardson J, Smith JE, McIntyre M et al (2005) Aloe vera for preventing radiation-induced skin reactions: a systematic literature review. Clin Oncol 17:478–484

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. D’Haese S, Bate T, Claes S et al (2005) Management of skin reactions during radiotherapy: a study of nursing practice. Eur J Canc Care 14:28–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wickline MM (2004) Prevention and treatment of acute radiation dermatitis: a literature review. Oncol Nurs Forum 31:237–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Miller RC, Schwartz DJ, Sloan JA et al (2011) Mometasone furoate effect on acute skin toxicity in breast cancer patients receiving radiotherapy: a phase III double-blind, randomized trial from the north central cancer treatment group N06C4. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 79:1460–1466

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bostrom A, Lindman H, Swarthing C et al (2001) Potent corticosteroid cream (mometasone furoate) significantly reduce radiation dermatitis: results from a double-blind, randomized study. Radiot Oncol 59:257–265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Omidvari S, Saboori H, Mohammadianpanah M et al (2007) Topical betamethason for prevention of radiation dermatitis. Indian J Dermatol Veneraol Leprol 73:209–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shukla PN, Gairola M, Mohanti BK et al (2006) Prophylactic beclomethasone spray to the skin during postoperative radiotherapy of carcinoma breast: a prospective randomized study. Indian J Canc 43:180–184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mak SS, Alexander M, Wai-man W et al (2000) The effects of hydrocolloid dressing and gentian violet on radiation-induced moist desquamation wound healing. Canc Nurs 23:220–229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Masferrer JP, Mejía MM, Fernández MV et al (2010) Prophylaxis with a cream containing urea reduces the incidence and severity of radio-induced dermatitis. Clin Transl Oncol 12:43–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rizza L, D’Agostino A, Girlando A et al (2010) Evaluation of the effect of topical agents on radiation-induced skin disease by reflectance spectrophotometry. J Pharma Pharmacol 62:779–785

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gollins S, Gaffney C, Slade S et al (2008) RCT on gentian violet versus a hydrogel dressing for radiotherapy-induced moist skin desquamation. J Wound Care 17:268–275

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hongbing M, Xiaozhi Z, Minghua B et al (2007) Clinical effect of Lianbai liquid in prevention and treatment of dermal injury caused by radiotherapy. J Tradit Chin Med 27:193–196

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liguori V, Guillemin C, Pesce GF et al (1997) Double-blind, randomized clinical study comparing hyaluronic acid cream to placebo in patients treated with radiotherapy. Radiot Oncol 42:155–161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schmuth M, Wimmer MA, Hofer S et al (2002) Topical corticosteroid therapy for acute radiation dermatitis: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Br J Dermatol 146:983–991

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Williams MS, Burk M, Loprinzi CL et al (1996) Phase III double-blind evaluation of an Aloe vera gel as a prophylactic agent for radiation-induced skin toxicity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 36:345–349

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Heggie S, Bryant GP, Tripcony L et al (2002) A phase III study on the efficacy of topical Aloe vera gel on irradiated breast tissue. Canc Nurs 25:442–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gosselin TK, Schneider SM, Plambeck MA et al (2010) A prospective randomized, placebo-controlled skin care study in women diagnosed with breast cancer undergoing radiation therapy. Oncol Nurs Forum 37:619–626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fisher J, Scott C, Stevens R et al (2000) Randomized phase III study comparing best supportive care to biafine as a prophylactic agent for radiation-induced skin toxicity for women undergoing breast irradiation: radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) 97-13. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 48:1307–1310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mak SS, Zee CY, Molassiotis A et al (2005) A comparison of wound treatments in nasopharyngeal cancer patients receiving radiation therapy. Canc Nurs 28:436–445

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Delaney G, Fisher R, Hook C et al (1997) Sucralfate cream in the management of moist desquamation during radiotherapy. Australas Radiol 41:270–275

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Elliott EA, Wright JR, Swann S et al (2006) Phase III trial of an emulsion containing trolamine for the prevention of radiation dermatitis in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: results of radiation therapy oncology group trial 99-13. J Clin Oncol 24:2092–2096

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jadad AR, Moore RA et al (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17:1–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Higgins JP, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21:1539–1558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Begg CB, Mazumdar M (1994) Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 50:1088–1101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Egger M, Davey SG (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315:629–634

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Aistars J (2005) The validity of skin care protocols followed by women with breast cancer receiving external radiation. Clin J Oncol Nurs 10:487–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sitton E (1992) Early and late radiation-induced skin alterations. part I: mechanisms of skin reactions. Oncol Nurs Forum 13:11–16

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hymes SR, Strom EA, Fife C (2006) Radiation dermatitis: clinical presentation, pathophysiology, and treatment 2006. J Am Acad Dermatol 54:28–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dunne-Daly CF (1995) Skin and wound care in radiation oncology. Canc Nurs 18:144–162

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Cronstein BN, Kimmel SC, Levin RI et al (1992) A mechanism for the antiinflammatory effects of corticosteroids: the glucocorticoid receptor regulates leukocyte adhesion to endothelial cells and expression of endothelial-leukocyte adhesion molecule 1 and intercellular adhesion molecule 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci 89:9991–9995

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Shaw TJ, Martin P (2009) Wound repair at a glance. J Cell Sci 122:3215–3223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Doughty D (1992) Principles of wound healing and wound management. In: Bryant BA (ed) Acute and chronic wounds: nursing management. Moshy-Year Book, St Louis, p 45

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hotter AN (1990) Wound healing and immunocompromise. Nurs Clin North Am 25:193–203

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Olascoaga A, Vilar-Compte D, Poitevin-Chacon A et al (2008) Wound healing in radiated skin: pathophysiology and treatment options. Int Wound J 5:246–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Braund R, Hook S, Medlicott NJ (2007) The role of topical growth factors in chronic wounds. Curr Drug Deliv 4:195–204

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Robson MC, Mustoe TA, Hunt TK (1998) The future of recombinant growth factors in wound healing. Am J Surg 176:80S–82S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Goldman R (2004) Growth factors and chronic wound healing: past, present, and future. Adv Skin Wound Care 17:24–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Steed DL (1998) Modifying the wound healing response with exogenous growth factors. Clin Plast Surg 25:397–405

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of VIP Ward, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310000, People’s Republic of China

    Yuejiao Zhang, Shoude Zhang & Xiaoling Shao

Authors
  1. Yuejiao Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shoude Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiaoling Shao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuejiao Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Zhang, S. & Shao, X. Topical agent therapy for prevention and treatment of radiodermatitis: a meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer 21, 1025–1031 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1622-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1622-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation