Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fast-track rehabilitation program and conventional care after esophagectomy: a retrospective controlled cohort study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this article is to evaluate fast-track rehabilitation program and conventional care after esophagectomy using a retrospective controlled cohort study in esophageal cancer patients.

Methods

Fifty-five patients underwent fast-track rehabilitation program and 57 patients underwent conventional care after esophagectomy. Fast-track rehabilitation program was performed to patients who have early movement, epidural analgesia control, fluid infusion volume control and enteral nutrition for early discharge. The other 57 patients underwent conventional care after esophagectomy. The average of hospital stay and complications were calculated in the patients between the two groups.

Results

The median length of hospital stay in the patients was significantly shorter after fast-track rehabilitation program than after conventional care (7.7 vs 14.8 day, P < 0.01). The percentage of patients who developed complications was significantly lower 30 day after fast-track rehabilitation program than after conventional care (29.1 vs 47.4 %, P < 0.05). 87.3 % in patients of the fast-track rehabilitation program group and 54.4 % in those of the conventional care group reported excellent to very good satisfaction with their pain control (P = 0.000).

Conclusions

The fast-track rehabilitation program results in fewer complications, less postoperative pain, a reduction in the hospital length of stay, and quicker return to work and normal activities after esophagectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kehlet H, Mogensen T (1999) Hospital stay of 2 days after open sigmoidectomy with a multimodal rehabilitation programme. Br J Surg 86(2):227–230. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01023.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Bass CS, Alexander JR, Bartolucci AA (2004) Fast tracking after Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy. Chest 126(4):1187–1194. doi:10.1378/chest.126.4.1187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jiang K, Cheng L, Wang JJ, Li JS, Nie J (2009) Fast track clinical pathway implications in esophagogastrectomy. World J Gastroenterol 15(4):496–501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sica GS, Sujendran V, Wheeler J, Soin B, Maynard N (2005) Needle catheter jejunostomy at esophagectomy for cancer. J Surg Oncol 91(4):276–279. doi:10.1002/jso.20314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Olsen MF, Wennberg E (2011) Fast-track concepts in major open upper abdominal and thoracoabdominal surgery: a review. World J Surg 35(12):2586–2593. doi:10.1007/s00268-011-1241-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brodner G, Pogatzki E, Van Aken H, Buerkle H, Goeters C, Schulzki C, Nottberg H, Mertes N (1998) A multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation in patients undergoing abdominothoracic esophagectomy. Anesth Analg 86(2):228–234

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Munitiz V, Martinez-de-Haro LF, Ortiz A, Ruiz-de-Angulo D, Pastor P, Parrilla P (2010) Effectiveness of a written clinical pathway for enhanced recovery after transthoracic (Ivor Lewis) oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 97(5):714–718. doi:10.1002/bjs.6942

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2008) Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg 248(2):189–198. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31817f2c1a

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Qadan M, Gardner SA, Vitale DS, Lominadze D, Joshua IG, Polk HC Jr (2009) Hypothermia and surgery: immunologic mechanisms for current practice. Ann Surg 250(1):134–140. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ad85f7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Leslie K, Sessler DI (2003) Perioperative hypothermia in the high-risk surgical patient. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 17(4):485–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kurz A, Sessler DI, Lenhardt R (1996) Perioperative normothermia to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection and shorten hospitalization. Study of Wound Infection and Temperature Group. N Engl J Med 334(19):1209–1215. doi:10.1056/NEJM199605093341901

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lobo DN, Bostock KA, Neal KR, Perkins AC, Rowlands BJ, Allison SP (2002) Effect of salt and water balance on recovery of gastrointestinal function after elective colonic resection: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 359(9320):1812–1818. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08711-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nisanevich V, Felsenstein I, Almogy G, Weissman C, Einav S, Matot I (2005) Effect of intraoperative fluid management on outcome after intraabdominal surgery. Anesthesiology 103(1):25–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kita T, Mammoto T, Kishi Y (2002) Fluid management and postoperative respiratory disturbances in patients with transthoracic esophagectomy for carcinoma. J Clin Anesth 14(4):252–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Neal JM, Wilcox RT, Allen HW, Low DE (2003) Near-total esophagectomy: the influence of standardized multimodal management and intraoperative fluid restriction. Reg Anesth Pain Med 28(4):328–334

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Langley SM, Alexiou C, Bailey DH, Weeden DF (2002) The influence of perioperative blood transfusion on survival after esophageal resection for carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg 73(6):1704–1709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Swisher SG, Holmes EC, Hunt KK, Gornbein JA, Zinner MJ, McFadden DW (1996) Perioperative blood transfusions and decreased long-term survival in esophageal cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 112(2):341–348

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lanuti M, de Delva PE, Maher A, Wright CD, Gaissert HA, Wain JC, Donahue DM, Mathisen DJ (2006) Feasibility and outcomes of an early extubation policy after esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 82(6):2037–2041. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.07.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bartels H, Stein HJ, Siewert JR (1998) Early extubation vs. late extubation after esophagus resection: a randomized, prospective study. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd 115:1074–1076

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Daryaei P, Vaghef Davari F, Mir M, Harirchi I, Salmasian H (2009) Omission of nasogastric tube application in postoperative care of esophagectomy. World J Surg 33(4):773–777. doi:10.1007/s00268-009-9930-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nguyen NT, Slone J, Wooldridge J, Smith BR, Reavis KM, Hoyt D (2009) Minimally invasive esophagectomy without the use of postoperative nasogastric tube decompression. Am Surg 75(10):929–931

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pettigrew RA, Hill GL (1986) Indicators of surgical risk and clinical judgement. Br J Surg 73(1):47–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ogus H, Selimoglu O, Basaran M, Ozcelebi C, Ugurlucan M, Sayin OA, Kafali E, Ogus TN (2007) Effects of intrapleural analgesia on pulmonary function and postoperative pain in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 21(6):816–819. doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2007.05.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lunardi AC, Cecconello I, Carvalho CR (2011) Postoperative chest physical therapy prevents respiratory complications in patients undergoing esophagectomy. Rev Bras Fisioter 15(2):160–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Abramov D, Yeshayahu M, Tsodikov V, Gatot I, Orman S, Gavriel A, Chorni I, Tuvbin D, Tager S, Apelbom A (2005) Timing of chest tube removal after coronary artery bypass surgery. J Card Surg 20(2):142–146. doi:10.1111/j.0886-0440.2005.200347.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lewis SJ, Egger M, Sylvester PA, Thomas S (2001) Early enteral feeding versus “nil by mouth” after gastrointestinal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. BMJ 323(7316):773–776

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hjort Jakobsen D, Sonne E, Basse L, Bisgaard T, Kehlet H (2004) Convalescence after colonic resection with fast-track versus conventional care. Scand J Surg 93(1):24–28

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tsui SL, Law S, Fok M, Lo JR, Ho E, Yang J, Wong J (1997) Postoperative analgesia reduces mortality and morbidity after esophagectomy. Am J Surg 173(6):472–478

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Rudin A, Flisberg P, Johansson J, Walther B, Lundberg CJ (2005) Thoracic epidural analgesia or intravenous morphine analgesia after thoracoabdominal esophagectomy: a prospective follow-up of 201 patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 19(3):350–357

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Michelet P, D'Journo XB, Roch A, Papazian L, Ragni J, Thomas P, Auffray JP (2005) Perioperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy: influence of thoracic epidural analgesia. Chest 128(5):3461–3466. doi:10.1378/chest.128.5.3461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the assistance of Dr. Jianjun Wang and others for their assistance in establishing the fast-track rehabilitation program protocol. Financial support for this study was provided by Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Health Department and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qingfeng Guo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cao, S., Zhao, G., Cui, J. et al. Fast-track rehabilitation program and conventional care after esophagectomy: a retrospective controlled cohort study. Support Care Cancer 21, 707–714 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1570-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1570-0

Keywords

Navigation